Benefaction proper and surrogation
-
Fernando Zúñiga
Abstract
The semantic role of beneficiary is usually conceptualized in very general terms, typically without an intensional definition of what can constitute a benefit in the particular construction under study. Among those accounts that have proposed to discuss benefaction as related to the notion(s) of surrogation, substituting, and/or deputing, Kittilä (2005) proposes a distinction between recipients, beneficiaries, and recipient-beneficiaries based on the binary features [reception] and [substitutive benefaction]; the recipient includes only reception (and the beneficiary only substitutive benefaction), whereas both features are relevant with recipient-beneficiaries.
This chapter proposes an alternative account (i) by defining benefaction proper in terms of a prototype related to possession (and thereby to reception) and a periphery, and (ii) by defining surrogation as a separate notion that can, but need not, coalesce with benefaction proper. Thus, the beneficiaries’ condition improves because they are relieved from having to carry out a given action themselves.
Abstract
The semantic role of beneficiary is usually conceptualized in very general terms, typically without an intensional definition of what can constitute a benefit in the particular construction under study. Among those accounts that have proposed to discuss benefaction as related to the notion(s) of surrogation, substituting, and/or deputing, Kittilä (2005) proposes a distinction between recipients, beneficiaries, and recipient-beneficiaries based on the binary features [reception] and [substitutive benefaction]; the recipient includes only reception (and the beneficiary only substitutive benefaction), whereas both features are relevant with recipient-beneficiaries.
This chapter proposes an alternative account (i) by defining benefaction proper in terms of a prototype related to possession (and thereby to reception) and a periphery, and (ii) by defining surrogation as a separate notion that can, but need not, coalesce with benefaction proper. Thus, the beneficiaries’ condition improves because they are relieved from having to carry out a given action themselves.
Chapters in this book
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents v
-
Introduction
- Recent developments and open questions in the field of semantic roles 1
- Identifying semantic role clusters and alignment types via microrole coexpression tendencies 27
- Semantic role clustering 51
- Semantic roles and verbless constructions 79
- Benefaction proper and surrogation 109
- Exploring a diachronic (re)cycle of roles 133
- Functive phrases in typological and diachronic perspective 173
- Language index 217
- Subject index 219
Chapters in this book
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents v
-
Introduction
- Recent developments and open questions in the field of semantic roles 1
- Identifying semantic role clusters and alignment types via microrole coexpression tendencies 27
- Semantic role clustering 51
- Semantic roles and verbless constructions 79
- Benefaction proper and surrogation 109
- Exploring a diachronic (re)cycle of roles 133
- Functive phrases in typological and diachronic perspective 173
- Language index 217
- Subject index 219
