Home Linguistics & Semiotics The syntax-prosody interface and sentential complementation in Hungarian
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The syntax-prosody interface and sentential complementation in Hungarian

  • Shinichiro Ishihara and Barbara Ürögdi
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Approaches to Hungarian
This chapter is in the book Approaches to Hungarian

Abstract

This paper discusses the experimental results and theoretical implications of our investigations of syntax–prosody mapping in Hungarian sentential embedding constructions. In experiments controlled for potential effects of factivity, contextual givenness and contrastive focus, we tested the predictions of competing theories seeking to identify the property yielding diverging syntactic and semantic effects in object clauses. Our findings suggest that factivity does not have a direct syntactic and hence prosodic correlate, contra e.g. Kiparsky & Kiparsky (1970), and these findings are compatible with an alternative analysis proposed by de Cuba & Ürögdi (2009) claiming that factivity is irrelevant for syntax, and clauses are differentiated by ‘referentiality’. We found givenness effects with all embedded clauses (factive and non-factive, ‘referential’ and ‘non-referential’), evidence that givenness is independent of these factors.

Abstract

This paper discusses the experimental results and theoretical implications of our investigations of syntax–prosody mapping in Hungarian sentential embedding constructions. In experiments controlled for potential effects of factivity, contextual givenness and contrastive focus, we tested the predictions of competing theories seeking to identify the property yielding diverging syntactic and semantic effects in object clauses. Our findings suggest that factivity does not have a direct syntactic and hence prosodic correlate, contra e.g. Kiparsky & Kiparsky (1970), and these findings are compatible with an alternative analysis proposed by de Cuba & Ürögdi (2009) claiming that factivity is irrelevant for syntax, and clauses are differentiated by ‘referentiality’. We found givenness effects with all embedded clauses (factive and non-factive, ‘referential’ and ‘non-referential’), evidence that givenness is independent of these factors.

Downloaded on 16.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/atoh.12.03ish/html
Scroll to top button