This publication is presented to you through Paradigm Publishing Services
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Chapter 8. Understanding abusive argumentum ad hominem through rhetorical context
Donald Trump’s ad hominem in the 2016 Presidential Campaign
-
Sara A. Mehltretter Drury
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Chapters in this book
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents v
- List of contributors ix
- Chapter 1. A collection of studies of argumentation in practice 1
- Chapter 2. Analyzing versus interpreting argumentation 13
- Chapter 3. Television dispositives and the enactment of advocacy arguments 33
- Chapter 4. Dissociation as strategic maneuvering in spokespersons’ argumentative replies at Chinese diplomatic press conferences 61
- Chapter 5. Re-visiting Richard Nixon’s “Checkers” speech 85
- Chapter 6. Strategic ambiguity as an argumentative resource 103
- Chapter 7. Argument and ultimate definition in Donald Trump’s worldview 117
- Chapter 8. Understanding abusive argumentum ad hominem through rhetorical context 137
- Chapter 9. Radically reframing the climate debate 157
- Chapter 10. Prototypical argumentative patterns in activist discourse 173
- Chapter 11. “Argumentexturing” 195
- Chapter 12. Shifting from a monological to a dialogical perspective on children’s argumentation 211
- Chapter 13. Characteristics of argumentation in consultations about palliative systemic treatment for advanced cancer 237
- Chapter 14. Interpretative legal argumentation and the Rule of Law as the Rule of Reasons 267
- Chapter 15. Protection stories 281
- Chapter 16. On philosophical argumentation 299
- Chapter 17. And then you are left holding the baby! 321
- Index 335
Chapters in this book
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents v
- List of contributors ix
- Chapter 1. A collection of studies of argumentation in practice 1
- Chapter 2. Analyzing versus interpreting argumentation 13
- Chapter 3. Television dispositives and the enactment of advocacy arguments 33
- Chapter 4. Dissociation as strategic maneuvering in spokespersons’ argumentative replies at Chinese diplomatic press conferences 61
- Chapter 5. Re-visiting Richard Nixon’s “Checkers” speech 85
- Chapter 6. Strategic ambiguity as an argumentative resource 103
- Chapter 7. Argument and ultimate definition in Donald Trump’s worldview 117
- Chapter 8. Understanding abusive argumentum ad hominem through rhetorical context 137
- Chapter 9. Radically reframing the climate debate 157
- Chapter 10. Prototypical argumentative patterns in activist discourse 173
- Chapter 11. “Argumentexturing” 195
- Chapter 12. Shifting from a monological to a dialogical perspective on children’s argumentation 211
- Chapter 13. Characteristics of argumentation in consultations about palliative systemic treatment for advanced cancer 237
- Chapter 14. Interpretative legal argumentation and the Rule of Law as the Rule of Reasons 267
- Chapter 15. Protection stories 281
- Chapter 16. On philosophical argumentation 299
- Chapter 17. And then you are left holding the baby! 321
- Index 335
