Chapter 14. Delimiting the burden of proof in political interviews

Kapitel in diesem Buch

1. Prelim pages i
2. Table of contents vii
3. Chapter 1. Introduction Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics 1
4. Chapter 2. In what sense do modern argumentation theories relate to Aristotle? 11
5. Chapter 3. Fallacies as derailments of argumentative discourse 37
6. Chapter 4. The role of the judge in legal proceedings 59
7. Chapter 5. Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity type 77
8. Chapter 6. The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochures 93
9. Chapter 7. Argumentation in doctor-patient interaction 109
10. Chapter 8. Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse in political deliberation 123
11. Chapter 9. Strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary debate 145
12. Chapter 10. The strategic use of argumentation from example in plenary debates in the European Parliament 159
13. Chapter 11. Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Dutch parliamentary debate 177
14. Chapter 12. The space for strategic manoeuvring in adjudicating a freedom of speech case in the Netherlands 193
15. Chapter 13. Strategic maneuvering by personal attacks at press conferences of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs 225
16. Chapter 14. Delimiting the burden of proof in political interviews 255
17. Chapter 15. Strategic manoeuvring with hyperbole in political debate 269
18. Chapter 16. A pragma-dialectical approach to governmental crisis communication 281
19. Chapter 17. Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports 309
20. Chapter 18. Analysing multimodal argumentation within the pragma-dialectical framework 335
21. Sources of the contributions 361
22. Index 363