Important knowledge of pain and phantom experiences after breast surgery and leg- or arm-amputation: Value of qualitative pain research
-
Stephen Butler
This paper by Berit Björkman et al., reports on the narrative information obtained by in-depth interviews from patients who have undergone amputations one month earlier, and are suffering from stump pain, phantom sensations and phantom limb pain, Their main finding is that “since no evidence-based treatment of choice for phantom pain exists, there is a need for clinical dialogues with patients, not only for giving necessary information about the phenomena, but also to listen carefully to the patients’ own descriptions and find out which functional losses or life changes patients fear the most. There should be a special focus on older patients”.
At first reading, it is a bit confusing, since most readers of medical scientific pain publications expect quantitative methods, statistics, and evidence based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). But the information here should not be discounted. Our job, if we are clinicians, is to treat the patient, not just the pain or worse, just the diagnosis. We must first listen to the patient and take the oral history to form a hypothesis to direct our investigations to make the best diagnosis. And we must listen to the patient to know if treatment we prescribe is working.
Qualitative research is an expanding field (Malterud, 2001; Steihaug and Malterud, 2008). Interviews with individual patients or focus groups, analyzed with qualitative research methods is actually the basis of most of the Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) questionnaires that we all use and patient interviews are demanded by regulators such as the FDA and EMEA in any pain research involving new medications that are applying for approval to bring to market. It is not fringe science and this is supported by a thriving literature. A good introduction to qualitative research methods is given by Denzin and Lincoln (Denzin and Lincoln, 2005), in their 1210 page handbook for use across disciplines, not only in medical science. Narrative is a foundation for cultural anthropology and in a sense, we as pain clinicians and researchers are deeply involved in the culture of pain. In the preface of this “Handbook”, Denzin comments on the “quiet revolution” where the clash between evidence based, quantitative, RCT research and qualitative research occurs. He also remarks on the “blurring of interdisciplinary boundaries” that is occurring. The article by Björkman et al. (Björkman et al., 2010) in this issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Pain is part of the revolution and we need to be more aware of the importance of qualitative research that can help us to better understand our patients for more effective treatment outcomes.
In short, the goal of qualitative, phenomenologic studies is to “make the invisible visible”, to uncover and articulate the meaning of a phenomenon from lived experience. A phenomenon, e.g. phantom limb pain, is experienced and understood in different ways by different individuals. The researcher observes and reports on this variation, and tries to create a full picture of the different reports. The method collects descriptions of experiences from a subjective perspective. The interviews are usually recorded, the text is analyzed in a structured way for “meaning-carrying units”, which are put together as thematic groups. These themes are then analyzed for essential structures. It may serve as an addition to knowledge obtained by quantitative methods, and often give us a reason for reconsideration and reflection.
We agree with the conclusion of this study, that the results “supplement the definition of phantom phenomena in scientific literature”. The results obtained by patient interviews using qualitative research methodology, give us a deeper understanding of the individual experiences. This is what counts for the patient, when it comes to questions such as suffering from pain and the effects of pain relief.
DOI of refers to article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2009.09.001.
References
Björkman B, Arnér S, Lund I, Hydén L-C. Adult limb and breast amputees’ experience and descriptions of phantom phenomena—a qualitative study. Scand J Pain 2010;1:43–9.Suche in Google Scholar
Denzin NK, Lincoln Y, editors. The handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. London: Sage Inc. Press; 2005.Suche in Google Scholar
Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001;358:483–8.Suche in Google Scholar
Steihaug S, Malterud K. Stories about bodies: a narrative study on self-understanding and chronic pain. Scand J Prim Health Care 2008;26:188–92.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2009 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Editorial
- Scandinavian Journal of Pain: A networking and publishing tool for pain researchers and pain clinicians in the Nordic countries
- Editorial comments
- Pain relief with paravertebral blocks or epidural analgesia? Those who do not know the history of paravertebral blocks are condemned to rediscover the complications
- Editorial comments
- Investigation of drug–drug interactions and pain—From volunteer studies to randomized controlled trials in patients with chronic pain
- Editorial comments
- Those who do not know their pain-history will repeat previous errors in pain management
- Editorial comments
- Fear and catastrophizing thoughts aggravate risks of chronic pain after a fracture
- Editorial comments
- Important knowledge of pain and phantom experiences after breast surgery and leg- or arm-amputation: Value of qualitative pain research
- Editorial comments
- Dialectical behavioural therapy for complex chronic pain conditions
- Editorial comments
- Chronic pain conditions after herniorrhaphy decrease with time, but slowly
- Editorial comments
- Norwegian patients with chronic pain conditions that can be managed with reasonable cost/benefit now have a legally binding right to treatment in Norway
- Review
- A systematic review of comparative studies indicates that paravertebral block is neither superior nor safer than epidural analgesia for pain after thoracotomy
- Original articles
- Does co-administration of paroxetine change oxycodone analgesia: An interaction study in chronic pain patients
- Original articles
- A personal experience learning from two pain pioneers, J.J. Bonica and W. Fordyce: Lessons surviving four decades of pain practice
- Original articles
- Pain-related fear, catastrophizing and pain in the recovery from a fracture
- Original articles
- Adult limb and breast amputees’ experience and descriptions of phantom phenomena—A qualitative study
- Original articles
- Applying dialectical behavior therapy to chronic pain: A case study
- Original articles
- Natural course of long-term postherniorrhaphy pain in a population-based cohort
- Original articles
- National guidelines for evaluating pain—Patients’ legal right to prioritised health care at multidisciplinary pain clinics in Norway implemented 2009
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Editorial
- Scandinavian Journal of Pain: A networking and publishing tool for pain researchers and pain clinicians in the Nordic countries
- Editorial comments
- Pain relief with paravertebral blocks or epidural analgesia? Those who do not know the history of paravertebral blocks are condemned to rediscover the complications
- Editorial comments
- Investigation of drug–drug interactions and pain—From volunteer studies to randomized controlled trials in patients with chronic pain
- Editorial comments
- Those who do not know their pain-history will repeat previous errors in pain management
- Editorial comments
- Fear and catastrophizing thoughts aggravate risks of chronic pain after a fracture
- Editorial comments
- Important knowledge of pain and phantom experiences after breast surgery and leg- or arm-amputation: Value of qualitative pain research
- Editorial comments
- Dialectical behavioural therapy for complex chronic pain conditions
- Editorial comments
- Chronic pain conditions after herniorrhaphy decrease with time, but slowly
- Editorial comments
- Norwegian patients with chronic pain conditions that can be managed with reasonable cost/benefit now have a legally binding right to treatment in Norway
- Review
- A systematic review of comparative studies indicates that paravertebral block is neither superior nor safer than epidural analgesia for pain after thoracotomy
- Original articles
- Does co-administration of paroxetine change oxycodone analgesia: An interaction study in chronic pain patients
- Original articles
- A personal experience learning from two pain pioneers, J.J. Bonica and W. Fordyce: Lessons surviving four decades of pain practice
- Original articles
- Pain-related fear, catastrophizing and pain in the recovery from a fracture
- Original articles
- Adult limb and breast amputees’ experience and descriptions of phantom phenomena—A qualitative study
- Original articles
- Applying dialectical behavior therapy to chronic pain: A case study
- Original articles
- Natural course of long-term postherniorrhaphy pain in a population-based cohort
- Original articles
- National guidelines for evaluating pain—Patients’ legal right to prioritised health care at multidisciplinary pain clinics in Norway implemented 2009
