Korean intervention effects are not a single phenomenon: Evidence from syntax-prosody interface

References

Arregi, Karlos. 2001. Focus and word order in Basque. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Suche in Google Scholar

Beaver, David & Clark Brady. 2008. Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444304176Suche in Google Scholar

Beck, Sigrid. 1996. Quantified structures as barriers for LF movement. Natural Language Semantics 4. 1–56.10.1007/BF00263536Suche in Google Scholar

Beck, Sigrid. 2006. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretations. Natural Language Semantics. 14. 1–56.10.1007/s11050-005-4532-ySuche in Google Scholar

Beck, Sigrid & Shin-Sook Kim. 1997. On Wh- and operator-scope in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics. 6. 339–384.10.1023/A:1008280026102Suche in Google Scholar

Boeckx, Cédric. 1999. Some in-situ, some in SpecCP. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Suche in Google Scholar

Boeckx, Cédric. 2000. Properties of French interrogatives. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Suche in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2008. On the operator freezing effect. Natural Language and Linguist Theory 26. 249–287.10.1007/s11049-008-9037-1Suche in Google Scholar

Breen, Mara. 2007. The identification and function of English prosodic features. Doctoral dissertation, Brain and Cognitive Science, MIT.Suche in Google Scholar

Brody, Michael. 1995. Focus and checking theory. In István Kenesei (ed.), Levels and structures, approaches to Hungarian 5, 31–43. Szeged: JATE.Suche in Google Scholar

Brody, Michael & Kriszta Szendrői. 2010. Exhaustive focus is an answer. http://ling.auf.net /lingBuzz/001113.Suche in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and points of view. In Li Charles (ed.), Subject and topic, 25–56. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chang, Suk-Jin. 1973. A generative study of discourse: Pragmatic aspects of Korean with reference to English. Language Research 9(Supplement). 2.Suche in Google Scholar

Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Johan Rooryck. 2002. Types of Wh-in-situ, Ms., Leiden University.Suche in Google Scholar

Cho, Young-mi. Yu. 1990. Syntax and phrasing in Korean. In S. Inkelas & D. Zec (eds.), The phonology-syntax connection, 47–62. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Choe, Hyon-Sook. 1994. Syntactic WH-Movement in Korean and Licensing. In Young-Key Kim-Renaud (ed.), Theoretical issues in Korean linguistics, 275:302. Stanford, CA: CLSI Publications for Stanford Linguistics Society.Suche in Google Scholar

Choe, Jae-Woong. 1985. Pitch-accent and q/wh words in Korean. In Susumu Kuno et al. (eds.), Proceedings of Harvard studies in Korean linguistics, 113–123. Cambridge: Harvard University.Suche in Google Scholar

Choi, Hye-won. 1996. Optimizing structure in context: Scrambling and information structure. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & And Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Deguchi, Masanori & Yoshihisa Kitagawa. 2002. Prosody and Wh-questions. In Masako Hirotani (ed.), The Proceedings of NELS 32, 73–92. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Suche in Google Scholar

Domínguez, Laura. 2004. Mapping focus: The syntax and prosody of focus in Spanish. Doctoral dissertation, University of Boston.Suche in Google Scholar

Drubig, Bernhard. 2000. Towards a typology of focus and focus constructions. Linguistics 41(1). 1–50.10.1515/ling.2003.003Suche in Google Scholar

É. Kiss, Katalin. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74. 245–273.10.1353/lan.1998.0211Suche in Google Scholar

Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A transformational approach to English Syntax. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Fanselow, Gisbert & Lenertová. Denisa 2011. Left peripheral focus: Mismatches between syntax and information structure. Natural Lang Linguist Theory 29. 169–209.10.1007/s11049-010-9109-xSuche in Google Scholar

Féry, Caroline & Shinichiro Ishihara. 2010. How focus and givenness shape prosody. In Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry (ed.), Information structure: Theoretical, typological, and experimental perspectives, 36–63. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570959.003.0003Suche in Google Scholar

Féry, Caroline & Samek-Lodovici Vieri 2006. Focus projection and prosodic prominence in Nested Foci. Language 82. 131–150.10.1353/lan.2006.0031Suche in Google Scholar

Hagstrom, Paul. 1998. Decomposing questions. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Suche in Google Scholar

Hirotani, Masako. 2005. Prosody and LF: Processing Japanese wh-questions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Suche in Google Scholar

Horvath, Julia. 1986. FOCUS in the theory of grammar and the syntax of Hungarian. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110849165Suche in Google Scholar

Horvath, Julia. 2006. Separating “focus movement’’ from focus. In V. S. S. Karimi et al. (eds.), Clever and right: A Festschrift for Joe Emonds. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1075/la.101.07horSuche in Google Scholar

Horvath. Julia. 2010. “Discourse features”, syntactic displacement and the status of contrast. Lingua 120. 1346–1369.Suche in Google Scholar

Hwang, Heeju. 2007. Wh-Phrase questions and prosody in Korean. Paper presented at the 17^th, Japanese/Korean Linguistics Conference.Suche in Google Scholar

Hwang, Hyun Kyung. 2011. Scope, prosody, and pitch accent: The prosodic marking of Wh-scope in two vrieties of Japanese and South Kyeongsang Korean. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.Suche in Google Scholar

Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2002. Invisible but audible Wh-scope marking: Wh-constructions and deaccenting in Japanese. The Proceedings of WCCFL 21, 180–193. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2007. Major phrase, focus intonation, multiple spell-out. The Linguistic Review 24. 137–167.Suche in Google Scholar

Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2011. Japanese focus prosody revisited: Freeing focus from prosodic phrasing. Lingua 121. 1870–1889.10.1016/j.lingua.2011.06.008Suche in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Jun, Sun-Ah. 1993. The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Los Angeles.Suche in Google Scholar

Jun, Sun-Ah & Oh Mira. 1996. A prosodic analysis of three types of Wh-phrases in Korean. Language and Speech 39. 37–61.10.1177/002383099603900103Suche in Google Scholar

Jung, Yeun-Jin. 2010. Syntax-phonology interface of Wh-questions. Studies in Generative Grammar 20(1). 549–576.10.15860/sigg.20.1.201002.73Suche in Google Scholar

Jung, Yeun-Jin. 2012. On the nature of wh-prosody and its syntactic dependency. Korean Journal of Linguistics 37(2). 417–444.10.18855/lisoko.2012.37.2.009Suche in Google Scholar

Jung, Yeun-Jin. 2014. On the syntactic grounding of the prosodic interpretation of Wh-questions. Studies in Generative Grammar 24(1). 105–131.10.15860/sigg.24.1.201402.105Suche in Google Scholar

Kenstowicz, Michael & Hyang-Sook Sohn. 1997. Phrasing and focus in Northern Kyungsang Korean. In Pier Marco Bertinetto, Livio Gaeta, Georgi Jetchev & David Michaels (eds.), Certamen phonologicum III, 137–156. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, Shin-sook. 2005. Focus intervention effects in questions. Handout of Theoretical East Asian Languages 3. Harvard University.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, Shin-Sook. 2002. Focus matters: Two types of intervention effect. Paper presented at WCCFL 21, Santa Cruz.Suche in Google Scholar

Kitagawa, Yoshihisa, Katsuo Tamaoka & Satoshi Tomioka. 2012. Prosodic matters in intervention effects in Japanese: An experimental study. Lingua 124. 41–63.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.01.006Suche in Google Scholar

Ko, Heejeong. 2005. Syntax of Why-in-situ: Merge into [SpecCP] in the overt syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. 23. 867–916.10.1007/s11049-004-5923-3Suche in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. Representation of focus. In A Von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (eds.), Handbook of semantics, 825–834. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110126969.10.825Suche in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika & Elisabeth Selkirk. 2007. Phase theory and prosodic spellout: The case of verbs. The Linguistic Review 24. 93–135.10.1515/TLR.2007.005Suche in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika & Elisabeth Selkirk. 2010. Distinguishing contrastive, new and given information. Talk delivered at the International Conference on Information Structure, sponsored by SFB 632: Informationsstruktur. Potsdam, July 2010.Suche in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred. 1995. The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic Analysis 25(1). 1–49.Suche in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred. 2001. For a structured meaning account of questions and answers. In C. Fery & W. Sternefeld (eds.), Audiatur Vox Sapientiae. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow. Akademie Verlag (= Studia Grammatica 52), 287–319. Berlin: AKademie Verlag10.1515/9783050080116.287Suche in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred. 2008. Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55. 243–276.10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.2Suche in Google Scholar

Moltmann, Friederike. 1990. Scrambling in German and the specificity effect. Ms., MIT.Suche in Google Scholar

Neeleman, Ad & Szendröi Kriszta. 2004. Superman sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 35. 149–159.10.1162/ling.2004.35.1.149Suche in Google Scholar

Park, Duk-soo. 2010. A pitch analysis of two types of Wh-Clauses in Korean. In Sang-Oak Lee (eds.), Contemporary Korean linguistics: International perspectives, 252–270. Paju-si, Korea: Thaehaksa Publishing Co.Suche in Google Scholar

Percus, Orin. 1997. Prying open the cleft. Northeast Linguistic Society 27. 337–351.Suche in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In Eric J. Reuland & Alice ter Meulen (eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness, 98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 2000. Phrasal movement and its Kin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5365.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet & Beckman Mary. 1988. Japanese tone structure. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Suche in Google Scholar

Rochemont, Michael. 1986. Focus in generative grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Publishing Co.10.1075/sigla.4Suche in Google Scholar

Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Suche in Google Scholar

Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1. 75–116.10.1007/BF02342617Suche in Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9781444343069.ch14Suche in Google Scholar

Soh, Hooi Ling. 2005. Wh-in-situ in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 143–155.10.1162/ling.2005.36.1.143Suche in Google Scholar

Sohn, Keunwon. 1995. Negative polarity items, scope and economy. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Suche in Google Scholar

Stjepanović, Sandra. 2003. Multiple Wh-fronting in serbo-croatian matrix questions and the matrix sluicing construction. In B. Cedric & K. Grohmann (ed.), Multiple wh-fronting, 255–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.64.14stjSuche in Google Scholar

Sugahara, Mariko. 2003. Downtrends and post-FOCUS intonation in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Suche in Google Scholar

Sun-Ah, Jun & Hyuck-Joon Lee. 1998. Phonetic and phonological markers of contrastive Focus in Korean, in Proceedings of the 5th ICSLP, 4: 1295–1298. Sydney.Suche in Google Scholar

Szendrői, Kriszta. 2003. A stress-based approach to the syntax of Hungarian focus. The Linguistic Review 20. 37–78.10.1515/tlir.2003.002Suche in Google Scholar

Tomioka, Satoshi. 2007. Pragmatics of LF intervention effects: Wh-interrogatives in Japanese and Korean. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 1570–1590.10.1016/j.pragma.2007.03.002Suche in Google Scholar

Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 1994. On nominal islands and LF extraction in Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12. 121–175.10.1007/BF00992747Suche in Google Scholar

Vallduví, Enric & Maria Vilkuna. 1998. On Rheme and Kontrast. In Peter.W. Culicover and Louise. McNally (eds.), Syntax and semantics, 79–108. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004373167_005Suche in Google Scholar

Wagner, Michael. 2005. Prosody and recursion. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Suche in Google Scholar

Wold, Dag. 1996. Long distance selective binding: The case of focus. In T. Galloway & S. Spence (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 6. 311–328. Ithaca, N.Y: CLC.10.3765/salt.v6i0.2766Suche in Google Scholar

Xie, Zhiguo. 2013. Focus, (non-)exhaustivity, and intervention effects in Wh-in-situ argument questions. The Linguistic Review 30(4). 585–617.10.1515/tlr-2013-0019Suche in Google Scholar

Xu, Yi. & Xu Ching X. 2005. Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation. Journal of Phonetics 33. 159–197.10.1016/j.wocn.2004.11.001Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, Barry C.-Y. 2008. Focus intervention effects as competition effects. In Proceedings of NELS-39, Cornell University, NY, November 7–9Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, Barry C.-Y. 2012. Intervention effects and Wh-construals. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21. 43–87.10.1007/s10831-011-9080-5Suche in Google Scholar

Yoon, Suwon. 2011. A structural asymmetry in intervention effects. Lingua 121. 942–962.10.1016/j.lingua.2010.12.006Suche in Google Scholar

Yun, Jiwon. 2012. The deterministic prosody of indeterminates. Paper presented at WCCFL 29, Somerville, MA.Suche in Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Malte. 2006. Contrastive focus. In G. Fanselow C. Fery and Manfred Krifka (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information structure (ISIS), volume 6, 147–160. Potsdam: Universitatsverlag Potsdam.Suche in Google Scholar

Zubizarrreta, Maria-Luisa. 1998. Prosody, focus and word order. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 2003. Intervention effects in the French Wh-in-situ construction: Syntax or interpretation? In Rafael Núñez-Cedeño, Luis López & Richard Cameron (eds.), A romance perspective in language knowledge and use, 359–379. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.238Suche in Google Scholar