Language without narrow syntax

References

Aboitiz, Francisco. 2012. Gestures, vocalizations and memory in language origins. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience 4(2). 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnevo.2012.00002 (accessed 4 April 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Abondolo, Daniel Mario (ed.). 1998. The Uralic languages. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Aczel, Peter. 1988. Non-well-founded sets. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 1998. Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16. 491–539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006090432389(accessed 22 September 2016).10.1023/A:1006090432389Search in Google Scholar

Bearth, Thomas. 2003. Syntax. In Derek Nurse & Gérard Phillipson (eds.), The Bantu languages, 127–142. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Bennis, H. 1986. Gaps and dummies. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110889536Search in Google Scholar

Berwick, R. C. & Noam Chomsky. 2011. The Biolinguistic program: The current state of its evolution and development. In Anna Maria Di Sciullo & Cedric Boeckx (eds.), The biolinguistic enterprise, New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty, 19–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Berwick Robert, C., Angela D. Friederici, Noam Chomsky & Johan J. Bolhuis. 2013. Evolution, brain, and the nature of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (2). 1364–6613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.12.002 (accessed 3 April 2014).10.1016/j.tics.2012.12.002Search in Google Scholar

Bhatt, Rakesh Mohan. 1999. Verb movement and the syntax of Kashmiri. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-9279-6Search in Google Scholar

Blake, Barry J. 2001. Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164894Search in Google Scholar

Boas, Franz. 1911. Handbook of American Indian languages. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina & Matthias Schlesewsky. 2009. Processing syntax and morphology; A neurocognitive perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina, Matthias Schlesewsky, Steven L Small & Josef P. Rauschecker. 2015. Neurobiological roots of language in primate audition: Common computational properties. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(3). 142–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.00810.1016/j.tics.2014.12.008Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan. 1994. Locative inversion and the architecture of Universal Grammar. Language 70(1). 72–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/416741 (accessed 6 September 2014).10.2307/416741Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-functional syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L., Revere Dale Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace 1995. The realis-irrealis distinction in Caddo, the Northern Iroquoian languages, and English. In Joan L. Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 349–365. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.32.15chaSearch in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1956. Three models for the description of language. IRE Transactions on Information Theory 2. 113–24.10.1109/TIT.1956.1056813Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries. In Howard Lasnik, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond, 104–131. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2007. Approaching UG from below. In Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gaertner (eds.), Interfaces+recursion=language?, 1–30. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207552-001Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Carlos Peregrín Otero (ed.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2010. Restricting stipulations: Consequences and challenges. Talk given at the University of Stuttgart, 23 March 2010. http://ifla.uni-stuttgart.de/index.php?article_id=137 (accessed 2 April 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.lingua.2012.12.003 (accessed 2 April 2014).10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2003. Agreement: The range of the phenomenon and the principles of the Surrey database of agreement. Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2). 155–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00117 (accessed 23 June 2010).10.1111/1467-968X.00117Search in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 1988. Agreement vs. case marking and direct objects. In Michael Barlow & Charles A. Ferguson (eds.), Agreement in natural language: Approaches, theories, descriptions, 159–180. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2003. Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511840579Search in Google Scholar

Culbertson, Jennifer. 2010. Convergent evidence for categorial change in French: From subject clitic to agreement marker. Language 86(1). 85–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0183 (accessed 18 February 2015).10.1353/lan.0.0183Search in Google Scholar

Dell, Gary S., Franklin Chang & Zenzi Griffin. 1999. Connectionist models of language production: Lexical access and grammatical encoding. Cognitive Science 23. 517–543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)00014-2 (accessed 30 March 2014).10.1207/s15516709cog2304_6Search in Google Scholar

Den Besten, Hans. 1983. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In Werner Abraham (ed.), On the formal syntax of the Westgermania, 47–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.3.03besSearch in Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.). 2000. The Amazonian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Doetjes, Jenny, Georges Rebuschi & Annie Rialland. 2004. Cleft sentences. In Francis Corblin & Henriëtte De Swart (eds.), Handbook of French semantics, 529–552. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark. 1999. A grammar of Tukang Besi. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110805543Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2005. Position of case affixes. In Matthew S. Martin Haspelmath, David Gil Dryer & Bernard Comrie (eds.), World atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eide, Kristin Mellum. 2002. Adjunction sites for negation in Norwegian: Modals and negation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 25 (2). 225–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/033258602321093373 (accessed 30 September 2016).10.1080/033258602321093373Search in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, Peter. 1994. German. In Ekkehard König & Johan Van Der Auwera (eds.), The Germanic Languages, 349–387. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Engdahl, Elisabet. 2012. Optional expletive subjects in Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 35 (2). 99–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0332586512000169 (accessed 5 September 2014).10.1017/S0332586512000169Search in Google Scholar

Epstein, Samuel David & T. Daniel Seely. 2002. Rule application as cycles in a level-free syntax. In Samuel David Epstein & T. David Seely (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program, 65–89. Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley.10.1002/9780470755662.ch4Search in Google Scholar

Felser, Claudia & Laura. Rupp 2001. Expletives as arguments: Germanic existential sentences revisited. Linguistische Berichte 187. 289–324.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. In Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Fitch, W. Tecumseh, Marc D. Hauser & Noam Chomsky. 2005. The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition 97. 179–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005 (accessed 11 March 2014).10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005Search in Google Scholar

Foley, William. 1986. The Papuan languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Foley, William A. 1991. The Yimas language of New Guinea. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Frampton, John & Sam Gutmann. 2002. Crash-proof syntax. In Samuel D. Epstein & T. Daniel Seely (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program, 90–105. Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley.10.1002/9780470755662.ch5Search in Google Scholar

Frascarelli, M., 2007. Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro. An interface approach to the linking of (null) pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25. 691–734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11049-007-9025-x (accessed 22 September 2016).10.1007/s11049-007-9025-xSearch in Google Scholar

Gibson, Kathleen Rita. 2005. Human brain evolution: Developmental perspectives. In Sue Taylor Parker, Jonas Langer & Constance Milbrath (eds.), Biology and knowledge revisited: From neurogenesis to psychogenesis, 123–144. Hampshire, UK: Taylor and Francis Group.Search in Google Scholar

Giorgi, Alessandra & Fabio Pianesi. 2002. Complementizer deletion in Italian. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 2, 190–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax: An introduction, vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/z.syn2Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, A. D. 1999. Classification. Boca Raton: Chappman and Hall/CRC Press.10.1201/9780367805302Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. 1990. Non-overt subjects in diary contexts. In Joan Mascaró & Marina Nespor (eds.), Grammar in progress: GLOW essays for Henk van Riemsdijk, 167–174. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110867848.167Search in Google Scholar

Haider, Hubert. 2010. The syntax of German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511845314Search in Google Scholar

Haugen, Einar. 1982. Scandinavian language structures. A comparative historical survey. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar

Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky & W. Tecumseh Fitch. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298(5598). 1569–1579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 (accessed 11 March 2014).10.1126/science.298.5598.1569Search in Google Scholar

Hickok, Gregory & Poeppel David. 2007. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8. 393–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2113 (accessed 4 April 2014).10.1038/nrn2113Search in Google Scholar

Hudson, Richard. 2007. Language networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hudson, Richard. 2010. An introduction to word grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511781964Search in Google Scholar

Iggesen, Oliver A. 2005. Number of cases. In Matthew S. Martin Haspelmath, David Gil Dryer & Bernard Comrie (eds.), World atlas of language structures, 202–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ingram, Andrew. 2006. Serial verb constructions in Dumo. In R. M. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. Empty categories, case, and configurationality. Natural Languages and Linguistic Theory 2(1). 39–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00233713 (accessed 22 June 2010).10.1007/BF00233713Search in Google Scholar

Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2003. Not so quirky: On subject case in Icelandic. In Ellen Brandner & Heike Zinsmeister (eds.), New perspectives on case theory, 127–163. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Joordens, Josephine C. A., Francesco d’Errico, Frank P. Wesselingh, Stephen Munro, John De Vos, Jakob Wallinga, Christina Ankjærgaard, Tony Reimann, Jan R. Wijbrans, Klaudia F. Kuiper, Herman J. Mücher, Hélène Coqueugniot, Vincent Prié, Ineke Joosten, Bertil Van Os, Anne S. Schulp, Michel Panuel, Victoria Van Der Haas, Wim Lustenhouwer, John J. G. Reijmer & Wil Roebroeks. 2015. Homo erectus at Trinil on Java used shells for tool production and engraving. Nature 518. 228–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13962 (accessed 18 February 2015).10.1038/nature13962Search in Google Scholar

Julien, Marit 2005. Nominal phrases from a Scandinavian Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.87Search in Google Scholar

Kiss, Katalin E. 2002. The EPP in a topic-prominent language. In Peter Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, expletives and the EPP, 107–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kruijff-Korbayová, Ivana & Marc Steedman. 2003. Discourse and information structure. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12. 249–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024160025821 (accessed 1 April 2015).10.1023/A:1024160025821Search in Google Scholar

La Polla, Randy & Chenglong Huang. 2003. A grammar of Qiang. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197273Search in Google Scholar

Labelle, Marie. 2007. Biolinguistics, the Minimalist Program, and psycholinguistic reality. Snippets 14. 6–7. http://www.ledonline.it/snippets/allegati/snippets14002.pdf (accessed 27 August 2013).Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Langley, Michelle C., Christopher Clarkson & Sean Ulm. 2008. Behavioural complexity in Eurasian Neanderthal populations: A chronological examination of the archaeological evidence. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18(3). 289–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0959774308000371 (accessed 6 September 2014).10.1017/S0959774308000371Search in Google Scholar

Legate, Julie. 2006. Split absolutive. In Alana Johns, Diane Massam & Juvenal Ndayiragije (eds.), Ergativity: Emerging issues, 143–172. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-4188-8_6Search in Google Scholar

Levelt, Willem J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lynch, John. 1995. The Anejom subject-marking system: Past, present, and future. Oceanic Linguistics 34 (1). 13–26.10.2307/3623109Search in Google Scholar

Mallick, Swapan, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, Iain Mathieson, Melissa Gymrek, Fernando Racimo, Mengyao Zhao, Niru Chennagiri, Susanne Nordenfelt, Arti Tandon, Pontus Skoglund, Iosif Lazaridis, Sriram Sankararaman, Qiaomei Fu, Nadin Rohland, … Svante Pääbo, Janet Kelso, Nick Patterson & David Reich. 2016. The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 genomes from 142 diverse populations. Nature 18964. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18964 (accessed 22 September 2016).10.1038/nature18964Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1993. Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions. In Sam A. Mchombo (ed.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar, vol. 1, 113–150. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

McWhorter, John. 2005. Defining creole. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Gary. 2012. External influences on English: From its beginnings to the Renaissance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654260.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1976. A grammar of Tuscarora. New York: Garland Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 2003. Pronouns and agreement: The information status of pronominal affixes. Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2). 235–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00119 (accessed 23 June 2010).10.1111/1467-968X.00119Search in Google Scholar

Miyagawa, Shigeru, 1989. Structure and case marking in Japanese. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004373259Search in Google Scholar

Nevins, Andrew, David Pesetsky & Cilene Rodrigues. 2009. Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment. Language 85. 355–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0107 (accessed 17 February 2016).10.1353/lan.0.0107Search in Google Scholar

Noonan, Michael. 1992. A grammar of Lango. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110850512Search in Google Scholar

Noonan, Michael. 2007. Complementation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II: Complex Constructions, 52–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619434.002Search in Google Scholar

Norde, Muriel. 2001. Deflexion as a counterdirectional factor in grammatical change. Language Sciences 23(2–3). 231–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00022-X (accessed 28 September 2016).10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00022-XSearch in Google Scholar

Nordström, Jackie. 2010. Modality and Subordinators. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.116Search in Google Scholar

Nordström, Jackie. 2011. Konjunktiv i fornsvenska at-satser. Språk och Stil 21. 171–198.Search in Google Scholar

Nordström, Jackie. 2014. Language as a discrete combinatorial system, rather than a recursive-embedding one. The Linguistic Review 31(1). 151–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2013-0023 (accessed 22 March 2014).10.1515/tlr-2013-0023Search in Google Scholar

Ordóñez, Francisco & Treviño. Esthela 1999. Left dislocated subjects and the pro-drop parameter: A case study of Spanish. Lingua 107. 39–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00020-5 (accessed 11 September 2014).10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00020-5Search in Google Scholar

Osborne, Timothy, Michael Putnam & Thomas M. Gross. 2011. Bare phrase structures, label-less trees, and specifier-less syntax: Is Minimalism becoming a dependency grammar? The Linguistic Review 28(3). 315–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2011.009 (accessed 26 July 2012).10.1515/tlir.2011.009Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, F. R. 2001. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139167178Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, Colin. 2003. Linear order and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry 34(1). 37–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/002438903763255922 (accessed 4 May 2013).10.1162/002438903763255922Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 1994. The language instinct. New York: William Morrow.10.1037/e412952005-009Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven & Ray. Jackendoff 2005. The faculty of language: What’s special about it? Cognition 95(2). 201–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004 (accessed 11 March 2014).10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004Search in Google Scholar

Platzack, Christer. 1986. COMP, INFL, and Germanic word order. In Lars Hellan & Kirsti Koch Christensen (eds.), Topics in Scandinavian syntax, 185–234. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-4572-2_9Search in Google Scholar

Platzack, Christer. 1987. The Scandinavian languages and the null-subject parameter. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5(3). 377–340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00134554 (accessed 10 September 2014).10.1007/BF00134554Search in Google Scholar

Prüfer, Kay, Fernando Racimo, Nick Patterson, Flora Jay, Sriram Sankararaman, Susanna Sawyer, Anja Heinze, Gabriel Renaud, Peter H. Sudmant, Cesare De Filippo, Heng Li, Swapan Mallick, Michael Dannemann, Qiaomei Fu, Martin Kircher, Martin Kuhlwilm, Michael Lachmann, Matthias Meyer, Matthias Ongyerth, Michael Siebauer, Christoph Theunert, … David Reich, Janet Kelso & Svante Pääbo. 2014. The complete genome sequence of a Neandertal from the Altai Mountains. Nature 505(7481). 43–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12886 (accessed 6 September 2014).10.1038/nature12886Search in Google Scholar

Putnam, Michael & Thomas Stroik. 2011. Syntax at ground zero. Linguistic Analysis 37(3–4). 389–405.Search in Google Scholar

Riedel, Kristina. 2009. The syntax of object marking in Sambaa: A comparative Bantu perspective. Utrecht: LOT.Search in Google Scholar

Rilling, James K., Matthew F. Glasser, Todd M. Preuss, Xiangyang Ma, Tiejun Zhao, Hu Xiaoping & Timothy E J Behrens. 2008. The evolution of the arcuate fasciculus revealed with comparative DTI. Nature Neuroscience 11. 426–428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn2072 (accessed 3 April 2014).10.1038/nn2072Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 2002. The EPP as a condition on tense dependencies. In Peter Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, expletives and the EPP, 123–154. Oxford: University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rodriguez-Vidal, Joaquín, Francesco d’Errico, Francisco Giles Pacheco, Ruth Blasco, Jordi Rosell, Richard P. Jennings, Alain Queffelec, Geraldine Finlayson, Darren A. Fa, José María Gutiérrez López, José S. Carrión, Juan José Negro, Stewart Finlayson, Luís M. Cáceres, Marco A. Bernal, Santiago Fernández Jiménez & Clive Finlayson. 2014. A rock engraving made by Neanderthals in Gibraltar. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(37). 13301–13306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411529111 (accessed 18 February 2015).10.1073/pnas.1411529111Search in Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm. 1980. Some elements of Vanimo, a New Guinea Tone language. Papers in New Guinea Linguistics 20. 77–109.Search in Google Scholar

Saur, Dorothee, Björn W. Kreher, Susanne Schnell, Dorothee Kümmerer, Philipp Kellmeyer, Magnus-Sebastian Vry, Roza Umarova, Mariacristina Musso, Volkmar Glauche, Stefanie Abel, Walter Huber, Michel Rijntjes, Jürgen Hennig & Cornelius Weiller. 2008. Ventral and dorsal pathways for language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105. 18035–18040. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805234105 (accessed 4 April 2014).10.1073/pnas.0805234105Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Search in Google Scholar

Siemund, Peter. 2013. Varieties of English: A typological approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139028240Search in Google Scholar

Siewierska, Anna. 1999. From anaphoric pronouns to grammatical agreement markers: Why objects don’t make it. Folia Linguistica 33(2). 225–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/flin.1999.33.1-2.225 (accessed 24 June 2010).10.1515/flin.1999.33.1-2.225Search in Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, Halldor Armann & Joan Maling. 2008. Argument drop and the empty left edge condition (ELEC). Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 81. 1–27.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, Katherine. 2008. Kwomtari grammar essentials. In Murray Honsberger, Carol Honsberger & Ian Tupper (eds.), Kwomtari phonology and grammar essentials, 53–171. Ukarumpa: SIL-PNG Academic Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Stout, Dietrich & Thierry Chaminade. 2012. Stone tools, language and the brain in human evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 367. 75–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0099 (accessed 17 March 2014).10.1098/rstb.2011.0099Search in Google Scholar

Surányi, Balázs. 2010. Towards a strongly derivational syntax. In Michael T. Putnam (ed.), Exploring crash-proof grammars, 167–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lfab.3.09surSearch in Google Scholar

Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1995. On agreement and nominative objects in Icelandic. In Hubert Haider, Susan Olsen & Sten Vikner (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, 307–327. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-8416-6_14Search in Google Scholar

Terrill, Angela. 2003. A grammar of Lavukaleve. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110923964Search in Google Scholar

Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2005. Íslensk tunga III: Setningar: Handbók um setningafræði. Reykjavík: Almenna bókafélagið.Search in Google Scholar

Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1994. Icelandic. In Ekkehard König & Johan Van Der Auwera (eds.), The Germanic languages, 142–189. Oxon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Trask, Robert. 1981. Basque verbal morphology. IKER 1. Euskalarien Nazioarteko Jardunaldiak. 285–304.Search in Google Scholar

Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2006. On the semantic motivation of syntactic verb movement to C in German. Theoretical Linguistics 32(3). 257–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/TL.2006.018 (accessed 21 September 2016).10.1515/TL.2006.018Search in Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166799Search in Google Scholar

Westergaard, Marit. 2009. Microvariation as diachrony: A view from acquisition. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 12(1). 49–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10828-009-9025-9 (accessed 21 September 2016).10.1007/s10828-009-9025-9Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Stephen M., Sebastiano Galantucci, Maria Carmela Tartaglia, Kindle Rising, Dianne K. Patterson, Maya L. Henry, Jennifer M. Ogar, Jessica DeLeon, Bruce L. Miller & Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini. 2011. Syntactic processing depends on dorsal language tracts. Neuron 72. 397–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.014 (accessed 3 April 2014).10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.014Search in Google Scholar

Woolford, Ellen. 1995. Object agreement in Palauan: Specificity, humanness, economy and optimality. In J. Beckman, S. Urbanczyk & L. Walsh (eds.), Papers in optimality theory, 655–700. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

Zifonun, G. 1995. Minimalia Grammaticalia: Das nicht-phorische es als Prüfstein grammatischer Theoriebildung. Deutsche Sprache 23. 39–60.Search in Google Scholar