This study analyzed the content of questions in the quiz show Who Wants to be a Millionaire in the UK, the USA, Australia, Singapore, and India. A total of 1,823 questions were sampled (427 from British programs, 374 from American programs, 324 from Australian programs, 349 from Singapore, and 349 from India). The topics of questions varied from country to country with programs in Australia and the UK over-representing language, the USA and Singapore over-representing light entertainment, and India over-representing history. The share of local themes was positively related to the country’s size of population. In all the countries, questions that awarded higher prizes more frequently required academic knowledge, whereas pocket money questions more often called for popular everyday knowledge. Overall, the global quiz format appears to be sensitive to relatively small cultural differences. The hierarchy of knowledge it features is in line with western norms.
Contents
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedRule Britannia! Britannia rules the waves: A cross-cultural study of five English-speaking versions of a British quiz show formatLicensedJuly 27, 2005
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedThe situational and time-varying context of routines in television viewing: An event history analysisLicensedJuly 27, 2005
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedThe gendered relationship between journalism and public relations in Austria and Germany. A feminist approachLicensedJuly 27, 2005
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedBridging or bonding? Relationships between integration and media use among ethnic minorities in the NetherlandsLicensedJuly 27, 2005
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedPsychological distress, perceived social support, and television viewing for reasons of companionship: A test of the compensation hypothesis in a population of crime victimsLicensedJuly 27, 2005
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedMarginality in the information age: Is the gender gap really diminishing?LicensedJuly 27, 2005
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedBook ReviewsLicensedJuly 27, 2005