A celebrated result of S. Bernstein [3] states that every solution of the minimal surface equation over the entire plane ℝ 2 has to be an affine linear function. Since the paper of Bernstein appeared in 1927, many different proofs and generalizations of this beautiful theorem were given, namely to higher dimensions and to more general equations, for a careful account we refer to the paper by Simon [6] and to the monograph by Dierkes, Hildebrandt, and Tromba [4, Chap. 3]. In his paper Simon [5] posed the question whether the equation (1+ u x 2 ) u xx +2 u x u y u xy +(1+ u y 2 ) u yy = 0 (1.1) has the Bernstein property i.e. whether every C 2 -solution defined on all of ℝ 2 necessarily has to be affine. We here show by a very simple argument that this is not the case.
Contents
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedThe “Wrong Minimal Surface Equation” does not have the Bernstein propertyLicensedNovember 28, 2011
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedTwo optimal families of iterative methods for solving nonlinear equationsLicensedNovember 28, 2011
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedIsometric embedding of semi-Riemannian metrics into Minkowski spaceLicensedNovember 28, 2011
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedEntire functions sharing one value with linear differential polynomialsLicensedNovember 28, 2011
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedMeromorphic functions that share one small function with their k-th derivativeLicensedNovember 28, 2011
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedApproximation schemes for solving disturbed control problems with non-terminal time and state constraintsLicensedNovember 28, 2011
-
Requires Authentication UnlicensedSome kinds of convergence defined by Folner sequencesLicensedNovember 28, 2011