Home Five Risk and post-traditional welfare
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Five Risk and post-traditional welfare

  • Kirk Mann
View more publications by Policy Press
Approaching retirement
This chapter is in the book Approaching retirement

Abstract

The first task of this chapter is to try and clarify the key features of a post-modern perspective. Distinguishing this from accounts that observe post-modernity without necessarily subscribing to a post-modern frame and from accounts that are ‘post-traditional’ is equally important. The observer must not be confused with the enthusiastic participant. However, before doing so it would be reasonable to make the case for including a chapter on post-modern/post-traditional perspectives, since this could be seen as an unwarranted intrusion by some ill-mannered sociological neighbours who mock the cherished, but ‘kitsch’ possessions within the home of social policy (Mann, 1998; Soper, 1993).

Although a number of distinct and different insights are provided by observers of post-modernity (Bauman, 1992), post-scarcity society (Harvey, 1994), risk society (Beck, 1992) and commentators on post-traditional society (Giddens, 1994, 1998), the number and type of ‘posts’ alone can be confusing to the uninitiated. Here five themes are seen as significant and although some are peculiar to one ‘post’ perspective, others are shared, albeit with a few quibbles over the degree of consensus.

  • First, there is a suggestion that a number of social changes have combined in a manner that means society is very different today from 50 years ago when the ‘modern’ welfare state was established.

  • Second, these changes pose fundamental questions about the ability of any form of public welfare to address the desires and needs of the population.

  • Third, some of the brightest sociological minds are persuaded that contemporary developed societies, like Britain, the US and Australia, are qualitatively different to their predecessors, wrestling by and large with the problems of success rather than failure.

Abstract

The first task of this chapter is to try and clarify the key features of a post-modern perspective. Distinguishing this from accounts that observe post-modernity without necessarily subscribing to a post-modern frame and from accounts that are ‘post-traditional’ is equally important. The observer must not be confused with the enthusiastic participant. However, before doing so it would be reasonable to make the case for including a chapter on post-modern/post-traditional perspectives, since this could be seen as an unwarranted intrusion by some ill-mannered sociological neighbours who mock the cherished, but ‘kitsch’ possessions within the home of social policy (Mann, 1998; Soper, 1993).

Although a number of distinct and different insights are provided by observers of post-modernity (Bauman, 1992), post-scarcity society (Harvey, 1994), risk society (Beck, 1992) and commentators on post-traditional society (Giddens, 1994, 1998), the number and type of ‘posts’ alone can be confusing to the uninitiated. Here five themes are seen as significant and although some are peculiar to one ‘post’ perspective, others are shared, albeit with a few quibbles over the degree of consensus.

  • First, there is a suggestion that a number of social changes have combined in a manner that means society is very different today from 50 years ago when the ‘modern’ welfare state was established.

  • Second, these changes pose fundamental questions about the ability of any form of public welfare to address the desires and needs of the population.

  • Third, some of the brightest sociological minds are persuaded that contemporary developed societies, like Britain, the US and Australia, are qualitatively different to their predecessors, wrestling by and large with the problems of success rather than failure.

Downloaded on 29.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781847429568-009/html
Scroll to top button