Basic Income or Caretaker Benefits?

Amy L. Wax

doi:10.2202/1932-0183.1118

Article

Basic Income or Caretaker Benefits?

Amy L. Wax

Published/Copyright: August 12, 2009

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Basic Income Studies Volume 4 Issue 1

Feminists have long taken the position that society should commit itself to the support of individuals who care for others. In this view, governments should subsidize "caretaking units," consisting of adults supporting dependents in need of care and assistance. This article undertakes to assess a proposal for the public support of caretaking units, as set forth by Anne Alstott in her book No Exit, and to compare that proposal to the alternative of a guaranteed basic income for all. By using an illustrative example, the article concludes that the caretaker benefit is less desirable than a basic income program. Caretaker benefits reward people who engage in premature and irresponsible childbearing at the expense of those who take costly steps to prepare themselves to be good parents and to achieve self-support before having children. By flouting basic principles of fairness, the resulting perverse priorities become a serious shortcoming of Alstott's proposed caretaker benefit program. In contrast, a guaranteed income offers subsidies to parents and nonparents alike, and thus achieves greater neutrality among reproductive choices.

Keywords: Keywords – caretaker benefits; fairness; feminism; guaranteed basic income; reproductive choice.

Published Online: 2009-8-12

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1118

Keywords for this article

Keywords – caretaker benefits; fairness; feminism; guaranteed basic income; reproductive choice.