Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Historical Injustice and the Right of Return
-
Lukas H. Meyer
Published/Copyright:
July 19, 2004
There are two main sources of theoretical doubt regarding the validity of claims for reparation: the questions arising from the non-identity problem and those arising from the supersession thesis. Neither of them significantly undermines the Palestinian refugees’ claims to reparations and a right of return.
Published Online: 2004-7-19
©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Article
- Settlement, Return, and the Supersession Thesis
- The Palestinian Right of Return and the Justice of Zionism
- Historical Injustice and the Right of Return
- Transitional Justice and the Right of Return of the Palestinian Refugees
- Whose Home Is It? Reflections on the Palestinians' Interest in Return
- Whose Right Is It? Reflections on Harel's Reflections on Palestinians' Interest in Return
Articles in the same Issue
- Article
- Settlement, Return, and the Supersession Thesis
- The Palestinian Right of Return and the Justice of Zionism
- Historical Injustice and the Right of Return
- Transitional Justice and the Right of Return of the Palestinian Refugees
- Whose Home Is It? Reflections on the Palestinians' Interest in Return
- Whose Right Is It? Reflections on Harel's Reflections on Palestinians' Interest in Return
