Home Feminist Approaches to Tort Law Revisited - A Reply to Professor Schwartz
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Feminist Approaches to Tort Law Revisited - A Reply to Professor Schwartz

  • Assaf Jacob
Published/Copyright: July 16, 2001
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

It takes courage to characterize feminist writings on tort law as "thin." Indeed, Professor Schwartz in his provocative and challenging article examines feminist writings in a unique and innovative way. In his analysis of a number of such writings, he attempts to demonstrate that they either have not done enough or could have done better. His provocative analysis of many issues invites vigorous discussion. One could write a separate comment on each and every one of the issues he raises; however, I will limit my comment to two: the tension between the "reasonable man" and the "reasonable woman" standard and the (no) duty to rescue rule. It takes courage to characterize feminist writings on tort law as "thin." Indeed, Professor Schwartz in his provocative and challenging article examines feminist writings in a unique and innovative way. In his analysis of a number of such writings, he attempts to demonstrate that they either have not done enough or could have done better. His provocative analysis of many issues invites vigorous discussion. One could write a separate comment on each and every one of the issues he raises; however, I will limit my comment to two: the tension between the "reasonable man" and the "reasonable woman" standard and the (no) duty to rescue rule.

Published Online: 2001-7-16

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2202/1565-3404.1028/pdf
Scroll to top button