Home Social Sciences Redistricting in the U.S.: A Review of Scholarship and Plan for Future Research
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Redistricting in the U.S.: A Review of Scholarship and Plan for Future Research

  • Theodore S. Arrington
Published/Copyright: July 26, 2010
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

The nation-wide cycle of redistricting is the most consequential, repetitive decision-making process shaping the nature of American democracy. Because the arrangement of the districts forms an essential part of the “rules of the game,” the process by which they are drawn is meta-politics or a quasi-constitution making activity. The research on this process is voluminous and includes bits and pieces of the process. But the process is complicated, in part because the criteria for redistricting are in conflict with one another. The criteria include considerations of political geography, physical features, community of interest, one person one vote, race and ethnicity, partisanship, contiguity, compactness, recognition of local political boundaries, incumbents’ addresses, and desires for minimal change. The literature also covers the use of geographic information systems in the process and possible reforms. But no overall theory of redistricting has been developed which includes all these features.

Published Online: 2010-7-26

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 12.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2202/1540-8884.1351/pdf
Scroll to top button