Abstract
Hot water freezing faster than cold water is simply startling, and this observation is known as the Mpemba effect since its rediscovery in 1969. But we are still confused and grappling in search of the underlying experimental conditions and the microscopic physics that can confirm, experimentally and theoretically whether this effect is real or misunderstood. Here, we derive the macroscopic physics of water freezing based on Newtonian cooling. Subsequently, we invoke the effect of covalent-bonded hydrogen and oxygen atoms with polarized electrons to evaluate the temperature (T)-dependent interaction strength between water molecules that determines the length of dynamical hydrogen bonds. After doing so, we expose the hidden Mpemba physics of superfreezing – low-density hot water (due to repulsion caused by highly polarized electrons) induce faster complete freezing compared to high-density cold water if and only if the cooling rate is sufficiently and continuously rapid. However, the question as to which water starts to freeze first (and/or reaches 0 °C first), is conditional. Along the way, we also derive the microscopic interaction potential inequality responsible for supercooling that delays freezing of cold water.
Acknowledgments
ADA is grateful to Sebastiammal Savarimuthu for her continuous support for the advancement of science and humanity. I would like to thank Proceedings A board member for insisting that I should comment on Ref. 26] and references therein.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: No funding received.
-
Data availability: Used experimental data have been cited, while all calculated data can be reproduced from the listed equations.
References
1. Mpemba, E. B.; Osborne, D. G. Phys. Edu. 1969, 4, 172; https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/4/3/312.Search in Google Scholar
2. Arulsamy, A. D. J. Chem. Sci. 2013, 125, 1223; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12039-013-0452-4.Search in Google Scholar
3. Arulsamy, A. D. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 2015, 124, 683; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-015-0568-7.Search in Google Scholar
4. Ahtee, M. Phys. Edu. 1969, 4, 379; https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/4/6/114.Search in Google Scholar
5. Firth, I. Phys. Edu. 1979, 6, 32; https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/6/1/310.Search in Google Scholar
6. Deeson, E. Phys. Edu. 1971, 6, 42; https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/6/1/311.Search in Google Scholar
7. Osborne, D. G. Phys. Edu. 1979, 14, 414; https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/14/7/313.Search in Google Scholar
8. Freeman, M. Phys. Edu. 1979, 14, 417; https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/14/7/314.Search in Google Scholar
9. Kell, G. S. Am. J. Phys. 1969, 37, 564; https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1975687.Search in Google Scholar
10. Walker, J. Scientific Amer. 1971, 237, 246; https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0977-246.Search in Google Scholar
11. Wojciechowski, B.; Owczarek, I.; Bednarz, G. Cryst. Res. Technol. 1988, 23, 843; https://doi.org/10.1002/crat.2170230702.Search in Google Scholar
12. Baxter, M. L. New Scientists 1969, 10, 89.Search in Google Scholar
13. Auerbach, D. Amer. J. Phys. 1995, 63, 882; https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18059.Search in Google Scholar
14. Elsker, J. J. Mol. Struc. 1991, 250, 245.Search in Google Scholar
15. Brewster, R. A.; Gebhart, B. Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 1988, 31, 331; https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(88)90016-6.Search in Google Scholar
16. Tankin, R. S.; Farhadieh, R. Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 1971, 14, 953; https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(71)90121-9.Search in Google Scholar
17. Burridge, H. C.; Linden, P. F. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37665; https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37665.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
18. Bechhoefer, J.; Kumar, A.; Ch’etrite, R. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2021, 3, 534; https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00349-8.Search in Google Scholar
19. Aristotle (340 BCE) in E. W. Webster. Meteorologica I; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1923.Search in Google Scholar
20. Bacon, F. (1620). Novum Organum Scientiarum. Francis Bacon: The New Organon, L. Jardine and M. Silverthorne; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000.10.1017/CBO9781139164030Search in Google Scholar
21. Descartes, R. (1637). Discours de la methode pour bien conduire sa raison, et chercher la verite dans les sciences; plus la dioptriqve; les meteores; et, la geometrie: Qui sont des essais de cete methode. Rene Descartes: Discourse on Method, Optics, Geometry, and Meteorology, P. J. Olscamp; Hackett Publishing Company: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2001.Search in Google Scholar
22. Clagett, M. Giovanni Marliani and Late Medieval Physics; AMS press, Inc.: New York, 1967; pp. 72, 79, 94.Search in Google Scholar
23. Newton, I. VII. Scala Graduum Caloris. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (London) 1701, 22, 824.10.1098/rstl.1700.0082Search in Google Scholar
24. Jahnke, H. N. A History of Analysis: History of Mathematics; American Mathematical Society, 2003; p. 138.10.1090/hmath/024Search in Google Scholar
25. Moroder, M.; Culhane, O.; Zawadzki, K.; Goold, J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024, 133, 140404; https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.133.140404.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
26. Kumar, A.; Bechhoefer, J. Nature 2020, 584, 64; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2560-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
27. Lu, Z.; Raz, O. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2017, 114, 5083; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701264114.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
28. Klich, I.; Raz, O.; Hirschberg, O.; Vucelja, M. Phys. Rev. X 2019, 9, 021060; https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevx.9.021060.Search in Google Scholar
29. Burridge, H. C.; Hallstadius, O. Proc. R. Soc. A 2020, 476, 20190829; https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0829.Search in Google Scholar
30. Bregović, N. Mpemba Effect from a Viewpoint of an Experimental Physical Chemist, 2012. Available from: https://www.rsc.org/images/nikola-bregovic-entry-tcm18-225169.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
31. Lopez, R. J. Newton’s Law of Cooling. In Maple via Calculus; Birkhauser: Boston, 1994; pp. 83–84. Available from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4612-0267-7.10.1007/978-1-4612-0267-7_21Search in Google Scholar
32. Ashton, G. D. Water Resour. Res. 1989, 25, 564; https://doi.org/10.1029/wr025i003p00564.Search in Google Scholar
33. Huang, W.; Li, Z.; Liu, X.; Zhao, H.; Guo, S.; Jia, Q. Ann. Glaciology 2013, 54, 189; https://doi.org/10.3189/2013aog62a075.Search in Google Scholar
34. Arulsamy, A. D.; Kregar, Z.; Eleršič, K.; Modic, M.; Subramani, U. S. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 15175; https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cp20138g.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
35. Arulsamy, A. D. J. Chem. Sci. 2014, 126, 677; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12039-014-0602-3.Search in Google Scholar
36. Valves Instruments Plus Ltd. Density of Liquid Water from 0 °C to 100 °C. Available from: https://www.vip-ltd.co.uk/Expansion/Density-of-waterTables.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
37. Arulsamy, A. D.; Ostrikov, K. Phys. Lett. A 2009, 373, 2267; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2009.04.057.Search in Google Scholar
38. Arulsamy, A. D.; Eleršič, K.; Modic, M.; Cvelbar, U.; Mozetič, M. ChemPhysChem 2010, 11, 3704; https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201000572.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
39. Arulsamy, A. D. Ann. Phys. 2011, 326, 541; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.011.Search in Google Scholar
40. Arulsamy, A. D. Z. Naturforsch. 2024, 79, 83; https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-2023-0099.Search in Google Scholar
41. Kumar, A.; Chetrite, R.; Bechhoefer, J. PNAS 2022, 119, e2118484119; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2118484119.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Review Articles
- Surfactants in action: chemistry, behavior, and industrial applications
- Smart nanomaterials for clean water and a comprehensive exploration of the potentials of metal oxide nanoparticles in environmental remediation
- Nanomaterials at the forefront: classification, fabrication technique, and cross-sector applications
- Original Papers
- Unlocking the potential of FeNbGe Half Heusler: stability, electronic, magnetic and thermodynamic properties
- Investigating the antibacterial potency of Schiff base derivatives as potential agents for urinary tract infection: DFT, solvation, molecular docking and pharmacokinetic studies
- Continuous rapid cooling of polarized electrons initiates Mpemba superfreezing
- Synthesis and characterization of CNTs doped polymeric composites: comparative studies on exploring impact of CNT concentration on morphological, structural, thermokinetic and mechanical attributes
- Frumkin’s adsorption model – a successful approach for understanding surfactant adsorption layers
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Review Articles
- Surfactants in action: chemistry, behavior, and industrial applications
- Smart nanomaterials for clean water and a comprehensive exploration of the potentials of metal oxide nanoparticles in environmental remediation
- Nanomaterials at the forefront: classification, fabrication technique, and cross-sector applications
- Original Papers
- Unlocking the potential of FeNbGe Half Heusler: stability, electronic, magnetic and thermodynamic properties
- Investigating the antibacterial potency of Schiff base derivatives as potential agents for urinary tract infection: DFT, solvation, molecular docking and pharmacokinetic studies
- Continuous rapid cooling of polarized electrons initiates Mpemba superfreezing
- Synthesis and characterization of CNTs doped polymeric composites: comparative studies on exploring impact of CNT concentration on morphological, structural, thermokinetic and mechanical attributes
- Frumkin’s adsorption model – a successful approach for understanding surfactant adsorption layers