Passivization strategies under ECM: evidence from Spanish dialects

References

Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer (eds.). 2015. External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Cristina Sevdali. 2014. Opaque and transparent datives, and how they behave in passives. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 17(1). 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-014-9064-8.Search in Google Scholar

Alsina, Alex. 1996. The role of argument structure in grammar. Evidence from Romance. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Alsina, Alex. 2002. L’infinitiu. In Joan Solà, Maria Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró & Manuel Pérez-Saldanya (eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani, vol. 3, 2389–2454. Barcelona: Empúries.Search in Google Scholar

Angelopoulos, Nikos, Chris Collins & Arhonto Terzi. 2020. Greek and English passives, and the role of by-phrases. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1). 1–29. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1185.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark, Kyle Johnson & Ian G. Roberts. 1989. Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 219–251.Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, Adriana. 1988. The case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 19(1). 1–35.Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2007. Agree, phases, and intervention effects. Linguistic Analysis 33(1-2). 54–96.Search in Google Scholar

Bosque, Ignacio & Ángel J. Gallego. 2011. Spanish double passives and related structures. Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto 6. 9–50.Search in Google Scholar

Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7Search in Google Scholar

Camus, Bruno. 2013. On Deísmo. Another case of variation in Spanish complementation. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 12. 13–39. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.16.Search in Google Scholar

Carstens, Vicki & Michael Diercks. 2012. Parameterizing case and activity: Hyperraising in Bantu. HO NELS talk 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Casalicchio, Jan & Michelle Sheehan. 2021. Long passives of causatives and perception verbs in Italian: Implications for phase theory. In Cambridge University Romance Linguistics Seminar, 2nd March 2021.Search in Google Scholar

Cassalicchio, Jan & Peter Herbeck. 2021. Variation in clausal size. A study of the complements of perception verbs in Spanish. Talk at VARINT 21, UAB, 18-19 November 2021.Search in Google Scholar

Casalicchio, Jan & Peter Herbeck. 2024. New perspectives on the syntax of causative and restructuring verbs in Romance. Isogloss 10.4. Special issue.10.5565/rev/isogloss.400Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step. Essays on minimalist syntax in honour of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3, 104–131. Oxford (NY): Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Ma Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory, 134–166. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam, Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott. 2019. Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. In Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott (eds.), Catalan Journal of Linguistics, special issue, 229–261.10.5565/rev/catjl.288Search in Google Scholar

Ciutescu, Elena. 2018. Defective causative and perception verb constructions in Romance. A minimalist approach to infinitival and subjunctive clauses. PhD Dissertation, UAB.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Chris. 2005. A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8. 81–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00076.x.Search in Google Scholar

Cuervo, María Cristina. 2003. Datives at large. PhD. Dissertation. MIT.Search in Google Scholar

D’Alessandro, Roberta, Irene Franco & Ángel J. Gallego. 2017. The verbal domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198767886.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Diercks, Michael. 2012. Parameterizing case: Evidence from Bantu. Syntax 15(3). 253–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00165.x.Search in Google Scholar

Embick, David. 2004. On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3). 355–392. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389041402634.Search in Google Scholar

Fernández-Salgueiro, Gerardo. 2005. Agree, the EPP-F and further raising in Spanish. In Randall Gess & Edward J. Rubin (eds.), Theoretical and experimental approaches to Romance linguistics, 97–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.272.07ferSearch in Google Scholar

Fernández-Sánchez, Javier. 2015. An (only apparent) case of hyper raising in Spanish. Iberia 7. 1–32.Search in Google Scholar

Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley. 2005. Flavors of v. In Paula Kempchinsky & Roumyana Slabakova (eds.), Aspectual inquiries, 95–120. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3033-9_5Search in Google Scholar

Freeze, Ray. 1992. Existentials and other locatives. Language 68. 553–595. https://doi.org/10.2307/415794.Search in Google Scholar

Gallego, Ángel J. 2007. Phase theory and parametric variation. PhD Dissertation, UAB.Search in Google Scholar

Gallego, Ángel J. 2010a. Phase theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Gallego, Ángel J. 2010b. On the prepositional nature of non-finite verbs. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 9. 72–102. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.95.Search in Google Scholar

Gallego, Ángel J. 2013. Object shift in Romance. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31. 409–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-013-9188-6.Search in Google Scholar

Gallego, Ángel J. 2014. Deriving feature inheritance from the copy theory of movement. The Linguistic Review 31. 41–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2013-0021.Search in Google Scholar

Gallego, Ángel J. 2016. Three types of prepositions in Spanish se-sentences: Consequences for cross-dialectal studies. Dialectologia 17. 51–70.Search in Google Scholar

Gallego, Ángel J. 2020. Morpho-syntactic variation in Romance v. A micro-parametric approach. Probus 32. 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2020-0008.Search in Google Scholar

Gallego, Ángel, J., & Juan, Uriagereka. 2020. Off the chain. Ms., UAB/UMD. Available at: https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/005093.Search in Google Scholar

Gallego, Ángel J. & Masaya Yoshida. 2025. Raising to object in romance: Evidence from ellipsis. Ms., UAB.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth & Samuel J. Keyser. 1993. On the argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of sylvain bromberger, 53–109. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth & Samuel J. Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5634.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2012. Lexical decomposition in modern generative grammar. In Wolfram Hinzen, Edouard Machery & Markus Werning (eds.), Handbook of compositionality, 328–350. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2024. Passive constructions: Universals and language description. Ms., Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (Leipzig).Search in Google Scholar

Herbeck, Peter. 2020. On finite subject-to-object raising in Spanish. Borealis 9. 87–124. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.9.1.5098.Search in Google Scholar

Hernanz, M. Lluïsa. 1999. El infinitivo. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 2197–2356. Madrid: Espasa.Search in Google Scholar

Hernanz, M. Lluïsa & Ángel J. Gallego. 2012. Tipos de tiempo defectivo. In Emilio Ridruejo Alonso, Josep Maria Solias i Arís, Nieves Mendizábal de la Cruz, Sara Alonso Calvo (coords.), Tradición y progreso en la lingüística general, 192–215. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 562(2). 251–299. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1980.0017.Search in Google Scholar

Hornstein, Norbert, Jairo Nunes & Ana Maria Martins. 2010. Perception and causative structures in English and European Portuguese. Syntax 11. 205–229.Search in Google Scholar

Jaeggli, Osvaldo A. 1986. Passive. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 587–622.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1993. Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica 47. 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1993.tb00837.x.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Keyser, Samuel J. & Thomas Roeper. 1984. On the middle and passive. Linguistic Inquiry 15(3). 381–416.Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 2000. Building statives. In Carol Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds.), Events. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard. 2001. Subjects, objects, and the EPP. In William Davies & Stanley Dubinsky (eds.), Objects and other subjects: Grammatical functions, functional categories, and configurationality, 103–121. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-010-0991-1_5Search in Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard. 2002a. Clause-mate conditions revisited. Glot International 6. 94–96.Search in Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard. 2002b. Case and passives. Ms., UMD.Search in Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard. 2019. A reconsideration of exceptional case-marking. Ms., UMD.Search in Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard & Mamoru Saito. 1999. On the subject of infinitives. In Howard Lasnik (ed.), Minimalist analysis, 7–24. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Legate, Julie Anne. 2014. Voice and v: Lessons from Acehnese. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262028141.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Legate, Julie Anne. 2021. Noncanonical passives: A typology of voices in an impoverished universal grammar. Annual Review of Linguistics 7. 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031920-114459.Search in Google Scholar

Legate, Julie Anne, Faruk Akkuş, Milena Šereikaitė & Don Ringe. 2020. On passives of passives. Language 96(4). 771–818. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2020.0062.Search in Google Scholar

Leonetti, Manuel. 2008. Specificity in clitic doubling and in differential object marking in Spanish. Probus 20. 33–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus.2008.002.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax–lexical semantics interface. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

López, Luis. 2012. Indefinite objects: Scrambling, choice functions and differential marking. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9165.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mendikoetxea, Amaya. 1999. Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 1575–1629. Madrid: Espasa.Search in Google Scholar

Montalbetti, Mario. 1999. Spanish passivized datives: The relevance of misanalysis. In Kyle Johnson & Ian G. Roberts (eds.), Beyond principles and parameters, 133–144. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-011-4822-1_5Search in Google Scholar

Ordóñez, Francisco & Francesc Roca. 2017. Causativas y leísmo generalizado en dialectos del español. In Ángel J. Gallego, Yolanda Rodríguez & Javier Fernández-Sánchez (eds.), Relaciones sintácticas, 531–546. Bellaterra: Servei de Publicacions (UAB).Search in Google Scholar

Ordóñez, Francisco & Francesc Roca. 2019. Differential object marking (DOM) and clitic subspecification in Catalonian Spanish. In Ángel J. Gallego (ed.), The syntactic variation of Spanish dialects, 35–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190634797.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Ordóñez, Francisco & Esthela Treviño. 2016. Agreement and DOM with se: A comparative study of Mexican and Peninsular Spanish. In Mary Kato & Francisco Ordóñez (eds.), The Morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America, 236–258. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190465889.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero. 2007. The object agreement constraint. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25. 315–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9010-9.Search in Google Scholar

Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero. 2013a. Differential object marking, case and agreement. Borealis 2(2). 221–239. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.2.2.2808.Search in Google Scholar

Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero. 2013b. Non-accusative objects. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 12. 155–173. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.65.Search in Google Scholar

Perlmutter, David. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 2013. Russian case morphology and the syntactic categories. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262019729.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2004. Tense, Case, and the nature of syntactic categories. In Jacqueline Guéron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds.), The syntax of time, 495–537. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6598.003.0021Search in Google Scholar

Picallo, M. Carme. 2002. Abstract agreement and clausal arguments. Syntax 5. 116–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00049.Search in Google Scholar

Pineda, Anna. 2014. Les fronteres de la (in)transitivitat. Estudi dels aplicatius en llengües romàniques i basc. PhD Dissertation, UAB.Search in Google Scholar

Plann, Susan. 1986. On case-marking clauses in Spanish: Evidence against the case resistance principle. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 336–345.Search in Google Scholar

Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

RAE-ASALE. 2009. Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa.Search in Google Scholar

Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb meaning and the Lexicon: A first-phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486319Search in Google Scholar

Ramchand, Gillian. 2018. Situations and syntactic structures: Rethinking auxiliaries and order in English. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/10911.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 1998. Building verb meanings. In Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geude (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi & Ur Shlonsky. 2007. Strategies of subject extraction. In Uli Sauerlandand & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces + recursion = language?, 115–160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207552.115Search in Google Scholar

Roca, Francesc. 1992. On the Licensing of pronominal clitics. MA Thesis: UAB.Search in Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, Miguel. 2007. The syntax of objects: Agree and differential object marking. PhD Dissertation, University of Connecticut.Search in Google Scholar

Romero, Juan. 2008. Los dativos en español. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Search in Google Scholar

Sheehan, Michelle. 2019. Restrictions on A-movement in English and Spanish and what they tell us about phase theory. ARC Seminar, October 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Sheehan, Michelle. 2020a. Passives of causatives and perception verbs in Romance: Further evidence for phases. CLT Seminar, November 2020.Search in Google Scholar

Sheehan, Michelle. 2020b. The Romance Person Case Constraint is not about clitic clusters. In Anna Pineda & Jaume Mateu (eds.), Dative constructions in Romance and Beyond, 143–171. Belrin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sheehan, Michelle & Sonia Cyrino. 2018. Why do some ECM verbs resist passivisation: A phase-based explanation. In Sherry Hucklebridge & Max Nelson (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 48, vol. 3, 81–90. ‎ CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Search in Google Scholar

Stowell, Tim. 1981. The origins of phrase structure. PhD Dissertation, MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Svenonius, Peter. 2002. Case is uninterpretable aspect. In Henk Verkuyl (ed.), Proceedings of Perspectives on Aspect Conference. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.Search in Google Scholar

Torrego, Esther. 1998. The dependencies of objects. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2337.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Torrego, Esther. 1999. Aspect in the prepositional system of Romance. In Teresa Satterfield, Christina Tortora, Diana Cresti (eds.), Current issues in Romance languages, 337–357. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.220.23torSearch in Google Scholar

Torrego, Esther. 2010. Variability in the case patterns of causative formation in romance and its implications. Linguistic Inquiry 41. 445–470. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00004.Search in Google Scholar

Treviño, Esthela. 1993. Las causativas del español con complemento infinitivo. México: El Colegio de México, DF.Search in Google Scholar

Tubino Blanco, Mercedes. 2011. Causatives in minimalism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.179Search in Google Scholar

Ura, Hiroyuki. 1998. Checking, economy, and copy raising in Igbo. Linguistic Analysis 28(1-2). 67–88.Search in Google Scholar

Uriagereka, Juan. 2006. Complete and partial infl. In Cedric Boeckx (ed.), Agreement systems, 267–298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.92.12uriSearch in Google Scholar

Uriagereka, Juan & Ángel J. Gallego. 2020. Off the chain. Ms., UMD/UAB. Available at: https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/005093.Search in Google Scholar

Woolford, Ellen. 2003. Burzio’s generalization, markedness, and locality constraints on nominative objects. In Ellen Brandner & Heike Zinsmeister (eds.), New perspectives on case theory, 301–329. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Woolford, Ellen. 2006. Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37. 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438906775321175.Search in Google Scholar

Zaenen, Annie, Joan Maling & Hoskuldur Thráinsson. 1985. Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3. 441–483.10.1007/BF00133285Search in Google Scholar