Home Selection of oxypeucedanin as a potential antagonist from molecular docking analysis of HSP90
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Selection of oxypeucedanin as a potential antagonist from molecular docking analysis of HSP90

  • Joshua Oluwasegun Bamidele EMAIL logo , George Oche Ambrose and Oluwaseun Suleiman Alakanse
Published/Copyright: November 5, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

HSP90 is observed as one of the copious molecular chaperones that play a key role in mediating appropriate folding, maturation, and firmness of many client proteins in cells. The expression rate of HSP90 in cancer cells is at a level of 2- to 10-fold higher than the 1- to 2-fold of its unstressed and healthy ones. To combat this, several inhibitors to HSP90 protein have been studied (such as geldanamycin and its derivative 17-AAG and 17-DMAG) and have shown some primary side effects including plague, nausea, vomiting, and liver toxicity, hence the search for the best-in-class inhibitor for this protein through in silico. This study is aimed at analyzing the inhibitory potency of oxypeucedanin-a furocoumarin derivations, which have been reported to have antipoliferative activity in human prostrate carcinoma DN145 cells, and three other drug candidates retrieved from the literature via computational docking studies. The results showed oxypeucedanin as the compound with the highest binding energy of −9.2 kcal/mol. The molecular docking study was carried out using PyRx, Auto Dock Vina option, and the target was validated to confirm the proper target and the docking procedure employed for this study.


Corresponding author: Joshua Oluwasegun Bamidele, University Of Ilorin, P.M.B 1515, Ilorin, Nigeria. Phone: +234 8160179867, E-mail:

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Ritossa, F. A new puffing pattern induced by temperature shock and DNP in Drosophila. Experientia 1962;18:571–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02172188.Search in Google Scholar

2. Nouza, K. Proteiny teplotního šoku (HSP). Zánět dokončení, Medicína 2002;2002:22.Search in Google Scholar

3. Garrido, C, Gurbuxani, S, Ravagnan, L, Kroemer, G. Heat shock proteins: endogenous modulators of apoptotic cell death. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001;286:433–42. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2001.5427.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Hüttner, S, Strasser, R. Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of glycoproteins in plants. Front Plant Sci 2012;3:67. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2012.00067.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Brehme, M, Voisine, C, Rolland, T, Wachi, S, Soper, JH, Zhu, Y, et al. A chaperome subnetwork safeguards proteostasis in aging and neurodegenerative disease. Cell Rep 2014;9:1135–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.09.042.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Schlesinger, MJ. Heat shock proteins. J Biol Chem 1990;265:12111–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560020819.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Picard, D. Preface to hsp90. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 2012;1823:605–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.02.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Whitesell, L, Lindquist, SL. HSP90 and the chaperoning of cancer. Nat Rev Canc 2005;5:761. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1716.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Connell, P, Ballinger, CA, Jiang, J, Wu, Y, Thompson, LJ, Höhfeld, J, et al. The co-chaperone CHIP regulates protein triage decisions mediated by heat-shock proteins. Nat Cell Biol 2001;3:93. https://doi.org/10.1038/35050618.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Hawle, P, Siepmann, M, Harst, A, Siderius, M, Reusch, HP, Obermann, WM. The middle domain of Hsp90 acts as a discriminator between different types of client proteins. Mol Cell Biol 2006;26:8385–95. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.02188-05.Search in Google Scholar

11. Neckers, L, Blagg, B, Haystead, T, Trepel, JB, Whitesell, L, Picard, D. Methods to validate Hsp90 inhibitor specificity, to identify off-target effects, and to rethink approaches for further clinical development. Cell Stress Chaperones 2018;23:467–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12192-018-0877-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Kyle Hadden, M, Lubbers, DJ, Blagg, J, Brian, S. Geldanamycin, radicicol, and chimeric inhibitors of the Hsp90 Nterminal ATP binding site. Curr Top Med Chem 2006;6:1173–82. https://doi.org/10.2174/156802606777812031.Search in Google Scholar

13. Murata, S, Chiba, T, Tanaka, K. CHIP: a quality-control E3 ligase collaborating with molecular chaperones. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2003;35:572–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1357-2725(02)00394-1.Search in Google Scholar

14. Lackie, RE, Maciejewski, A, Ostapchenko, VG, Marques-Lopes, J, Choy, WY, Duennwald, ML, et al. The Hsp70/Hsp90 chaperone machinery in neurodegenerative diseases. Front Neurosci 2017;11:254. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00254.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Supko, JG, Hickman, RL, Grever, MR, Malspeis, L. Preclinical pharmacologic evaluation of geldanamycin as an antitumor agent. Canc Chemother Pharmacol 1995;36:305–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002800050328.Search in Google Scholar

16. Trepel, J, Mollapour, M, Giaccone, G, Neckers, L. Targeting the dynamic HSP90 complex in cancer. Nat Rev Canc 2010;10:537. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2887.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Lee, YY, Lee, S, Jin, JL, Yun-Choi, HS. Platelet anti-aggregatory effects of coumarins from the roots of Angelica genuflexa and A. gigas. Arch Pharm Res 2003;26:723. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02976681.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Kim, YK, Kim, YS, Ryu, SY. Antiproliferative effect of furanocoumarins from the root of Angelica dahurica on cultured human tumor cell lines. Phytother Res 2007;21:288–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2043.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Kang, TJ, Lee, SY, Singh, RP, Agarwal, R, Yim, DS. Anti-tumor activity of oxypeucedanin from Ostericum koreanum against human prostate carcinoma DU145 cells. Acta Oncol 2009;48:895–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860902824925.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Lomakina, E, Waugh, RE. Bond formation during cell compression. In: Principles of cellular engineering. Rochester, New york: Academic Press; 2006:105–22 pp.10.1016/B978-012369392-1/50006-1Search in Google Scholar

21. Sevin, M, Girodon, F, Garrido, C, de Thonel, A. HSP90 and HSP70: Implication in inflammation processes and therapeutic approaches for myeloproliferative neoplasms. Dijon, France: Mediators of inflammation; 2015.10.1155/2015/970242Search in Google Scholar

22. Martins Ana Sofia, AS, et al. A pivotal role for heat shock protein 90 in Ewing sarcoma resistance to anti-insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor treatment in vitro and in vivo study. Canc Res 2008;68:6260–70. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472. 18676850.Search in Google Scholar

23. Zhao Rongmin, R. Chaperone for protein folding and gene regulation. Biochem Cell Biol 2005;83:703–10. https://doi.org/10.1139/o05-158.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Marcu, et al. The heat shock protein 90 antagonist novobiocin interacts with a previously unrecognized ATP-binding domain in the carboxyl terminus of the chaperone. J Biol Chem 2000;274:37181–86. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M003701200.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Chen, et al. Hsp90 N-and C-terminal double inhibition synergistically suppresses Bcr-Abl-positive human leukemia cells. Oncotarget 2017;8:10025. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14324. 28036294.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Park, et al. The antiproliferative activity of oxypeucedanin via induction of G2/M phase cell cycle arrest and p53-dependent MDM2/p21 expression in human hepatoma cells. Molecules 2020;25:501. 10.3390/molecules25030501.10.3390/molecules25030501Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-11-05

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2019-0136/html
Scroll to top button