Home Fabrication of polyimide films with imaging quality using a spin-coating method for potential optical applications
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Fabrication of polyimide films with imaging quality using a spin-coating method for potential optical applications

  • Danbo Mao EMAIL logo , Gang Lv , Guohan Gao and Bin Fan
Published/Copyright: October 24, 2019
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Optical polyimide (PI) films were prepared by spin-coating from nearly non-volatile dimethylacetamide (DMAc) solutions. The uniformity of film thickness met the requirements of diffraction imaging quality. The results show that the final rotating speed ω, dynamic viscosity η, and initial polymer solid concentration c are the main factors affecting the film thickness T, and an empirical relationship which describes the film thickness as a function of the measured parameters was established to be Tc3.473,  η0.586,  ω0.811. Moreover, the viscosity dependence on concentration is system specific. Unlike traditional photoresist, the thickness uniformity of the PI film is determined by both spinning and precure process, which is intensively discussed in the present work. Uniform, 22-μm thick, PI films with transmitted wavefronts peak to valley (PV) ≤ 1/5 λ and root mean square (RMS) ≤ 1/50 λ were prepared under the optimum process: spin speed 900 rpm, initial fluid viscosity 10,500 cp, final spin time 120 s, precure temperature 70°C, spin process repeated 3 times. The results will find use in the production of optical quality membrane for ultra-lightweight optics or other applications.

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2016YFB0500200

Funding statement: This research was supported in part by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2016YFB0500200).

References

[1] Hyde RA. Appl. Opt. 1999, 38, 4198–4212.10.1364/AO.38.004198Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Barton IM, Britten JA, Dixit SN. Appl. Opt. 2001, 40, 447–451.10.1364/AO.40.000447Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Meinel AB, Meinel MP. Opt. Eng. 2002, 41, 1995–2008.10.1117/1.1487364Search in Google Scholar

[4] Paul A, Chris S, Jeanette D. Proc. SPIE. 2012, 8442, 844221.10.1117/12.925413Search in Google Scholar

[5] Paul A, Jeanette D, Kevin W. Proc. SPIE. 2014, 9143, 91431.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Jeanette LD, Paul A, Jeff K. AIAA Pap. 2014, 13–17.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Guo C, Zhang Z, Xue D. Opt. Commun. 2018, 407, 227–233.10.1016/j.optcom.2017.09.006Search in Google Scholar

[8] Jiao J, Wang B, Wang C. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. SpatInf. Sci. 2017, 42, 371.10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-W1-371-2017Search in Google Scholar

[9] Zhang J, Li M, Yin G. Chin. Opt. Lett. 2016, 14, 100501.10.3788/COL201614.100501Search in Google Scholar

[10] Zhang J, Li M, Yin G. Optics 2016, 127, 9833–9839.10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.07.055Search in Google Scholar

[11] Sahu N, Parija B, Panigrahi S. Indian J. Phys. 2009, 83, 493–502.10.1007/s12648-009-0009-zSearch in Google Scholar

[12] Yan Y, Zhou P, Zhang SX. Chin. Phys. B. 2018, 27, 068104.10.1088/1674-1056/27/6/068104Search in Google Scholar

[13] Kabir II, Sheppard LR, Liu R. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2018, 354, 369–382.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.09.009Search in Google Scholar

[14] Karpitschka S, Weber CM, Riegler H. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015, 129, 243–248.10.1016/j.ces.2015.01.028Search in Google Scholar

[15] Danglad-Flores J, Eickelmann S, Riegler H. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2018, 179, 257–264.10.1016/j.ces.2018.01.012Search in Google Scholar

[16] Sahoo S, Arora A, Doshi P. Comput. Fluids 2016, 131, 180–189.10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.03.016Search in Google Scholar

[17] Griffiths PT. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2015, 221, 9–17.10.1016/j.jnnfm.2015.03.008Search in Google Scholar

[18] Paul J, Lima H, Andrade AM. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2006, 17, 593.10.1007/s10854-006-0004-5Search in Google Scholar

[19] Chang Y, Wu WC, Chen WC. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2001, 148, F77–F81.10.1149/1.1357183Search in Google Scholar

[20] Washo BD. IBM J. Res. Dev. 1977, 21, 190–198.10.1147/rd.212.0190Search in Google Scholar

[21] Givens FL, Daughton WJ. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1979, 126, 269–272.10.1149/1.2129019Search in Google Scholar

[22] Lawrence CJ. Phys. Fluids 1988, 31, 2786–2795.10.1063/1.866986Search in Google Scholar

[23] Daughton WJ, Givens FL. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1982, 129, 173–179.10.1149/1.2123749Search in Google Scholar

[24] Mohajerani E, Farajollahi F, Mahzoon R. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 2007, 9, 3901.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Emslie AG, Bonner FT, Peck LG. J. Appl. Phys. 1958, 29, 858–862.10.1063/1.1723300Search in Google Scholar

[26] Acrivos A, Shah MJ, Petersen EE. J. Appl. Phys. 1960, 31, 963–968.10.1063/1.1735785Search in Google Scholar

[27] Jenekhe SA, Schuldt SB. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1984, 23, 432–436.10.1021/i100016a009Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-05-30
Accepted: 2019-09-24
Published Online: 2019-10-24
Published in Print: 2019-11-26

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2019-0177/html
Scroll to top button