Home Effect of notch sensitivity on the mechanical properties of HA/PEEK functional gradient biocomposites
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effect of notch sensitivity on the mechanical properties of HA/PEEK functional gradient biocomposites

  • Pan Yusong EMAIL logo , Chen Yan , Shen Qianqian and Pan Chengling
Published/Copyright: January 14, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Biomaterials used as loading-bearing orthopedic implants usually require various excellent properties such as mechanical, bioactive and bio-tribological performances. Moreover, all of the orthopedic applications feature stress concentrations (notch sensitivity) in their design. In the present work, hydroxyapatite-reinforced polyetheretherketone functional gradient biocomposites (HA/PEEK FGBm) were successfully prepared by the layer stacking method combined with hot pressing molding technology. The effects of notch geometry on the stress-strain behavior of HA/PEEK FGBm were evaluated. The fracture morphology was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The study of the stress-strain behavior indicated that the tensile and flexural stresses of HA/PEEK FGBm linearly increased with increasing strain under all the notch sensitivities. The fracture strain of the biocomposites decreased with increasing stress concentration factor and total HA content in the functional biocomposites. Moreover, the tensile and flexural strengths of HA/PEEK FGBm were lower than those of homogeneous HA/PEEK biocomposites. The SEM observation of the fracture micro-morphology showed that the fracture mechanism of HA/PEEK FGBm was gradually controlled by the brittle fracture process. Furthermore, both the tensile and the flexural strengths of HA/PEEK FGBm decreased with the increase in stress concentration factor and total HA content in the biocomposites.


Corresponding author: Pan Yusong, School of Material Science and Engineering, An Hui University of Science and Technology, Huai Nan, 232001, China, e-mail:

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 51175004).

References

[1] Kurtz SM, Devine JN. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 4845–4869.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[2] Kyomoto M, Moro T, Yamane S, Hashimoto M, Takatori Y, Ishihara K. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 7829–7839.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.023Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Stolarski TA, Gawarkiewicz R. Tribol. Int. 2015, 81, 9–18.10.1016/j.triboint.2014.07.018Search in Google Scholar

[4] Petrovic L, Pohle D, Munstedt H, Rechtenwald T, Schlegel KA, Rupprecht S. J. Biomed. Sci. 2006, 13, 41–46.10.1007/s11373-005-9032-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Almasi D, Izman S, Assadian M, Ghanbari M, Kadir MR. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 314, 1034–1040.10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.074Search in Google Scholar

[6] Ni Z, Hua WY, Jiang ZH, Liang XY, Liang QH. Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2013, 29, 74–77.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Pan YS, Shen QQ, Chen Y, Yu K, Pan CL, Zhang L. Mater. Technol. 2015, 30, 257–263.10.1179/1753555714Y.0000000179Search in Google Scholar

[8] Lee JH, Jang HL, Lee KM, Baek HR, Jin K, Hong KS, Noh JH, Lee HK. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9, 6177–6187.10.1016/j.actbio.2012.11.030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Gabriel LC, Yue WM, Roeder RK. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 927–935.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.10.031Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Rae P, Brown E, Orler E. Polymer 2007, 48, 598–615.10.1016/j.polymer.2006.11.032Search in Google Scholar

[11] Jaekel DJ, Macdonald DW, Kurtz SM. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2011, 4, 1275–1282.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.04.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Li J, Zhang LQ. Polym. Compos. 2010, 31, 1315–1320.10.1002/pc.20986Search in Google Scholar

[13] Sobieraj MC, Murphy JE, Brinkman JG, Kurtz SM, Rimnac CM. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 9156–9162.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.032Search in Google Scholar

[14] Capozucca R, Bonci B. Compos. Struct. 2015, 122, 367–375.10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.062Search in Google Scholar

[15] Pan YS, Shen QQ, Chen Y. Micro Nano Lett. 2013, 8, 357–361.10.1049/mnl.2013.0265Search in Google Scholar

[16] Noda NA, Ohtsuka H, Zhang H, Sano Y, Ando M, Shinozaki T, Guan W. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 2015, 38, 125–138.10.1111/ffe.12228Search in Google Scholar

[17] Lorenzino P, Navarro A. Int. J. Fatigue 2015, 70, 205–215.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.09.012Search in Google Scholar

[18] Huang BS, Zhao GH, Wang ZH. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 556–562, 725–728.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.556-562.725Search in Google Scholar

[19] Busscher HJ, Jong HP, Arends J. Mater. Chem. Phys. 1987, 17, 553–558.10.1016/0254-0584(87)90014-9Search in Google Scholar

[20] Zhu QX, Wu JQ, Feng Q, Wang HP. Mater. Sci. Forum: Mater. Res. 2009, 610–613, 1203–1207.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.610-613.1203Search in Google Scholar

[21] Pan YS, Wang J, Pan CL. Micro Nano Lett. 2012, 7, 880–884.10.1049/mnl.2012.0768Search in Google Scholar

[22] Tang SM, Cheang P, Abubakar MS, Khor KA, Liao K. Int. J. Fatigue 2004, 26, 49–57.10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00080-XSearch in Google Scholar

[23] Zare Y, Garmabi H. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 321, 219–225.10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.09.156Search in Google Scholar

[24] Ahn JS, Woo KS. J. Compos. Mater. 2014, 48, 3–20.10.1177/0021998312467551Search in Google Scholar

[25] Shady E, Gowayed Y. Polym. Compos. 2010, 31, 1838–1845.10.1002/pc.20976Search in Google Scholar

[26] Qing H. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2014, 89, 102–113.10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.03.046Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-7-4
Accepted: 2015-12-4
Published Online: 2016-1-14
Published in Print: 2016-11-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 3.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2015-0304/pdf
Scroll to top button