Home Literary Studies Equity as a Question of Decorum and Manners: Conscience as Vision
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Equity as a Question of Decorum and Manners: Conscience as Vision

  • Piyel Haldar

    Piyel Haldar teaches law at Birkbeck College, University of London. He specialises in early modern legal history. His current research investigates the emblematic forms of legal argument during the European renaissance and the evolution of law as a global network of discourse during the same period. His most recent publication is “The Tongue and the Eye; Eloquence and Office in Renaissance Humanism” in Genealogies of Legal Vision, eds. Peter Goodrich and Valerie Hayaert (Routledge 2015).

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 7, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper argues for a re-evaluation of the manner in which conscience is used by equity lawyers. Debates by early modern humanists sought an alignment between conscience and public office. Indeed, conscience had very little to do with the private morals or private compunction of the Chancellor. Rather, conscience was implicated at the level of duty, honestas and dignity. It required stricter attention to the metaphysics of public official conduct. In these terms, conscience was a humanist re-evaluation of a classical idea that gave heavier emphasis to the poesis of vision.

About the author

Piyel Haldar

Piyel Haldar teaches law at Birkbeck College, University of London. He specialises in early modern legal history. His current research investigates the emblematic forms of legal argument during the European renaissance and the evolution of law as a global network of discourse during the same period. His most recent publication is “The Tongue and the Eye; Eloquence and Office in Renaissance Humanism” in Genealogies of Legal Vision, eds. Peter Goodrich and Valerie Hayaert (Routledge 2015).

Published Online: 2016-9-7
Published in Print: 2016-9-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 22.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/pol-2016-0018/html
Scroll to top button