Abstract
This study examines the adequacy of the library and information science (LIS) curriculum in responding to fast-changing global trends in the library profession developments. The study utilizes a case study design to investigate the University of Dar es Salaam and Open University of Tanzania. The findings of the study reveal the importance of aligning LIS education curriculum with global trends to ensure that graduates have the requisite skills and knowledge to meet the demands of the ever-evolving field. The study highlights digital literacy, emerging technologies, user-centered services, and diversity, equity, and inclusion as critical areas requiring prioritization in the LIS curriculum. The study recommends the development of technical skills, soft skills, emerging technologies, and cultural competencies with practical training opportunities, real-world case studies, and industry partnerships. The study emphasizes the importance of information security and privacy, data management and analysis, collection development and management, marketing and outreach, digital humanities and scholarship, and accessibility and universal design in LIS education.
1 Introduction
The field of library and information science (LIS) is experiencing rapid changes due to the advancement in technology and the ever-growing volume of information. As the role of libraries and librarians continue to evolve, it becomes imperative to examine how LIS programs respond to these fast-changing global trends in the profession. Tanzania is one of the countries in Africa where the LIS profession is still in its infancy stage. The country has a limited number of library schools, and their curricula are based on traditional models that do not adequately address the current needs of the profession (Hirsh, 2018). Therefore, the need to assess the adequacy of the curricula in University of Dar es Salaam (UDSM) and Open University of Tanzania (OUT) cannot be overstated.
2 Literature Review
2.1 Global Trends in the LIS Profession
Numerous studies have been conducted to investigate the state of LIS curricula in various countries throughout the world. The study by Wyman and Imamverdiyev (2018) examined the current state of LIS education worldwide and identified a need for LIS programs to adapt to the changing needs of the workforce. The authors noted that advances in technology and the increasing digitization of information have transformed the role of librarians and information professionals, and that LIS programs must keep pace with these changes to remain relevant and meet the needs of students and employers. The study found that many LIS programs are already adapting to these changes by incorporating new technologies and expanding their curricula to include courses on topics such as data management, digital preservation, and user experience design. However, the authors also noted that there is a need for greater collaboration between LIS programs and employers to ensure that graduates are equipped with the skills and knowledge needed to succeed in the workforce. In addition, Shah, Pei, and Chen (2023) examined the state of LIS education in Pakistan. The study investigated the origins, development, obstacles, and potential of LIS education as well as how it affects employment chances in this area. One important conclusion from the study was that all of the libraries that were the subject of the analysis were determined to set aside specific areas within their buildings for LIS graduates to gain computer-related soft skills. These areas would function as real-world classrooms where students could gain practical experience and develop their abilities, better equipping them for the demands of the workforce.
Furthermore, Yew, Chiu, Nakamura, and Li (2022) conducted a quantitative review of LIS programs accredited by the American Library Association and the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals to investigate how LIS programs are adapting to contemporary technological advancements. One of the findings of the study was that a majority of programs still preserve the keyword “Library” in their name, but not necessarily in the academic units offering them. The study noted that while the term “Library” is still commonly used in the names of LIS programs, many of these programs have expanded their focus beyond traditional library services to include areas such as digital curation, data science, and information management. This suggests that LIS programs are adapting to the changing needs of the field and the broader society. However, the authors also noted that there is a need for greater transparency in the naming of LIS programs, as some programs may still be perceived as solely focused on traditional library services. This could potentially limit the appeal of LIS programs to students who are interested in broader areas of information management and technology.
Likewise, the study by Shah et al. (2023) conducted a study on the emergence, evolution, challenges, and future prospects of LIS education and its impact on job opportunities in Pakistan. The study found that faculty members play a critical role in identifying and achieving the objectives of academic programs in LIS education. According to the study, faculty members are responsible for developing and delivering course materials that are relevant and up-to-date with current practices in the field. They also play a key role in conducting high-quality research that can contribute to the advancement of the field and inform curriculum development. The authors suggest that continued investment in faculty development and research can help overcome some of the challenges facing LIS education in Pakistan and other countries.
In addition, in the field of LIS education, having knowledgeable and dedicated faculty members is crucial, as demonstrated by the research conducted in 2023 by Zareef, Arif, and Jabeen. According to their findings, these faculty members are essential in ensuring that students obtain a top-notch education and are prepared for lucrative professions in the field of LIS. Besides, the study explores doctoral-level LIS research trends of the present and provides a thorough research agenda for the future. The purpose of this agenda is to direct and motivate aspiring LIS academics as they make contributions to the discipline (Zareef, Arif, & Jabeen, 2023).
2.2 Effectiveness of Curriculum in Preparing LIS Graduates
Chow, Shaw, Gwynn, Martensen, and Howard (2011) conducted a study on changing times and requirements: implications for LIS education. The study noted several key findings related to the changing landscape of LIS education. One of the key findings of the study was the tension between teaching traditional LIS curricula and the need to adapt to changing technological and societal trends. The authors note that LIS education programs must strike a balance between teaching technical skills and intellectual content, particularly in areas such as communications and customer service. The study also highlighted the continued importance and value of accreditation in LIS education. Accreditation provides a framework for ensuring that programs meet certain standards and prepares students for professional careers in the field.
Goodsett and Koziura’s (2016) survey titled “Are library science programs preparing new librarians? Creating a sustainable and vibrant librarian community” found out that there are significant gaps between the skills and knowledge that library science programs are providing to their graduates and the skills and knowledge that new librarians need to succeed in the current job market. The survey results indicated that while library science programs are generally effective in teaching traditional library skills such as cataloging and reference, there is a lack of emphasis on newer areas such as digital technologies, user experience design, and project management. This can leave new librarians unprepared for the types of tasks and responsibilities they may encounter in the workplace. The survey also found that there is a need for greater collaboration between library science programs and employers to ensure that graduates are learning the skills that are in demand in the job market. This includes the development of more practical and experiential learning opportunities such as internships and practicums.
The study conducted by Chaputula (2014) revealed a lack of career possibilities for LIS graduates in Malawi despite possessing sufficient abilities, suggests a significant need for acknowledgment and structural adjustments within the LIS sector. The absence of employment for qualified graduates indicates a mismatch between the abilities taught and those required by the job market. Addressing this issue requires advocacy efforts to raise awareness about the importance of the LIS profession, as well as collaborative initiatives between policymakers, educational institutions, and industries to create meaningful employment opportunities for graduates, ensuring their skills are effectively utilized in the job market.
From the studies reviewed, it is clear that the field of LIS education has been the subject of numerous studies in recent years. Researchers such as Chow et al. (2011), Goodsett and Koziura (2016), Shah et al. (2023), and Wyman and Imamverdiyev (2018) have emphasized the importance of the continual evolution and adaptation of LIS education programs to meet the changing needs of the field. This is particularly important given the rapid advances in technology, changing user needs, and the growing demand for professionals with diverse skill sets. The study carried out by Varalakshmi (2006) underlines the importance of creating LIS employees that is compatible with the demands of the modern information environment. It implies that LIS curricula need to be reviewed to make sure they are still relevant in the hybrid environment of the twenty-first century. In addition, the results of Kamba’s study from 2011 demonstrate how far the LIS curriculum in Nigeria has come. Kamba claims that significant progress has been made in integrating Information and Communication Technology competencies into the curriculum to produce graduates who are competitive in the labor market.
Despite of the initiatives in reviewing the LIS curriculum, the core values and principles of the profession must also be maintained, including the importance of user-centered services, ethical practice, and the dissemination of accurate and relevant information. To achieve these goals, LIS programs must embrace innovative teaching methods, forge closer relationships with employers, and develop curricula that provide a balance between technical and intellectual content, particularly in the areas of communication and customer service. For instance, the study by Subaveerapandiyan, Sunanthini, and Amees (2023) provides insight into the understanding and opinions of artificial intelligence (AI) among Zambian professionals working in libraries and information science. The study found obstacles to the use of AI technologies in Zambian libraries as well as worries that AI would eventually replace librarians in their professions. The study found a notable gap in the awareness of librarians: the current LIS curriculum does not incorporate themes related to AI. This highlights the urgent necessity to incorporate AI modules into LIS curricula to update the program in line with industry expectations and better serve graduates’ interests in postsecondary education. Finally, these studies suggest that the future success of the LIS profession depends on the ability of LIS education programs to evolve and adapt while maintaining the essential values and principles of the field.
Study Objective. The objective of this study was to examine the LIS curricula provided by UDSM and OUT equip students with the requisite expertise and abilities to adapt to the rapidly evolving global trends in the LIS profession, based on the previous studies reviewed. Specifically, the study aimed to:
Identify the Relevance of Global Trends in LIS Education Curriculum at UDSM and OUT
Evaluate the effectiveness of the current curriculum in preparing graduates from the UDSM and OUT for the rapidly evolving demands of the library profession in the global market.
3 Methodology
3.1 Study Location
This study was conducted at two universities, namely, UDSM and OUT, which are operating under the umbrella of TCU and have been offering the LIS Programme for several years. These universities were selected due to their long-standing experience in running the course. UDSM started by offering doctoral and Masters LIS however, due to high demand of the program recently they have also stated offering bachelor degree program in LIS. However, OUT also offers LIS at the diploma and certificate levels in addition to doctorate, masters, and bachelor’s degree levels. Only LIS bachelor degree candidates were included in this study. The expansion of the LIS programs at UDSM and OUT led to the inclusion of bachelor’s degree holders in the study. The research can analyze the program’s success, identify any emerging difficulties or areas for improvement, and provide essential information to the program’s future development by gaining insights from students enrolled in the new bachelor’s degree program.
3.2 Research Approach
A quantitative research approach was employed, which involved a survey of LIS lecturers and current students from the two universities under study. This approach is preferred in research studies that aim to measure, quantify, or test relationships between variables (Kothari, 2004). In the case of the study on the effectiveness of the LIS curriculum at UDSM and OUT, the quantitative approach allows for the collection of numerical data from a large sample of participants, making it easier to generalize the findings to the wider population of LIS students and lecturers. The use of statistical analysis also enables the identification of relationships between variables, allowing for a more objective assessment of the effectiveness of the curriculum in preparing graduates for the demands of the profession.
3.3 Study Participants (n = 96)
Ninety-six individuals participated in this study, comprising 70 LIS students and 26 LIS lecturers. Each university had 35 LIS students and 13 LIS lecturers who completed the online questionnaire, making up the study sample. The participants were selected deliberately based on their familiarity with the LIS curriculum content, ensuring the accuracy of the data gathered for the study. The data collection method employed was an online survey, which was convenient for the participants and allowed for efficient data collection.
3.4 Selection of Participants
This study’s participants were specifically LIS bachelor’s degree students. The research purpose was to gain insights from students at this educational level, and hence, this specific sample was chosen. Purposive sampling was used to recruit individuals from the universities under investigation, UDSM and OUT.
3.5 Procedure
The data gathering process entailed administering a well-designed questionnaire to participants. The survey included four closed-ended questions about the current state of LIS education at UDSM and OUT. The participants were given clear instructions on how to complete the questionnaire, and they were given an acceptable period to submit their responses.
3.6 Validity and Reliability
To guarantee the accuracy and completeness of the data gathered by the questionnaire in this study, validity and reliability checks were conducted.
3.7 Content Validity
Several measures were performed to determine the content validity of the questionnaire. First and foremost, the questionnaire was painstakingly created to include questions that match with the research objectives, which focused on the state of LIS education at the UDSM and the OUT. This guaranteed that the questions were relevant and directly related to the aims of the study. In addition, before distributing the questionnaire to the primary participants, a pilot testing phase was carried out. During this pilot test, a small group of people completed the questionnaire, and their responses were carefully considered. This stage was critical in discovering any potential ambiguity or unanswered queries from responders. Based on input from pilot test participants, essential improvements and refinements were made to improve the clarity and usefulness of the questionnaire in collecting accurate and meaningful data.
3.8 Reliability
A test–retest approach was used to assess the reliability of the data collection procedure. Participants were asked to complete the questionnaire twice, and a subset of the participants went through this process. This test–retest was designed to assess the consistency and reliability of the questionnaire’s results. The approach entailed comparing the replies gathered from the two questionnaire administrations. The study was able to measure the reliability of the data collection instrument by analyzing the level of agreement between the original test results and the retest replies. High levels of agreement would imply that the questionnaire delivers consistent findings over time and, as a result, might be regarded dependable for gathering the information required for the study. In conclusion, the study carefully considered validity and reliability issues during the data collection method. By designing the questionnaire in accordance with the goals of the study and then fine-tuning it through pilot testing, validity was guaranteed. To ensure the consistency and dependability of the questionnaire’s results, reliability was evaluated using a test–retest process. These steps improve the overall caliber and dependability of the information gathered for the study on the state of LIS education at UDSM and OUT.
3.9 Data Collection Instrument and Analysis
To collect relevant data for the study, a well-designed questionnaire consisting of four closed-ended questions was used. The closed-ended questions were chosen to make data collecting and processing easier. Closed-ended questions give respondents specific response alternatives, making data collecting quick and efficient. The use of closed-ended questions also helps to ensure consistency in responses and simplifies data processing. The questionnaire was designed to gather data about the current state of LIS education in UDSM and OUT. The collected data from the survey were analyzed using the Statistical Product for Service Solutions (SPSS) version 20 computer program. The findings were presented in figures and tables, which made the interpretation and visualization of the results easier. The use of this methodology ensured the data collected were reliable, valid, and allowed for a comprehensive analysis of the current state of LIS education in these universities.
4 Results and Discussion
4.1 Relevance of Global Trends in LIS Education Curriculum at UDSM and OUT
The researcher requested the study participants to state the relevance of LIS Education Curriculum at UDSM and OUT. Findings from the analysis are presented in Table 1.
Relevance of Global Trends in LIS Education Curriculum at UDSM and OUT (n = 26)
Variables | Responses | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | |||
F | % | F | % | |
Information ethics and privacy | 16 | 61.5 | 10 | 38.5 |
Open access and open science | 18 | 69.2 | 8 | 30.8 |
Data management and curation | 20 | 76.9 | 6 | 23.1 |
Information literacy and instruction | 19 | 73.1 | 7 | 26.9 |
Scholarly communication and publishing | 22 | 84.6 | 4 | 15.4 |
Scholarly communication and publishing, data management and curation, information literacy and instruction, open access and open science, and information ethics and privacy were cited by study participants as the relevance of global trends in LIS education curriculum, as detailed in the following subsections.
4.1.1 Scholarly Communication and Publishing
From the analysis, it was revealed that 84.6% of the study participant cited scholarly communication as the relevant global trend in LIS education curriculum. Scholarly communication and publishing are critical areas of expertise for information professionals. As the landscape of scholarly communication and publishing continues to evolve, LIS education curriculum must keep up with global trends (Eve, 2014). This includes an understanding of the traditional publication process as well as new models of publication, such as open access publishing, preprint servers, and institutional repositories (Suber, 2012). Information professionals must be able to navigate the complexities of copyright and intellectual property rights, and be knowledgeable about issues related to scholarly impact and metrics.
4.1.2 Data Management and Curation
A total of 76.9% of the study participants revealed that data management and current is the relevant global trend in LIS education. Data management and curation have become increasingly important areas of focus for information professionals (Carlson & Johnston, 2015). As the volume and complexity of data continues to grow, there is a need for professionals who can effectively manage, organize, and preserve data. LIS education curriculum must cover topics such as data management planning, metadata standards, data analysis, and data visualization (Koltay, 2016). Information professionals must also be able to communicate effectively with researchers and other stakeholders to understand their data needs and requirements.
4.1.3 Information Literacy and Instruction
It further revealed by 73.1% of the study participants that information literacy and instruction is one of the global trends in LIS education. Information literacy and instruction are fundamental skills for information professionals (Association of College and Research Libraries, 2016). The capacity to evaluate and use information critically is crucial in an age of growing online information. According to Eisenberg and Berkowitz (2016), the LIS curriculum should cover competencies including assessing sources, comprehending information seeking behavior, and integrating information for decision-making. This training enables information specialists to create instructional programs that are inclusive and empower both users and their communities (Mubofu & Mambo, 2021). Librarians promote information literacy and serve as living examples of how important it is for navigating the information world of today.
4.1.4 Open access and Open Science
The study also noted that 69.2% of the study participants noted that Open access and Open Science are the current global trends in LIS education and the new curriculums should consider including them. Open access and open science are important global trends that have significant implications for information professionals (Tennant et al., 2016). As the push for greater openness in research and scholarship continues, information professionals must be able to support open access publishing, data sharing, and open science practices (Suber, 2012). LIS education curriculum must cover topics such as open access policies and mandates, licensing and copyright issues, and the use of open access repositories and tools.
4.1.5 Information Ethics and Privacy
A total of 61.5% of the study participant indicated that information ethics and privacy is the current global trend in LIS education that need to be included in the LIS curriculum. Information ethics and privacy are increasingly important areas of concern for information professionals (Richards & King, 2014). As the amount of personal and sensitive information that is collected and stored continues to grow, there is a need for professionals who are knowledgeable about issues related to privacy and data protection. LIS education curriculum must cover topics such as privacy laws and regulations, data security and encryption, and ethical considerations related to the collection, use, and dissemination of information (Floridi, 2014). Information professionals must also be able to effectively communicate these issues to stakeholders and help to develop policies and practices that protect individual privacy and data security.
5 Alignment of LIS Curriculum with Global Trends in the Library Profession
Researchers further wanted to know about the alignment of LIS curriculum with global trends in the library profession. Findings are presented in Table 2.
Alignment of LIS Curriculum with Global Trends in the Library Profession (n = 26)
Variables | Responses | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Not at all | Some what | Moderately | Very much | Completely | |
Digital literacy and emerging technologies | — | 2 (7.7%) | 1 (3.8%) | 18 (69.2%) | 5 (19.2%) |
User-centered services | 1 (3.8%) | 3 (11.5%) | 10 (38.5%) | 8 (30.8%) | 4 (15.4%) |
Diversity, equity, and inclusion | — | 4 (15.4%) | 6 (23.1%) | 8 (30.8%) | 8 (30.8%) |
Preservation and conservation of cultural heritage materials | 2 (7.7%) | 7 (26.9%) | 9 (34.6%) | 3 (11.5%) | 5 (19.2%) |
Collaboration and partnerships with other organizations | — | 5 (19.2%) | 8 (30.8%) | 9 (34.6%) | 4 (15.4%) |
Lecturers from UDSM and OUT were requested to state the alignment of LIS Curriculum with Global Trends in the Library Profession. Findings from the analysis are further discussed in the following sections:
5.1 Digital Literacy and Emerging Technologies
A total of 69.2% of the lecturers noted that Digital Literacy and Emerging Technologies aligns very much with the LIS global curriculum with global trends in the library profession. Digital literacy and emerging technologies are increasingly important areas of expertise for information professionals, and they align well with the global trends in the library profession (Gasser & Cortesi, 2018). Digital literacy involves the ability to use and critically evaluate digital tools and resources, as well as the ability to create and share digital content. Emerging technologies, such as AI, machine learning, and blockchain, are transforming the ways in which information is accessed, organized, and used (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA), 2018).
5.2 User-centered Services
According to the analysis, 30.8% of study participants believe that user-centered services correspond with current LIS curriculum and global trends in the library profession. User-centered services are an important aspect of the LIS profession (IFLA, 2018). They focus on the needs and experiences of library users and aim to provide services and resources that are tailored to meet those needs. However, according to the analysis mentioned in the question, only 30.8% of the study participants believe that user-centered services correspond with current LIS curriculum and global trends in the library profession. Recent literature suggests that user-centered services are indeed a critical aspect of the LIS profession and align with current global trends. For example, the IFLA (IFLA, 2019; Lotts & Graves, 2022) Global Vision Report identifies user-centricity as a key trend, noting that libraries need to focus on user needs and work to provide services that meet those needs.
5.3 Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)
Have gained significant importance in various fields, including the LIS curriculum. Based on the survey analysis, 30.8% of the lecturers believe that DEI is a current global trend in the LIS curriculum. This finding indicates that a significant portion of lecturers recognizes the importance of incorporating DEI principles into the LIS curriculum (Agosto & Liu, 2021). DEI principles emphasize the importance of recognizing and valuing diversity, promoting equity, and creating an inclusive environment. Incorporating DEI principles in the LIS curriculum can prepare future information professionals to work with diverse communities and serve them effectively. It can also promote social justice, reduce biases and discrimination, and enhance access to information and services.
5.4 Preservation and Conservation of Cultural Heritage Materials
Preservation and conservation of cultural heritage materials is a critical aspect of the LIS curriculum. According to the survey analysis, 11.5% of the lecturers identified it as one of the current global trends in LIS curriculum. This finding indicates that lecturers recognize the importance of preserving and conserving cultural heritage materials, which can include a wide range of physical and digital artifacts, such as books, manuscripts, photographs, and audiovisual materials. The act of preserving and looking after cultural heritage materials protects them from potential harm, deterioration, or loss, ensuring their long-term survival and accessibility for future generations (Awamleh & Hamad, 2022; Mubofu, Mambo, & Samzugi, 2020). Incorporating preservation and conservation principles into the LIS curriculum can equip information professionals with the knowledge, skills, and techniques necessary to care for cultural heritage materials (Mazzei & Zallocco, 2019). It can also promote awareness and understanding of the importance of preserving and conserving these materials, particularly in the context of cultural heritage and memory.
5.5 Collaboration and Partnerships with other Organizations
Collaboration and partnerships with other organizations have become increasingly important in the LIS field. According to the survey analysis, 34.6% of the lecturers noted that collaboration and partnerships with other organizations are very much a trend in the LIS curriculum. This finding indicates that lecturers recognize the value of collaboration and partnerships in advancing the LIS field’s goals and promoting community engagement. Collaboration can involve working with other institutions, agencies, and stakeholders to share resources, knowledge, and expertise. Partnerships can involve formal or informal agreements to work together on specific projects or initiatives, such as providing information services, developing digital repositories, or promoting open access (Hartel, 2017). Incorporating collaboration and partnerships principles into the LIS curriculum can help information professionals to develop the necessary skills and competencies to work effectively with other organizations. It can also promote innovation, efficiency, and sustainability in the delivery of information services and resources.
6 Effectiveness of LIS Curriculum in Preparing Graduates for the Global Market
The researcher also asked the students to assess the effectiveness of the LIS curriculum in preparing graduates for the global job market. The results of this assessment are presented in Figure 1.

Effectiveness of LIS Curriculum in Preparing Graduates.
On the basis of the survey analysis, we can see that a majority of the surveyed students believe that the LIS curriculum is somewhat or fully prepared to address current trends and challenges in the field. Specifically, 45 students (64.3%) noted that the LIS curriculum is somewhat prepared, while 30 students (42.9%) said that it is fully prepared. On the other hand, a significant minority of students expressed concerns about the preparedness of the LIS curriculum to address emerging issues in the field. Specifically, 20 students (28.6%) said that the LIS curriculum is not prepared, while only 14 students (20%) were unsure about its preparedness.
These figures provide valuable insight into the perceptions of LIS students regarding the adequacy of the current LIS curriculum in addressing the challenges and trends in the field. While the majority of students believe that the LIS curriculum is prepared to some extent, the significant number of students who express concerns suggests that there may be room for improvement. It is essential for LIS programs to consider the feedback provided by students when assessing and evaluating the preparedness of their curricula. By addressing the concerns raised by students, LIS programs can ensure that their curricula remain relevant and responsive to the needs and demands of the field.
7 Areas for Improvement in LIS Curriculum for Global Market Demands
The researchers further asked students to identify areas where the LIS curriculum could be improved to better meet the demands of the global job market. Table 3 presents the results of this inquiry.
Areas for Improvement in LIS Curriculum for Global Market Demands (n = 70)
Variables | Response | |
---|---|---|
F | % | |
Technical skills | 42 | 60 |
Soft skills | 45 | 64.5 |
Emerging technologies | 38 | 54.3 |
Management and leadership skills | 25 | 35.7 |
Information security and privacy | 13 | 18.6 |
Data management and analysis | 16 | 22.9 |
Collection development and management | 28 | 40 |
Marketing and outreach | 19 | 27.1 |
Digital humanities and scholarship | 28 | 40 |
Cultural competencies and sensitivity | 32 | 45.7 |
Accessibility and universal design | 35 | 50 |
7.1 Technical Skills
It is important for any academic program, including LIS, to adapt to changing market demands and incorporate necessary technical skills into their curriculum. It is encouraging to hear that 60% of the students recognize the need for improvement in technical skills within the LIS curriculum. To meet these demands, the curriculum could include courses on emerging technologies, such as AI, data analytics, and digital preservation. In addition, courses that focus on information management systems, database design, and programming languages can also be incorporated to equip students with the necessary technical skills.
7.2 Soft Skills
It was found that 64.5% of the students agreed that the LIS curriculum has to be upgraded in this area to better meet the expectations of the global economy. Employers are increasingly looking for people with soft skills that enable them to collaborate well with varied teams, clients, and stakeholders in today’s globalized market. The fact that 64.5% of students believe that the LIS curriculum needs to be enhanced to better meet the demands of the global market underlines the importance of including soft skills training in the curriculum for aspiring professionals in this discipline. LIS professionals that have excellent soft skills will be better able to communicate with their clients, understand their needs, and create effective solutions that satisfy their expectations.
7.3 Emerging Technologies
It is clear from the analysis that a significant proportion of students (54.3%) believe that emerging technologies are important to LIS professionals. This suggests that there is a need for LIS professionals to be knowledgeable about and adept in the use of emerging technologies to effectively carry out their roles and responsibilities. Given the rapid pace of technological change and innovation, staying current with emerging technologies can be a challenging task. However, it is essential for LIS professionals to keep up with emerging technologies to provide the best possible service to their users and to remain relevant in the field.
7.4 Management and Leadership Skills
It was further noted by 35.7% of the students that management and leadership skills is an area that needs improvement in LIS profession. The fact that 35.7% of the students feel that management and leadership skills are an area that needs improvement in LIS profession is significant. It suggests that there may be a gap between the skills that are being taught in LIS programs and the skills that are necessary to succeed as a leader in the field. Management and leadership skills are critical for LIS professionals, as they are often responsible for managing teams, developing and implementing strategic plans, and overseeing day-to-day operations. Effective management and leadership require a combination of technical expertise, interpersonal skills, and strategic thinking.
7.5 Information Security and Privacy
It is alarming that 18.6% of students believe that the LIS profession has to make improvements in the area of information security and privacy. It implies that there can be a discrepancy between the instruction that LIS professionals receive in this area and the knowledge and abilities required to ensure the safety of sensitive information. Any organization handling sensitive information, including libraries and information centers, must take information security and privacy seriously. It is critical now more than ever for LIS workers to have a solid awareness of information security and privacy best practices due to the growing threat of cyberattacks and data breaches.
7.6 Data Management and Analysis
Data management and analysis are areas that, in the opinion of 22.9% of the students surveyed, need improvement. It is possible that there is a discrepancy between the training that LIS professionals receive in these areas and the skills and knowledge that are required for effective data management and analysis. Modern libraries and information centers need to have strong data management and analysis capabilities. Experts in the discipline of LIS must possess a thorough comprehension of the most effective methods for managing and analyzing data. This is necessary due to the growing amount of data being produced and the importance of making decisions based on data.
7.7 Collection Development and Management
It was found out that 40% of the study participants noted that collection development and management needs improvement. The fact that 40% of the study participants noted that collection development and management needs improvement in LIS profession suggests that there may be a gap between the skills and knowledge that are necessary for effective collection development and management and the training that LIS professionals receive in these areas. Collection development and management are critical components of library and information center services. With the increasing amount of information being produced and the diverse needs of library users, it is essential for LIS professionals to have a strong understanding of collection development and management best practices.
7.8 Marketing and Outreach
A total of 27.1% of the students said that marketing and outreach are crucial components of the LIS curriculum and need to be improved. The services offered by libraries and information centers must include marketing and outreach. LIS workers must possess a thorough awareness of marketing and outreach best practices due to the growing competition for users’ attention as well as the evolving requirements and expectations of library users. Offering courses and training in marketing and outreach together with giving students the chance to obtain experience in these fields through internships or other practical opportunities may be advantageous for LIS programs.
7.9 Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Forty percent of research participants agree that digital humanities and scholarship are areas in which the LIS profession can develop. With technology playing an expanding role in information science and research, it is critical for LIS workers to comprehend digital humanities and scholarship best practices. The fact that 40% of study participants believe that digital humanities and scholarship are areas in which the LIS profession needs to improve suggests that there may be a mismatch between the skills and knowledge required for effective engagement with digital humanities and scholarship and the training that LIS professionals receive in these areas.
7.10 Cultural Competencies and Sensitivity
The study found that 45.7% of the participants believed that cultural competencies and sensitivity need improvement in the LIS profession. This underscores the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion in the LIS field. As LIS professionals serve diverse populations, it is crucial for them to have a comprehensive understanding of cultural competencies and sensitivity best practices. By doing so, they can effectively cater to the needs of their diverse user communities and create inclusive environments that foster learning and growth for all.
7.11 Accessibility and Universal Design
The finding that 50% of students believe there is space for improvement in the area of accessibility and universal design highlights the need of ensuring that library and information services are accessible to all users, regardless of their skills or disabilities. Accessibility and universal design entail creating and delivering library and information services that are useable by all people, including those with disabilities. This includes offering accessible digital materials, physical access to library locations, and assistive devices that can help users to access information.
8 Conclusion and Recommendations
8.1 Conclusion
The study highlights the importance of aligning LIS education curriculum with global trends in the library profession to ensure that graduates have the necessary skills and knowledge to meet the demands of the ever-evolving field. While the study shows that some areas are more aligned than others, it is essential for LIS lecturers to continually review and update their curriculum to ensure that graduates are well prepared to navigate the challenges and opportunities of the library and information field. By prioritizing digital literacy, emerging technologies, user-centered services, and diversity, equity, and inclusion in the LIS curriculum, we can produce graduates who are well equipped to make a positive impact in the library profession and beyond.
In adddition, the study concludes that while a significant percentage of LIS students feel that the curriculum is at least somewhat prepared to address current trends and challenges in the field, there is still room for improvement. Technical skills, soft skills, emerging technologies, and cultural competencies were identified as areas that require attention to better prepare graduates for the global job market. To stay relevant and meet the evolving needs of the industry, it is crucial for LIS programs to take into account these findings and make necessary updates to their curricula.
8.2 Recommendation
Based on the findings of the study, it is recommended that LIS education programs prioritize the alignment of their curriculum with global trends in the library profession, particularly in areas such as digital literacy and emerging technologies.
Furthermore, efforts should be made to strengthen the alignment of user-centered services and diversity, equity, and inclusion within the curriculum to better prepare graduates for the changing demands of the field. To achieve this, LIS programs should engage with practicing professionals and stay up-to-date with industry trends to ensure that their curriculum reflects the latest developments in the field.
Moreover, it is recommended that LIS programs prioritize the development of technical skills, soft skills, emerging technologies, and cultural competencies in their curricula. This can be achieved through a variety of means, such as offering more hands-on training opportunities, incorporating real-world case studies, and partnering with industry leaders to ensure that students are exposed to the latest trends and practices in the field.
In addition, LIS programs should consider integrating courses or modules that focus on information security and privacy, data management and analysis, collection development and management, marketing and outreach, digital humanities and scholarship, and accessibility and universal design. By taking these steps, LIS programs can better prepare their graduates for the global job market and ensure that they are equipped with the skills and knowledge necessary to succeed in their careers.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
References
Agosto, J., & Liu, Y. (2021). Diversity, equity, and inclusion in LIS curriculum: A content analysis of course, Syllabi. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 62(2), 1–18. doi: 10.3138/jelis.2020-0006.Search in Google Scholar
Association of College and Research Libraries. (2016). Framework for information literacy for higher education. American Library Association.Search in Google Scholar
Awamleh, M. A., & Hamad, F. (2022). Digital preservation of information sources at academic libraries in Jordan: An employee’s perspective. Library Management, 43(1/2), 172–191. doi: 10.1108/LM-10-2021-0088.Search in Google Scholar
Carlson, J., & Johnston, L. R. (2015). Data information literacy: Librarians, data and the education of a new generation of researchers. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.10.26530/OAPEN_626975Search in Google Scholar
Chaputula, H. A. (2014). Job prospects for Mzuzu university library and information science graduates. New Library World, 115(11/12), 571–587. doi: 10.1108/NLW-11-2013-0089.Search in Google Scholar
Chow, A. S., Shaw, T. L., Gwynn, D., Martensen, D., & Howard, M. (2011). Changing times and requirements: Implications for LIS education. LIBRES: Library & Information Science Research Electronic Journal, 21(1), 1–20.10.32655/LIBRES.2011.1.2Search in Google Scholar
Eisenberg, M. B., & Berkowitz, R. E. (2016). The big6 curriculum. New York: Linworth Publishing.10.5040/9798400618635Search in Google Scholar
Eve, M. P. (2014). Open access and the humanities: Contexts, controversies and the future. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316161012Search in Google Scholar
Floridi, L. (2014). The ethics of information. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gasser, U., & Cortesi, S. (2018). Youth and digital skills: New opportunities and challenges for learning. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Publication, 2018, 5.Search in Google Scholar
Goodsett, M., & Koziura, A. (2016). Are library science programs preparing new librarians? Creating a sustainable and vibrant librarian community. Journal of Library Administration, 56(6), 697–721.10.1080/01930826.2015.1134246Search in Google Scholar
Hirsh, S. G. (2018). The evolution of library and information science education. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.Search in Google Scholar
Hartel, J. (2017). Collaboration and partnerships in library and information science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 51(1), 463–506. doi: 10.1002/aris.2017.51.issue-1.Search in Google Scholar
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). (2018). IFLA Trend Report.Search in Google Scholar
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). (2019). IFLA Global Vision Report.Search in Google Scholar
Kamba, M. A. (2011). ICT competency framework for library and information science schools in Nigeria: The need for model curriculum. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 3(4), 68–80.Search in Google Scholar
Koltay, T. (2016). Data literacy: In search of a name and identity. Journal of Documentation, 72(5), 891–905.Search in Google Scholar
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Lotts, M., & Graves, S. J. (2022). User-centered services in academic libraries: An analysis of current practices and future directions. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 54(1), 164–175.Search in Google Scholar
Mazzei, A., & Zallocco, P. (2019). Preservation and conservation of cultural heritage materials: The contribution of the library and information science (LIS) field. Heritage Science, 7(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s40494-019-0282-2.Search in Google Scholar
Mubofu, C., & Mambo, H. (2021). The role of libraries in community empowerment: a systematic review. Indonesian Journal of Librarianship, 2(1), 1–16. doi: 10.33701/ijolib.v1i2.1492.Search in Google Scholar
Mubofu, C., Mambo, H. & Samzugi, A. (2020). Academic libraries and information resources preservation strategies: Past, present and the way forward. Covenant Journal of Library & Information Science (CJLIS), 3(1), 1–11. https://journals.covenantuniversity.edu.ng/index.php/cjlis/article/view/2142/1161.10.47231/YMKG7952Search in Google Scholar
Richards, N. M., & King, J. H. (2014). Big data ethics. Wake Forest Law Review, 49, 393.Search in Google Scholar
Shah, S. H., Pei, L., & Chen, T. (2023). Emergence, evolution, challenges and future prospect in LIS education and its impact on job opportunity of LIS education in Pakistan. Collection and Curation, 42(4), 117–127. doi: 10.1108/CC-11-2022-0039.Search in Google Scholar
Suber, P. (2012). Open access. Massachusetts: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9286.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Subaveerapandiyan, A., Sunanthini, C., & Amees, M. (2023). A study on the knowledge and perception of artificial intelligence. IFLA Journal, 49(3), 503–513. doi: 10.1177/03400352231180230.Search in Google Scholar
Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B., & Hartgerink, C. H. (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: An evidence-based review. F1000Research, 5, 63210.12688/f1000research.8460.1Search in Google Scholar
Varalakshmi, R. S. R. (2006). Educating 21st century LIS professionals – The needs and expectations: A survey of Indian LIS professionals and alumni. In C. Khoo, D. Singh & A.S. Chaudhry (Eds.), Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Conference on Library & Information Education & Practice 2006 (A-LIEP 2006), Singapore, 3–6 April 2006 (pp. 338–346). Singapore: School of Communication & Information, Nanyang Technological University.10.2307/40323829Search in Google Scholar
Wyman, A., & Imamverdiyev, M. (2018). Global trends and transformations in library science education. Information and Learning Science, 119(3/4), 215–225.10.1108/ILS-11-2017-0110Search in Google Scholar
Yew, A. C. Y., Chiu, D. K., Nakamura, Y., & Li, K. K. (2022). A quantitative review of LIS programs accredited by ALA and CILIP under contemporary technology advancement. Library Hi Tech, 40(6), 1721–1745.10.1108/LHT-12-2021-0442Search in Google Scholar
Zareef, M., Arif, M., & Jabeen, M. (2023). Research trends in LIS: The case of doctoral research in Pakistan, 1981–2021. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. doi: 10.1177/09610006231161331.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Regular Articles
- An Empirical Evaluation of Research on “Library Management” at the Doctoral Level in India: A Study of the Last 50 Years from 1971 to 2020
- Social Unrest Prediction Through Sentiment Analysis on Twitter Using Support Vector Machine: Experimental Study on Nigeria’s #EndSARS
- Measuring the Concept of PID Literacy: User Perceptions and Understanding of PIDs in Support of Open Scholarly Infrastructure
- Culturally Responsive Librarians: Shifting Perspectives Toward Racial Empathy
- Farmers’ Use of the Mobile Phone for Accessing Agricultural Information in Haryana: An Analytical Study
- How European Research Libraries Can Support Citizen-Enhanced Open Science
- Research Image Management Practices Reported by Scientific Literature: An Analysis by Research Domain
- Adding Perspective to the Bibliometric Mapping Using Bidirected Graph
- Students’ Perspectives on the Application of Internet of Things for Redesigning Library Services at Kurukshetra University
- Whom Do I Ask? First-Time Postpartum Mothers in a Developing Economy
- The Effectiveness of Software Designed to Detect AI-Generated Writing: A Comparison of 16 AI Text Detectors
- Requirements of Digital Archiving in Saudi Libraries in the Light of International Standards: King Fahad National Library as a Model
- Analyzing Hate Speech Against Women on Instagram
- Adequacy of LIS Curriculum in Response to Global Trends: A Case Study of Tanzanian Universities
- COVID-19 Emergency Remote Teaching: Lessons Learned from Five EU Library and Information Science Departments
- Review Article
- Assessing Diversity in Academic Library Book Collections: Diversity Audit Principles and Methods
- Communications
- Twitter Interactions in the Era of the Virtual Academic Conference: A Comparison Between Years
- The Classification of Q1 SJR-Ranked Library and Information Science Journals by an AI-driven “Suspected Predatory” Journal Classifier
- Scopus-Based Study of Sustainability in the Syrian Higher Education Focusing on the Largest University
- Letter to the Editor
- Most Preprint Servers Allow the Publication of Opinion Papers
- SI Communicating Pandemics: COVID-19 in Mass Media
- COVID-19 in Mass Media: Manufacturing Mass Perceptions of the Virus among Older Adults
- Topical Issue: TI Information Behaviour and Information Ethics
- A Compass for What Matters: Applying Virtue Ethics to Information Behavior
- Studies on Information Users and Non-Users: An Alternative Proposal
- Ethical Issues of Human Information Behaviour and Human Information Interactions
- Ethics and Social Responsibility in Information Behavior, an Interdisciplinary Research in Uruguay
Articles in the same Issue
- Regular Articles
- An Empirical Evaluation of Research on “Library Management” at the Doctoral Level in India: A Study of the Last 50 Years from 1971 to 2020
- Social Unrest Prediction Through Sentiment Analysis on Twitter Using Support Vector Machine: Experimental Study on Nigeria’s #EndSARS
- Measuring the Concept of PID Literacy: User Perceptions and Understanding of PIDs in Support of Open Scholarly Infrastructure
- Culturally Responsive Librarians: Shifting Perspectives Toward Racial Empathy
- Farmers’ Use of the Mobile Phone for Accessing Agricultural Information in Haryana: An Analytical Study
- How European Research Libraries Can Support Citizen-Enhanced Open Science
- Research Image Management Practices Reported by Scientific Literature: An Analysis by Research Domain
- Adding Perspective to the Bibliometric Mapping Using Bidirected Graph
- Students’ Perspectives on the Application of Internet of Things for Redesigning Library Services at Kurukshetra University
- Whom Do I Ask? First-Time Postpartum Mothers in a Developing Economy
- The Effectiveness of Software Designed to Detect AI-Generated Writing: A Comparison of 16 AI Text Detectors
- Requirements of Digital Archiving in Saudi Libraries in the Light of International Standards: King Fahad National Library as a Model
- Analyzing Hate Speech Against Women on Instagram
- Adequacy of LIS Curriculum in Response to Global Trends: A Case Study of Tanzanian Universities
- COVID-19 Emergency Remote Teaching: Lessons Learned from Five EU Library and Information Science Departments
- Review Article
- Assessing Diversity in Academic Library Book Collections: Diversity Audit Principles and Methods
- Communications
- Twitter Interactions in the Era of the Virtual Academic Conference: A Comparison Between Years
- The Classification of Q1 SJR-Ranked Library and Information Science Journals by an AI-driven “Suspected Predatory” Journal Classifier
- Scopus-Based Study of Sustainability in the Syrian Higher Education Focusing on the Largest University
- Letter to the Editor
- Most Preprint Servers Allow the Publication of Opinion Papers
- SI Communicating Pandemics: COVID-19 in Mass Media
- COVID-19 in Mass Media: Manufacturing Mass Perceptions of the Virus among Older Adults
- Topical Issue: TI Information Behaviour and Information Ethics
- A Compass for What Matters: Applying Virtue Ethics to Information Behavior
- Studies on Information Users and Non-Users: An Alternative Proposal
- Ethical Issues of Human Information Behaviour and Human Information Interactions
- Ethics and Social Responsibility in Information Behavior, an Interdisciplinary Research in Uruguay