References

Abish, Aynur. 2014. Modality of Kazakh as spoken in China. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2016. Sentence types. In Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), Oxford handbook of mood and modality, 141–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.8Search in Google Scholar

Alpatov, Vladimir A., Peter Arkadiev & Vera Podlesskaya. 2008. Grammatika japonkogo jazyka. [A grammar of Japanese] Moskva: Natalis.Search in Google Scholar

Andvik, Erik E. 2010. A grammar of Tshangla. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004178274.i-490Search in Google Scholar

Antonov, Anton. 2013. Grammaticalization of allocutivity markers in Japanese and Korean in a crosslinguistic perspective. In Martine Robbeets & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Shared grammaticalization: With special focus on the Transeurasian languages, 317–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.132.22antSearch in Google Scholar

Antonov, Anton. 2015. Verbal allocutivity in a cross-linguistic perspective. Linguistic Typology 19(1). 55–85.10.1515/lingty-2015-0002Search in Google Scholar

Arkadiev, Peter & Alexander Letuchiy. 2011. Prefixes and suffixes in the Adyghe polysynthetic wordform: Types of interaction. In Vittorio S. Tomelleri, Manana Topadze & Anna Lukianowicz (eds.), Languages and cultures in the Caucasus, 495–514. München & Berlin: Otto Sagner.Search in Google Scholar

Arkadiev, Peter M. 2018. Morphology in typology: Traditional categories and recent approaches. Manuscript. Submitted to Rochelle Lieber et al. (eds.), The Oxford encyclopedia of morphology. August 2018 version.Search in Google Scholar

Arkhangelskiy, Timofey A. Ms. Clitics in the Besermyan dialect of Udmurthttps://wp.hse.ru/data/2014/10/02/1100269480/10LNG2014.pdf, (accessed 15 February 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Avronin, Valentin A. 1961. Grammatika nanajskogo jazyka. Tom 2. [A Grammar of Nanai. Volume 2] Moskva & Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.Search in Google Scholar

Bal, Krishna B. Ms. Structure of Nepali grammar. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237261579_Structure_of_Nepali_Grammar, (accessed 15 February 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar. 2000. On the syntax of agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Studies in Language 24(3). 583–610.10.1075/sl.24.3.05bicSearch in Google Scholar

Bitkeyev, Piotr Ts., Roza P. Doraeva, Dordži A. Pavlov & Grigorij Ts. Piurbeev. 1983. Grammatika Kalmytskogo Jazyka. [A Grammar of Kalmyk] Elista: Kalmytskoje knizhnoje izdatel’stvo.Search in Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1970[1933]. Language. London & Aylesbury: Compton Printing LTD.Search in Google Scholar

Boye, Kasper 2016. The expression of epistemic modality. In Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera Oxford handbook of mood and modality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brassett, Cecilia, Philip Brassett & Meiyan Lu. 2006. The Tujia language. München: Lincom.Search in Google Scholar

Bugaeva, Anna. 2012. Southern Kuril Ainu. In Nicolas Tranter (ed.), The languages of Japan and Korea, 461–509. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time. The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi. 2010. The cartography of syntactic structures. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 51–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard 2013. Is Siberia a linguistic area? Paper presented at Voices from the Indigenous Siberia, with an emphasis on Yukaghir, 13 December 2013, Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

Cooke, Joseph R. 1989. Thai sentence particles and other topics. Pacific Linguistics Series A-80, Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics No. 12 Canberra: The Australian National University.Search in Google Scholar

Corcu-Gül, Devlet 2006. Analysis of discourse particles in relation to the information structure of texts & dialogues: Examples from Turkish www.semanticsarchive.net/Archive/DVkMDJkZ/Barcelona_Workshop_2005.pdf. (accessed 02 February 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Coupe, Alexander R. 2007. A Grammar of Mongsen Ao. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198522Search in Google Scholar

Cristofaro, Sonia 2013. Using grammars for the purposes of cross-linguistic comparison. A presentation handout. LLACAN, 11/6/2013. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301690626_Using_grammars_for_the_purposes_of_cross-linguistic_comparison, (accessed 15 February 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Cysouw, Michael & Jeff Good. 2013. Languoid, doculect, glossonym: Formalizing the notion ‘language’. Language Documentation and Conservation 7. 331–359.Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 2016. Thoughts on language-specific and crosslinguistic entities. Linguistic Typology 20(2). 427–437.10.1515/lingty-2016-0016Search in Google Scholar

David, Anne Boyle. 2014. Descriptive grammar of Pashto and its dialects. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614512318Search in Google Scholar

Dej-Amorn, Somruedee 2006. The grammar of Green Hmong particles. PhD thesis: Mahidol University.Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1(1). 33–52.10.1515/lity.1997.1.1.33Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 2003. Classical Tibetan. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 255–270. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203214961-40Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 2010. Towards a history of verb agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Himalayan Linguistics 9(1). 1–39.10.5070/H99123042Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 2012. Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 529–564.10.1515/lity-2012-0020Search in Google Scholar

Dik, Simon C. 1997. The theory of functional grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark & Bronwen Whiting. 2011. Quantifying areality: A study of prenasalization in Southeast Asia and New Guinea. Linguistic Typology 15. 101–121.10.1515/lity.2011.005Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Mathew S. 2013. Polar questions. In Mathew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/116, (accessed 08 February 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68(1). 81–138.10.1353/lan.1992.0028Search in Google Scholar

Dum-Tragut, Jasmine. 2009. Armenian: Modern East Armenian. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/loall.14Search in Google Scholar

Enfield, Nick J. & Bernard Comrie. 2015. Mainland Southeast Asian languages. In Nick J. Enfield & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The state of the art, 1–28. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781501501685Search in Google Scholar

Fang, Hongmei. 2018. Mirativity in Mandarin: The Sentence-Final Particle Le (了). Open Linguistics 2018(4). 589–607.10.1515/opli-2018-0029Search in Google Scholar

Feuillet, Jack. 2001. Aire linguistique balkanique. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wolfgang Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals. Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien. La typologie des langues et les universaux linguistiques: An international handbook: Ein internationales Handbuch: Manuel international, 1510–1529. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Gil, David. 2016. Describing languoids: When incommensurability meets the language-dialect continuum. Linguistic Typology 20(2). 432–462.10.1515/lingty-2016-0017Search in Google Scholar

Goddard, Cliff. 2005. The languages of East and Southeast Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gorelova, Liliya. 2002. Manchu grammar. Leiden, Boston & Köln: Brill.10.1163/9789047401148Search in Google Scholar

Greed, Teija. 2014. The expression of knowledge in Tatar. In Y. Aikhenvald Alexandra & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic typology, 69–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701316.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Gupta, Anthea Fraser. 1992. The pragmatic particles of Singapore Colloquial English. Journal of Pragmatics 18. 31–57.10.1016/0378-2166(92)90106-LSearch in Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel & Martin Haspelmath. 2018. Glottolog 3.3. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. http://glottolog.org<http://glottolog.org (accessed 17 April 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Hancil, Sylvie, Alexander Haselow & Margje Post (eds.). 2015a. Final particles. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110375572Search in Google Scholar

Hancil, Sylvie, Alexander Haselow & Margje Post. 2015b. Introduction. In Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow & Margje Post (eds.), Final particles (2015a), 3–38. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110375572Search in Google Scholar

Haselow, Alexander. 2013. Arguing for a wide conceptions of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Lnguistica 47/2. 375–424.10.1515/flin.2013.015Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110884210Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2001. The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wolfgang Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals. Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien. La typologie des langues et les universaux linguistiques: An international handbook: Ein internationales Handbuch: Manuel international, 1492–1510. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2010a. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687.10.1353/lan.2010.0021Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2010b. Framework-free grammatical theory. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 341–368. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0014Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45(1). 31–80.10.1515/flin.2011.002Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2013. Argument indexing: A conceptual framework for the syntactic status of bound person forms. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 197–225. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110331127.197Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2015. Defining vs. diagnosing linguistic categories: A case study of clitic phenomena. In Joanna Błaszczak, Dorota Klimek-Jankowska & Krzysztof Migdalski (eds.), How categorical are categories? 273–303. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614514510-009Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2018. How comparative concepts and descriptive linguistic categories are different. In Daniël Olmen, Tanja Mortelmans & Frank Brisard (eds.), Aspects of linguistic variation, 83–114. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110607963-004Search in Google Scholar

Hewitt, B.G. 1995. Georgian: A structural reference grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/loall.2Search in Google Scholar

Hölzl, Andreas. 2018. A typology of questions in Northeast Asia and beyond: An ecological perspective. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ido, Shinji. 2005. Tajik. München: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Izuhara, Eiko. 1992. Ne’ no komyunikeeshon kinoo [Communicative functions of ne]. In Masanori Fujiwara, Hiroko Kakkenbusshu, Tanomu Kashima, Yosuke Momiyama & Akito Ozaki (eds.), Nihongo Kenkyuu to Nihongo Kyooiku, 159–172. Nagoya: Nagoya Daigaku Shuppankai.Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1971[1931]. K xarakteristike jevrazijskoko jazykovogo sojuza. In Roman. Jakobson (ed.), Selected Writings, vol. 1, 2nd edn., 143–201 The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110889604Search in Google Scholar

Janhunen, Juha. 2012. Mongolian. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/loall.19Search in Google Scholar

Kabak, Barış & Irene Vogel. 2001. The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish. Phonology 18. 315–360.10.1017/S0952675701004201Search in Google Scholar

Kachru, Yamuna. 2006. Hindi. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/loall.12Search in Google Scholar

Kibrik, Andrey. 2011. Cognitive discourse analysis: local discourse structure. In Marcin Grygiel & Laura A. Janda (eds.), Slavic linguistics in a cognitive framework, 273–304. Frankfurt/New York: Peter Lang Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Kibrik, Andrey & Vera Podlesskaya (eds.). 2009. Rasskazy o snovidenijax: Korpusnoe issledovanie ustnogo russkogo diskursa [Narrating dreams: A corpus study of Russian oral discourse]. Moskva: Metatekst.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Chonghyuck 2019. Korean question particles are pronominals: A transparent case of representing discourse participants in the syntax. Forthcoming. https://www.google.ru/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=2ahUKEwilgJHCsMDgAhVNI5oKHeRxCzwQFjAAegQIEBAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fling.auf.net%2Flingbuzz%2F001157%2Fcurrent.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1bQrQfgczBQ1a8WV1k1y53. (accessed 16 February 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Kim, So Yong & Krasimira Aleksova. 2003. Mirativity in Korean and Bulgarian. Paper presented at the Third International Academic Conference of KACEES Bulgaria, Korea, Central & East Europe – Humanities and Social Science, 14th – 15th July, 2003, Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria. http://georgesg.info/belb/personal/aleksova/admirativ_bulgarian_korean_trans.pdf. (accessed 15 February 2019).Search in Google Scholar

King, John T. 2009. A grammar of Dhimal. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria & Bernhard Wälchli. 2001. The circum-Baltic languages: An areal-typological approach. In Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), The circum-Baltic languages: Typology and contacts, 615–750. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.55.15kopSearch in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997. Turkish. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kullman, Rita & D. Tsyrempil. 2001[1996]. Mongolian grammar. Ulaanbaatar: Institute of Language and Literature, Academy of Sciences.Search in Google Scholar

Kwok, Wai-Ying 2006. A study of Cantonese informative sentence-final particles aa3, laa3, wo3 and bo3. Masters thesis: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Search in Google Scholar

LaPolla, Randy. 2003. A grammar of Qiang. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197273Search in Google Scholar

Le, Giang Ha. 2015. Vietnamese sentence-final particles. Masters thesis: University of Southern California.Search in Google Scholar

Ler Soon Lay, Vivien. 2005. An in-depth study of discourse particles in Singapore English. PhD thesis. Singapore: National University of Singapore.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1989[1981]. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, Los Angeles & London: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Xia, Jingfang Li & Yongxian Luo. 2014. A grammar of Zoulei, Southwest China. Bern: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0351-0785-2Search in Google Scholar

Li, Yong-Song. 2011. A study of Dolgan. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Liljegren, Henrik. 2017. Profiling Indo-Aryan in Hindukush-Karakoram: A preliminary study of micro-typological patterns. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 4(1). 107–156.10.1515/jsall-2017-0004Search in Google Scholar

Luke, Kang Kwong. 1990. Utterance particles in Cantonese conversation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.9Search in Google Scholar

Mair, Viktor H. & Jane Hickman (eds.). 2014. Reconfiguring the silk road: New research on the east-west exchange in antiquity. Philadelphia: University of Pensylvania Museum of Archeology and Anthropology.Search in Google Scholar

Malchukov, Andrej L. 1995. Even. München: Lincom.Search in Google Scholar

Malchukov, Andrej L. & Viktor S. Xrakovskij. 2016. The linguistic interaction of mood with modality and other categories. In Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), Oxford handbook of mood and modality, 196–220. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.7Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Samuel. 1992. A reference grammar of Korean. Tokyo: Charles E. Tuttle Company.Search in Google Scholar

Masica, Colin P. 1976. Defining a linguistic area: South Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maslova, Elena. 2003. A grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197174Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip. 1994. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith A. 2016. On linguistic categories. Linguistic Typology 20(2). 417–425.10.1515/lingty-2016-0015Search in Google Scholar

Nedjalkov, Igor. 1997. Evenki. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen, Tam & Thi Minh. 2013. A Grammar of Bih. PhD thesis: University of Oregon.Search in Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna. 2011. Ingush grammar. Berkeley Los Angeles & London: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nikolaeva, Irina. 2014. A grammar of Tundra Nenets. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110320640Search in Google Scholar

Nikolaeva, Irina. 2016. Analyses of the semantics of mood. In Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), Oxford handbook of mood and modality, 68–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nikolaeva, Irina & Maria Tolskaya. 2001. A grammar of Udihe. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110849035Search in Google Scholar

Nuyts, Jan & Johan van der Auwera (eds.). 2016. Oxford handbook of mood and modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pak, Miok 2004. Korean particles and clause types. Manuscript. Georgetown University. https://faculty.georgetown.edu/portnerp/Papers/KoreanParticlesMiokPak.pdf, (accessed 15 February 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, F. R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Panfilov, Vladimir Z. 1965. Grammatika nivxskogo jazyka. Čast’ 2. [A Grammar of Nivkh. Part 2] Moskva & Leningrad: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Panov, Vladimir. 2016. Burjatskie zaključitel’nye časticy v areal’no-tipologičeskoj perspektive [Buryat final particles in the perspective of the areal typology]. Ural-Altaic Studies 4(23). 101–127.Search in Google Scholar

Paul, Waltraud & Victor Junnan Pan. 2017. What you see is what you get: Chinese sentence-final particles as head-final complementisers. In Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds.), Discourse Particles: Formal approaches to their syntax and semantics, 49–77. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110497151-003Search in Google Scholar

Perry, John R. 2005. A Tajik Persian reference grammar. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789047414919Search in Google Scholar

Person, Kirk Roger 2000. Sentence Final Particles in Bisu Narrative. PhD thesis. University of Texas in Arlington.Search in Google Scholar

Peterson, John. 2011. A grammar of Kharia. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004187207.i-474Search in Google Scholar

Plaisier, Heleen. 2007. A grammar of Lepcha. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Plungian, Vladimir & Johan van der Auwera. 2006. Towards a typology of discontinuous past marking. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 59(4). 317–349.10.1524/stuf.2006.59.4.317Search in Google Scholar

Post, Mark W. 2007. A Grammar of Galo. PhD thesis: La Trobe University.Search in Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1995. Outline of classical Chinese grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Search in Google Scholar

Robbeets, Martine. 2017. The Transeurasian languages. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics, 586–626. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781107279872.023Search in Google Scholar

Sabirov, Ravil’ A. 2006. Tatarskij jazyk izučit’ legko. [It’s easy to learn Tatar] Kazan’: Tatarname.Search in Google Scholar

Saigo, Hideki. 2011. The Japanese sentence-final particles in talk-in-interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.205Search in Google Scholar

Sanzheyev, Garma D. 1962. Grammatika buriatskogo jazyka. [A Grammar of Buriat] Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Vostočnoj Literatury.Search in Google Scholar

Say, Sergey S. 2009. Grammatičeskij očerk kalmyckogo jazyka [A sketch of Kalmyk grammar]. In Sergej S. Say, Vlada V. Baranova & Natalia V. Serdobolskaja (eds.), Issledovanija po grammatike kalmytskogo jazyka [Studies on the grammar of Kalmyk]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana V.2. St. Petersburg: Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences.Search in Google Scholar

Shimada, Masaharu & Akiko Nagano. 2017. Miratives in Japanese: The rise of mirative markers via grammaticalization. In Silvio Cruschina & Eva-Maria Remberger (eds.), The rise and development of evidential and epistemic markers, 213–244. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/jhl.7.1-2.09shiSearch in Google Scholar

Skorik, Pyotr Y. 1977. Grammatika čukotskogo jazyka. Čast’ vtoraja. [A Grammar of Chukchi. Part two] Leningrad: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Smeets, Henricus Johannes. 1984. Studies in West Circassian phonology and morphology. Leiden: Hakuchi.Search in Google Scholar

Smyth, David. 2002. Thai: An essential grammar. London, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Sneddon, James N. 1996. Indonesian: A comprehensive grammar. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Soe, Myint 1999. A grammar of Burmese. PhD thesis. Eugene: University of Oregon.Search in Google Scholar

Sohn, Ho-Min. 2001 [1999]. The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Solnit, David B. 1997. Eastern Kayah Li: Grammar, texts, glossary. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.10.1515/9780824841638Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, Andrew & Ana R. Luís. 2012a. A canonical clitic. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 123–150. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604326.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, Andrew & Ana R. Luís. 2012b. Clitics: An introduction. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9781139033763Search in Google Scholar

Stapert, Eugénie. 2013. Contact-induced change in Dolgan: An investigation into the role of linguistic data for the reconstruction of a people’s (pre)history. Utrecht: LOT.Search in Google Scholar

Sun, Hongkai & Guangkun Liu. 2009. A grammar of Anong: Language death under intense contact. Leiden, Boston: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Tamura, Suzuko. 2000. The Ainu language. Tokyo: Sanseido.Search in Google Scholar

Thurgood, Graham, Ela Thurgood & Li Fengxiang. 2014. A grammatical sketch of Hainan Cham. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614516040Search in Google Scholar

Tournadre, Nicholas & Sangda Dorje. 2005. Manual of standard Tibetan: Language and civilization. Boston: Shambhala.Search in Google Scholar

Tournadre, Nicolas & Konchok Jiatso. 2001. Final auxiliary verbs in literary Tibetan and in the dialects. Linguistics of Tibeto-Burman Area 24(1). 49–111.Search in Google Scholar

van Driem, George. 1993. Proto-Tibeto-Burman verbal agreement system. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 56(2). 292–334.10.1017/S0041977X00005528Search in Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1993. A synopsis of role and reference grammar. In Robert D. van Valin Jr. (ed.), Advances in role and reference grammar, 1–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.82.03vanSearch in Google Scholar

Vastenius, Anu. 2011. Expressive Particles in Serbian, Bulgarian, Greek, and Kurdish. BA thesis in General Linguistics. Lunds Universitet.Search in Google Scholar

Vokurová, Zuzana 2008. Epistemic modalities in spoken standard Tibetan. PhD thesis: Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Karlovy – Université Paris 8.Search in Google Scholar

Volodin, Alexander P. 1976. Itel’menskij jazyk. [The Itelmen Language] Moskva: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner-Nagy, Beáta Boglárka. 2018. A grammar of Nganasan. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004382763Search in Google Scholar

Wiemer, Björn. 2004. Population Linguistics on a micro-scale. Lessons to be learnt from Baltic and Slavic dialects in contact. In Bernd Kortmann (ed.), Dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective, 497–526. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Wright, Jonathan Michael. 2009. Hkongso Grammar Sketch. Masters thesis: Graduate Institute of Applied Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Yılmaz, Erkan. 2004. A Pragmatic Analysis of Turkish Discourse Particles Yani, İşte and Şey. PhD thesis: Middle East University.Search in Google Scholar

Zheng, Yiqing. 1997. Huihui Yu Yanjiu. [A study of Cham] Shanghai: Shanghai Yuandong Chuban She.Search in Google Scholar

Zubova, Yulia N. 2013. Sintaksis i semantika častic v besermianskom dielekte udmurtskogo jazyka [Syntax and Semantics of Particles in Besermyan Udmurt]. Masters degree thesis: Russian State University of Humanities (RGGU).Search in Google Scholar

Zwicky, Arnold M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1983. Cliticization vs. Inflection: English N’T. Language 3. 502–213.10.2307/413900Search in Google Scholar