On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else?

Bernd Heine

doi:10.1515/ling-2013-0048

Enjoy 40% off

academic books on De Gruyter Brill *

Article

On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else?

Bernd Heine

Published/Copyright: November 12, 2013

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Linguistics Volume 51 Issue 6

Abstract

Discourse markers have been the subject of a considerable body of recent research. Most commonly, their genesis and development was described in terms of grammaticalization. But there were also alternative approaches to deal with their development, and the term pragmaticalization was proposed to account for features of discourse markers that pose a problem to grammaticalization theory.

In the present paper it is argued that neither grammaticalization nor pragmaticalization are entirely satisfactory in the understanding of the nature of discourse markers. On the basis of recent work on Discourse Grammar (Kaltenböck et al. 2011; Heine et al. 2012) it is argued that the rise of discourse markers involves an operation called cooptation, whereby information units such as clauses, phrases, or words are transferred from the domain of sentence grammar to that of discourse organization.

Keywords: cooptation; discourse marker; grammaticalization; pragmaticalization; thetical

Published Online: 2013-11-12

Published in Print: 2013-11-15

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0048

Keywords for this article

cooptation; discourse marker; grammaticalization; pragmaticalization; thetical