Home Antibody titer 6 months after the third dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination
Article Open Access

Antibody titer 6 months after the third dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination

  • Rikei Kozakai , Susumu Suzuki , Kuniko Hoshi , Yoshihiko Izumi and Shinichiro Takahashi EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 7, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Objectives

Administration of the third dose of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine was initiated on December 1, 2021, in Japan. However, data on the long-term effects of this third vaccination remain scarce. Here, we examined the levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in those who received the Pfizer BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine, 6 months after the third vaccination.

Methods

Samples from 40 healthy volunteers were used to measure SARS-CoV-2 antibodies with chemiluminescent assays against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the virus.

Results

At 445 days after the first dose of BNT162b2, which is 180 days after the third vaccination, the mean anti-RBD IgG level was 159.4 AU/mL (SD 100.1 AU/mL), which was significantly higher than 144 days after the second vaccination, while mean anti-RBD IgM was baseline level (0.4 C.O.I.). The decline in IgG, 180 days after the third vaccination, was 74.1% (SD 16.1%), which was significantly lower than the 88.6% (SD 4.4%) decline observed 144 days after the second vaccination. Furthermore, we revealed that the reduction in IgG from 14 to 180 days after the third vaccination showed a significant inverse correlation with age, and the higher antibody response in younger participants at 14 days after the third vaccination disappeared at longer time points.

Conclusions

The long-term durability of the IgG titer was significantly higher following the third vaccination compared with the second vaccination, and the reduction in IgG titer after the third vaccination inversely correlated with age.

Introduction

As of the middle of July 2022, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) had infected over 558 million individuals worldwide and caused more than 6.36 million deaths. A third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was administered from December, 2021, in Japan. A number of reports have been published regarding the humoral responses induced by and the effectiveness of the third dose of Pfizer BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. However, the long-term persistence of the immune response after the third dose of vaccine has not been reported, especially in healthy volunteers. Our group recently reported the antibody titers and side effects observed after two doses of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine [9], the decline in antibodies 6 months after the first vaccination [10] and the potent incremental increase in the IgG antibody titer after the third vaccination [11]. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the production of IgG after the third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine decreased age-dependently, and the number of side effects generally decreased with age [12]. In the current study, we examined the levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthy volunteers at Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, 6 months after the third vaccination.

Materials and methods

Participants

Vaccines (30 µg of BNT162b2/Comirnaty; Pfizer/BioNTech, New York, NY, USA) were administered at Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital from March 2021. A total of 41 volunteer healthcare workers (31 women and 10 men, mean ± standard deviation [SD] age 40.2 ± 12.9 years) were enrolled in the study [9, 10]. Participants received a first dose of BNT162b2 in March or April 2021, followed by a second identical dose 21 days later. The third vaccination was administered on average on day 265, during December 2021 or January 2022, approximately 8 months after the second vaccination. Sera were collected 14, 35, 180, 264 (1 day before the third vaccination), 279 and 445 days after the first vaccination. The results for the 445-day time point, which is about 6 months after the third vaccination, are presented in this report.

Antibody assays

Antibody titers were evaluated using a newly established, highly sensitive, fully automated chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) designed to specifically detect IgG against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain (RBD), as described previously [9, 10].

Statistical analysis

Humoral immune response data were statistically analyzed using Prism software (version 9.0; GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Tukey’s multiple comparison test was employed to assess the statistical significance of the IgG data at each time point compared with that at day 445. The non-liner regression curve was calculated using the least-squares method, and the extra sum of squares F-test was employed to validate this difference. Correlations between age and the levels of IgG were examined using Spearman’s correlation test. The level of significance was set at p≤0.05.

Results

In total, 40 out of the 41 participants completed 14 months of follow-up since the first dose of BNT162b2 (Table 1). Serum samples were obtained at an average of 445 days (SD 4.8 days) after the first dose of BNT162b2 (Table 1, Figure 1A), which is 180 days after the third vaccination. At this time point, the mean anti-RBD IgG level was 159.4 AU/mL (SD 100.1 AU/mL), compared with the mean anti-RBD IgM baseline level (0.4 C.O.I.) (Table 1, Figure 1B). The mean anti-RBD IgG level was significantly higher than 144 days after the second vaccination.

Table 1:

Humoral responses of study participants 180 days after the third BNT162b2 vaccination.

Participant no. Age, years Gender Days from 1st vaccination IgM (C. O. I.) IgG (AU/mL) IgM decline from day 279, % IgG decline from day 279, %
1 62 M 449 0.2 351.0 91.3 53.8
2 52 F 449 0.2 132.3 85.7 75.8
3 42 M 449 0.1 78.1 50.0 74.7
4 42 F 444 0.2 111.5 89.5 65.8
5 28 F 446 1.4 128.2 17.6 75.2
6 60 F 449 0.2 280.1 33.3 55.6
7 53 M 449 0.1 205.6 75.0 65.2
8 26 F 454 0.4 76.3 55.6 90.5
9 44 F 446 0.6 86.4 −20.0 55.7
10 28 F 451 0.4 86.5 33.3 86.8
11 41 F 447 0.3 45.2 0.0 85.1
12 38 F 447 0.3 75.1 76.9 95.1
13 57 M 447 0.1 65.6 66.7 82.6
14 33 F 441 1.9 62.1 −280.0 75.6
15 37 F 442 0.1 222.1 95.0 75.4
16 44 F 449 0.4 457.3 69.2 9.4
17 27 F 443 2.2 272.4 90.4 73.6
18 56 F 440 0.2 102.2 33.3 88.0
19 56 M 444 0.2 90.1 0.0 79.3
20 41 M 445 0.2 209.0 50.0 56.8
21 26 F 444 0.1 84.8 50.0 85.9
22 28 F 437 0.5 49.9 28.6 76.6
23 64 M 439 0.3 178.6 0.0 61.3
24 40 F 435 0.1 84.5 80.0 87.1
25 32 F 442 0.5 378.7 66.7 75.5
26 28 F 441 0.4 169.1 86.2 84.7
27 57 M 435 0.3 218.0 66.7 46.4
28 33 F 445 0.1 235.6 50.0 56.9
29 63 F 435 0.1 102.8 92.3 81.3
30 48 F 441 0.4 22.4 42.9 88.9
31 41 F 441 0.3 210.1 25.0 77.5
32 39 F 452 0.2 136.7 50.0 83.3
33 37 F 452 0.1 77.0 50.0 85.9
34 23 F 450 0.4 163.6 96.8 87.6
35 23 F 450 0.2 110.5 77.8 84.7
36 23 F 450 0.3 318.8 0.0 60.1
37 24 F 451 0.2 196.5 50.0 67.4
38 37 M 452 0.2 149.8 90.9 90.6
39 27 F 452 0.1 279.6 91.7 85.2
40 62 M 454 0.3 70.2 91.7 75.9
Average 40.2 445.5 0.4 159.4 98.7 74.1
SD 12.9 4.8 0.4 100.1 122.8 16.1
Figure 1: 
(A) Schematic presentation of the sampling procedure. (B) Box plot of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels following vaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine. Current data at day 445 are shown in black, and data at baseline, and on days 14, 35, 180, 264 and 279 are shown in gray and are presented for comparison. Data are shown as boxplots representing the 25th percentile, 75th percentile, median, and 95% confidence interval using Prism software (version 9.0; GraphPad software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Statistical significance of the data at each time point compared with that at day 445, calculated by Tukey’s multiple comparison test, is indicated by asterisks (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001).
Figure 1:

(A) Schematic presentation of the sampling procedure. (B) Box plot of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels following vaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine. Current data at day 445 are shown in black, and data at baseline, and on days 14, 35, 180, 264 and 279 are shown in gray and are presented for comparison. Data are shown as boxplots representing the 25th percentile, 75th percentile, median, and 95% confidence interval using Prism software (version 9.0; GraphPad software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Statistical significance of the data at each time point compared with that at day 445, calculated by Tukey’s multiple comparison test, is indicated by asterisks (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001).

The decline in the IgG level, 180 days after the third vaccination, was 74.1% (SD 16.1%), which was significantly lower than the decline (88.6% [SD 4.4%) even 144 days after the second vaccination (Figure 2). Interestingly, before (R2=0.3512, Spearman’s r=−0.6429, p<0.00001) and 14 days after (R2=0.1481, Spearman’s r=−0.4563, p=0.0027) the third dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, we observed a clear decrease in IgG level with age (12). By contrast, in the current study, at 180 days after the third vaccination, this difference disappeared and no relationship between IgG levels and age was detected (R2=0.000579, Spearman’s r=−0.0572, p=0.8828) (Figure 3A). We further revealed that, the reduction in IgG from 14 to 180 days after the third vaccination significantly inversely correlated with age (R2=0.1514, Spearman’s r=−0.4693, p=0.0131) (Figure 3B). We further calculated percental loss of IgG and found that this reduction was also tended to be decreased with age (R2=0.07426, Spearman’s r=−0.3,056,837, p=0.0889).

Figure 2: 
Comparison of the humoral responses and the duration of the IgG titer after the first and second (red) and third (black) vaccinations. Circles and squares represent the mean value for each time point and the standard deviations are also shown. p-values were calculated from the end point decline using the Mann–Whitney test and Prism software (version 9.0; GraphPad software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Additionally, the non-liner regression curve, calculated using the least-squares method, and the extra sum of the squares F-test was employed to validate this difference (****p<0.0001).
Figure 2:

Comparison of the humoral responses and the duration of the IgG titer after the first and second (red) and third (black) vaccinations. Circles and squares represent the mean value for each time point and the standard deviations are also shown. p-values were calculated from the end point decline using the Mann–Whitney test and Prism software (version 9.0; GraphPad software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Additionally, the non-liner regression curve, calculated using the least-squares method, and the extra sum of the squares F-test was employed to validate this difference (****p<0.0001).

Figure 3: 
Correlation between age at day 445 post-vaccination and (A) IgG levels, and (B) reduction in IgG levels (C) percental loss of IgG levels (i.e., the decline in IgG from 14 days after the third vaccination), with the superimposed linear regression lines (with 95% CI) shown. Black circles represent males and gray circles represent females. Statistical methods were based on Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and p-values are indicated. Linear regression lines, blue.
Figure 3:

Correlation between age at day 445 post-vaccination and (A) IgG levels, and (B) reduction in IgG levels (C) percental loss of IgG levels (i.e., the decline in IgG from 14 days after the third vaccination), with the superimposed linear regression lines (with 95% CI) shown. Black circles represent males and gray circles represent females. Statistical methods were based on Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and p-values are indicated. Linear regression lines, blue.

Discussion

Recently, Padoan et al. [13] reported the SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike protein RBD IgG levels and the neutralizing antibody levels 3–4 months after the third dose of vaccination in healthcare workers. Their study lacked a time point before the third dose vaccination, which meant that it was difficult to interpret the decrease in titer during this 3 to 4-month period. However, in their study, after the second dose vaccination, IgG levels were 2,719.0 (723–4,154.0) kBAU/L in COVID (˗) subjects, compared with 1,076.0 (529.3–3,409.0) kBAU/L 3–4 months after the third dose, which was approximately 40% of the level detected after the second dose. In our current study, the decline in IgG level was 88.6% after the second dose and 74.1%, a significantly lower decrease, after the third dose, which is relatively consistent with Padoan et al. findings that the decline is not so profound after the third dose (13) compared with after the second dose [10]. It was recently published that 3 months after the third vaccination with BNT162b2, the higher levels of neutralization of Delta variants are maintained [14], further confirming the durability of the third vaccination. A similar report was published by Herzberg et al. [15], that antibody levels dropped significantly within a short period of 11 weeks after the third dose, but even after this decline, levels still remained higher than after the second dose.

To date, no report has been published regarding antibody levels 6 months after the third vaccination. Recently, Xin et al. reported the neutralization titers and safety of four regimens involving 6-month follow-up after a booster dose of vaccination in two single-center phase 2 clinical trials [16]. Although they did not assess IgG antibody titers, they reported that the neutralization titers declined approximately 4-fold and 2.5-fold from days 28 to 180 after the third dose in adults aged 18–59 years and those aged 60 years and older, respectively [16]. Our results are consistent with this study, confirming that the older population maintains a similar level of IgG titer compared with the younger population. This finding may indicate the durability of the long-term humoral response in the older population.

The long-term efficacy of BNT162b2 vaccination remains to be determined. However, we found that 6 months after the third vaccination, the mean anti-RBD IgG level was significantly higher than 144 days after the second vaccination, and also we revealed that the waning of the IgG level 6 months after the third vaccination, is significantly less compared with the decline following the second vaccination. The higher rise of IgG antibody titer after the third compared to the second vaccination and the lower decline both result in a higher mean antibody titer 6 months after the third vaccination. Collectively, our results support the utility of the third booster dose in reinforcing the duration of humoral immunity.


Corresponding author: Shinichiro Takahashi, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 1-15-1 Fukumuro, Miyagino-ku, Sendai 983-8536, Japan, E-mail:

Funding source: Shino-Test Corporation Research Fund

Award Identifier / Grant number: N/A

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the generous help of all members of the Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical Hospital including Ms. Yuri Sato, Ms. Nodoka Chida, Ms. Mizue Takahashi, and Ms. Shukuko Iwabuchi. The authors also thank Fujirebio, for support.

  1. Research funding: This work was supported in part by the Shino-Test Corporation Research Fund.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. R.K. and S.T. designed the study. R.K., K.H. and Y.I. provided samples and clinical data. S.S. performed statistical analysis. S.T. prepared the manuscript. All authors participated in discussions and interpretation of the data and results.

  3. Competing interests: RK: provision of reagents (FUJIREBIO), SS, KH, YI: no potential competing interest, ST: granted from Shino-Test Corp. research fund. Outside the submitted work, S.T. is granted from Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (21K07346) from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan, Daiichi-Sankyo Research Support, Kyowa-Kirin Research Support.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: Research involving human subjects complied with all relevant national regulations, institutional policies and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013), and has been approved by the Ethics Committee in Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital in the 2020 fiscal year (2020-2-256).

References

1. Keskin, AU, Bolukcu, S, Ciragil, P, Topkaya, AE. SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody responses after third CoronaVac or BNT162b2 vaccine following two-dose CoronaVac vaccine regimen. J Med Virol 2022;94:39–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27350.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Moreira, EDJr., Kitchin, N, Xu, X, Dychter, SS, Lockhart, S, Gurtman, A, et al.. Safety and efficacy of a third dose of BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med 2022;386:1910–21.10.1056/NEJMoa2200674Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Munro, APS, Janani, L, Cornelius, V, Aley, PK, Babbage, G, Baxter, D, et al.. Safety and immunogenicity of seven COVID-19 vaccines as a third dose (booster) following two doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 or BNT162b2 in the UK (COV-BOOST): a blinded, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet 2021;398:2258–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02717-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Romero-Ibarguengoitia, ME, Rivera-Salinas, D, Hernandez-Ruiz, YG, Armendariz-Vazquez, AG, Gonzalez-Cantu, A, Barco-Flores, IA, et al.. Effect of the third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine on quantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike 1-2 IgG antibody titers in healthcare personnel. PLoS One 2022;17:e0263942. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263942.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Belik, M, Jalkanen, P, Lundberg, R, Reinholm, A, Laine, L, Vaisanen, E, et al.. Comparative analysis of COVID-19 vaccine responses and third booster dose-induced neutralizing antibodies against Delta and Omicron variants. Nat Commun 2022;13:2476. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30162-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Haveri, A, Solastie, A, Ekstrom, N, Osterlund, P, Nohynek, H, Nieminen, T, et al.. Neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant after third mRNA vaccination in health care workers and elderly subjects. Eur J Immunol 2022;52:816–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.202149785.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Spitzer, A, Angel, Y, Marudi, O, Zeltser, D, Saiag, E, Goldshmidt, H, et al.. Association of a third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine with incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among health care workers in Israel. JAMA 2022;327:341–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.23641.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Lustig, Y, Gonen, T, Meltzer, L, Gilboa, M, Indenbaum, V, Cohen, C, et al.. Superior immunogenicity and effectiveness of the third compared to the second BNT162b2 vaccine dose. Nat Immunol 2022;23:940–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-022-01212-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Kozakai, R, Kushida, A, Moumouni, PFAA, Okuma, S, Takahashi, K, Hoshi, K, et al.. Assessment of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination titer and side effects in healthy volunteers. J Lab Med 2022;46:107–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2021-0156.Search in Google Scholar

10. Kozakai, R, Hoshi, K, Izumi, Y, Takahashi, S. Profound decline of antibody titers 6 months after BNT162b2 vaccination in healthy volunteers. J Lab Med 2021;46:147–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2021-0147.Search in Google Scholar

11. Kozakai, R, Hoshi, K, Izumi, Y, Takahashi, S. Assessment of antibody titer after third doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in healthy volunteers. J Lab Med 2022;46:151–3. https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2022-0008.Search in Google Scholar

12. Kozakai, R, Suzuki, S, Fukami, K, Hoshi, K, Izumi, Y, Takahashi, S. Assessment of antibody titer and side effects after third doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in healthy volunteers. J Lab Med 2022;46:171–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2022-0057.Search in Google Scholar

13. Padoan, A, Cosma, C, Della Rocca, F, Barbaro, F, Santarossa, C, Dall’Olmo, L, et al.. A cohort analysis of SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG levels and neutralizing antibodies in fully vaccinated healthcare workers. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;60:1110–5. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0322.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Alidjinou, EK, Demaret, J, Corroyer-Simovic, B, Labreuche, J, Goffard, A, Trauet, J, et al.. Immunogenicity of BNT162b2 vaccine booster against SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron variants in nursing home residents: a prospective observational study in older adults aged from 68 to 98 years. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2022;17:100385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100385.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Herzberg, J, Fischer, B, Becher, H, Becker, AK, Honarpisheh, H, Guraya, SY, et al.. Short-term drop in antibody titer after the third dose of SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine in adults. Vaccines 2022;10:805. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050805.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Xin, Q, Wu, Q, Chen, X, Han, B, Chu, K, Song, Y, et al.. Six-month follow-up of a booster dose of CoronaVac in two single-centre phase 2 clinical trials. Nat Commun 2022;13:3100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30864-w.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2022-07-15
Accepted: 2022-11-24
Published Online: 2022-12-07
Published in Print: 2023-02-23

© 2022 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/labmed-2022-0092/html
Scroll to top button