What Can We Learn by Studying Lawyers’ Involvement in Multidistrict Litigation?

Articles in the same Issue

1. Frontmatter
2. Editorial
3. Special Issue in Honor of Richard A. Nagareda
4. Article
5. Mass Litigation Governance in the Post-Class Action Era: The Problems and Promise of Non-removable State Actions in Multi-district Litigation
6. Comment
7. Using State Test Cases to Settle Multidistrict Litigation? A Comment on “Mass Litigation Governance in the Post-Class Action Era”
8. Article
9. The Mass Tort Bankruptcy: A Pre-History
10. Comment
11. Models of Closure in Mass Torts: A Comment on “The Mass Tort Bankruptcy: A Pre-History”
12. Article
13. Settlement, ADR, and Class Action Superiority
14. Comments
15. Replacing Class Actions with Private ADR: A Comment on “Settlement, ADR, and Class Action Superiority”
16. How Valuable Are Negative Value Claims?
17. Article
18. Repeat Players in Federal Multidistrict Litigation
19. Comments
20. Tribal Rituals of the MDL
21. What Can We Learn by Studying Lawyers’ Involvement in Multidistrict Litigation?
22. Article
23. The Corrective Justice State
24. Comments
25. Revisiting the Government as Plaintiff
26. Keeping the Regulatory Faith