The impact of parity and maternal obesity on the fetal outcomes of a non-selected Lower Saxony population
-
Lars Brodowski
, Niels Rochow
Abstract
Objectives
Maternal obesity during pregnancy is associated with adverse intrauterine events and fetal outcomes and may increase the risk of obesity and metabolic disease development in offspring. Higher parity, regardless of socioeconomic status, is associated with increased maternal body mass index (BMI). In this study, we examined the relationship between parity, maternal obesity, and fetal outcomes in a large sample of mother-neonate pairs from Lower Saxony, Germany.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study examined pseudonymized data of a non-selected singleton cohort from Lower Saxony’s statewide quality assurance initiative. 448,963 cases were included. Newborn outcomes were assessed in relation to maternal BMI and parity.
Results
Maternal obesity was associated with an increased risk of placental insufficiency, chorioamnionitis, and fetal distress while giving birth. This effect was present across all parity groups. Fetal presentation did not differ between BMI groups, except for the increased risk of high longitudinal position and shoulder dystocia in obese women. Maternal obesity was also associated with an increased risk of premature birth, low arterial cord blood pH and low 5-min APGAR scores.
Conclusions
Maternal obesity increases the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. There is a positive correlation between parity and increased maternal BMI. Weight-dependent fetal risk factors increase with parity, while parity-dependent outcomes occur less frequently in multipara. Prevention and intervention programs for women planning to become pregnant can be promising measures to reduce pregnancy and birth complications.
Acknowledgments
The authors greatly appreciate the support of the obstetric hospitals in Lower Saxony and the Ärztekammer Niedersachsen in recruiting participants and providing data.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Author contributions: Conceived and concepted the study: LB CVK MV FK. Study design: LB NR MV. Supervision: LB FK CVK FK SB MV. Analyzed the data: MV NR. Contributed patient information/analysis tools: SB MV NR. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: LB NR EIY. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.
-
Ethical approval: This is a retrospective analysis of birth data from the Lower Saxony Perinatal Survey under the Ethical Approval of the Ethics Committee of the Lower Saxony Medical Association.
References
1. Bianco, AT, Smilen, SW, Davis, Y, Lopez, S, Lapinski, R, Lockwood, CJ. Pregnancy outcome and weight gain recommendations for the morbidly obese woman. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00578-4.Search in Google Scholar
2. Barker, DJ. Fetal programming of coronary heart disease. Trends Endocrinol Metabol 2002;13:364–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1043-2760(02)00689-6.Search in Google Scholar
3. LifeCycle Project-Maternal, O, Childhood Outcomes Study, G, Voerman, E, Santos, S, Inskip, H, Amiano, P, et al.. Association of gestational weight gain with adverse maternal and infant outcomes. JAMA 2019;321:1702–15. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.3820.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
4. Drake, AJ, Reynolds, RM. Impact of maternal obesity on offspring obesity and cardiometabolic disease risk. Reproduction 2010;140:387–98. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep-10-0077.Search in Google Scholar
5. Nelson, SM, Matthews, P, Poston, L. Maternal metabolism and obesity: modifiable determinants of pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod Update 2010;16:255–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmp050.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
6. O’Tierney-Ginn, PPL, Minium, J, Hauguel deMouzon, S, Catalano, PM. Sex-specific effects of maternal anthropometrics on body composition at birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;356:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.031.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
7. Stothard, KJ, Tennant, PW, Bell, R, Rankin, J. Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 2009;301:636–50. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.113.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Aune, D, Saugstad, OD, Henriksen, T, Tonstad, S. Maternal body mass index and the risk of fetal death, stillbirth, and infant death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2014;311:1536–46. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.2269.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Kappel-Latif, S, Zacherl, J, Hejna, M, Westerhoff, M, Tamandl, D, Ba-Ssalamah, A, et al.. * Pancho trial, p53-adapted neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable esophageal cancer completed-mutation rate of the marker higher than expected. Eur Surg ACA Acta chirurgica Austriaca 2018;50:160–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-018-0527-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
10. Rooney, BL, Schauberger, CW. Excess pregnancy weight gain and long-term obesity: one decade later. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:245–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-200208000-00008.Search in Google Scholar
11. Villamor, E, Cnattingius, S. Interpregnancy weight change and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study. Lancet 2006;368:1164–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69473-7.Search in Google Scholar
12. Kehl, S, Dotsch, J, Hecher, K, Schlembach, D, Schmitz, D, Stepan, H, et al.. Intrauterine growth restriction. Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (S2k-level, AWMF registry No. 015/080, October 2016. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2017;77:1157–73. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118908.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
13. Ayres-de-Campos, D, Arulkumaran, S, Panel, FIFMEC. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Introduction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015;131:3–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
14. ACOG Committee Opinion No 579. Definition of term pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:1139–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000437385.88715.4a.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser, 2000; 894:i–xii, 1–253.Search in Google Scholar
16. Wolfe, H. High prepregnancy body-mass index – a maternal-fetal risk factor. N Engl J Med 1998;338:191–2. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199801153380310.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Devlieger, R. Maternal obesity in Europe: where do we stand and how to move forward?: a scientific paper commissioned by the European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, EBCOG. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;201:203–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
18. R Development Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019.Search in Google Scholar
19. McIntyre, HD. Overweight and obesity in Australian mothers: epidemic or endemic? Med J Aust 2012;196:184–8. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja11.11120.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Cunningham, CE, Teale, GR. A profile of body mass index in a large rural Victorian obstetric cohort. Med J Aust 2013;198:39–42. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja12.11033.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
21. Callaway, LK. The prevalence and impact of overweight and obesity in an Australian obstetric population. Med J Aust 2006;184:56–9. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00115.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
22. Magann, EF. The effects of an increasing gradient of maternal obesity on pregnancy outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2013;53:250–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12047.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Athukorala, C. The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women who are overweight or obese. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010;10:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-56.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
24. Usha Kiran, TS. Outcome of pregnancy in a woman with an increased body mass index. BJOG 2005;112:768–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00546.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
25. Han, Z. Maternal underweight and the risk of preterm birth and low birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Int J Epidemiol 2011;40:65–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq195.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
26. Gunderson, EP. Childbearing and obesity in women: weight before, during, and after pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2009;36:317–32. ix. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2009.04.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
27. Cnattingius, S, Lambe, M. Trends in smoking and overweight during pregnancy: prevalence, risks of pregnancy complications, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Semin Perinatol 2002;26:286–95. https://doi.org/10.1053/sper.2002.34771.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
28. Oken, E. Gestational weight gain and child adiposity at age 3 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:322.e1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.11.027.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
29. Oken, E. Maternal gestational weight gain and offspring weight in adolescence. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:999–1006. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e31818a5d50.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
30. Mamun, AA. Associations of gestational weight gain with offspring body mass index and blood pressure at 21 years of age: evidence from a birth cohort study. Circulation 2009;119:1720–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.108.813436.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
31. Celi, F. Epidemiology of overweight and obesity among school children and adolescents in three provinces of central Italy, 1993-2001: study of potential influencing variables. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003;57:1045–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601640.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
32. Hyatt, MA. Maternal parity and its effect on adipose tissue deposition and endocrine sensitivity in the postnatal sheep. J Endocrinol 2010;204:173–9. https://doi.org/10.1677/joe-09-0358.Search in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2020-0614).
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Corner of Academy
- External cephalic version in the outpatient clinic
- Original Articles – Obstetrics
- How COVID-19 pandemic is changing the practice of prenatal screening and diagnosis?
- Analysis of prevalence and sociodemographic conditions among women in labor with and without COVID-19 in public hospitals in Chile
- Influence of Covid-19 infection on fetal thymus size after recovery
- Second trimester fetal thymus size in association to preterm birth
- Heat stable carbetocin vs. oxytocin for the prevention of post-partum hemorrhage in emergency caesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
- Enhanced S100B expression in T and B lymphocytes in spontaneous preterm birth and preeclampsia
- The impact of parity and maternal obesity on the fetal outcomes of a non-selected Lower Saxony population
- Importance of frame rate for the measurement of strain and synchrony in fetuses using speckle tracking echocardiography
- Kidney graft function before pregnancy as a predictor of graft, maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant renal transplant recipients
- Sociodemographic factors affecting perceived stress during pregnancy and the association with immune-mediator concentrations
- Original Articles – Neonates
- Smoking influence on early and late fetal growth
- Maternal oxytocin administration modulates gene expression in the brains of perinatal mice
- Original Articles – Fetus
- Human epididymis protein 4 and fetal lung maturity
- Commentary
- Plato unmasks hidden limits of tele-education
- Letter to the Editors
- COVID-19 delta variant and anxiety and fear in pregnant women
- Reply to: COVID-19 Delta variant and anxiety and fear in pregnant women
- COVID-19 infected pregnant women and cardiotocographic features
- Letter Reply
- Response to the concern that the baseline change in CTG traces does not reflect the impact of maternal COVID-19
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Corner of Academy
- External cephalic version in the outpatient clinic
- Original Articles – Obstetrics
- How COVID-19 pandemic is changing the practice of prenatal screening and diagnosis?
- Analysis of prevalence and sociodemographic conditions among women in labor with and without COVID-19 in public hospitals in Chile
- Influence of Covid-19 infection on fetal thymus size after recovery
- Second trimester fetal thymus size in association to preterm birth
- Heat stable carbetocin vs. oxytocin for the prevention of post-partum hemorrhage in emergency caesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
- Enhanced S100B expression in T and B lymphocytes in spontaneous preterm birth and preeclampsia
- The impact of parity and maternal obesity on the fetal outcomes of a non-selected Lower Saxony population
- Importance of frame rate for the measurement of strain and synchrony in fetuses using speckle tracking echocardiography
- Kidney graft function before pregnancy as a predictor of graft, maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant renal transplant recipients
- Sociodemographic factors affecting perceived stress during pregnancy and the association with immune-mediator concentrations
- Original Articles – Neonates
- Smoking influence on early and late fetal growth
- Maternal oxytocin administration modulates gene expression in the brains of perinatal mice
- Original Articles – Fetus
- Human epididymis protein 4 and fetal lung maturity
- Commentary
- Plato unmasks hidden limits of tele-education
- Letter to the Editors
- COVID-19 delta variant and anxiety and fear in pregnant women
- Reply to: COVID-19 Delta variant and anxiety and fear in pregnant women
- COVID-19 infected pregnant women and cardiotocographic features
- Letter Reply
- Response to the concern that the baseline change in CTG traces does not reflect the impact of maternal COVID-19