Future expressions in a sixth-century Latin translation of Josephus

References

Adams, James Noel. 1976. The text and language of a Vulgar Latin chronicle (Anonymous Valesianus II). London: Institute of Classical Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Adams, James Noel. 1977. The Vulgar Latin of the letters of Claudius Terentianus (P. Mich. VIII, 467–72). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Adams, James Noel. 1991. Some neglected evidence for Latin habeo with infinitive: The order of the constituents. Transactions of the Philological Society 89(2). 131–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968x.1991.tb00404.x.Search in Google Scholar

Adams, James Noel. 2007. The regional diversification of Latin 200 BC – AD 600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511482977Search in Google Scholar

Adams, James Noel. 2013. Social variation and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511843433Search in Google Scholar

Adams, James Noel. 2016. An anthology of informal Latin, 200 BC–AD 900: Fifty texts with translations and linguistic commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139626446Search in Google Scholar

Aerts, Willem Johan. 1965. Periphrastica: An investigation into the use of εἶναι and ἔχειν as auxiliaries and pseudo-auxiliaries in Greek from Homer up to the present day. Amsterdam: A. Hakkert.Search in Google Scholar

Álvarez Rodríguez, Adelino. 2001. El futuro de subjuntivo del latín al romance. Málaga: Analecta Malacitana.Search in Google Scholar

Amenta, Luisa. 2003. Perifrasi aspettuali in Greco e in latino. Milan: Franco Angeli.Search in Google Scholar

Baños, José Miguel. 1996a. Sobre el infinito de futuro pasivo (I): Consideraciones generales. In Ana María Aldama (ed.) De Roma al siglo XX, vol. 1, 31–41. Madrid: Sociedad de Estudios Latinos.Search in Google Scholar

Baños, José Miguel. 1996b. Sobre el infinitivo de futuro pasivo (II): Su desaparición en latín tardío. Cuadernos de Filología Clásica - Estudios Latinos 10(9). 9–20.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Albert AtwoodJr. 1977. An historiographical analysis of the De excidio Hierosolymitano of Pseudo-Hegesippus. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, Charles Edwin. 1910. Syntax of Early Latin. Vol. 1 – The verb. Boston & Leipzig: Allyn & Bacon.Search in Google Scholar

Bentein, Klaas. 2016. Verbal periphrasis in Ancient Greek: Have- and be- constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747093.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bernard, Jacques-Emmanuel. 1998. Historiographical transfers. Josephus, Caesar and the Jewish Privileges. Bulletin du Centre de Recherche Français de Jérusalem 2. 89–100.Search in Google Scholar

Blasco Ferrer, Eduardo. 1984. Storia lingüística della Sardegna. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.10.1515/9783111329116Search in Google Scholar

Blasco Ferrer, Eduardo. 1986. La lingua sarda contemporanea. Della Torre: Cagliari.Search in Google Scholar

Blatt, Franz. 1938. Remarques sur l’histoire des traductions latines. Classica et Mediaevalia 1. 217–246.Search in Google Scholar

Blatt, Franz. 1958. The Latin Josephus I. Aarhus: Acta Jutlandica.Search in Google Scholar

Bourova, Viara. 2005. À la recherché du “conditionnel latin”: les constructions “infinitive + forme de habere” examinées à partir d’un corpus électronique. In Claus D. Pusch, Johannes Kabatek & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Romanistiche Korpuslinguistik 2: Korpora und diachrone Sprachwissenschaft, 303–316. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Bourova, Viara. 2007. Les constructions latines infinitive + habebam vs infinitive + habui et le développement du conditionnel roman. In David Trotter (ed.). Actes du XXIVè Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes, Aberyswyth 2004 2, 461–474. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.10.1515/9783110923582.461Search in Google Scholar

Bourova, Viara & Liliane Tasmowski. 2007. La préhistoire des futurs romans: Ordre des constituants et sémantique. Cahiers Chronos 19. 25–41.10.1163/9789401205191_004Search in Google Scholar

Boysen, Karl (ed.). 1898. Flavii losephii opera ex versione latina antiqua. Pars VI: De Iudaeorum Vetustate sive Contra Apionem Libri II. Prague & Vienna: F. Tempsky. Leipzig: G. Freytag.Search in Google Scholar

Brennan, M. Josephine. 1947. A study of the Clausulae in the Sermons of St. Augustine. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar

Browning, Robert. 1960. Review of F. Blatt, The Latin Josephus. I. Introduction and Text. The Antiquities: Books I–V. Classical Review New Series 10(1). 44–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009840x00172774.Search in Google Scholar

Burton, Philip. 2016. Analytic passives and deponents in classical and later Latin. In James N. Adams & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Early Latin. Continuity or change? 163–179. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316450826.008Search in Google Scholar

Cardini, Franco. 2004. Cassiodoro il grande: Roma, i barbari e il monachesimo. Milan: Jaca Book.Search in Google Scholar

Coleman, Robert. 1971. The origin and development of Latin habeo + infinitive. Classical Quarterly 26. 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838800033930.Search in Google Scholar

Fetzer, Anita. 2011. “I think this is I mean perhaps this is too erm too tough a view of the world but I often think …”: Redundancy as a contextualization device. Language Sciences 33(2). 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2010.10.003.Search in Google Scholar

Fleischman, Suzanne. 1982. The future in thought and language. Diachronic evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Floricic, Franck. 2018. Remarques sur le futur en sardo logudorese. In Sophie Azzopardi & Evelyne Oppermann-Marsaux (eds.), Regards croisés sur le futur en français et dans différentes langues romanes, Linx, 77, 185–208. Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/linx/2543.10.4000/linx.2871Search in Google Scholar

Flusser, David. 1959. Review of “The Latin Josephus… by Franz Blatt” (1958). Qiryat Sefer 34. 458–463 (In Hebrew).Search in Google Scholar

Fruyt, Michèle. 2011. Grammaticalisation in Latin. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax. Volume 4, 661–857. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Glare, Peter Geoffrey William (ed.). 1982. Oxford Latin Dictionary2 (OLD). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Glei, Reinhold F., Maik Goth, Christoph Schülke & Randolf Lukas (eds.). 2021. Medievalia et Humanistica 46. Lanham & London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.10.5771/9781538157916Search in Google Scholar

Halporn, James W. & Mark Vessey (trans.). 2004. Cassiodorus: Institutions of divine and secular learning, on the soul. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.10.3828/978-0-85323-998-7Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2000. Periphrasis. In Geert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung 1. Halbband/Morphology. An international handbook on inflection and word-formation volume 1, 654–664. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110111286.1.9.654Search in Google Scholar

Herman, József & Roger Wright. 2000. Vulgar Latin. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hofmann, Johann Baptist & Anton Szantyr. 1972. Lateinsche Syntax und Stilistik. Munich: Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Search in Google Scholar

Horrocks, Geoffrey. 2010. Greek: A history of the language and its speakers, 2nd edn. Chichester & Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444318913Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, Frede. 1986. The syntax of Medieval Occitan. Tübingen: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783111329277Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, Frede. 1990. Old French and comparative Gallo-Romance syntax. Tübingen: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110938166Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Leslie Webber. 1945. Notes on the style and vocabulary of Cassiodorus’ Institutiones. Classical Philology 40(1). 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1086/362856.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Michael Allan. 1993. Sardinian syntax. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Langslow, David. 2012. Typologies of translation techniques in Greek and Latin. In Alex Mullen & Patrick James (eds.), Multilingualism in the Graeco-Roman worlds, 141–171. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139012775.008Search in Google Scholar

Lavarenne, Maurice. 1959. Sur le sens futur du participe en -dus. Latomus 18. 396.Search in Google Scholar

Leiwo, Martti. 2010. Petronius’ linguistic resources. In Eleanor Dickey & Anna Chahoud (eds.), Colloquial and literary Latin, 281–291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511763267.018Search in Google Scholar

Lembi, Gaia. 2005. The Latin translation of Josephus’ Antiquitates. In Joseph Sievers & Gaia Lembi (eds.), Josephus and Jewish history in Flavian Rome and beyond, 371–381. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789047415527_023Search in Google Scholar

Lepori, Antonio. 2001. Gramàtiga Sarda po is Campidanesus. Duas obras in d’unu libru. Due opere in un libro. Compendio di grammatica Campidanese per italofoni. Quartu Sant’Elena: Edizioni Dessi.Search in Google Scholar

Leumann, Manu. 1962. Lateinisch habere mit Infinitivum. Museum Helveticum 19(1). 65–71.Search in Google Scholar

Levenson, David B. & Thomas R. Martin. 2015. The ancient Latin translations of Josephus. In Honora Howell Chapman & Zuleika Rodgers (eds.), A companion to Josephus, 322–344. Chichester & Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118325162.ch21Search in Google Scholar

Lukas, Randolf. 2021. The Latin translator’s master copy and the existing Greek manuscripts in AJ 1–10. In Reinhold F. Glei, Maik Goth, Christoph Schülke & Randolf Lukas (eds.), Medievalia et Humanistica 46, 149–165. Lanham & London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Lukas, Randolf. 2022. Josephus Latinus, Antiquitates Judaicae Buch 6 und 7. Einleitung, Edition und Kommentar zur Übersetzungstechnik. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Search in Google Scholar

Magni, Elisabetta. 2010. Mood and modality. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax. Volume 2, 193–275. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215458.193Search in Google Scholar

Maltby, Robert. 2002. Gerund and gerundive usage in Isidore of Seville. In Machtelt Bolkestein, Caroline Kroon, Harm Pinkster, H. Wim Remmelink & Rodie Risselada (eds.), Theory and description in Latin linguistics. Selected papers from the 11th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, 219–234. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004409057_016Search in Google Scholar

Markopoulos, Theodore. 2009. The future in Greek: From ancient to medieval. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McElduff, Siobhán. 2013. Roman theories of translation: Surpassing the source. New York & London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203588611Search in Google Scholar

Mynors, Roger Aubrey Baskeville (ed.). 1937. Cassiodori Senatoris Institutiones. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Niese, Benedikt (ed.). 1888–1895. Flavii Iosephi Opera. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Search in Google Scholar

Nuyts, Jan. 2014. Surveying modality and mood: An introduction. In Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 1–8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nuyts, Jan & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), 2014. The Oxford handbook of modality and mood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Oberhelman, Steven M. 1988. The history and development of the Cursus Mixtus in Latin literature. Classical Quarterly 38(1). 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838800031438.Search in Google Scholar

O’Donnell, James Joseph. 1979. Cassiodorus. Berkeley, Los Angeles & London: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pinkster, Harm. 1985. The development of future tense auxiliaries in Latin. Glotta 63. 186–208.Search in Google Scholar

Pinkster, Harm. 1987. The strategy and chronology of the development of future and perfect tense auxiliaries in Latin. In Martin Harris & Paolo Ramat (eds.), The historical development of auxiliaries, 193–223. Berlin, New York & Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110856910.193Search in Google Scholar

Pinkster, Harm. 2015. The Oxford Latin syntax: Volume 1: The simple clause. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283613.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pisano, Simone. 2009. Il futuro e il condizionale analitici in alcune varietà sarde moderne: Genesi di marche grammaticali da forme verbali lessicalmente piene. Bollettino di Studi Sardi 2. 147–166.Search in Google Scholar

Pitkäranta, Reijo. 1978. Studien zum Latein des Victor Vitensis. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Search in Google Scholar

Risch, Ernst. 1984. Gerundivum und Gerundium. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110850772Search in Google Scholar

Rochette, Bruno. 1995. Du grec au latin et du latin au grec. Les problèmes de la traduction dans l’antiquité gréco-latine. Latomus 54(2). 245–261.Search in Google Scholar

Sentí i Pons, Andreu. 2010. La perífrasi deure + inf. en el català preliterari. Génesi i evolució d’una perífrasi Romànica en el seu context lingüístic. In Imma Creus Bellet, Maite Puig & Joan Ramon Veny Mesquida (eds.), Actes del quinzè col·loquí de llengua i literatura catalanes: Universitat de Lleida, 7–11 de setembre de 2009, Volum 1, 107–124. L’abadia de Montserrat: Associació Internacional de Llengua i Literatura Catalanes.Search in Google Scholar

Sentí i Pons, Andreu. 2013. Gramaticalització i subjectivació de la modalitat en català antic. Alicante: Universitat d’Alacant PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Sentí i Pons, Andreu. 2015. Modal verbs, future and grammaticalization in Old Catalan. A cognitive approach. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 14. 179–198. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.162.Search in Google Scholar

Sjögren, Håkan. 1906. Zum Gebrauch des Futurums im Altlateinischen. Uppsala: Akademiska Bokhandeln. Leipzig: Otto Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar

Skahill, Bernard Henry. 1934. The syntax of the Variae of Cassiodorus. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Stotz, Peter. 1996. Handbuch zur lateinischen Sprache des Mittelalter: Dritter Band. Munich: Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Szymanski, Ladislas. 1963. The translation procedure of Epiphanius-Cassiodorus in the “Historia Tripartita”: Books I and II. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Search in Google Scholar

Thesaurus linguae Latinae (ThLL). 1900. Leipzig & Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Tuval, Michael. 2019. Flavius Josephus. In Alexander Kulik, Gabriele Boccaccini, Lorenzo Di Tomasso, David Hamidovic & Michael Stone (eds.), A guide to Early Jewish texts and traditions in Christian transmission, 281–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190863074.003.0014Search in Google Scholar

Van de Vyver, André. 1931. Cassiodore et Son Œuvre. Speculum 6(2). 244–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/2848361.Search in Google Scholar

Van Emde Boas, Emde, Albert Rijksbaron, Luuk Huitink & Mathieu P. de Bakker. 2019. The Cambridge grammar of Classical Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139027052Search in Google Scholar

Varvaro, Alberto. 2013. Latin and the making of the Romance languages. In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Ledgeway Adam (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages, vol. 2, 6–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHO9781139019996.002Search in Google Scholar

Vincent, Nigel & Delia Bentley. 2001. The demise of the Latin future periphrasis in -urus + esse. In Claude Moussy, Jacqueline Dangel, Michèle Fruyt, Léon Nadjo & Lyliane Sznajder (eds.), De lingua Latina novae quaestiones: Actes du Xè Colloque International de Linguistique Latine Paris-Sèvres, 19–23 avril 1999, 143–155. Louvain, Paris & Sterling, VA: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Willis, James A. 1961. Review of F. Blatt, The Latin Josephus. I. Introduction and Text. The Antiquities: Books I–V. Journal of Roman Studies 51. 272–273. https://doi.org/10.2307/298896.Search in Google Scholar