Home Linguistics & Semiotics Latin free-choice pronouns in relation to one another (and to other indefinites)
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Latin free-choice pronouns in relation to one another (and to other indefinites)

  • Alessandra Bertocchi EMAIL logo and Mirka Maraldi
Published/Copyright: October 9, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper reconsiders some of the arguments on free-choice indefinite pronouns in Latin dealt with in Maraldi (2000, Maraldi 2002) and Bertocchi et al. (2010) and tries to deepen the analysis of some of the points introduced there. Since Latin has four different forms all expressing a free-choice meaning, we try to determine in which features they are equivalent and in which they are distinct. We also take into consideration the relation existing between free-choice pronouns, on the one hand, and other indefinite pronouns, on the other, which come to occur in contexts usually reserved to free-choice pronouns.

References

Bertocchi, Alessandra. 2002. The expression of exclusiveness by nisi. In G. Calboli (ed.), Papers on grammar, 8, 25–42. Roma: Herder.10.1515/joll.2002.8.1.25Search in Google Scholar

Bertocchi, Alessandra & Mirka Maraldi. 2003. Some concessive expressions in the passage from Classical to Late Latin. In Heikki Solin, Martti Leiwo & Hilla Halla-aho (eds.), Latin vulgaire-latin tardif VI, 459–477. Hildesheim: Olms-Weidmann.Search in Google Scholar

Bertocchi, Alessandra & Anna Orlandini. 1996. Quelques aspects de la comparaison en latin. Indogermanische Forschungen 101. 195–232.Search in Google Scholar

Bertocchi, Alessandra, Mirka Maraldi & Anna Orlandini. 2010. Quantification. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax, 3, 19–173. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215465.19Search in Google Scholar

Chierchia, Gennaro. 2006. Broaden your views: Implicatures of domain widening and the “logicality” of language. Linguistic Inquiry 37. 535–590.10.1162/ling.2006.37.4.535Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 1983. Quantifier scope ambiguity and definiteness. Berkeley Linguistic Society 9. 25–36.10.3765/bls.v9i0.2018Search in Google Scholar

Ferrarino, Pietro. 1942. Cumque e i composti di -que. Memorie della R. Accademia delle Scienze dell’Istituto di Bologna, Classe di Scienze Morali, serie IV, 4. Bologna: Azzoguidi.Search in Google Scholar

Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2001. The meaning of free choice. Linguistics and Philosophy 24. 659–735.10.1023/A:1012758115458Search in Google Scholar

Gianollo, Chiara. 2013. Latin aliquis as an epistemic indefinite. In S. Chiriacescu (ed.), Proceedings of the VI Nereus International Workshop “Theoretical implications at the syntax/semantics interface in Romance” (Arbeitspapier 127), 55–81. Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin & Ekkehard König. 1998. Concessive conditionals in the languages of Europe. In Johan van der Auwera (ed.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, 563–640. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110802610.563Search in Google Scholar

Hofmann, Johann Baptist & Anton Szantyr. 1972. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. München: C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Search in Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence. 2000. Pick a theory, not just any theory. In Laurence Horn & Yasuhiko Kato (eds.), Negation and polarity: Syntactic and semantic perspectives, 147–192. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence. 2005. Airport 86 revisited: Toward a unified indefinite any. In Gregory Carlson & Francis J. Pelletier (eds.), Reference and quantification. The partee effect, 179–205. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Ioup, Georgette. 1977. Specificity and the interpretation of quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy 1. 233–245.10.1007/BF00351105Search in Google Scholar

Jayez, Jacques & Lucia M. Tovena. 2002. Determiners and (un)certainty. In Brendan Jackson (ed.), Proceedings of SALT XII, 164–183. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.10.3765/salt.v12i0.2861Search in Google Scholar

Kadmon, Nirit & Fred Landman. 1993. Any. Linguistics and Philosophy 16. 353–422.10.1007/BF00985272Search in Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard & Johan van der Auwera. 1988. Clause integration in German and Dutch: Conditionals, concessive conditionals, and concessives. In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 101–133. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.18.07konSearch in Google Scholar

Kühner, Raphael & Carl Stegmann. 1962. Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache, 3. Auflage durchgesehen von A. Thierfelder. München: Max Hueber.Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maraldi, Mirka. 2000. Some remarks on Latin free-choice indefinites. In Gualtiero Calboli (ed.), Papers on grammar, 5, 109–124. Bologna: CLUEB.10.1515/joll.2000.5.1.109Search in Google Scholar

Maraldi, Mirka. 2002. Free-choice quantification and concession in Latin. In Donna Shalev & Lea Savicki (eds), Donum grammaticum: Studies in Latin and Celtic linguistics in honour of Hannah Rosén, 243–253. Louvain: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Muller, Claude. 2010. Quantification dissociée dans les indéfinis Free Choice du français. Langue Française 166. 93–107.10.3917/lf.166.0093Search in Google Scholar

Traina, Alfonso & Tullio Bertotti. 1985. Sintassi normativa della lingua latina. Bologna: Cappelli.Search in Google Scholar

Wackernagel, Jakob. 1928. Vorlesungen über Syntax II. Basel: E. Birkhäuser.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-10-9
Published in Print: 2015-10-1

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 14.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/joll-2015-0008/html
Scroll to top button