Beobachtungen zu den Voraussetzungen des hypothetisch-deduktiven und des hypothetisch-induktiven Argumentierens im Rahmen einer hermeneutischen Konzeption der Textinterpretation
-
Lutz Danneberg
and
Andrea Albrecht
Abstract
The contribution clarifies from an epistemological and hermeneutical perspective some of the indispensable assumptions which are generally made during hypothetical deductive and hypothetical inductive inferences in text interpretations, but which are rarely reflected as such. The modes of inference of the natural sciences often serve as a model for, e. g., a ›hermeneutics of nature‹, even though these modes of inference cannot be directly compared to those of the humanities (1). In order to understand the conditions for making such a comparison, we consider the problem of interpretation conceived as the problem of the arbitrariness of interpretations. This problem, which has the three components of question, of evaluation, and of knowledge, can be solved by a concept of interpretation in which the arbitrariness is avoided or limited by a methodology of text interpretation (2). Meeting the general demands of a theory/methodology of interpretation requires us to explicitly specify the underlying concepts of meaning and interpretation (3). When interpretation is understood as relating a text to a context, the concept of meaning fixes a primary context for this text-context relation. The concept of interpretation associated to the concept of meaning distinguishes further contexts, possibly in a hierarchical order. Relations between different interpretations can then be analyzed as relations between the concepts of meaning and interpretation. Furthermore, disputes about the sense and relevance of questions can then be understood analytically as well as historically. We illustrate this with the example of the question whether Don Quixote was a Marrano. This will show that even with fixed concepts of meaning and interpretation no a priori criteria for the definitive closure of the interpretation of a work of literature can be given (4). Inferences of interpretation presuppose relations of meaning, by which we understand a relation between the signifier and the signified. For poetic texts the manifold dimensions of the differences between semantic, exemplifying, and analogical relations of meaning have to be taken into account, which may, with respect to a given text, be mutually in competition or in support. We illustrate this with the example of Hugo von Hofmannsthal’s Chandos letter. Exemplifications and analogies often enlarge the spectrum of meaning of poetic texts (5). Among the requirements of text interpretations we also count general background assumptions. In addition to heuristic assumptions there are presumptions. While hypothetical assumptions do not have to be justified a priori and while assertions do require proof, for a presumption the burden of proof lies with the critic. The status of a presumption is determined by the epistemic situation in which the interpretation is carried out (6). When the validity of two hypotheses of interpretation is to be compared, the hypotheses have to be evaluated. The evaluation of the plausibility of an interpretation can refer to either the initial hypotheses or the results of the interpretation. We observe that, just like in the natural sciences, evaluative decisions are underdetermined. In this context we also briefly comment on some assumptions concerning the ›inference to the best explanation‹ (7). Finally, we deal with the often raised suspicion of circularity of hermeneutic arguments. This suspicion is frequently declared to be the central difference between inferences in the natural sciences as opposed to inferences in the humanities. Historically, the hermeneutic circle and its inevitability is an invention of modernity. It can be shown systematically that not every circular inference needs to be vicious. Rather, whether it is vicious or not is rather determined by the epistemic situation. As long as the implicit knowledge that guides an argument is not fully explored, the circular or non-circular character of an argument cannot be judged (8).
Literatur
Aristoteles, Metaphysik, hg. von Horst Seidel, übers. von Herman Bonitz, Hamburg 1989.Search in Google Scholar
Aubier, Dominique, Don Quichotte. Prophète d’Israїl, Paris 1966.Search in Google Scholar
Barnes, Barry/David Bloor, Relativism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Science, in: Martin Hollis/Steven Lukes (Hg.), Rationality and Relativism, Cambridge 1982, 21–47.Search in Google Scholar
Bartlett, Steven, James, The Idea of a Metalogic of Reference, Methodology and Science 9 (1976), 85–92.Search in Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Siegmund Jacob, Ausführlicher Vortrag der Biblischen Hermeneutic, hg. von Joachim Christoph Bertram, Halle 1769.Search in Google Scholar
Betz, Gregor, Petitio principii and Circular Argumentation as Seen from a Theory of Dialectical Structures, Synthese 175 (2010), 327–349.10.1007/s11229-009-9512-1Search in Google Scholar
Biro, John, Rescuing Begging the Question, Metaphilosophy 8 (1977), 257–271.10.1111/j.1467-9973.1977.tb00281.xSearch in Google Scholar
Blair, J. Anthony, Walton’s Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. A Critique and Development, Argumentation 15 (2001), 365–379.10.1023/A:1012021017836Search in Google Scholar
Blass, Friedrich, Hermeneutik und Kritik, in: Iwan von Müller (Hg.), Handbuch der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft in systematischer Darstellung, Bd.1, Nördlingen 1886, 147–295.Search in Google Scholar
Böschenstein, Renate/Karl Pestalozzi, Der Brief eines Lords. Kirchensprache und Sprachkrise, in: Joachim Burkhardt (Hg.), Kirchensprache – Sprache der Kirche, Stuttgart/Zürich 1964, 56–89.Search in Google Scholar
Borchardt, Rudolf, Hugo von Hofmannsthals prosaische Schriften [1917], in: R.B., Gesammelte Werke in Einzelbänden, Prosa 1, hg. von Maria Luise Borchardt, Stuttgart 1957, 86–89.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Harald I., A Theory-Laden Observation Can Test a Theory, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (1993), 555–559.10.1093/bjps/44.3.555Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Harald I., Circular Justification, Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1 (1994), 406–414.10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1994.1.193045Search in Google Scholar
Cardaillac Louis (Hg.), Tolède XIIIe-XIIIe. Muselmans, chrétiens et juifs. La savoir et la tolerance, Paris 1992.Search in Google Scholar
Castañares, Wenceslao, Interpretant and Subject. Semiotics or Hermeneutics, Semiotica 81 (1990), 193–202.10.1515/semi.1990.81.3-4.193Search in Google Scholar
Chalmers, Alan, The Theory-Dependence of the Use of Instruments in Science, Philosophy of Science 70 (2003), 493–509.10.1086/376924Search in Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok, Circularity and Reliability in Measurement, Perspectives of Science 3 (1995), 153–172.10.1162/posc_a_00479Search in Google Scholar
Charrak, André, La critique du syllogisme dans Bacon et Descartes, Les Ètudes philosophiques 75 (2005), 469–481.10.3917/leph.054.0469Search in Google Scholar
Cling, Andrew D., Self-Supporting Arguments, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2003), 279–303.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00262.xSearch in Google Scholar
Collins, Harry M., Changing Order. Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. With a New Afterword [1985], Chicago/London 1992.Search in Google Scholar
Collins, Harry M., The Experimenters’ Regress as Philosophical Sociology, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33 (2002), 153–160.10.1016/S0039-3681(01)00033-4Search in Google Scholar
Crease, Robert P., The Play of Nature. Experimentation as Performance, Bloomington 1993.Search in Google Scholar
Danneberg, Lutz, Peirces Abduktionskonzeption als Entdeckungslogik. Eine philosophiehistorische und rezeptionskritische Untersuchung, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 70 (1988), 305–326.10.1515/agph.1988.70.3.305Search in Google Scholar
Danneberg, Lutz, Methodologien. Struktur, Aufbau und Evaluation, Berlin 1989.Search in Google Scholar
Danneberg, Lutz, Interpretation. Kontextbildung und Kontextverwendung, Siegener Periodicum zur internationalen empirischen Literaturwissenschaft 9 (1990), 89–130.Search in Google Scholar
Danneberg, Lutz, Siegmund Jacob Baumgartens biblische Hermeneutik, in: Axel Bühler (Hg.), Unzeitgemäße Hermeneutik. Interpretationstheorien im Denken der Aufklärung, Frankfurt a.M. 1994, 88–157.Search in Google Scholar
Danneberg, Lutz, Die Historiographie des hermeneutischen Zirkels. Fake und fiction eines Behauptungsdiskurses, Zeitschrift für Germanistik N. F. 5 (1995), 611–624 (Danneberg 1995a).Search in Google Scholar
Danneberg, Lutz, Zur Theorie der werkimmanenten Interpretation, in: Wilfried Barner/Christoph König (Hg.), Zeitenwechsel. Germanistische Literaturwissenschaft vor und nach 1945, Frankfurt a. M. 1995, 313–342 (Danneberg 1995b).Search in Google Scholar
Danneberg, Lutz, Wie kommt die Philosophie in die Literatur?, in: Christiane Schildknecht/Dieter Teichert (Hg.), Philosophie in Literatur, Frankfurt a. M. 1996, 19–54.Search in Google Scholar
Danneberg, Lutz, Schleiermachers Hermeneutik im historischen Kontext. Mit einem Blick auf ihre Rezeption, in: Dieter Burdorf/Reinold Schmücker (Hg.), Dialogische Wissenschaft. Perspektiven der Philosophie Schleiermachers, Paderborn 1998, 81–105.Search in Google Scholar
Danneberg, Lutz, Zum Autorkonstrukt und zu einem methodologischen Konzept der Autorintention, in: Fotis Jannidis et al. (Hg.), Rückkehr des Autors. Zur Erneuerung eines umstrittenen Begriffs, Tübingen 1999, 77–105.10.1515/9783110944754.77Search in Google Scholar
Danneberg, Lutz, Kontext, in: Harald Fricke et al. (Hg.), Reallexikon der deutschen Literaturwissenschaft, Bd. 2, Berlin/New York 2000, 333–336.Search in Google Scholar
Danneberg, Lutz, Idem per idem, Geschichte der Germanistik. Mitteilungen 27/28 (2005), 28–30 (Danneberg 2005a).Search in Google Scholar
Danneberg, Lutz, Kontroverstheologie, Schriftauslegung und Logik als donum Dei. Bartholomaeus Keckermann und die Hermeneutik auf dem Weg in die Logik, in: Sabine Beckmann/Klaus Garber (Hg.), Kulturgeschichte Preußens königlich polnischen Anteils in der Frühen Neuzeit, Tübingen 2005, 435–563 (Danneberg 2005b).10.1515/9783110940107.435Search in Google Scholar
Danneberg, Lutz, Weder Tränen noch Logik. Über die Zugänglichkeit fiktionaler Welten, in: Uta Klein/Katja Mellmann/Steffanie Metzger (Hg.), Heuristiken der Literaturwissenschaft. Einladung zu disziplinexternen Perspektiven auf Literatur, Paderborn 2006, 35–83.Search in Google Scholar
Danneberg, Lutz, Schleiermacher und die Hermeneutik, in: Annette B. Baertschi/Colin G. King (Hg.), Die modernen Väter der Antike. Die Entwicklung der Altertumswissenschaften an Akademie und Universität im Berlin des 19. Jahrhunderts, Berlin 2009, 211–276.10.1515/9783110210422.209Search in Google Scholar
Danneberg, Lutz, Keckermann und die Hermeneutik. Ein Kommentar zu den hermeneutischen Regeln in seinem Werk Systema Logicae, in: Ralf Bogner et al. (Hg.), Realität als Herausforderung. Literatur in ihren konkreten historischen Kontexten, Berlin/New York 2011, 161–179.10.1515/9783110253948.161Search in Google Scholar
Danneberg, Lutz, Das Sich-Hineinversetzen und der sensus auctoris et primorum lectorum, in: Andrea Albrecht et al. (Hg.), Theorien, Methoden und Praktiken des Interpretierens, Berlin/New York 2015, 407–458.Search in Google Scholar
Diels, Hermann, Wissenschaft und Prophezeiung, Internationale Monatsschrift für Wissenschaft und Technik 6 (1911), 1–10.Search in Google Scholar
Diemer, Alwin, Elementarkurs Philosophie. Hermeneutik, Düsseldorf/Wien 1977.Search in Google Scholar
Dingle, Herbert, A Re-examination of the Michelson-Morley Experiment, Vistas in Astronomy 9 (1967), 97–100.10.1016/0083-6656(67)90017-7Search in Google Scholar
Dingler, Hugo, Über den Zirkel in der empirischen Begründung der Geometrie, Kant-Studien 30 (1925), 310–330.10.1515/kant.1925.30.1-2.310Search in Google Scholar
Dörries, Matthias, Vicious Circles, or, The Pitfalls of Experimental Virtuosity, in: Michael Heidelberger/Friedrich Steinle (Hg.), Experimental Essays. Versuche zum Experiment, Baden-Baden 1998, 123–140.Search in Google Scholar
Duhem, Pierre, Ziel und Struktur der physikalischen Theorien, Leipzig 1908 (ND Hamburg 1978).Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto, Zeichen. Einführung in einen Begriff und seine Geschichte, Frankfurt a. M. 1977.Search in Google Scholar
Faur, José, Don Quichiotte. Un talmudiste au passé souillé, in: Shmul Trigano (Hg.), Le Juif caché. Marranisme et modernité, Paris 2000, 159–168.Search in Google Scholar
Floridi, Luciano, Sextus Empiricus. The Transmission and Recovery of Scepticism, New York 2002.Search in Google Scholar
Fraher, Richard M., ›Ut nullus describatur reus prius quam convincatur‹. Presumption of Innocence in Medieval Canon Law, in: Stephan Kutter/Kenneth Pennington (Hg.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Medieval Canon Law, Vatican City 1985, 494–506.Search in Google Scholar
Franklin, Allan, How to Avoid the Experimentersʼ Regress, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 25 (1994), 463–491.10.1016/0039-3681(94)90062-0Search in Google Scholar
Gabriel, Gottfried, Kontinentales Erbe und analytische Methode. Nelson Goodman und die Tradition, Erkenntnis 52 (2000), 185–198.10.1023/A:1005557524926Search in Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik [1960], Tübingen ²1965.Search in Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 1: Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik [1960], Tübingen 61990.Search in Google Scholar
Geier, Manfred, Methoden der Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, München 1983.Search in Google Scholar
Ginev, Dimitri, Scientific Progress and the Hermeneutic Circle, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 19 (1988), 391–395.10.1016/0039-3681(88)90006-4Search in Google Scholar
Ginev, Dimitri, On the Hermeneutic Fore-Structure of Scientific Research, Continental Philosophy Review 32 (1999), 143–168.10.1023/A:1006966329046Search in Google Scholar
Ginev, Dimitri, Transformationen der Hermeneutik. Zum Dialog hermeneutischer Philosophie und wissenschaftlichen Forschungsprogrammen, Würzburg 2008.Search in Google Scholar
Godin, Benoît/Yves Gringras, The Experimenters’ Regress. From Scepticism to Argumentation, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33 (2002), 137–152.10.1016/S0039-3681(01)00032-2Search in Google Scholar
Gomperz, Heinrich, Kann die Deduktion zu ›neuen‹ Ergebnissen führen?, Kant-Studien 35 (1930), 466–479.10.1515/kant.1930.35.1-4.466Search in Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson, Languages of Art. An Approach to a Theory of Symbols, Indianapolis 1968.Search in Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson, Replies, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 39 (1981), 273–280.10.2307/430161Search in Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson, Routes of Reference, Critical Inquiry 8 (1981/82), 121–132.10.1086/448143Search in Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast [1955], Cambridge 41983.Search in Google Scholar
Heelan, Patrick A., Natural Science as a Hermeneutic of Instrumentation, Philosophy of Science 50 (1983), 181–204.10.1086/289105Search in Google Scholar
Heelan, Patrick A., Fleck’s Contribution to Epistemology, in: Robert S. Cohen/Thomas Schnelle (Hg.), Cognition and Facts. Materials on Ludwik Fleck, Boston et al. 1986, 287–307.10.1007/978-94-009-4498-5_15Search in Google Scholar
Heelan, Patrick A., Yes! There Is a Hermeneutics of Natural Science. A Rejoinder to Markus, Science in Context 3 (1989), 477–488.10.1017/S0269889700000910Search in Google Scholar
Heelan, Patrick A., Hermeneutical Philosophy and the History of Science, in: Daniel O. Dahlstrom (Hg.), Nature and Scientific Method, Washington 1991, 23–36.10.2307/j.ctv176d3.5Search in Google Scholar
Heelan, Patrick A., Why a Hermeneutical Philosophy of the Natural Sciences?, Man and World 30 (1997), 271–298.10.1023/A:1004203402228Search in Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Sein und Zeit [1926], Tübingen 161986.Search in Google Scholar
Hofmannsthal, Hugo von, Brief des Lord Chandos an Francis Bacon, mit einem Begleittext hg. von Rudolf Hirsch, Darmstadt 1975.Search in Google Scholar
Hruschka, Joachim, Die Unschuldsvermutung in der Rechtsphilosophie der Aufklärung, Zeitschrift für gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 112 (2000), 285–300.Search in Google Scholar
Hutchison, Douglas S., L’Épistemologie du Principe de Contradiction chez Aristote, Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 6 (1988), 213–227.Search in Google Scholar
Jacquette, Dale, Logical Dimensions of Question-Begging Argument, American Philosophical Quarterly 30 (1993), 317–327.Search in Google Scholar
Jahraus, Oliver, Sich selbst interpretierende Texte. Franz Kafkas Von den Gleichnissen, Poetica 26 (1994), 385–408.10.30965/25890530-0260304007Search in Google Scholar
Jens, Walter, Statt einer Literaturgeschichte [1957], Pfullingen 51962.Search in Google Scholar
Kamlah, Wilhelm/Paul Lorenzen, Logische Propädeutik oder Vorschule des vernünftigen Redens, revidierte Ausgabe, Mannheim/Wien/Zürich 1967.Search in Google Scholar
Kaser, Max, Beweislast und Vermutung im römischen Formularprozeß, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung 71 (1954), 221–241.10.7767/zrgra.1954.71.1.221Search in Google Scholar
Kauffeld, Fred J., Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens of Proof in Acts of Proposing and Accusing, Argumentation 12 (1998), 245–266.10.1023/A:1007704116379Search in Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Arthur, Über den Zirkelschluß in der Rechtsfindung [1973], in: A.K., Beiträge zur juristischen Hermeneutik sowie weitere rechtsphilosophische Abhandlungen, Köln et al. 1984, 65–77.Search in Google Scholar
Keckermann, Bartholomäus, Systema logicae. Tribus libris adornatum [1600], Editio Secunda, ab Avthore recognita & emendata, Hanoviae 1603.Search in Google Scholar
Klärner, Holger, Der Schluß auf die beste Erklärung, Berlin/New York 2003.10.1515/9783110906844Search in Google Scholar
Kockelmans, Joseph J., Heidegger and Science, Washington 1985.Search in Google Scholar
Kockelmans, Joseph J., On the Hermeneutic Dimension of Natural Sciences, Ètudes Phénoménologiques 2:3 (1986), 33–81.10.5840/etudphen1986237Search in Google Scholar
Kockelmans, Joseph J., On the Hermeneutical Nature of Modern Natural Science, Man and World 30 (1997), 299–313.10.1023/A:1004259519066Search in Google Scholar
Kockelmans, Joseph J., Ideas for a Hermeneneutic Phenomenology of the Natural Sciences, Dordrecht 2002.10.1007/978-94-010-0379-7Search in Google Scholar
Köller, Wilhelm, Der Peircesche Denkansatz als Grundlage für die Literatursemiotik, in: Achim Eschbach/Wendelin Rader (Hg.), Literatursemiotik, T. 1: Methoden, Analysen, Tendenzen, Tübingen 1980, 39–63.Search in Google Scholar
Köster, Rolf-Jürgen, Die Rechtsvermutung der Unschuld. Historische und dogmatische Grundlagen, Bonn 1979.Search in Google Scholar
Lehrer, Keith, The Knowledge Cycle, Noûs 11 (1977), 17–25.10.2307/2214327Search in Google Scholar
Lehrer, Keith, Knowledge, Oxford 1978.Search in Google Scholar
Lorenzen, Paul, Logik und Hermeneutik, in: P.L., Konstruktive Wissenschaftstheorie, Frankfurt a. M. 1978, 11–21.10.1007/978-3-322-96251-5_1Search in Google Scholar
Martin Luther, Assertio omnium articulorum M. Lvtheri per Bullam Leonis X. novissimman danmatorum [1520], in: D. Martin Luthers Werke. Kritische Gesamtausgabe, Abt. 1, Bd. 7: Schriften, Predigten, Disputationen 1520/21, Weimar 2003 [Nachdruck der Ausgabe 1897], 91–151 (Luther 2003a).Search in Google Scholar
Luther, Martin, Grund und Ursach aller Artikel D. Martin Luthers, so durch römische Bulle unrechtlich verdammt sind [1521], in: D. Martin Luthers Werke. Kritische Gesamtausgabe, Abt. 1, Bd. 7: Schriften, Predigten, Disputationen 1520/21, Weimar 2003 [Nachdruck der Ausgabe 1897], 299–457 (Luther 2003b).Search in Google Scholar
Markus, Gyorgy, Why Is there no Hermeneutics of Natural Sciences? Some preliminary Theses, Science in Context 1 (1987), 5–51.10.1017/S0269889700000041Search in Google Scholar
Martz, Linda, Relations Between Conversos and Old Christians in Early Modern Toledo. Some Different Perspectives, in: Mark D. Meyerson/Edward D. English (Hg.), Christians, Muslims, and Jews in Medieval and Early Modern Spain. Interaction and Cultural Change, Notre Dame, Ind. 1999, 220–240.10.2307/j.ctvpj7bxm.15Search in Google Scholar
McGaha, Michael, Is there a Hidden Jewish Meaning in Don Quixotte, Cervantes. Bulletin of the Cervantes Society of America 24 (2004), 173–188.Search in Google Scholar
McGinn, Colin, Charity, Interpretation, and Belief, Journal of Philosophy 74 (1977), 521–535.10.2307/2025795Search in Google Scholar
Muschg, Adolf, Literatur als Therapie? Ein Exkurs über das Heilsame und das Unheilsame, Frankfurt a. M. 1981.Search in Google Scholar
Pozzi, Lorenzo, Da Ramus a Kant. Il dibattio sulla sillogistica (con appendice su Lewis Carroll), Milano 1981.Search in Google Scholar
Prang, Helmut, Der moderne Dichter und das arme Wort, Germanisch-romanische Monatsschrift 7 (1957), 130–145.Search in Google Scholar
Radder, Hans, Experimental Reproducibility and the Experimenter’ Regress, Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1 (1992), 63–73.10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1992.1.192744Search in Google Scholar
Rapp, Christof, Aristoteles über die Rechtfertigung des Satzes vom Widerspruch, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 47 (1993), 521–541.Search in Google Scholar
Reichelberg, Ruth, Don Quichotte ou le roman d’un Juif masque, Paris 1999.Search in Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Leandro, Don Miguel, judío de Cervantes, Santander 1978.Search in Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley, Should we Attempt to Justify Induction, Philosophical Studies 8 (1957), 45–47.10.1007/BF02308902Search in Google Scholar
Sander, Thoma, Beweislastverteilung und Intuitionen in philosophischen Diskursen, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 34 (2003), 69–97.10.1023/A:1023281715255Search in Google Scholar
Schuhmann, Klaus, Weltbild und Poetik. Zur Wirklichkeitsdarstellung in der Lyrik der BRD bis zur Mitte der siebziger Jahre, Berlin/Weimar 1979.Search in Google Scholar
Schulz, Lorenz, Die praesumtio innocentiae. Verdacht und Vermutung der Unschuld, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung 119 (2002), 193–218.Search in Google Scholar
Seddon, Frederick, The Principle of Contradiction in Metaphysics Gamma, New Scholasticism 55 (1981), 191–207.10.5840/newscholas198155211Search in Google Scholar
Sextus Empiricus, Pyrrhoniae Hypotyposes, ex recensione Immanuelis Bekkeri, Berlin 1842.Search in Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, Begging the Question, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (1999), 174–191.10.1080/00048409912348921Search in Google Scholar
Sporn, Carl, Ein Facsimiledruck des Hofmannsthalschen »Brief des Lord Chandos und Francis Bacon«, Philobiblon 21 (1977), 141–144.Search in Google Scholar
Staiger, Emil, Die Kunst der Interpretation. Studien zur deutschen Literaturgeschichte, Zürich 1955.Search in Google Scholar
Sterne, Laurence, The Works in One Volume, Philadelphia 1830.Search in Google Scholar
Stuckenberg, Carl-Friedrich, Untersuchungen zur Unschuldsvermutung, Berlin/New York 1997.10.1515/9783110906349Search in Google Scholar
Stuckenberg, Carl-Friedrich, Die normative Aussage der Unschuldsvermutung, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 111 (1999), 422–460.10.1515/zstw.1999.111.2.422Search in Google Scholar
Théry, Gabriel, Tolède, grande ville de la renaissance médiévale, pint de jonction entre les cultures musulmane et christienne, Oran 1944.Search in Google Scholar
Turner, Dean/Richard Hazlett (Hg.), The Einstein Myth and the Ives Paper. A Counter-Revolution in Physics. With Commentary, Old Greenwich 1979.Search in Google Scholar
Van Peursen, Cornelis Anthonie, Ars inveniendi. Filosofie van de inventiviteit van Francis Bacon tot Immanuel Kant, Kampen 1993.Search in Google Scholar
Wacke, Andreas, Zur Beweislast im klassischen Zivilprozeß. Giovanni Pugliese versus Ernst Levy, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Romanistische Abteilung 109 (1992), 411–449.Search in Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N., Mill and de Morgan on whether the Syllogism Is a Petitio, International Logic Review 8 (1977), 57–68.Search in Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N., Are Circular Arguments Necessarily Vicious, American Philosophical Quarterly 22 (1985), 263–274.Search in Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N., Arguments from Ignorance, University Park 1995.Search in Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N., Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning, Mahwah 1996 (Walton 1996a).Search in Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N., Plausible Deniability and Evasion of Burden of Proof, Argumentation 10 (1996), 47–58 (Walton 1996b).10.1007/BF00126158Search in Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N., Profiles of Dialogue for Evaluating Arguments From Ignorance, Argumentation 13 (1999), 53–71.10.1023/A:1007738812877Search in Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N., Epistemic and Dialectical Models of Begging the Question, Synthese 152 (2006), 237–284.10.1007/s11229-005-3984-4Search in Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N., Metadialogues for Resolving Burden of Proof Disputes, Argumentation 21 (2007), 291–316.10.1007/s10503-007-9056-9Search in Google Scholar
Wandropper, Bruce W., Duelos y quebrantos. Once Again, Romance Notes 20 (1979/80), 413–417.Search in Google Scholar
Wandropper, Bruce W., An Apology for Philology, Modern Languages Notes 102 (1987), 176–190.Search in Google Scholar
Wedin, Michael V., A Curious Turn in Metaphysics Gamma. Protagoras and Strong Denial of the Principle of Non-Contradiction, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 85 (2003), 107–130.10.1515/agph.2003.007Search in Google Scholar
Weinrich, Harald, Kontraktionen [1968], in: Dietlind Meinecke (Hg.), Über Paul Celan, Frankfurt a. M. 21973, 214–225.Search in Google Scholar
Winko, Simone, Zur Plausibilität als Beurteilungskriterium literaturwissenschaftlicher Interpretationen, in: Andrea Albrecht et al. (Hg.), Theorien, Methoden und Praktiken des Interpretierens, Berlin/Boston 2015, 48–511.Search in Google Scholar
Woods, John/Douglas N. Walton, The Petitio. Aristotle’s Five Ways, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (1982), 77–100.10.1080/00455091.1982.10715784Search in Google Scholar
Wreen, Michael, Light From Darkness, From Ignorance Knowledge, Dialectica 43 (1989), 299–314.10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00947.xSearch in Google Scholar
Zwergel, Herbert A., Principium contradictionis. Die aristotelische Begründung des Prinzips vom zu vermeidenden Widerspruch und die Einheit der Ersten Philosophie, Meisenheim a. G. 1972.Search in Google Scholar
© 2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Special Issue: Hermeneutics and Philosophy of Science
- Beobachtungen zu den Voraussetzungen des hypothetisch-deduktiven und des hypothetisch-induktiven Argumentierens im Rahmen einer hermeneutischen Konzeption der Textinterpretation
- Hermeneutics and Human Nature
- Interpretation and the Hypothetico-Deductive Method: A Dilemma
- Was kann und soll Rationale Rekonstruktion hermeneutischer Interpretationsansätze (nicht) leisten?
- Is There Such a Thing as Narrative Explanation?
- Der Schluss auf die beste Erklärung im Kontext der Literaturinterpretation
- Historische Angemessenheit als hermeneutisches Konzept, Argument oder Problem?
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Special Issue: Hermeneutics and Philosophy of Science
- Beobachtungen zu den Voraussetzungen des hypothetisch-deduktiven und des hypothetisch-induktiven Argumentierens im Rahmen einer hermeneutischen Konzeption der Textinterpretation
- Hermeneutics and Human Nature
- Interpretation and the Hypothetico-Deductive Method: A Dilemma
- Was kann und soll Rationale Rekonstruktion hermeneutischer Interpretationsansätze (nicht) leisten?
- Is There Such a Thing as Narrative Explanation?
- Der Schluss auf die beste Erklärung im Kontext der Literaturinterpretation
- Historische Angemessenheit als hermeneutisches Konzept, Argument oder Problem?
