Exploring the emergence of language-unique event perception and description in children

References

Allen, Shanley & Martha Crago. 1996. Early passive acquisition in Inuktitut. Journal of Child Language 23(1). 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000900010126.Search in Google Scholar

Bates, Elizabeth A. & Brian MacWhinney. 1989. Functionalism and the competition model. The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing, 3–73. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bever, Thomas G. 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In John R. Hayes (ed.), Cognition and language development, 279–362. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Bloom, Lois. 1970. Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Search in Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit & Kenneth Wexler. 1987. The maturation of syntax. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (eds.), Parameter setting. Studies in theoretical psycholinguistics, 4, 123–172. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-009-3727-7_6Search in Google Scholar

Bowerman, Melissa. 1973. Structural relationships in children’s utterances: Syntactic or semantic? In T. Moore (ed.), Cognitive development and the Acquisition of language, 197–213.10.1016/B978-0-12-505850-6.50015-3Search in Google Scholar

Choi, Soonja & Melissa Bowerman. 1991. Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of languagelanguage-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition 41(1–3). 83–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90033-z.Search in Google Scholar

Cychosz, Meg & Marta Salazar. 2016. Acquisition of the passive in Spanish-speaking children. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Reports 12. 308–332. https://doi.org/10.5070/p7121040734.Search in Google Scholar

Deutscher, Guy. 2011. Through the language glass: Why the world looks different in other languages. London: Arrow Books.Search in Google Scholar

Hakuta, Kenji. 1982. Interaction between particles and word order in the comprehension and production of simple sentences in Japanese children. Developmental Psychology 18(1). 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.1.62.Search in Google Scholar

Hinds, John & Yoshihiro Nishimitsu. 1986. Situation and person focus: Nihongorashisa to eigo rashisa [The Characteristics of Japanese and English]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Ikegami, Yoshihiko. 1981. “Suru” to “naru” no gengogaku: Gengo to bunka no taiporojī eno shiron [Linguistics of “Do”and “become”]. Tokyo: Taishūkan.Search in Google Scholar

Ishiguro, Hiroaki. 1985. Developmental study of the comprehension of giving and receiving sentences in Japanese children: Case and point of view. Japanese Journal of Psychology 56. 192–199. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.56.192.Search in Google Scholar

Ito, Hajime. 2016. Nihongo ・Chūgokugo ・Eigo bogowasha ni okeru jitai sannyosha shōtenka no ketteiyōin no sai [The differences among Japanese, Chinese and English native speakers of determining factors that influence which participants are focused on when describing an event]. Kansai kokusai daigaku kenkyu kiyō 17. 11–22.Search in Google Scholar

Ito, Hajime & Pei-Tsuen Wang. 2016. Nihongo ・Chūgokugo ・Eigo ni okeru jitai haaku no ‘kata’ to jitai byōsha no ‘kata’ no kanrensei [The Difference of Event Protective between English, Chinese, and Japanese]. Chengchi Journal of Japanese Studies 13. 21–47.Search in Google Scholar

Ito, Hajime. 2018. Nichieigo bogo washa ni okeru jittai no egakikata no kata no chigai to jittai no toraekata no kata no tigai [Differences in the way of perceiving and describing events between English and Japanese native speakers]. Gengo Kenkyu [Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan] 154. 153–175.Search in Google Scholar

Kanaya, Takehiro. 2004. Eigo ni mo shugo wa nakatta:Nihongo bumpō kara gengo sennen shi e [The subject did not exist also in English]. Tokyo: Kōdansha.Search in Google Scholar

Kunihiro, Tetsuya. 1974. Ningen chūsin to jyōkyō chūsin:nichiei hyōgen kōzō no hikaku [Person-centeredness and Situation-centeredness:A contrastive study of the structure of English and Japanese expressions]. Eigo Seinen 119(11). 48–50.Search in Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu & Etsuko Kaburaki. 1977. Empathy and syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 627–672.Search in Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1978. Danwa no bunpō [Grammar of discourse]. Tokyo: Taishūkan.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1. 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5.Search in Google Scholar

Maratsos, Michael. Dana, Fox E. C. Judith, Becker A. Mary & A. Chalkley. 1985. Semantic restrictions on children’s passives. Cognition 19(2). 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90017-4.Search in Google Scholar

Moerk, Ernst L. 1980. Relationships between parental input frequencies and children’s language acquisition: A reanalysis of Brown’s data. Journal of Child Language 7(1). 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000900007054.Search in Google Scholar

Otomo, Kiyoshi, Susanne Miyata & Yasuhiro Shirai. 2015. Dōshi no goi keitaiso no kakutoku katei: Kakutoku no junjosei to hahaoya kara no gengoteki nyuryoku to no kanrensei [The Acquisition of Verb Morphology in Japanese: Order of Acquisition and Relationships with Maternal Language Input]. Hattatsu shinrigaku kenkyū [The Japanese Journal of Developmental Psychology] 26(3). 197–209.Search in Google Scholar

Rispoli, Mathew. 1987. The acquisition of the transitive and intransitive action verb categories in Japanese. First Language 7(Issue 21). 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272378700702103.Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Robert M W Dixon (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. 1966. Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5. 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(66)80023-3.Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. 1987. Thinking for speaking. Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society, 435–445. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v13i0.1826Search in Google Scholar

Sugisaki, Koji. 1999. Japanese passives in acquisition. UCONN Working Papers in Linguistics 10. 145–156.Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2000. A typology of event conflation. Toward a cognitive semantics: Typology and process in concept structuring. Takao, Takayuki (Trans.) Ibento tōgō no ruikei-ron. In Shigeru Sakahara (ed.), Ninti gengogaku no hatten [Advances in cognitive linguistics], 347–451.10.7551/mitpress/6848.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Tanaka, Nozomi. & Yasuhiro Shirai. 2012. L1 acquisition of Japanese transitive verbs: How do children acquire grammar in the absence of clear evidence? Japanese/Korean Linguistics 21. 281–295.Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2005. Constructing a language: A usage-based Theory of language acquisition. MA: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv26070v8Search in Google Scholar

Whorf, Benjamin L. 1956. Language Thought and reality. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar