Abstract
Let X be an open subset of
Funding source: Division of Mathematical Sciences
Award Identifier / Grant number: 1600327
Funding statement: Partly supported by NSF Grant DMS 1600327.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to express his special gratitudes to Professor Plamen D. Stefanov for introducing the problem and his valuable discussions throughout this work. The author thanks Professor Todd Quinto for his helpful comments. The author also thanks the referees for their valuable comments that have helped in improving the manuscript.
References
[1] G. Beylkin, The inversion problem and applications of the generalized Radon transform, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 37 (1984), no. 5, 579–599. 10.1002/cpa.3160370503Search in Google Scholar
[2] J. Boman and E. T. Quinto, Support theorems for real-analytic Radon transforms, Duke Math. J. 55 (1987), no. 4, 943–948. 10.1215/S0012-7094-87-05547-5Search in Google Scholar
[3] J. M. Bony, Equivalence des diverses notions de spectre singulier analytique, Sèmin. Goulaouic-Schwartz 1976/1977 (1977), Exposé No. 3. Search in Google Scholar
[4] J. Bros and D. Iagolnitzer, Support essentiel et structure analytique des distributions, Sèmin. Goulaouic-Lions-Schwartz 1974/1975 (1975), Exposé No. 18. Search in Google Scholar
[5] C. R. Crawford, K. F. King, C. J. Ritchie and J. D. Godwin, Respiratory compensation in projection imaging using a magnification and displacement model, IEEE Trans. Medical Imag. 15 (1996), 327–332. 10.1109/42.500141Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] L. Desbat, S. Roux and P. Grangeat, Compensation of some time dependent deformations in tomography, IEEE Trans. Medical Imag. 26 (2007), 261–269. 10.1109/TMI.2006.889743Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[7] B. Frigyik, P. Stefanov and G. Uhlmann, The X-ray transform for a generic family of curves and weights, J. Geom. Anal. 18 (2008), no. 1, 89–108. 10.1007/s12220-007-9007-6Search in Google Scholar
[8] V. Guillemin, On some results of Gel’fand in integral geometry, Pseudodifferential Operators and Applications (Notre Dame 1984), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 43, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1985), 149–155. 10.1090/pspum/043/812288Search in Google Scholar
[9] V. Guillemin and S. Sternberg, Geometric Asymptotics, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1977. 10.1090/surv/014Search in Google Scholar
[10] V. Guillemin and S. Sternberg, Some problems in integral geometry and some related problems in microlocal analysis, Amer. J. Math. 101 (1979), no. 4, 915–955. 10.2307/2373923Search in Google Scholar
[11] B. Hahn, Reconstruction of dynamic objects with affine deformations in computerized tomography, J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 22 (2014), no. 3, 323–339. 10.1515/jip-2012-0094Search in Google Scholar
[12] B. N. Hahn, Efficient algorithms for linear dynamic inverse problems with known motion, Inverse Problems 30 (2014), no. 3, Article ID 035008. 10.1088/0266-5611/30/3/035008Search in Google Scholar
[13] B. N. Hahn and E. T. Quinto, Detectable singularities from dynamic Radon data, SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 9 (2016), no. 3, 1195–1225. 10.1137/16M1057917Search in Google Scholar
[14] A. Homan and H. Zhou, Injectivity and stability for a generic class of generalized Radon transforms, J. Geom. Anal. 27 (2017), no. 2, 1515–1529. 10.1007/s12220-016-9729-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[15] L. Hörmander, Fourier integral operators. I, Acta Math. 127 (1971), no. 1–2, 79–183. 10.1007/BF02392052Search in Google Scholar
[16] L. Hörmander, Uniqueness theorems and wave front sets for solutions of linear differential equations with analytic coefficients, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 24 (1971), 671–704. 10.1002/cpa.3160240505Search in Google Scholar
[17] L. Hörmander, The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators. III: Pseudodifferential operators, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 274, Springer, Berlin, 1985. Search in Google Scholar
[18] A. Katsevich, Improved cone beam local tomography, Inverse Problems 22 (2006), no. 2, 627–643. 10.1088/0266-5611/22/2/015Search in Google Scholar
[19] A. Katsevich, Motion compensated local tomography, Inverse Problems 24 (2008), no. 4, Article ID 045012. 10.1088/0266-5611/24/4/045012Search in Google Scholar
[20] A. Katsevich, An accurate approximate algorithm for motion compensation in two-dimensional tomography, Inverse Problems 26 (2010), no. 6, Article ID 065007. 10.1088/0266-5611/26/6/065007Search in Google Scholar
[21] A. Katsevich, M. Silver and A. Zamyatin, Local tomography and the motion estimation problem, SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 4 (2011), no. 1, 200–219. 10.1137/100796728Search in Google Scholar
[22] A. I. Katsevich, Local tomography for the limited-angle problem, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 213 (1997), no. 1, 160–182. 10.1006/jmaa.1997.5412Search in Google Scholar
[23] V. P. Krishnan, A support theorem for the geodesic ray transform on functions, J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 15 (2009), no. 4, 515–520. 10.1007/s00041-009-9061-5Search in Google Scholar
[24] V. P. Krishnan and E. T. Quinto, Microlocal analysis in tomography, Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging. Vol. 1, 2, 3, Springer, New York (2015), 847–902. 10.1007/978-1-4939-0790-8_36Search in Google Scholar
[25] F. Natterer, The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography, B. G. Teubner, Stuttgart, 1986. 10.1007/978-3-663-01409-6Search in Google Scholar
[26] S. Roux, L. Desbat, A. Koenig and P. Grangeat, Exact reconstruction in 2d dynamic ct: Compensation of time-dependent affine deformations, Phys. Medicine Biol. 49 (2004), 2169–2182. 10.1088/0031-9155/49/11/004Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[27] M. Sato, Hyperfunctions and partial differential equations, Proceedings of the International Conference on Functional Analysis (Tokyo 1969), Tokyo University Press, Tokyo (1970), 91–4. Search in Google Scholar
[28] J. Sjöstrand, Singularités analytiques microlocales, Astérisque 95 (1982), 1–166. Search in Google Scholar
[29] P. Stefanov and G. Uhlmann, Stability estimates for the X-ray transform of tensor fields and boundary rigidity, Duke Math. J. 123 (2004), no. 3, 445–467. 10.1215/S0012-7094-04-12332-2Search in Google Scholar
[30] M. E. Taylor, Pseudodifferential Operators, Princeton Math. Ser. 34, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1981. 10.1515/9781400886104Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Numerical solution of a source identification problem: Almost coercivity
- Invertibility and stability for a generic class of radon transforms with application to dynamic operators
- A class of homotopy with regularization for nonlinear ill-posed problems in Hilbert space
- Inverse nodal problems for integro-differential operators with a constant delay
- Unique continuation for a reaction-diffusion system with cross diffusion
- On solenoidal-injective and injective ray transforms of tensor fields on surfaces
- The Ivanov regularized Gauss–Newton method in Banach space with an a posteriori choice of the regularization radius
- Identification of point sources in an elliptic equation from interior measurements: Application to a seawater intrusion problem
- Tikhonov regularization with ℓ0-term complementing a~convex penalty: ℓ1-convergence under sparsity constraints
- On the travel time tomography problem in 3D
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Numerical solution of a source identification problem: Almost coercivity
- Invertibility and stability for a generic class of radon transforms with application to dynamic operators
- A class of homotopy with regularization for nonlinear ill-posed problems in Hilbert space
- Inverse nodal problems for integro-differential operators with a constant delay
- Unique continuation for a reaction-diffusion system with cross diffusion
- On solenoidal-injective and injective ray transforms of tensor fields on surfaces
- The Ivanov regularized Gauss–Newton method in Banach space with an a posteriori choice of the regularization radius
- Identification of point sources in an elliptic equation from interior measurements: Application to a seawater intrusion problem
- Tikhonov regularization with ℓ0-term complementing a~convex penalty: ℓ1-convergence under sparsity constraints
- On the travel time tomography problem in 3D