Abstract
Increasing risks and crises present a challenging new normal for contemporary emergency management. It is important for public organizations to build robust government structures that can adapt to changing circumstances, rather than conform to rigid established procedures. Nevertheless, scholars have not fully explored how the transition to such robustness develops after crisis events. This paper fills the research gap by proposing an event-driven policy process model based on 171 identified crisis event studies, whereby a crisis drives learning that leads to changes in government structures or policy processes. Using a systematic review of the literature, we find that variation in crisis type and scale of impact influence subsequent policy dynamics that are critical to learning by governments. Key process dynamics (e.g. agenda setting, policy formulation, and implementation) and various types of learning are identified in the crisis-driven process that leads to robustness in public organizations. In addition, the role of scientific evidence and learning decay also play roles in this transition.
-
Declaration of conflicting interests: There’s no financial/personal interest or belief that could affect their objectivity.
| Coding variables | Inter-coder reliability (%) |
|---|---|
| Types of event | 100 |
| Scale | 100 |
| Agenda setting | 61.5 |
| Evidence | 84.6 |
| Policy formulation | 84.6 |
| Policy implementation | 69.2 |
| Instrumental learning | 76.9 |
| Social policy leaning | 76.9 |
References
Ager, A. A., R. Lasko, V. Myroniuk, S. Zibtsev, M. A. Day, U. Usenia, V. Bogomolov, I. Kovalets, and C. R. Evers. 2019. “The Wildfire Problem in Areas Contaminated by the Chernobyl Disaster.” Science of the Total Environment 696: 133954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133954.Search in Google Scholar
Albright, E. A. 2011. “Policy Change and Learning in Response to Extreme Flood Events in Hungary: An Advocacy Coalition Approach.” Policy Studies Journal 39 (3): 485–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00418.x.Search in Google Scholar
Albright, E. A., and D. A. Crow. 2021. “Capacity Building Toward Resilience: How Communities Recover, Learn, and Change in the Aftermath of Extreme Events.” Policy Studies Journal 49 (1): 89–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12364.Search in Google Scholar
Anderies, J. M., and M. A. Janssen. 2013. “Robustness of Social-Ecological Systems: Implications for Public Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 41 (3): 513–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12027.Search in Google Scholar
Ansell, C., E. Sørensen, and J. Torfing. 2020. “The COVID-19 Pandemic as a Game Changer for Public Administration and Leadership? The Need for Robust Governance Responses to Turbulent Problems.” Public Management Review 23 (7): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272.Search in Google Scholar
Argyris, C. 1977. “Double Loop Learning in Organizations.” Harvard Business Review 55 (5): 115–25.Search in Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., and B. D. Jones. 1991. “Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems.” The Journal of Politics 53 (4): 1044–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131866.Search in Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., and B. D. Jones. 2002. Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Beck, U., S. Lash, and B. Wynne. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Washington: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Berry, F. S., and W. D. Berry. 1990. “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis.” The American Political Science Review 84 (2): 395–415. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963526.Search in Google Scholar
Birkland, T. A. 1997. After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Birkland, T. A. 1998. “Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda Setting.” Journal of Public Policy 18 (1): 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x98000038.Search in Google Scholar
Birkland, T. A. 2004. ““The World Changed Today”: Agenda-Setting and Policy Change in the Wake of the September 11 Terrorist Attacks.” Review of Policy Research 21 (2): 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00068.x.Search in Google Scholar
Birkland, T. A. 2006. Lessons of Disaster: Policy Change After Catastrophic Events. Washington: Georgetown University Press.10.1353/book13054Search in Google Scholar
Birkland, T. A. 2019. An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making, 5th ed. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315292335Search in Google Scholar
Birkland, T., and S. Waterman. 2008. “Is Federalism the Reason for Policy Failure in Hurricane Katrina?” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 38 (4): 692–714. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjn020.Search in Google Scholar
Bobrow, D. 2006. “Policy Design: Ubiquitous, Necessary and Difficult.” In Handbook of Public Policy, edited by B. Guy Peters, and J. Pierre, 75–96. London: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781848608054.n5Search in Google Scholar
Bobrow, D. B., and J. S. Dryzek. 1987. Policy Analysis by Design. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bodas, M., T. D. Kirsch, and K. Peleg. 2020. “Top Hazards Approach–Rethinking the Appropriateness of the All-Hazards Approach in Disaster Risk Management.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 47: 101559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101559.Search in Google Scholar
Boin, A., E. Stern, and B. Sundelius. 2016. The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership Under Pressure. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316339756Search in Google Scholar
Boin, A., and P. ’t Hart. 2003. “The Crisis Approach.” In Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research, edited by J. D. Delamater, 429–43. New York: Springer.Search in Google Scholar
Bond, A., A. Morrison-Saunders, J. A. E. Gunn, J. Pope, and F. Retief. 2015. “Managing Uncertainty, Ambiguity and Ignorance in Impact Assessment by Embedding Evolutionary Resilience, Participatory Modelling and Adaptive Management.” Journal of Environmental Management 151: 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.030.Search in Google Scholar
Bulkow, K., J. Urban, and W. Schweiger. 2013. “The Duality of Agenda-Setting: The Role of Information Processing.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 25 (1): 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/eds003.Search in Google Scholar
Burby, R. J. 2006. “Hurricane Katrina and the Paradoxes of Government Disaster Policy: Bringing About Wise Governmental Decisions for Hazardous Areas.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 604 (1): 171–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205284676.Search in Google Scholar
Capano, G., and J. J. Woo. 2017. “Resilience and Robustness in Policy Design: A Critical Appraisal.” Policy Sciences 50 (3): 399–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9273-x.Search in Google Scholar
Carolan, M. S. 2007. “One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Flood Management Policy in the United States.” Environmental Politics 16 (1): 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010601073507.Search in Google Scholar
Collier, J., S. Balakrishnan, and Z. Zhang. 2020. “Comparing Actions and Lessons Learned in Transportation and Logistics Efforts for Emergency Response to Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Harvey.” Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 17 (3): 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2019-0022.Search in Google Scholar
Comfort, L. K., W. L. Waugh, and B. A. Cigler. 2012. “Emergency Management Research and Practice in Public Administration: Emergence, Evolution, Expansion, and Future Directions.” Public Administration Review 72 (4): 539–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02549.x.Search in Google Scholar
Crow, D. A. 2010. “Policy Entrepreneurs, Issue Experts, and Water Rights Policy Change in Colorado.” Review of Policy Research 27 (3): 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00443.x.Search in Google Scholar
Crow, D. A., and E. A. Albright. 2021. Community Disaster Recovery: Moving from Vulnerability to Resilience. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009053457Search in Google Scholar
Crow, D. A., E. A. Albright, and E. A. Koebele. 2019. “Stakeholder Participation and Strategy in Rulemaking: A Comparative Analysis.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 19 (2): 208–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440018821655.Search in Google Scholar
Crow, D. A., L. A. Lawhon, J. Berggren, J. Huda, E. Koebele, and A. Kroepsch. 2017. “A Narrative Policy Framework Analysis of Wildfire Policy Discussions in Two Colorado Communities.” Politics & Policy 45 (4): 626–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12207.Search in Google Scholar
Davis, G. L., and A. Robbin. 2015. “Network Disaster Response Effectiveness: The Case of ICTs and Hurricane Katrina.” Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 12 (3): 437–67.10.1515/jhsem-2014-0087Search in Google Scholar
De Guzman, E. M., and Asian Disaster Response Unit. 2003. “Towards Total Disaster Risk Management Approach.” In United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. New York: Asian Disaster Response Unit.Search in Google Scholar
DeLeon, P. 1999. “The Stages Approach to the Policy Process: What has it Done? Where is it Going.” In Theories of the Policy Process 1, edited by P. A. Sabatier, 19–32. Boulder: Westview Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1954. The Public and Its Problems. Athens: Swallow Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S. 1983. “Don’t Toss Coins in Garbage Cans: A Prologue to Policy Design.” Journal of Public Policy 3 (4): 345–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x00007510.Search in Google Scholar
Du Gay, P. 2005. The Values of Bureaucracy. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199275458.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Duguid, K. 2021. “Cost of Flood Damage to U.S. Homes Will Increase by 61 % in 30 Years.” Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/cost-flood-damage-us-homes-will-increase-by-61-30-years-2021-02-22/ (accessed March 8, 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Engle, N. L. 2011. “Adaptive Capacity and Its Assessment.” Global Environmental Change 21 (2): 647–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.019.Search in Google Scholar
Entman, R. M. 1993. “Framing: Towards Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.Search in Google Scholar
Fifer, N., and S. K. Orr. 2013. “The Influence of Problem Definitions on Environmental Policy Change: A Comparative Study of the Y Ellowstone Wildfires.” Policy Studies Journal 41 (4): 636–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12035.Search in Google Scholar
Gilabert, P., and H. Lawford-Smith. 2012. “Political Feasibility: A Conceptual Exploration.” Political Studies 60 (4): 809–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00936.x.Search in Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. 1998. The Theory of Institutional Design. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gunnell, J. G. 1993. The Descent of Political Theory: The Genealogy of an American Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Head, B. W., and J. Alford. 2015. “Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management.” Administration & Society 47 (6): 711–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601.Search in Google Scholar
Hilgartner, S., and C. L. Bosk. 1988. “The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model.” American Journal of Sociology 94 (1): 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1086/228951.Search in Google Scholar
Hill, M., and N. L. Engle. 2013. “Adaptive Capacity: Tensions Across Scales.” Environmental Policy and Governance 23 (3): 177–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1610.Search in Google Scholar
Howlett, M., G. Capano, and M. Ramesh. 2018. “Designing for Robustness: Surprise, Agility and Improvisation in Policy Design.” Policy and Society 37 (4): 405–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1504488.Search in Google Scholar
Howlett, M., M. Ramesh, and A. Perl. 2003. “Studying Policy Dynamics: Policy Cycles and Regimes.” In A Modern Guide to Public Policy, edited by G. Capano, and M. Howlett. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Howlett, M., M. Ramesh, and A. Perl. 2009. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Huber-Stearns, H. R., C. Schultz, and A. S. Cheng. 2019. “A Multiple Streams Analysis of Institutional Innovation in Forest Watershed Governance.” Review of Policy Research 36 (6): 781–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12359.Search in Google Scholar
Jaeger, C. C., T. Webler, E. A. Rosa, and O. Renn. 2013. Risk, Uncertainty And Rational Action. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315071817Search in Google Scholar
James, T. E., and P. D. Jorgensen. 2009. “Policy Knowledge, Policy Formulation, and Change: Revisiting a Foundational Question.” Policy Studies Journal 37 (1): 141–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00300.x.Search in Google Scholar
Jenkins-Smith, H. C., and P. A. Sabatier. 1994. “Evaluating the Advocacy Coalition Framework.” Journal of Public Policy 14 (2): 175–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x00007431.Search in Google Scholar
Kettl, D. F. 2020. “States Divided: The Implications of American Federalism for Covid-19.” Public Administration Review 80 (4): 595–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13243.Search in Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.Search in Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: HaperCollins Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Kouzmin, A., A. M. G. Jarman, and U. Rosenthal. 1995. “Inter-Organizational Policy Processes in Disaster Management.” Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 4: 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653569510082669.Search in Google Scholar
Leung, W., B. Noble, J. Gunn, and J. A. G. Jaeger. 2015. “A Review of Uncertainty Research in Impact Assessment.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 50: 116–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.09.005.Search in Google Scholar
Majone, G. 1975. “On the Notion of Political Feasibility.” European Journal of Political Research 3 (3): 259–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1975.tb00780.x.Search in Google Scholar
May, P. 1992. “Policy Learning and Failure.” Journal of Public Policy 12 (4): 331–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x00005602.Search in Google Scholar
May, P. 2003. “Policy Design and Implementation.” In Handbook of Public Administration, edited by B. Guy Peters, and J. Pierre, 223–33. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781848608214.n18Search in Google Scholar
McEntire, D. A., C. Fuller, C. W. Johnston, and R. Weber. 2002. “A Comparison of Disaster Paradigms: The Search for a Holistic Policy Guide.” Public Administration Review 62 (3): 267–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00178.Search in Google Scholar
Mitchell, T., and K. Harris. 2012. “Resilience: A Risk Management Approach.” United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/globalplatform/entry_bg_paper∼7552.pdf (accessed March 8, 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Montpetit, É. 2003. Misplaced Distrust: Policy Networks and the Environment in France, the United States, and Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.Search in Google Scholar
Morgan, M. G., M. Henrion, and M. Small. 1990. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511840609Search in Google Scholar
Nigg, J. M., J. Barnshaw, and M. R. Torres. 2006. “Hurricane Katrina and the Flooding of New Orleans: Emergent Issues in Sheltering and Temporary Housing.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 604 (1): 113–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205285889.Search in Google Scholar
O’Donovan, K. 2017. “Policy Failure and Policy Learning: Examining the Conditions of Learning After Disaster.” Review of Policy Research 34 (4): 537–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12239.Search in Google Scholar
OECD. 2011. Strategic Agility for Strong Societies and Economies. Paris: OECD. https://one.oecd.org/document/GOV/PGC/PGR(2012)1/en/pdf#:∼:text=The%20concept%20of%20strategic%20agility%20has%20the%20potential,and%20enhancing%20the%20mobility%20of%20people%20and%20knowledge.Search in Google Scholar
Olsen, J. P. 2006. “Maybe It is Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui027.Search in Google Scholar
Olsen, J. P. 2017. Democratic Accountability, Political Order, and Change: Exploring Accountability Processes in an Era of European Transformation. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198800606.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Olsson, P., L. H. Gunderson, S. R. Carpenter, P. Ryan, L. Lebel, C. Folke, and C. S. Holling. 2006. “Shooting the Rapids: Navigating Transitions to Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems.” Ecology and Society 11 (1): 18. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-01595-110118.Search in Google Scholar
Perry, R. W. 2007. “What is a Disaster?” In Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by H. Rodríguez, E. L. Quarantelli, and R. R. Dynes, 1–15. New York: Springer.Search in Google Scholar
Petticrew, M., and H. Roberts. 2006. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470754887Search in Google Scholar
Running, S. W. 2006. “CLIMATE CHANGE: Is Global Warming Causing More, Larger Wildfires?” Science 313 (5789): 927–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130370.Search in Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A. 1991. “Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process.” PS: Political Science & Politics 24 (2): 147–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096500050630.Search in Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A., and C. M. Weible. 2019. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Innovations and Clarifications.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by C. M. Weible, and P. A. Sabatier, 189–220. Boulder: Westview Press.10.4324/9780367274689-7Search in Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M., and M. S. Lund. 1989. “The Tools Approach: Basic Analytics.” In Beyond Privatization: The Tools of Government Action, edited by L. M. Salamon, 23–50. Washington: Urban Institute Press.Search in Google Scholar
Scheufele, D. A., and S. Iyengar. 2012. “The State of Framing Research: A Call for New Directions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication Theories, 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Schneider, A., and H. Ingram. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2939044.Search in Google Scholar
Schneider, M., and P. Teske. 1992. “Toward a Theory of the Political Entrepreneur: Evidence from Local Government.” American Political Science Review 86 (3): 737–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964135.Search in Google Scholar
Severson, A. W., and E. A. Coleman. 2015. “Moral Frames and Climate Change Policy Attitudes.” Social Science Quarterly 96 (5): 1277–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12159.Search in Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1985. “Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science.” American Political Science Review 79 (2): 293–304. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956650.Search in Google Scholar
Simonovic, S. P., and R. Arunkumar. 2016. “Comparison of Static and Dynamic Resilience for a Multipurpose Reservoir Operation.” Water Resources Research 52 (11): 8630–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018634.Search in Google Scholar
Singh, S. P., and M. Swanson. 2017. “How Issue Frames Shape Beliefs About the Importance of Climate Change Policy across Ideological and Partisan Groups.” PLoS One 12 (7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181401.Search in Google Scholar
Sørensen, E., and C. Ansell. 2021. “Towards a Concept of Political Robustness.” Political Studies 71 (1): 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321721999.Search in Google Scholar
Staber, U., and J. Sydow. 2002. “Organizational Adaptive Capacity: A Structuration Perspective.” Journal of Management Inquiry 11 (4): 408–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492602238848.Search in Google Scholar
Stone, D. 1999. “Learning Lessons and Transferring Policy Across Time, Space and Disciplines.” Politics 19 (1): 51–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.00086.Search in Google Scholar
Svara, J. H. 2001. “The Myth of the Dichotomy: Complementarity of Politics and Administration in the Past and Future of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 61 (2): 176–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00020.Search in Google Scholar
Tierney, K. 2014. The Social Roots of Risk: Producing Disasters, Promoting Resilience. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Global Change Research Program. 2018. Fourth National Climate Assessment. Washington: U.S. Global Change Research Program.Search in Google Scholar
Vigoda-Gadot, E., and S. Mizrahi. 2014. Managing Democracies in Turbulent Times: Trust, Performance, and Governance in Modern States. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-54072-1Search in Google Scholar
Waugh, W. L., Jr. 2004. “The “All-Hazards” Approach Must be Continued.” Journal of Emergency Management 2 (1): 11–2. https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2004.0003.Search in Google Scholar
Weaver, R. K. 2010. Automatic Government: The Politics of Indexation. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Search in Google Scholar
Weible, C. M. 2007. “An Advocacy Coalition Framework Approach to Stakeholder Analysis: Understanding the Political Context of California Marine Protected Area Policy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17 (1): 95–117, https://doi-org.aurarialibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.1093/jopart/muj015.10.1093/jopart/muj015Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, W. 1887. The Study of Administration. n.p. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/012371528 (accessed March 8, 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, W. 1941. “The Study of Administration.” Political Science Quarterly 56 (4): 481–506. https://doi.org/10.2307/2143644.Search in Google Scholar
Wolfe, M., B. D. Jones, and F. R. Baumgartner. 2013. “A Failure to Communicate: Agenda Setting in Media and Policy Studies.” Political Communication 30 (2): 175–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737419.Search in Google Scholar
Yeo, J., and C. C. Knox. 2019. “Public Attention to a Local Disaster Versus Competing Focusing Events: Google Trends Analysis Following the 2016 Louisiana Flood.” Social Science Quarterly 100 (7): 2542–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12666.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Crisis as Opportunities for Robust Government: A Systematic Review of Policy Process Literature
- Evaluating the Quality of State Hazard Mitigation Plans Based on Hazard Identification, Risk, and Vulnerability Assessments
- The Homeland Kaleidoscope: Perceptions of Threats and Coping Among Israeli Civilians in a Diversity of Conflict Zones
- Distribution Center Location Selection in Humanitarian Logistics Using Hybrid BWM–ARAS: A Case Study in Türkiye
- Associations Between Public Service Motivation, Depression and Anxiety Among Firefighters: A Chain Mediation Model of Employee Resilience and Job Satisfaction
- In Defense of Disinformation
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Crisis as Opportunities for Robust Government: A Systematic Review of Policy Process Literature
- Evaluating the Quality of State Hazard Mitigation Plans Based on Hazard Identification, Risk, and Vulnerability Assessments
- The Homeland Kaleidoscope: Perceptions of Threats and Coping Among Israeli Civilians in a Diversity of Conflict Zones
- Distribution Center Location Selection in Humanitarian Logistics Using Hybrid BWM–ARAS: A Case Study in Türkiye
- Associations Between Public Service Motivation, Depression and Anxiety Among Firefighters: A Chain Mediation Model of Employee Resilience and Job Satisfaction
- In Defense of Disinformation