The idiodynamic method: willingness to communicate and anxiety processes interacting in real time

References

Al-Tamimi, Alaa. 2020. The effects of emotional decoding on eliciting empathetic responses in language teachers: An idiodynamic case study. Sharjah: American University of Sharjah MA Thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Bonett, Douglas G. & Thomas A. Wright. 2000. Sample size requirements for estimating Pearson, Kendall and Spearman correlations. Psychometrika 65(1). 23–28.10.1007/BF02294183Search in Google Scholar

Boudreau, Carmen, Peter D. MacIntyre & Jean-Marc Dewaele. 2018. Enjoyment and anxiety in second language communication: An idiodynamic approach. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 8(1). 149–170.10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.1.7Search in Google Scholar

Ducker, Nathan. 2020. Crossing the Rubicon: An idiodynamic investigation into the relationship between willingness to communicate and learner talk. Birmingham: Aston University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Elahi Shirvan, Majid & Nahid Talebzadeh. 2017. English as a foreign language learners’ anxiety and interlocutors’ status and familiarity: An idiodynamic perspective. Polish Psychological Bulletin 48(4). 489–503.10.1515/ppb-2017-0056Search in Google Scholar

Elahi Shirvan, Majid & Nahid Talebzadeh. 2018. Exploring the fluctuations of foreign language enjoyment in conversation: An idiodynamic perspective. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 47(1). 21–37.10.1080/17475759.2017.1400458Search in Google Scholar

Elahi Shirvan, Majid G., Khajavy Hassan, Peter D. MacIntyre & Tahereh Taherian. 2019. A meta-analysis of L2 willingness to communicate and its three high-evidence correlates. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 48. 1241–1267.10.1007/s10936-019-09656-9Search in Google Scholar

Gregersen, Tammy & Peter D. MacIntyre. 2017. Idiodynamics: An innovative method to build emotional intelligence through systematic self-assessment/reflection/critique. In Tammy Gregersen & Peter D. MacIntyre (eds.), Innovative practices in language teacher education, 33–53. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-51789-6_3Search in Google Scholar

Gregersen, Tammy, Peter D. MacIntyre & Mario Meza. 2014. Motion of emotion: Idiodynamic case studies of learners’ foreign language anxiety. The Modern Language Journal 98. 574–588.10.1111/modl.12084Search in Google Scholar

Gregersen, Tammy, Peter D. MacIntyre & Tucker Olson. 2017. Do you see what I feel? An idiodynamic assessment of expert and peers’ reading of nonverbal anxiety cues. In Christina Gkonou, Mark Daubney & Jean-Marc Dewaele (eds.), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications, 158–191. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783097722-008Search in Google Scholar

Gudykunst, William. 1995. A model of uncertainty reduction in intercultural encounters. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 4. 79–98.10.1177/0261927X8500400201Search in Google Scholar

Gudykunst, William & Robin Shapiro. 1996. Communication in everyday interpersonal and intergroup encounters. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 20. 19–45.10.1016/0147-1767(96)00037-5Search in Google Scholar

Gudykunst, William & Yun Kim Young. 2003. Communicating with strangers. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Search in Google Scholar

Hiver, Phil & Ali H. Al-Hoorie. 2020. Research methods for complexity theory in applied linguistics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/HIVER5747Search in Google Scholar

Hodis, Georgeta M., Nilanjana R. Bardhan & Flaviu A. Hodis. 2010. Patterns of change in willingness to communicate in public speaking contexts: A latent growth modeling analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research 38(3). 248–267.10.1080/00909882.2010.490840Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, R. Burke & Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher 33(7). 14–26.10.3102/0013189X033007014Search in Google Scholar

Kang, Su-Ja. 2005. Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System 33. 277–292.10.1016/j.system.2004.10.004Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Marc. 2011. Dynamic systems approaches: Cool enough? Hot enough? Child Development Perspectives 5. 279–285.10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00190.xSearch in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Peter D. 1994. Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports 11. 135–142.10.1080/08824099409359951Search in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Peter D. 2012. The idiodynamic method: A closer look at the dynamics of communication traits. Communication Research Reports 29(4). 361–367.10.1080/08824096.2012.723274Search in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Peter D. 2019. Anxiety/uncertainty management and communication accommodation in women’s brief dyadic conversations with a stranger: An idiodynamic approach. SAGE Open 9(3). 1–18.10.1177/2158244019861482Search in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Peter D. 2020. Expanding the theoretical base for the dynamics of willingness to communicate. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 10(1). 111–131.10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.1.6Search in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Peter D. & Alicia Serroul. 2015. Motivation on a per-second timescale: Examining approach-avoidance motivation during L2 task performance. In Zoltán Dörnyei, Peter D. MacIntyre & Alastair Henry (eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning, 109–138. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783092574-013Search in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Peter D. & Jason Legatto. 2011. A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics 32(2). 149–171.10.1093/applin/amq037Search in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Peter D., Patricia Babin & Richard Clément. 1999. Willingness to communicate: Antecedents and consequences. Communication Quarterly 47. 215–229.10.1080/01463379909370135Search in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Peter D., Baker Susan, Clément Richard & Donovan Leslie. 2002. Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning 52. 537–564.10.1111/1467-9922.00194Search in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Peter D., Tammy Gregersen & Phil Hiver. 2017. Nonverbal communication strategies and competence appraisals: An idiodynamic perspective. In Paper presented at the Situated Strategy Use Conference, Komotini, Greece, 28–30 September.Search in Google Scholar

McCroskey, James. 1992. Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly 40. 16–25.10.1080/01463379209369817Search in Google Scholar

Mercer, Sarah. 2016. The contexts within me: L2 self as a complex dynamic system. In Jim King (ed.), The dynamic interplay between context and the language learner, 11–28. London: Palgrave.10.1057/9781137457134_2Search in Google Scholar

Nagle, Charles, Pavel Trofimovich & Anne Bergeron. 2019. Toward a dynamic view of second language comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41. 647–672.10.1017/S0272263119000044Search in Google Scholar

Pawlak, Mirosław, Anna Mystkowska-Wiertelak & Jakub Bielak. 2016. Investigating the nature of classroom willingness to communicate (WTC): A micro-perspective. Language Teaching Research 20(5). 654–671.10.1177/1362168815609615Search in Google Scholar

Siegler, Robert & Kevin Crowley. 1991. The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist 46. 606–620.10.1037/0003-066X.46.6.606Search in Google Scholar

Stephan, Walter, Stephan Cookie White & Gudykunst William. 1999. Anxiety in intergroup relations: A comparison of anxiety/uncertainty management theory and integrated threat theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 23. 613–628.10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00012-7Search in Google Scholar

Thelen, Esther & Linda Smith. 1994. A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2524.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Marijn, Marjolijn Verspoor & Wander Lowie. 2011. Variability and DST. In Marjolijn Verspoor, Kees de Bot & Wander Lowie (eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development, 55–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.29.04vanSearch in Google Scholar

Verspoor, Marjolijn, Kees de Bot & Wander Lowie (eds.). 2011. A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.29Search in Google Scholar

Wood, David. 2016. Willingness to communicate and second language speech fluency: An idiodynamic investigation. System 60. 11–28.10.1016/j.system.2016.05.003Search in Google Scholar