Online task planning and L2 oral fluency: does manipulating time pressure affect fluency in L2 monologic oral narratives?

References

Ahmadian, Mohammad. 2012. The relationship between working memory capacity and L2 oral performance under task-based careful online planning condition. Tesol Quarterly 46(1). 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.8.Search in Google Scholar

Ahmadian, Mohammad & Mansoor Tavakoli. 2014. Investigating what second language learners do and monitor under careful online planning conditions. Canadian Modern Language Review 70(1). 50–75. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1769.Search in Google Scholar

Ahmadian, Mohammad, Mansoor Tavakoli & Hossein Dastjerdi. 2015. The combined effects of online planning and task structure on complexity, accuracy and fluency of L2 speech. Language Learning Journal 43(1). 41–56.10.1080/09571736.2012.681795Search in Google Scholar

Awwad, Anas. 2019. L2 learners’ and professionals’ perceptions of cognitive task complexity: Towards developing an index of task difficulty. Journal of Asia TEFL 16(2). 468. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.2.2.468.Search in Google Scholar

Awwad, Anas & Parvaneh Tavakoli. 2019. Task complexity, language proficiency and working memory: Interaction effects on second language speech performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-0378 (Epub ahead of print).Search in Google Scholar

Awwad, Anas, Parvaneh Tavakoli & Clare Wright. 2017. “I think that’s what he’s doing”: Effects of intentional reasoning on second language (L2) speech performance. System 67. 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.05.002.Search in Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2008. Doing phonetics by computer: Praat: Ver 4.5.01 [Computer program software]. Available at: http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.Search in Google Scholar

Breck, Eric. 1998. SoundScriber. Michigan: University of Michigan. Available at: http://www-personal.umich.edu/∼ebreck/code/sscriber/.Search in Google Scholar

Bui, Gavin & Peter Skehan. 2018. Complexity, accuracy, and fluency. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0046.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0046Search in Google Scholar

Bui, Gavin & Zeping Huang. 2018. L2 fluency as influenced by content familiarity and planning: Performance, measurement, and pedagogy. Language Teaching Research 22(1). 94–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816656650.Search in Google Scholar

Bui, Gavin, Mohammad Javad Ahmadian & Ann-Marie Hunter. 2019. Spacing effects on repeated L2 task performance. System 81. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.006.Search in Google Scholar

Bygate, Martin & Virginia Samuda. 2005. Integrative planning through the use of task repetition. In Rod Ellis (ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language, vol. 11, 37–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/lllt.11.05bygSearch in Google Scholar

Dawadi, Saraswati. 2019. Roles of planning and tasks in EFL performance. Journal for English as a Second Language TESL-EJ 23(2). 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v24i1-2.27677.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2005. Planning and task performance in a second language, vol. 11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/lllt.11Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2009. The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics 30(4). 474–509. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp042.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod & Fanguan Yuan. 2005. The effects of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In Rod Ellis (ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language, vol. 11, 167–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/lllt.11.11ellSearch in Google Scholar

Foster, Pauline. 2020. Oral fluency in a second language: A research agenda for the next ten years. Language Teaching 53(4). 446–461. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026144482000018x.Search in Google Scholar

Foster, Pauline, Alan Tonkyn & Gillian Wigglesworth. 2000. Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics 21(3). 354e375. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354.Search in Google Scholar

Geng, Xu & Gibson Ferguson. 2013. Strategic planning in task-based language teaching: The effects of participatory structure and task type. System 41(4). 982–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.09.005.Search in Google Scholar

Housen, Alex & Folkert Kuiken. 2009. Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 30(4). 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp048.Search in Google Scholar

Housen, Alex, Folkert Kuiken & Ineke Vedder. 2012. Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA, vol. 32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/lllt.32Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Nayoung. 2020. Conditions and tasks: The effects of planning and task complexity on L2 speaking. Journal of Asia TEFL 17(1). 34–52. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.1.3.34.Search in Google Scholar

Kormos, Judit. 2006. Speech production and second language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Kormos, Judit & Mariann Dénes. 2004. Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System 32(2). 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

Lennon, Paul. 2000. The lexical element in spoken second language fluency. In Heidi Riggenbach (ed.), Perspectives on fluency, 25–42. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levelt, Willem. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Miyake, Akira & Priti Shah (eds.). 1999. Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174909Search in Google Scholar

Nakatsuhara, Fumiyo, Parveneh Tavakoli & Anas Awwad. 2019. Towards a model of multi-dimensional performance of C1 level speakers assessed in the Aptis Speaking Test. ARAGs Research Reports Online. London: The British Council.Search in Google Scholar

Panahzadeh, Vahid & Bita Asadi. 2019. On the impacts of pressured vs. unpressured online task planning on EFL students’ oral production in classroom and testing contexts. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics 5(3). 341–352. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.651267.Search in Google Scholar

Segalowitz, Norman. 2010. Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203851357Search in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter. 1998. A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1177/003368829802900209Search in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter. 2009. Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics 30(4). 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047.Search in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter. 2014. The context for researching a processing perspective on task performance. In Peter Skehan (ed.), Processing Perspectives on Task Performance, vol. 5, 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/tblt.5.01skeSearch in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter. 2015. Limited attention capacity and cognition. In Martin Bygate (ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT, vol. 8, 123–155. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/tblt.8.05skeSearch in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter & Pauline Foster. 1999. The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning 49(1). 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00071.Search in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter & Pauline Foster. 2005. Strategic and on-line planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In Rod Ellis (ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language, vol. 11, 193–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/lllt.11.12skeSearch in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter, Bei Xiaoyue, Li Qian & Zhan. Wang. 2012. The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance. Language Teaching Research 16(2). 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811428414.Search in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter, Pauline Foster & Sabrina Shum. 2016. Ladders and snakes in second language fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 54(2). 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9992.Search in Google Scholar

SPSS, Inc. 2015. Statistical package for the social sciences I. SPSS for Windows. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Shungo, Judit Kormos & Takum Uchihara. 2021. The relationship between utterance and perceived fluency: A meta-analysis of correlational studies. The Modern Language Journal 105. 2.10.1111/modl.12706Search in Google Scholar

Tavakoli, Parvaneh. 2019. Automaticity, fluency and second language performance. In Zhisheng Wen & Mohammad Ahmadian (eds.), Researching L2 task performance and pedagogy, 39–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/tblt.13.03tavSearch in Google Scholar

Tavakoli, Parvaneh. 2020. Making fluency research accessible to second language teachers: The impact of a training intervention. Language Teaching Research. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820951213.Search in Google Scholar

Tavakoli, Parvaneh & Ann-Marie Hunter. 2018. Is fluency being ‘neglected’in the classroom? Teacher understanding of fluency and related classroom practices. Language Teaching Research 22(3). 330–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817708462.Search in Google Scholar

Tavakoli, Parvaneh & Clare Wright. 2020. Second language speech fluency: From research to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108589109Search in Google Scholar

Tavakoli, Parvaneh & Peter Skehan. 2005. Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In Rod Ellis (ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language, 11, 239–273. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/lllt.11.15tavSearch in Google Scholar

Tavakoli, Parvaneh & Pauline Foster. 2008. Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning 58(2). 439–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00446.x.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Zhan. 2014. On-line time pressure manipulations. In Peter Skehan (ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance, vol. 5, 27–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.5.02wanSearch in Google Scholar

Wang, Zhan, Peter Skehan & Gaowei Chen. 2019. The effects of hybrid online planning and L2 proficiency on video-based speaking task performance. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 3(1). 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.37398.Search in Google Scholar

Yuan, Fangyuan & Rod Ellis. 2003. The effects of pre‐task Planning and on‐Line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics 24(1). 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.1.1.Search in Google Scholar