Noticing without negotiation?: What L2 Spanish learners report hearing in peer-produced language

References

ACTFL. 2015. ACTFL performance descriptors for language learners. https://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/ACTFLPerformance-Descriptors.pdf. (accessed 11 July 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Gillian & George Yule. 1983. Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod, Helen Basturkmen & Shawn Loewen. 2001. Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning 51(2). 281–318.10.1111/1467-9922.00156Search in Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. Anders & Herbert A. Simon. 1984. Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fernández Dobao, Ana. 2016. Peer interaction and learning: A focus on the silent learner. In Masatoshi Sato & Susan Ballinger (eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda, 33–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.45.02ferSearch in Google Scholar

Gass, Susan, Ildikó Svetics & Sarah Lemelin. 2003. Differential effects of attention. Language Learning 53(3). 497–545.10.1111/1467-9922.00233Search in Google Scholar

Gass, Susan M. & Alison Mackey. 2000. Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Gass, Susan M. & Larry Selinker. 2008. Second language acquisition: An introductory course. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9780203932841Search in Google Scholar

Gass, Susan M. & Evangeline M. Varonis. 1994. Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16(3). 283–302.10.1017/S0272263100013097Search in Google Scholar

Leow, Ronald P. 2001. Attention, awareness and foreign language behavior. Language Learning 51. 113–155.10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00016.xSearch in Google Scholar

Linell, P. 2009. Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy & Leila Ranta. 1997. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19. 37–66.10.1017/S0272263197001034Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy, Kazuya Saito & Masatoshi Sato. 2013. Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching 46(1). 1–40.10.1017/S0261444812000365Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, Alison. 2006. Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics 27(3). 405–430.10.1093/applin/ami051Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, Alison, Susan Gass & McDonough Kim. 2000. How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(4). 471–497.10.1017/S0272263100004010Search in Google Scholar

Malovrh, Paul A. 2008. A multifaceted analysis of the interlanguage development of Spanish direct-object clitic pronouns observed in L2-learner production. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Peace, Meghann M. 2014. That was the goal, for her to understand: Spanish anaphora in L2 speech. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Peace, Meghann M. 2015. Other-orientation in non-native Spanish and its effects on the direct object. Foreign Language Annals 48(4). 669–687.10.1111/flan.12166Search in Google Scholar

Philp, Jenefer. 2003. Constraints on ‘noticing the gap’: Nonnative speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25. 99–126.10.1017/S0272263103000044Search in Google Scholar

Philp, Jenefer, Rebecca Adams & Noriko Iwashita. 2014. Peer interaction and second languagelearning. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203551349Search in Google Scholar

Philp, Jenefer, Susan Walter & Helen Basturkmen. 2010. Peer interaction in the foreign language classroom: What factors foster a focus on form? Language Awareness 19(4). 261–279.10.1080/09658416.2010.516831Search in Google Scholar

Qi, Donald S. & Sharon Lapkin. 2001. Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing 10. 277–303.10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00046-7Search in Google Scholar

Ranta, Leila. 2002. The role of learners’ language analytic ability in the communicative classroom. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning, 159–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.2.11ranSearch in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 1995. Attention, memory, and the ‘noticing’ hypothesis. Language Learning 45(2). 283–331.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00441.xSearch in Google Scholar

Sato, Masatoshi. 2011. Constitution of form-orientation: Contributions of context and explicit knowledge to learning from recasts. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 14(1). 1–28.Search in Google Scholar

Sato, Masatoshi. 2017. Oral peer corrective feedback: Multiple theoretical perspectives. In Hossein Nasaji & Eva Kartchava (eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning, 19–34. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315621432-3Search in Google Scholar

Sato, Masatoshi & Roy Lyster. 2012. Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development: Monitoring, practice, and proceduralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34. 591–626.10.1017/S0272263112000356Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Richard. 1993. Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 13. 206–226.10.1017/S0267190500002476Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Richard. 1995. Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In Richard Schmidt (ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning, 1–63. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Richard. 2001. Attention. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, 3–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Richard W. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11. 129–158.10.1093/applin/11.2.129Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Richard W. & Sylvia Nagem Frota. 1986. Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In Richard R. Day (ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition, 237–326. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Search in Google Scholar

Sheen, YoungHee. 2004. Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research 8(3). 263–300.10.1191/1362168804lr146oaSearch in Google Scholar

Sheen, YoungHee. 2007. The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly 41(2). 255–284.10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.xSearch in Google Scholar

Storch, Neomy. 2002. Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning 52(1). 119–158.10.1111/1467-9922.00179Search in Google Scholar

Swain, Merrill. 2005. The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In Eli Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 471–483. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Tarone, Elaine & George Yule. 1989. Focus on the language learner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tomlin, Russell S. & Victor Villa. 1994. Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16. 183–203.10.1017/S0272263100012870Search in Google Scholar

VanPatten, Bill. 1989. Can learners attend to form and content while processing input? Hispania 72(2). 409–417.10.2307/343165Search in Google Scholar

VanPatten, Bill. 2007. Input processing in adult second language acquisition. In Bill VanPatten & Jessica Williams (eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction, 115–135. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.10.4324/9781410615299Search in Google Scholar

Watanabe, Yuko & Merrill Swain. 2008. Perception of learner proficiency: Its impact on the interaction between an ESL learner and her higher and lower proficiency partners. Language Awareness 17(2). 115–130.10.1080/09658410802146651Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Jessica. 1999. Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning 49(4). 583–625.10.1111/0023-8333.00103Search in Google Scholar

Yule, George. 1997. Referential communication tasks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Yule, George & Doris Macdonald. 1990. Resolving referential conflicts in L2 interaction: The effect of proficiency and interactive role. Language Learning 40(4). 539–556.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00605.xSearch in Google Scholar