Linguistic ethnography and immigrant youth’s social lives in the liminal interludes of schooling

Inmaculada M. García-Sánchez

doi:10.1515/ijsl-2022-0033

Article

Linguistic ethnography and immigrant youth’s social lives in the liminal interludes of schooling

Inmaculada M. García-Sánchez

Published/Copyright: January 11, 2023

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal International Journal of the Sociology of Language Volume 2023 Issue 279

Abstract

In this paper, I examine how liminal spatio-temporal contexts both afford and constrain how immigrant children navigate their social lives in educational settings. Liminal schooling contexts have largely been unexamined in micro-ethnographic approaches to schooling, despite the potential of these contexts for illuminating the educational lives of youth. Shifting the ethnographic lens to the interactions occurring in seemingly liminal schooling contexts (in between ratified activities, in between ratified places, etc.) reveal heightened forms of behavior at the extremes of a continuum ranging from empathy/inclusion to violence/exclusion. On the one hand, liminality can render immigrant youth more vulnerable to racialized bullying, including verbal and physical aggression, since many of the institutional protections that apply in ratified schooling contexts are in abeyance. On the other hand, liminal contexts also allow for displays of support and empathy that can lead to the development of cross-ethnic peer friendships, which can happen when social-ethnic boundaries and hierarchies that are reproduced in more central contexts are relaxed. This paper builds on a linguistic ethnography documenting the social lives of Moroccan immigrant children in a Southwestern Spanish town. Using videoanalysis and ethnographic methods in discourse analysis, I focus on videotaped interactions between immigrant students and their Spanish counterparts taking place in the interstices of school life – when students are walking between buildings, in the fringes/corners of the schoolyard, in between classes … etc. The long-term ethnography allows me to examine the interactions occurring in these liminal contexts in relation to institutional culture and to the relational history between children. This paper calls for examining youth’s schooling experiences more holistically. What happens in liminal contexts is crucial to achieving educational equity in the 21st century: it can, for example, undermine progressive curricular efforts and can have positive/negative implications for immigrant youth’s enduring feelings of belonging and educational enfranchisement.

Keywords: (im)migrant youth; liminality; linguistic ethnography; microaggressions and micro-affirmations; schooling

Corresponding author: Inmaculada M. García-Sánchez, School of Education and Information Studies, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA, E-mail: igarcias@ucla.edu

References

Adger, Carolyn Temple & Laura Wright. 2015. Discourse in educational settings. In Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 2nd edn., 858–879. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9780470753460.ch26Search in Google Scholar

Baquedano-López, Patricia. 2000. Narrating community in doctrina classes. Narrative Inquiry 10(2). 1–24.10.1075/ni.10.2.07baqSearch in Google Scholar

Bhabha, Homi Kharshedji. 1993. Cultures in-between. Artforum International 32(1). 167–171.10.1111/npqu.11411Search in Google Scholar

Bhabha, Homi Kharshedji. 1994. Location of culture. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, Usree & Laura Sterponi. 2020. The morning assembly: Constructing subjecthood, authority, and knowledge through classroom discourse in an Indian school. In Kathryn M. Howard & Matthew J. Burdelski (eds.), Language socialization in classrooms, 181–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316946237.012Search in Google Scholar

Bloome, David, Stephanie Power Carter, Beth Morton Christian, Sheila Otto & Nora Shuart-Faris. 2005. Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.4324/9781410611215Search in Google Scholar

Cazden, Courtney. 1988/2001. Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning, 2nd edn. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.Search in Google Scholar

Duranti, Alessandro. 1985. Sociocultural dimensions of discourse. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis, vol. 1, 193–230. London: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Duranti, Alessandro. 1992. Language and bodies in social space: Samoan ceremonial greetings. American Anthropologist 94. 657–691. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1992.94.3.02a00070.Search in Google Scholar

Duranti, Alessandro. 1997. Universal and culture-specific properties of greetings. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7. 63–97. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1997.7.1.63.Search in Google Scholar

Echeverría, Begoña. 2003. Schooling, language, and identity in the Basque Autonomous Community. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 34(4). 351–372.10.1525/aeq.2003.34.4.351Search in Google Scholar

Erickson, Frederick. 1982. Classroom discourse as improvisation: Relationships between academic task structure and social participation structures in lessons. In Louise Cherry Wilkinson (ed.), Communicating in the classroom, 153–182. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Erickson, Frederick. 1996. Going for the zone: The social and cognitive ecology of teacher–student interaction in classroom conversations. In Deborah Hicks (ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling, 29–63. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511720390.002Search in Google Scholar

Erickson, Frederick & Jeffrey Shultz. 1981. When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. In Judith L. Green & Cynthia Wallat (eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings, 147–160. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

García-Sánchez, Inmaculada María. 2010. Serious games: Code-switching and identity in Moroccan immigrant girls’ pretend play. Pragmatics 20(4). 523–555. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20.4.03gar.Search in Google Scholar

García-Sánchez, Inmaculada María. 2013. The everyday politics of ‘cultural citizenship’ among North African immigrant school children in Spain. Language and Communication 33. 481–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.03.003.Search in Google Scholar

García-Sánchez, Inmaculada María. 2014. Language and Muslim immigrant childhoods: The politics of belonging. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118323939Search in Google Scholar

García-Sánchez, Inmaculada María. 2016. Multiculturalism and its discontents: Essentializing ethnic Moroccan and Roma identities in classroom discourse in Spain. In H. Samy Alim, John R. Rickford & Arnetha F. Ball (eds.), Raciolinguistics: How language shapes our ideas about race, 291–309. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190625696.003.0017Search in Google Scholar

García-Sánchez, Inmaculada María. 2017. Friendship, participation, and multimodality in Moroccan immigrant girls’ peer groups. In Maryanne Theobald (ed.), Friendship and peer culture in multilingual settings. Sociological studies of children and youth, 21, 1–33. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.10.1108/S1537-466120160000021003Search in Google Scholar

García-Sánchez, Inmaculada María. 2019. Liminality, peer relations, and ethno-gendered bullying among children in schools. Presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, Toronto, Canada, April 5–9.Search in Google Scholar

García-Sánchez, Inmaculada María. 2020. Interactional contingencies and contradictions in the socialization of tolerance in a Spanish multicultural school. In Kathryn M. Howard & Matthew J. Burdelski (eds.), Language socialization in classrooms, 29–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316946237.003Search in Google Scholar

Gee, James Paul & Judith Green. 1998. Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education 23(1). 119–169. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167289.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1961. Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Garden City, NY: Anchor.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2018. Cooperative action. Learning in doing: Social, cognitive, and computational perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles & Alessandro Duranti. 1992. Rethinking context: An introduction. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, 1–42. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, Kris, Betsy Rymes & Joanne Larson. 1995. Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review 65. 445–471.10.17763/haer.65.3.r16146n25h4mh384Search in Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, Kris, Patricia Baquedano-López & Carlos Tejeda. 1999. Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity 6(4). 286–303.10.1080/10749039909524733Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Shirley Bryce. 1983. Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511841057Search in Google Scholar

Heller, Monica & Marilyn Martin-Jones (eds.). 2001. Voices of authority: Education and linguistic difference. London: Ablex Publishing.10.5040/9798216032854Search in Google Scholar

Hollan, Douglas. 2017. Empathy across cultures. In Heidi Maibom (ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of empathy, 341–352. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315282015-31Search in Google Scholar

Howard, Kathryn & Sarah Lipinoga. 2010. Closing down openings: Pretextuality and misunderstanding in parent–teacher conferences with Mexican immigrant families. Language and Communication 30(1). 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2009.10.004.Search in Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell. 1964. Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication. American Anthropologist 66(6). 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00010.Search in Google Scholar

Langer-Osuna, Jennifer, Jen Munson, Emma Gargroetzi, Immanuel Williams & Rosa Chavez. 2020. So what are we working on?”: How student authority relations shift during collaborative mathematics activity. Educational Studies in Mathematics 104. 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09962-3.Search in Google Scholar

Lytra, Vally. 2007. Play frames and social identities. Contact encounters in a Greek primary school. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.163Search in Google Scholar

Lytra, Vally. 2017. Playful talk, learners’ play frames and the construction of identities. In Stanton Wortham, Deoksoon Kim & Stephen May (eds.), Discourse and education. Encyclopedia of language and education, 3rd edn., 161–172. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-02243-7_13Search in Google Scholar

Martin-Jones, Marilyn. 2015. Multilingual classroom discourse as a window on wider social, political and ideological processes. In Markee Markee (ed.), The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction, 446–460. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118531242.ch26Search in Google Scholar

Matusov, Eugene. 1998. When solo activity is not privileged: Participation and internalization models of development. Human Development 41(5/6). 326–349. https://doi.org/10.1159/000022595.Search in Google Scholar

Mehan, Hugh. 1979. Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674420106Search in Google Scholar

Michaels, Sarah. 1981. “Sharing time”: Children’s narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language in Society 10. 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500008861.Search in Google Scholar

O’Donnell, Ian & Kimmett Edgar. 1999. Fear in prison. The Prison Journal 79(1). 90–99.10.1177/0032885599079001006Search in Google Scholar

Philips, Susan. 1972. Participant structures and communicative competence: Warm springs children in community and classroom. In Courtney B. Cazden, Vera John & Dell H. Hymes (eds.), Functions of language in the classroom, 370–394. New York: Columbia Teachers Press.Search in Google Scholar

Philips, Susan. 1983. The invisible culture: Communication in classroom and community on the warm spring Indian reservation. Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press.Search in Google Scholar

Philips, Susan. 2013. Method in anthropological discourse analysis: The comparison of units of interaction. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 23(1). 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12011.Search in Google Scholar

Rampton, Benjamin. 1999. Sociolinguistics and cultural studies: New ethnicities, liminality and interaction. Social Semiotics 9(3). 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350339909360443.Search in Google Scholar

Rampton, Benjamin, Cecilia Roberts, Constant Leung & Roxy Harris. 2002. Methodology in the analysis of classroom discourse. Applied Linguistics 23(3). 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.3.373.Search in Google Scholar

Rex, Lesley & Judith Green. 2008. Classroom discourse and interaction: Reading across the traditions. In Bernard Spolsky & Francis M. Hult (eds.), Handbook of educational linguistics, 571–584. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.10.1002/9780470694138.ch40Search in Google Scholar

Rogers, Rebecca (ed.). 2004. An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781410609786Search in Google Scholar

Rowe, Mary. 2008. Micro-affirmations and micro-inequities. Journal of the International Ombudsman Association 1. 45–48.Search in Google Scholar

Rymes, Betsy. 2016. Classroom discourse analysis: A tool for critical reflection, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315775630Search in Google Scholar

Santagata, Rossella. 2004. “Are you joking or are you sleeping?” Cultural beliefs and practices in Italian and U.S. teachers’ mistake-handling strategies. Linguistics and Education 15(1–2). 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2004.12.002.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emmanuel & Harvey Sacks. 1973. Opening up closings. Semiotica 8. 289–327. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289.Search in Google Scholar

Shuy, Roger & Peg Griffin. 1981. What do they do any day: Studying functional language. In Patrick W. Dickson (ed.), Children’s oral communication skills, 271–286. New York: Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Sterponi, Laura. 2007. Clandestine interactional reading: Intertextuality and double-voicing under the desk. Linguistics and Education 18. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2007.04.001.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Victor. 1969/2017. The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315134666Search in Google Scholar

Van Genepp, Arnold. 1909/1960. The rites of passage. (Translated by Monika B. Vizedom and Gabrielle L. Caffe). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Van Lier, Leo. 1984. Discourse analysis and classroom research: A methodological perspective. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 49. 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1984.49.111.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-02-22

Accepted: 2022-11-19

Published Online: 2023-01-11

Published in Print: 2023-01-27

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2022-0033

Keywords for this article

(im)migrant youth; liminality; linguistic ethnography; microaggressions and micro-affirmations; schooling