Cultural translation of a domestic violence intervention for small children: key policy and practice directions

References

1. Hungerford A, Wait SK, Fritz AM, Clements CM. Exposure to intimate partner violence and children’s psychological adjustment, cognitive functioning, and social competence: a review. Aggress Violent Beh 2012;17:373–82.10.1016/j.avb.2012.04.002Search in Google Scholar

2. Thompson R, Zuroff DC, Hindi E. Relationships and traumatic events as predictors of depressive styles in high-risk youth. Pers Individ Dif 2012;53:474–9.10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.017Search in Google Scholar

3. Tomoda A, Polcari A, Anderson CM, Teicher MH. Reduced visual cortex gray matter volume and thickness in young adults who witnessed domestic violence during childhood. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e52528.10.1371/journal.pone.0052528Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Lamers-Winkelman F, Schipper JC, Oosterman M. Children’s physical health complaints after exposure to intimate partner violence. Br J Health Psych 2012;17:771–84.10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02072.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Garoma S, Fantahun M, Worku A. Maternal intimate partner violence victimization and under-five children mortality in Western Ethiopia: a case-control study. J Trop Pediatr 2012;58:467–74.10.1093/tropej/fms018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Kauppi AL, Vanamo T, Karkola K, Merikanto J. Fatal child abuse: a study of 13 cases of continuous abuse. Mental Illness 2012;4:5–9.10.4081/mi.2012.e2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Shalev I. Early life stress and telomere length: investigating the connection and possible mechanisms: a critical survey of the evidence base, research methodology and basic biology. BioEssays 2012;34:943–52.10.1002/bies.201200084Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Lee RD, Walters ML, Hall JE, Basile KC. Behavioral and attitudinal factors differentiating male intimate partner violence perpetrators with and without a history of childhood family violence. J Fam Violence 2013;28:85–94.10.1007/s10896-012-9475-8Search in Google Scholar

9. Gelaye B, Lam N, Cripe SM, Sanchez SE, Williams MA. Correlates of violent response among Peruvian women abused by an intimate partner. J Interpers Violence 2010;25:136–51.10.1177/0886260508329127Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Low S, Mulford C. Use of a social-ecological framework to understand how and under what conditions family violence exposure affects children’s adjustment. J Fam Violence 2013;28:1–3.10.1007/s10896-012-9486-5Search in Google Scholar

11. Mair C, Cunradi CB, Todd M. Adverse childhood experiences and intimate partner violence: Testing psychosocial mediational pathways among couples. Ann Epidemiol 2012;22:832–9.10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.09.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Thomas R, Zimmer-Gembeck M. Accumulating evidence for parent child interaction therapy in the prevention of child maltreatment. Child Dev 2011;82:177–92.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01548.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Lee J, Kolomer S, Thomsen D. Evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention for children exposed to domestic violence: a preliminary program evaluation. Child Adolesc Social Work J 2012;29:357–72.10.1007/s10560-012-0265-1Search in Google Scholar

14. Øverlien C. Narrating the good life – children in shelters for abused women talk about the future. Qual Soc Work 2012;11:470–85.10.1177/1473325011401469Search in Google Scholar

15. Levendosky AA, Lannert B, Yalch M. The effects of intimate partner violence on women and child survivors: an attachment perspective. Psychodyn Psychiatry 2012;40:397–434.10.1521/pdps.2012.40.3.397Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Toth SL, Gravener J. Bridging research and practice: relational interventions for maltreated children. Child Adolesc Ment Health 2012;17:131–8.10.1111/j.1475-3588.2011.00638.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. O’Brien KL, Cohen L, Pooley JA, Taylor MF. Lifting the domestic violence cloak of silence: resilient Australian women’s reflected memories of their childhood experiences of witnessing domestic violence. J Fam Violence 2013;28:95–108.10.1007/s10896-012-9484-7Search in Google Scholar

18. Wathen CN, MacGregor JC, Hammerton J, Coben JH, Herrman H, Stewart DE, et al. Priorities for research in child maltreatment, intimate partner violence and resilience to violence exposures: results of an international delphi consensus development process. BMC Public Health 2012;12:684.10.1186/1471-2458-12-684Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Calvete E, Orue I. Cognitive mechanisms of the transmission of violence: exploring gender differences among adolescents exposed to family violence. J Fam Violence 2013;28:73–84.10.1007/s10896-012-9472-ySearch in Google Scholar

20. Maneta E, Cohen S, Schulz M, Waldinger RJ. Links between childhood physical abuse and intimate partner aggression: The mediating role of anger expression. Violence Vict 2012;27: 315–28.10.1891/0886-6708.27.3.315Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Larrivée MC, Hamelin-Brabant L, Lessard G. Knowledge translation in the field of violence against women and children: an assessment of the state of knowledge. Child Youth Serv Rev 2012;34:2381–91.10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.09.001Search in Google Scholar

22. Randell KA, Bledsoe LK, Shroff PL, Pierce MC. Educational interventions for intimate partner violence: guidance from survivors. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012;28:1190–6.10.1097/PEC.0b013e318271be7fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Guimei M, Fikry FE, Esheiba OM. Patterns of violence against women in three communities in Alexandria, Egypt. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2012;37:331–8.10.1097/NMC.0b013e31825c99d8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Fusco RA, Rautkis ME. Transracial mothering and maltreatment: are black/white biracial children at higher risk? Child Welfare 2012;91:55–77.Search in Google Scholar

25. Arulogun Dr OS, Titiloye MA, Oyewole EO, Nwaorgu OG, Afolabi NB. Experience of violence among deaf girls in Ibadan metropolis, Nigeria. Int J Collab Res Internal Med Public Health 2012;4:1488–96.Search in Google Scholar

26. Becker KD, Mathis G, Mueller CW, Issari K, Atta SS, Okado I. Barriers to treatment in an ethnically diverse sample of families enrolled in a community-based domestic violence intervention. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma 2012;21:829–50.10.1080/10926771.2012.708013Search in Google Scholar

27. Øverlien C. Children exposed to domestic violence: conclusions from the literature and challenges ahead. J Soc Work 2010;10:80–97.10.1177/1468017309350663Search in Google Scholar

28. Ragin C. Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

29. Ragin C. Set relations in social research: evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis 2006;14:291–310.10.1093/pan/mpj019Search in Google Scholar

30. Ragin C. Redesigning social enquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2008.10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

31. Rihoux B, Ragin C, Eds. Configurational comparative methods: qualitative comparative analysis (qca) and related techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

32. Cronqvist L. Tosmana 1.3.2. Marburg, 2011.http://www.tosmana.net/.Search in Google Scholar

33. Ragin C, Drass K, Davey S. Fuzzy set/qualitative comparative analysis 2.0. Tucson, Arizona: Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, 2007. http://www.u.arizona.edu/~cragin/fsQCA/software.shtml.Search in Google Scholar

34. Leximancer Pty Ltd. Leximancer 4. Brisbane: University of Queensland, 2012; Available from: https://www.leximancer.com/science/.Search in Google Scholar

35. Bell E, Seidel B. The evidence-policy divide: a ‘critical computational linguistics’ approach to the language of 18 health agency ceos from 9 countries BMC Public Health 2012;12:932.DOI: 10.1186/471-2458-12-932 URL: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/932.10.1186/1471-2458-12-932Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Bell E, Blashki G. A method for assessing community flood management knowledge for vulnerable groups: Australia’s 2010–2011 floods. Comm Dev J 2013, doi: 10.1093/cdj/bst002, http://cdj.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/02/03/cdj.bst002.abstract.10.1093/cdj/bst002Search in Google Scholar

37. Pakenham KI, Tilling J, Cretchley J. Parenting difficulties and resources: the perspectives of parents with multiple sclerosis and their partners. Rehabil Psychol 2012;57:52–60.10.1037/a0026995Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Kuyini AB, Alhassan A-R, Mahama FK. The Ghana community-based rehabilitation program for people with disabilities: what happened at the end of donor support? J Soc Work Disabil Rehabil 2011;10:247–67.10.1080/1536710X.2011.622981Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Baker SC, Gallois C, Driedger SM, Santesso N. Communication accommodation and managing musculoskeletal disorders: doctors’ and patients’ perspectives. Health Commun 2011;26:379–88.10.1080/10410236.2010.551583Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Smith A, Humphreys M. Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with leximancr concept mapping. Behav Res Meth 2006;38:262–79.10.3758/BF03192778Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

42. Foucault M, Rabinow P. The Foucault reader: an introduction to Foucault’s thought. London: Penguin, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

43. Habermas J. The theory of communicative action, vol. 2. System and lifeworld: a critique of functionalist reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1987.Search in Google Scholar

44. Gadamer H. Truth and method. New York: Continuum, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

45. Foucault M. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977.Search in Google Scholar

46. Derrida J. Speech and phenomena and other essays on Husserl’s theory of signs. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973.Search in Google Scholar

47. Derrida J. Writing and difference. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1978.Search in Google Scholar

48. Derrida J. Positions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Search in Google Scholar

49. Baly AR. Leaving abusive relationships: constructions of self and situation by abused women. J Interpers Violence 2010;25:2297–315.10.1177/0886260509354885Search in Google Scholar PubMed

50. Trinch S. Deconstructing the “stakes” in high stakes gatekeeping interviews: battered women and narration. J Pragmat 2007;39:1895–918.10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.006Search in Google Scholar

51. Hamilton M. Judicial discourses on women’s agency in violent relationships: cases from California. Womens Stud Int Forum 2010;33:570–8.10.1016/j.wsif.2010.09.007Search in Google Scholar

52. Hart AS, Bagshaw D. The idealised post-separation family in australian family law: a dangerous paradigm in cases of domestic violence. J Fam Stud 2008;14:291–309.10.5172/jfs.327.14.2-3.291Search in Google Scholar

53. Lea SJ, Lynn N. Dialogic reverberations: police, domestic abuse, and the discontinuance of cases. J Interpers Violence 2012;27:3091–114.10.1177/0886260512441075Search in Google Scholar PubMed

54. Lorda CU. A consensual topic: the French and Spanish parliaments against domestic violence. J Pragmat 2010;42:943–56.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.020Search in Google Scholar

55. Pond R, Morgan M. Protection, manipulation or interference with relationships? Discourse analysis of New Zealand lawyers’ talk about supervised access and partner violence. J Comm Appl Soc Psychol 2008;18:458–73.10.1002/casp.948Search in Google Scholar

56. Wells EC. “But most of all, they fought together”: judicial attributions for sentences in convicting battered women who kill. Psychol Women Quart 2012;36:350–64.10.1177/0361684312448932Search in Google Scholar

57. Schow D. The culture of domestic violence advocacy: values of equality/behaviors of control. Women Health 2006;43:49–68.10.1300/J013v43n04_04Search in Google Scholar PubMed

58. Harris KL, Palazzolo KE, Savage MW. ‘I’m not sexist, but...’: how ideological dilemmas reinforce sexism in talk about intimate partner violence. Discourse Soc 2012;23:643–56.10.1177/0957926512455382Search in Google Scholar