Home Medicine Phonetic environment of disfluencies in children with stuttering
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Phonetic environment of disfluencies in children with stuttering

  • Sangeetha Mahesh EMAIL logo and Y.V. Geetha
Published/Copyright: June 4, 2014

Abstract

Phonological contributions to stuttering have been discussed with increased attention in the recent years. The present study is aimed to analyze the effect of phonological environment during the instances of stuttering. The study included 10 monolingual children with stuttering (CWS) in the age range of 6–8 years, who spoke Kannada (south Indian language) as their mother tongue. Conversation, topic narration, story narration, and picture description tasks were carried out in Kannada language. The relative difficulty of individual syllables for each participant was determined. Further, the effect of phonetic environment (succeeding syllable) during the instances of stuttering was calculated. The results revealed a rank order of relative occurrence of succeeding consonantal contexts. Most of the time, the phonetic environment included voiceless consonants, nasals, and plosives compared to others. This indicated that CWS may have difficulties in the transition of articulatory movement from oral to nasal and from voiced to voiceless consonants during speech production. Findings also revealed variability in the occurrence of phonetic context within and between CWS, which supports the disturbances occurring across various time domains. It is hoped that the findings of the current study will support theorists, researchers, and clinicians in arriving at a more comprehensive understanding of stuttering and phonetic behavior in CWS.


Corresponding author: Sangeetha Mahesh, MSc (Speech and Hearing), Department of Clinical Services, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Manasagangothri, Naimisham Campus, Mysore, 570006, India, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors of the paper wish to thank the Director of the All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, India for allowing us to conduct the study. We also thank all the participants of the study.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ conflict of interest disclosure: The authors state that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Research funding: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

References

1. Van Riper C. The nature of stuttering, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1982.Search in Google Scholar

2. Au-Yeung J, Howell P. Lexical and syntactic context and stuttering. Clin Ling Phon 1998;12:67–78.10.3109/02699209808985213Search in Google Scholar

3. Packman A, Onslow M, Richard F, van Doorn, J. Syllabic stress and variability: a model of stuttering. Clin Ling Phon 1996;10:235–63.10.3109/02699209608985174Search in Google Scholar

4. Dworzynski K, Howell P. Predicting stuttering from phonetic complexity in German. J Fluency Dis 2004;29:149–73.10.1016/j.jfludis.2004.03.001Search in Google Scholar

5. Wingate MD. The structure of stuttering: a psycholinguistic analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988.10.1007/978-1-4615-9664-6Search in Google Scholar

6. Chang S, Ohde RN, Conture EG. Co-articulation and formant transition rate in young children who stutter. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002;45:676–88.10.1044/1092-4388(2002/054)Search in Google Scholar

7. Geetha YV. Some linguistic aspects of stuttering in Kannada. An unpublished Master’s dissertation. University of Mysore, 1979.Search in Google Scholar

8. Jayaram M. Phonetic influences on stuttering in monolingual and bilingual stutterers. J Comm Dis 1983;16:278–97.10.1016/0021-9924(83)90013-8Search in Google Scholar

9. Starkweather CW, Hirschman P, Tannenbaum RS. Latency of vocalization: stutterers vs. nonstutterers. J Speech Hear Res 1976;19:481–92.10.1044/jshr.1903.481Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Soumya GP, Sangeetha M. Phonetic influences in bilingual children with stuttering. Student research at AIISH (Articles based on dissertation done at AIISH) 2011;9:258–66.Search in Google Scholar

11. Adams MR, Hayden P. The ability of stutterers and non stutterers to initiate and terminate phonation during production of an isolated vowel. J Speech Hear Res 1976;19:290–96.10.1044/jshr.1902.290Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Riley G. Stuttering severity instrument for children and adults, 3rd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-ed, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

13. Deepa A, Savithri SR. Re-standardization of Kannada articulation test, Student research at AIISH (Articles based on dissertation done at AIISH) 2010;8:53–5.Search in Google Scholar

14. Schiffman HF. A reference grammar of spoken Kannada. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1983.Search in Google Scholar

15. Upadhyaya UP. Kannada phonetic reader. CIIL, Manasagangothri, Mysore, 1972.Search in Google Scholar

16. Robb M, Blomgren M. Analysis of F2 transitions in the speech of stutterers and nonstutterers. J Fluency Dis 1996;21:1–16.Search in Google Scholar

17. Wingate ME. Stuttering as a phonetic transition defect. J Speech Hear Dis 1969;34:107–8.10.1044/jshd.3401.107Search in Google Scholar

18. Kent R. Stuttering as a temporal programming disorder. In: Curlee RF, Perkins WH, editors. Nature and treatment of stuttering: new directions. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press, 1984:283–303.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-11-20
Accepted: 2014-1-27
Published Online: 2014-6-4
Published in Print: 2015-2-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 16.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijdhd-2013-0042/html
Scroll to top button