Non-contact heating efficiency of flowing liquid effected by different susceptors in high-frequency induction heating system
Abstract
The skin effect causes about 86% of the energy to be concentrated in the narrow surface layer during the induction heating process, which leads to the uneven temperature distribution during the treatment of flowing liquid by induction heating technology. The concentration of heat caused by the skin effect can be avoided by dispersing the induced heating metal structure in the treated fluid, but in most cases, this will lead to a decrease in heating efficiency. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare and design the susceptor structures that can avoid the heating concentration problem caused by the skin effect and have higher efficiency. Hence, in this research four kinds of susceptor structures that are the metal sphere, sheet metal, static mixer, and metal pipe were studied. The results show that the combination of metal sphere susceptor and sheet metal susceptor can result in higher heating efficiency than the metal sphere susceptor alone. Ferromagnetic stainless steel with lower relative permeability is more suitable for making sheet metal susceptor than paramagnetic stainless steel. Adding internal components to the metal pipe susceptor will not change its heating efficiency. The heating efficiency of metal sphere type susceptor, sheet metal susceptor, and static mixer susceptor can be up to 58%, 64%, and 67%, respectively. When 430 metal pipe heater is used, the highest heating efficiency can be obtained, and the highest heating efficiency is 80%.
Funding source: Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province
Award Identifier / Grant number: 2020B0202010004
Funding source: Graduate research innovation project of Tianjin University of science and technology in 2021
Award Identifier / Grant number: YJSKC2021S03
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: The authors acknowledge the financial support of this project by the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (No. 2020B0202010004) and the Graduate research innovation project of Tianjin University of Science and Technology in 2021 (No. YJSKC2021S03).
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
Acero, J., C. Carretero, R. Alonso, and J. M. Burdio. 2013. “Quantitative Evaluation of Induction Efficiency in Domestic Induction Heating Applications.” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 49 (4): 1382–9, https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2012.2227495.Search in Google Scholar
Acero, J., I. Lope, J. M. Burdio, C. Carretero, and R. Alonso. 2015. “Performance Evaluation of Graphite Thin Slabs for Induction Heating Domestic Applications.” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 51 (3): 2398–404, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2014.2369824.Search in Google Scholar
Acero, J., I. Lope, C. Carretero, and J. M. Burdio. 2020. “Adapting of Non-metallic Cookware for Induction Heating Technology via Thin-Layer Non-magnetic Conductive Coatings.” IEEE Access 8: 11219–27, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2965209.Search in Google Scholar
Augustin, C., and W. Hungerbach. 2009. “Production of Hollow Spheres (HS) and Hollow Sphere Structures (HSS).” Materials Letters 63 (13–14): 1109–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2009.01.015.Search in Google Scholar
Başaran, A., T. Yilmaz, and C. Çivi. 2020. “Energy and Exergy Analysis of Induction-Assisted Batch Processing in Food Production: A Case Study—Strawberry Jam Production.” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 140 (4): 1871–82, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08931-0.Search in Google Scholar
Başaran, A., T. Yılmaz, S. T. Azgın, and C. Çivi. 2021. “Comparison of Drinking Milk Production with Conventional and Novel Inductive Heating in Pasteurization in Terms of Energetic, Exergetic, Economic and Environmental Aspects.” Journal of Cleaner Production 317: 128280, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128280.Search in Google Scholar
Başaran, A., T. Yılmaz, and C. Çivi. 2018. “Application of Inductive Forced Heating as a New Approach to Food Industry Heat Exchangers.” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 134 (3): 2265–74, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7250-7.Search in Google Scholar
Bio Gassi, K., B. Guene Lougou, M. Baysal, and C. Ahouannou. 2021. “Thermal and Electrical Performance Analysis of Induction Heating Based-Thermochemical Reactor for Heat Storage Integration into Power Systems.” International Journal of Energy Research 45 (12): 17982–8001, https://doi.org/10.1002/er.6947.Search in Google Scholar
Di Luozzo, N., M. Fontana, and B. Arcondo. 2012. “Modelling of Induction Heating of Carbon Steel Tubes: Mathematical Analysis, Numerical Simulation and Validation.” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 536: S564-68, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.12.084.Search in Google Scholar
Han, W., K. T. Chau, C. Jiang, and W. Liu. 2018. “All-Metal Domestic Induction Heating Using Single-Frequency Double-Layer Coils.” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 54 (11): 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2018.2846548.Search in Google Scholar
He, C., N. Yang, Y. Jin, S. Wu, Y. Pan, X. Xu, and Z. Jin. 2021. “Application of Induced Electric Field for Inner Heating of Kiwifruit Juice and its Analysis.” Journal of Food Engineering 306: 110609, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2021.110609.Search in Google Scholar
Idakiev, V. V., A. Bück, L. Mörl, and E. Tsotsas. 2019. “Inductive Heating of Fluidized Beds: Mobile versus Stationary Heat Exchange Elements.” Drying Technology 37 (5): 652–63, https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2018.1526190.Search in Google Scholar
Idakiev, V. V., P. V. Lazarova, A. Bück, E. Tsotsas, and L. Mörl. 2017. “Inductive Heating of Fluidized Beds: Drying of Particulate Solids.” Powder Technology 306: 26–33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.11.011.Search in Google Scholar
Idakiev, V. V., S. Marx, A. Roßau, A. Bück, E. Tsotsas, and L. Mörl. 2015. “Inductive Heating of Fluidized Beds: Influence on Fluidization Behavior.” Powder Technology 286: 90–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.08.003.Search in Google Scholar
Idakiev, V. V., C. Steinke, F. Sondej, A. Bück, E. Tsotsas, and L. Mörl. 2018. “Inductive Heating of Fluidized Beds: Spray Coating Process.” Powder Technology 328: 26–37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.01.017.Search in Google Scholar
Jin, Y., N. Yang, D. Xu, C. He, Y. Xu, X. Xu, and Z. jin. 2020a. “Innovative Induction Heating of Grapefruit Juice via Induced Electric Field and its Application in Escherichia coli O157:H7 Inactivation.” RSC Advances 10 (46): 27280–7, https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA03873C.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Jin, Y., N. Yang, and X. Xu. 2020b. “Innovative Induction Heating Technology Based on Transformer Theory: Inner Heating of Electrolyte Solution via Alternating Magnetic Field.” Applied Thermal Engineering 179: 115732, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115732.Search in Google Scholar
Kilic, V. T., E. Unal, and H. Volkan Demir. 2020. “High-efficiency Flow-Through Induction Heating.” IET Power Electronics 13 (10): 2119–26, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-pel.2019.1609.Search in Google Scholar
Kittiamornkul, N., S. Yingcharoen, T. Khumsap, and L. Inklab. 2017. “A Small Pasteurization System Using Magnetic Induction for Coconut Juice.” In 14th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology. https://doi.org/0.1109/ECTICon.2017.8096253.10.1109/ECTICon.2017.8096253Search in Google Scholar
Lamo, C., N. C. Shahi, A. Singh, and A. K. Singh. 2019. “Pasteurization of Guava Juice Using Induction Pasteurizer and Optimization of Process Parameters.” LWT 112: 108253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108253.Search in Google Scholar
Lucia, O., P. Maussion, E. J. Dede, and J. M. Burdio. 2014. “Induction Heating Technology and its Applications: Past Developments, Current Technology, and Future Challenges.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 61 (5): 2509–20, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2013.2281162.Search in Google Scholar
Meng, X., Z. Sun, and G. Xu. 2012. “Single-phase Convection Heat Transfer Characteristics of Pebble-Bed Channels with Internal Heat Generation.” Nuclear Engineering and Design 252: 121–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.05.041.Search in Google Scholar
Nazari, M., D. Jalali Vahid, R. K. Saray, and Y. Mahmoudi. 2017. “Experimental Investigation of Heat Transfer and Second Law Analysis in a Pebble Bed Channel with Internal Heat Generation.” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 114: 688–702, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.06.079.Search in Google Scholar
Park, J. S., S. Taniguchi, and Y. J. Park. 2009. “Maximum Joule Heat by Tubular Susceptor with Critical Thickness on Induction Heating.” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 42 (4): 045509, https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/42/4/045509.Search in Google Scholar
Rudnev, V., D. Loveless, and R. Cook. 2017. Handbook of Induction Heating, 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press.10.1201/9781315117485Search in Google Scholar
Tian, S., and M. Barigou. 2016. “Assessing the Potential of Using Chaotic Advection Flow for Thermal Food Processing in Heating Tubes.” Journal of Food Engineering 177: 9–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.12.005.Search in Google Scholar
Todaka, T., T. Kishino, and M. Enokizono. 2008. “Low Curie Temperature Material for Induction Heating Self-Temperature Controlling System.” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 320 (20): e702-7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.04.146.Search in Google Scholar
Unver, U. 2016. “Efficiency Analysis of Induction Air Heater and Investigation of Distribution of Energy Losses.” Tehnicki vjesnik – Technical Gazette 23 (5), https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20151122224719.Search in Google Scholar
Wu, L., H. Ma, J. Mei, Y. Li, Q. Xu, and Z. Li. 2022. “Low Energy Consumption and High Quality Bio-Fuels Production via In-Situ Fast Pyrolysis of Reed Straw by Adding Metallic Particles in an Induction Heating Reactor.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47 (9): 5828–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.229.Search in Google Scholar
Wu, J. S., C. Y. Wu, and R. G. Zhang. 2014. Eddy Current Technology and Application. Changsha: Central South University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, G., Z. Wan, and X. Yang. 2020. “Induction Heating by Magnetic Microbeads for Pasteurization of Liquid Whole Eggs.” Journal of Food Engineering 284: 110079, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110079.Search in Google Scholar
Wu, S., N. Yang, Y. Jin, D. Li, Y. Xu, X. Xu, and Z. Jin. 2020. “Development of an Innovative Induction Heating Technique for the Treatment of Liquid Food: Principle, Experimental Validation and Application.” Journal of Food Engineering 271: 109780, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.109780.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, S., L. Zhao, M. Zhang, J. Feng, and H. Dong. 2022. “Experimental Investigation of Flow and Exergy Transfer Characteristics in the Air-Cooled Randomly Packed Particle Bed Based on Second Law Analysis.” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 185: 122360, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.122360.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Unified fractional indirect IMC-based hybrid dual-loop strategy for unstable and integrating type CSTRs
- Oxidative desulfurization of model and real fuel samples with natural zeolite-based catalysts: experimental design and optimization by Box–Behnken method
- Non-contact heating efficiency of flowing liquid effected by different susceptors in high-frequency induction heating system
- Gas–liquid mixing in the stirred tank equipped with semi-circular tube baffles
- Customizing continuous chemistry and catalytic conversion for carbon–carbon cross-coupling with 3dP
- Influence factor of Pr(III) recovery kinetics from rare-earth simulant wastewater by PAN microtubule hyperfiltration reactor
- NanoParticle Flow Reactor (NanoPFR): a tested model for simulating carbon nanoparticle formation in flow reactors
- Hot slag modification with mechanical stirring: heat transfer characteristics in a slag pot
- Assessment of effectiveness factor in porous catalysts under non-symmetric external conditions of concentration
- CFD simulation of gas–solid fluidized bed hydrodynamics; prediction accuracy study
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Unified fractional indirect IMC-based hybrid dual-loop strategy for unstable and integrating type CSTRs
- Oxidative desulfurization of model and real fuel samples with natural zeolite-based catalysts: experimental design and optimization by Box–Behnken method
- Non-contact heating efficiency of flowing liquid effected by different susceptors in high-frequency induction heating system
- Gas–liquid mixing in the stirred tank equipped with semi-circular tube baffles
- Customizing continuous chemistry and catalytic conversion for carbon–carbon cross-coupling with 3dP
- Influence factor of Pr(III) recovery kinetics from rare-earth simulant wastewater by PAN microtubule hyperfiltration reactor
- NanoParticle Flow Reactor (NanoPFR): a tested model for simulating carbon nanoparticle formation in flow reactors
- Hot slag modification with mechanical stirring: heat transfer characteristics in a slag pot
- Assessment of effectiveness factor in porous catalysts under non-symmetric external conditions of concentration
- CFD simulation of gas–solid fluidized bed hydrodynamics; prediction accuracy study