Home Seed Yield and Quality of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) as Influenced by Staggered Sowing and Organic Fertilizer Application in the Humid Tropics
Article Open Access

Seed Yield and Quality of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) as Influenced by Staggered Sowing and Organic Fertilizer Application in the Humid Tropics

  • F.O. Oshundiya , V.I.O. Olowe EMAIL logo , F.A. Sowemimo and J.N. Odedina
Published/Copyright: October 4, 2014
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted on the Teaching and Research Farm of the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta (7° 15′ N, 3° 25′ E, altitude 140 m above sea level) in south western Nigeria between June and November, 2012 to evaluate the performance of two sunflower varieties (SAMSUN-3 and Funtua) as affected by different sowing dates and organic fertilizer application. The experiment was laid out in split–split plot design with sowing dates as main plot, organic fertilizer as sub-plot and variety as sub-sub-plot, and replicated three times. Sowing date significantly (P≤0.05) increased and reduced number of phenological days to flowering of early and late sown sunflower, respectively. Funtua (a local adapted variety) matured 7 days later than SAMSUN-3 (recently released variety) when sown late. Application of organic fertilizer significantly (P≤0.05) increased plant height of early and late sown sunflower. Delay in sowing till first week in September significantly (P≤0.05) reduced head diameter, number of seeds per head and seed yield of late sown sunflower. Oil and protein contents of seeds from early and late sown sunflower plants were significantly (P≤0.05) increased by organic fertilizer application, except protein content of late sown sunflower. However, it significantly (P≤0.05) increased oil yield by 23% relative to the control in the late sown sunflower. Based on the comparatively high seed yield (850.45–1,525.78 kg/ha) recorded in our study, it is recommended that sunflower be sown in the forest–savanna transition zone in early July or second to third week in August.

Introduction

Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) occupies the fourth position among vegetable oilseeds after soybean, oil palm and canola in the world (Rodriguez et al., 2002 and Ahmad et al., 2011). Although sunflower is generally regarded as a temperate zone crop, it is currently cultivated on approximately 23 million hectares in 40 countries of the world, including some countries in the humid tropical Africa because it is quite rustic and can perform well under varying climatic and soil conditions (Seiler et al., 2008, Kaleem et al., 2011b). The major goal of growing sunflower is for its seed (achene) that contains oil (36–52%) and protein (28–32%) as reported by Rosa et al. (2009). The crop has been receiving steady attention by various scientists from diverse disciplines in recent past because sunflower oil is a premium oil with light colour and is widely used in the diets of heart patients because it contains very low cholesterol and high (90%) unsaturated fatty acid concentration (Flagella et al., 2002; Qahar et al. 2010). In recent past, there has been a steady increase in demand for organic foods globally because of the health risks posed by conventional method of production (Yiridoe et al., 2005). After reviewing 343 studies, it was revealed that organic crops and crop-based foods contain up to 60% higher key antioxidants than conventionally grown crops (Baranski et al., 2014). We therefore decided to explore the potential of organic sunflower in the transition zone. The productivity of sunflower in terms of seed yield, oil and protein output varies widely depending on multifarious factors of the environment such as radiation (Dosio et al., 2000), temperature (Kaleem et al., 2009 and 2011a), rainfall distribution (Lawal et al., 2011; Asbag et al., 2009; Olowe et al., 2013), agronomic practices like time of sowing (de la Vega and Hall, 2002; Lawal et al., 2011; Anjum et al., 2012), plant density and nitrogen nutrition (Ali et al., 2012), varying planting pattern (Yasin et al., 2013) and sowing of improved varieties and hybrids (Ali et al., 2011). Consequently, there is a disparity among the reported African (812 kg/ha) and Nigerian (1,000 kg/ha) averages by Olowe et al. (2013) and the world average of 1,520 kg/ha (USDA, 2012).

Although much work has been done on sunflower agronomy in different agro-ecological locations of the world with a view to gaining insight into the effects of the cultural practices that enhance seed yield, there is still a dearth of information on the performance of newly released and improved, and locally adapted sunflower varieties as affected by organic fertilizers and varying sowing dates in the forest–savanna transition zone which is outside its traditional growing region (savanna). Earlier research works on sunflower agronomy in the tropics reported varying optimum rates of nitrogen fertilizer to be 60 kg N/ha in Nigeria (Olowe et al., 2005), 80 kgN/ha in India (Rasool et al., 2013), 150 kgN/ha at Islamabad, Pakistan (Bakht et al., 2010) and 180 kgN/ha at Faisalabad, Pakistan (Nasim et al., 2012b). Sunflower growers rarely apply organic fertilizers to sunflower despite the inherent advantage (slow nutrient release and potential improvement of soil structure and water holding capacity) of organic plot compared with the conventional plot (Posner et al., 2008). In fact, the resource-constrained farmers in the tropics seldom apply mineral fertilizers because of restricted access to the input and its exorbitant cost. Different brands of organic fertilizers using plant residues, municipal and abattoir wastes are now being produced in Nigeria for farmers’ use in crop production and they are significantly cheaper that mineral fertilizers. Unfortunately, information is lacking on the response of sunflower to organic fertilizer application in humid tropical Africa. Recent work in India reported linear increase in seed yield as farmyard manure rate increased from 10 to 20 ton/ha, suggesting that an additional increase in seed yield with increase in rate of farmyard manure (Rasool et al., 2013). Similarly, plant population density (Olowe, 2005; Petcu et al., 2010) and planting ratio (Shakuntula et al., 2012) studies also indicated varying results in different locations. Optimum sowing date of sunflower as early and late season crops is relatively well known to be late May and July – Early August, respectively in the forest–savanna transition zone (Ogunemi, 2000). The seed quality of sunflower is a function of an inter play of the genetic, environmental and agronomic manipulations (Baydar and Erbas, 2005; Petcu et al., 2010; Olowe et al., 2013). However, most of the studies conducted in the humid tropics neither related the performance of sunflower to the phenology of the crop nor ascertained the quality of the seeds after imposing the various treatments. Furthermore, attempts have not been made to exploit the possibility of having two good quality sunflower crops in a year by staggering sowing dates. Consequently, part of what is still lacking now in the agronomy of sunflower in the humid tropics is a comparative study that will provide an insight into the effects of some weather parameters and manipulation of cultural practices on the phenology, seed yield and quality of sunflower. The hypothesis of the study was hinged on possibility of growing more than one crop of sunflower in a year. Therefore, this study was carried out to determine the effects of staggered sowing and organic fertilizer application on growth, development, seed quality and yield of two sunflower varieties in a forest–savanna transition zone of the tropics.

Materials and methods

Growth conditions

The field studies were conducted at the Teaching and Research Farm of the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta (7° 15′ N, 3° 25′ E, altitude 140 m above sea level) in south western Nigeria on a loamy sand soil between June and November, 2012. The two test varieties were Funtua, a locally adapted, late-maturing variety (110–120 days) and SAMSUN-3, also late maturing (110–120 days), drought tolerant and contains good antioxidants (NASC, 2013). The soil characteristics of the two experimental plots are shown in Table 1. The soils of the experimental sites were loamy sand in texture and low to medium in nitrogen and phosphorus, and adequate in potassium based on rating for soil fertility classes as described by Anon (1989). The meteorological data for the growth period of the two experiments were collected from the Department of Water Resources Management and Agrometeorology located about 300 m away from the Research Farm. The experimental site was located in the forest–savanna transition zone with a traditional bi-modal rainfall distribution having peaks usually in July and September and a short dry spell often referred to as august break. Weather data during the two periods of experimentation in 2012 are presented in Tables 24. The months of July (155.4 mm) and October (184.7 mm) were the wettest months during the growing periods of early and late sown sunflower. The coolest and hottest months based on mean atmospheric temperature were August (25.4°C) and November (28.2°C). Relative humidity values, however, ranged between 77.5% (October) and 82.6% (August) as shown in Table 2. The amount of rainfall received by early and late sown sunflower, number of rainy days and daily sunshine duration decreased as sowing was delayed (Table 3). The growing degree days (GGD) values for early and late sown sunflower varieties during the four sowing dates are presented in Table 4. The values ranged between 2,073.39° and 2,423.07°C and 1,942.37° and 2,038.43°C for the early and late sown SAMSUN-3 variety, respectively. While for Funtua, the values were 2,067.90°–2,370.06°C and 2,052.29°–2,189.27°C for the early and late sown sunflower, respectively.

Table 1:

Some physico-chemical characteristics of the experimental fields (0–30 cm level)

Soil characteristicsEarly sown fieldLate sown field
Sand (%)84.085.0
Silt (%)7.07.0
Clay (%)9.08.0
Textural classLoamy sandLoamy sand
pH (H2O)5.375.50
Carbon level (%)0.50.85
Total N (%)0.180.20
Available P (mg/kg)1.490.80
Exchangeable K (cmol/kg)0.230.67
Table 2:

Rainfall distribution (mm), mean monthly temperature (T°C) and relative humidity(RH, %) during period of experimentation in 2012

Growth weekJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
I53.8*35.60.011.676.32.3
II22.2*52.23.610.935.821.0
III71.640.711.532.031.326.3
IV77.526.921.2126.941.30.0
Total rainfall149.1155.436.3181.4184.749.6
Mean T°C26.726.025.426.227.128.2
RH, %78.780.982.676.077.581.9
Table 3:

Rainfall distribution, number of rainy days and total daily sunshine duration across four planting dates of early and late sown sunflower

Sowing dateEarly sownLate sown
Rainfall (mm)No. of rainy daysDaily sunshine durationRainfall (mm)No. of rainy daysDaily sunshine duration
I522.219391.1448.421497.5
II450.618375.3436.920470.9
III373.117328.9421.919444.1
IV337.514300.6415.718413.8
Table 4:

Growing degree days (GDD) of early and late sown sunflower varieties across sowing dates

Sowing dateV1-SAMSUN-3V2-FUNTUA
Early sownLate sownEarly sownLate sown
I2,133.512,003.852,067.902,100.84
II2,109.131,942.372,209.572,052.29
III2,073.391,955.102,370.062,084.77
IV2,423.072,038.432,152.722,189.27

Experimental design and measurements

The two field experiments were laid out in a split–split plot design with three replications. The treatment combinations were 16 comprising of four main plots (sowing date at weekly interval: I, II, III and IV: 19, 26 June, 3 and 10 July and 14, 21 and 28 August and 4 September for early and late sown sunflower, respectively), two sub-plots: Control – no fertilizer applied and organic fertilizer application at 50 ton/ha equivalent to 60 kgN ha−1 of mineral fertilizer rate recommended for sunflower (Olowe et al., 2005) and two sub-sub-plots (SAMSUN-3 and Funtua) varieties. The organic fertilizer (“Aleshinloye” Fertilizer) used contained 1.2% N, 76 ppm P, 13.75 cmol K and 10.28 cmol Na.

Crop husbandry

The experimental sites were ploughed twice and harrowed once before marking out the plots. At each sowing date, seeds of the test varieties were sown at a spacing of 60 cm×30 cm which corresponded to 56,000 plants ha−1. Three seeds of the test varieties were sown per hole and later thinned to one plant per stand at 2 weeks after sowing (WAS). Each experimental plot consisted of four rows 5 m in length and measured 1.8 m×5 m (9.0 m2). No agro-chemicals were used during both experiments in order to simulate the usual practice of the resource-constrained farmers. Organic fertilizer was applied and incorporated into the soil during seedbed preparation a week before sowing. Manual weeding was done at 3 and 6 WAS and five randomly selected plants were tagged from the middle rows of each plot for plant height measurement at flowering (R5–when 30–80% of disk flowers have completed flowering on the inflorescence) and physiological maturity (R9–when the bracts are yellow and brown) as described by Schneiter and Miller (1981). The tagged plants were later harvested and used for yield component analysis. The crop was grown under rain-fed conditions which is the usual practice of the resource-constrained farmers. There were no incidences of pests and diseases during the early and late sown cropping. This could be attributed to the fact that sunflower is still alien to this agro-ecological zone.

Data collection

The characters determined on plot basis were number of phenological days to flowering (R5) and physiological maturity (R9), plant height (cm), i.e. height from the soil surface to the tip of the head at R5 and R9, head diameter (cm), head weight (g), number and weight (g) of seeds per head, 100 seed weight (g), seed yield (kg ha−1), oil and protein contents (%) in the seed and oil yield (kg ha−1). Plant height, seed yield and yield components were determined on the five earlier tagged plants on plot basis. Heat unit accumulation measured as GDD was determined using the equation of McMaster and Wilhelm (1997) as:

GDD=Tmax+Tmin/2Tbase
Tbase was taken as 7.2°C based on several studies of heat units as adopted by Agele (2003) and Canavar et al. (2010). Values of GDD recorded for early and late sown sunflower across the four sowing dates are presented in Table 4.

The oil and protein contents of seed were determined using Soxhlet extraction with petroleum ether as the solvent and Kjeldahl block digestion and steam distillation as described by Eglan et al. (1981), respectively. The materials used for protein determination included digestion block, digestion tubes, Kjeldahl distillation unit and automatic titrator.

Data analysis

The data collected were statistically analysed using the MSTATC package (Freed et al., 1989) and significant (P<0.05; F-test) treatment means of the main effects and interactions were separated using the least significant difference method at 5% probability level.

Results

Effect of staggered sowing and organic fertilizer application on phenology and height characteristics of early and late sown sunflower

Sowing date significantly (P≤0.05; F-test) affected number of phenological days to flowering of early and late sown sunflower and number of phenological days to physiological maturity of late sown sunflower (Table 5). However, sowing date had no significant effect on height at flowering and physiological maturity of both early and late sown sunflower. Organic fertilizer application significantly (P≤0.05; F-test) reduced number of phenological days to flowering of early sown sunflower and increased plant height at flowering and physiological maturity of both early and late sown sunflower. Similarly, variety effect was significant (P≤0.05; F-test) on plant height at flowering and physiological maturity of both early and late sown sunflower with Funtua recording higher values for these traits than SAMSUN-3. Funtua also attained flowering and physiological maturity later than SAMSUN-3 (significant at P<0.05) during the early and late sowing, respectively. Plant height at flowering and physiological maturity of late sown sunflower were significantly (P≤0.05; F-test) affected by sowing date×fertilizer and sowing date×variety interactions, respectively (Table 5). Since fertilizer×variety and sowing date×fertilizer×variety effects were not significant for all the traits evaluated in our study, they are not presented in Tables 57, except Fertilizer×Variety effect on number of seeds per head in Table 6.

Table 5:

Effects of staggered sowing, organic fertilizer application and variety on plant height and number of phenological days to flowering (R5) and physiological maturity (R9) of early and late sown sunflower

TreatmentEarly sownLate sown
Days toHeight (m) atDays toHeight (m) at
R5R9R5R9R5R9R5R9
Sowing date (SD)
I70.8110.82.292.3579.0111.72.182.27
II72.8114.02.752.3471.7105.42.132.22
III77.4116.02.302.3569.7101.22.282.38
IV85.2114.62.252.3070.2100.91.811.86
LSD 5%2.57**nsnsns6.82*3.18**Nsns
Fertilizer (F)
F077.7114.32.182.2572.0104.42.002.09
F175.3113.42.382.4473.2105.22.212.27
LSD 5%1.23**ns0.07**0.06**nsns0.06**0.06**
Variety (V)
SAMSUN-374.8112.12.062.1371.5101.62.002.09
Funtua78.2115.62.512.5673.7108.02.202.28
LSD 5%2.72*ns0.11**0.12**ns2.51**0.13**0.10**
SD×Fnsnsnsnsnsns*ns
SD×Vnsnsnsnsnsnsns*
Table 6:

Effects of staggered sowing, organic fertilizer application and variety of sunflower seed yield, yield attributes and seed quality of early sown sunflower

TreatmentHead diameter (cm)Head weight (g)No. of seeds per headWeight100 seed weight (g)Seed yield (kg/ha)Oil content (%)Protein content (%)Oil yield (kg/ha)
Sowing date (SD)
I15.469.91,065.765.37.31,258.7922.218.0250.69
II14.559.81,028.054.66.31,051.7024.821.0260.93
III14.967.11,029.161.77.01,189.4327.622.9342.08
IV15.576.21,105.262.67.01,206.5123.719.6305.59
LSD 5%nsnsnsnsnsnsns1.78*ns
Fertilizer (F)
F014.361.2977.556.16.41,081.1821.818.2262.08
F115.870.81,136.566.07.41,272.0427.322.6317.61
LSD 5%0.28**4.92**52.34**4.82**0.19**92.87**1.78**1.59**ns
Variety (V)
SAMSUN-315.266.51,032.061.77.01,194.6725.121.1307.71
Funtua14.965.51,082.060.56.81,158.5424.019.7271.87
LSD 5%nsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
SD×Fnsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
SD×Vnsns*nsnsnsnsnsns
F×Vnsns**nsnsnsnsnsns
Table 7:

Effects of staggered sowing, organic fertilizer application and variety of sunflower seed yield, yield attributes and seed quality of late sown sunflower

TreatmentHead diameter (cm)Head weight (g)No. of seeds per headWeight100 seed weight (g)Seed yield (kg/ha)Oil content (%)Protein content (%)Oil yield (kg/ha)
Sowing date (SD)
I16.487.51,150.679.27.91,525.7824.319.1367.80
II16.694.91,143.587.58.41,517.4324.419.6381.46
III16.390.51,158.982.87.91,068 5123.219.7300.34
IV14.672.8884.464.46.9852.4524.417.8213.56
LSD 5%1.28*ns93.25**nsns177.098**nsnsns
Fertilizer (F)
F015.380.11,017.070.67.31,117.9622.818.9274.79
F116.692.81,151.786.48.31,364.1325.319.1356.79
LSD 5%0.62**5.25**36.15**6.77**0.51**118.68**2.31*ns50.203*
Variety (V)
SAMSUN-316.383.51,087.976.57.41,230.5923.219.2299.71
Funtua15.689.41,080.880.58.11,251.5024.818.9331.87
LSD 5%0.49*nsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
SD×Fnsnsnsnsnsns**ns
SD×V***nsnsnsnsnsnsns

Effect of staggered sowing and organic fertilizer applicationon seed yield, some yield attributes and seed quality of early and late sown sunflower

Sowing date did not affect seed yield, yield attributes and quality of sunflower, except protein content (P≤0.05; F-test) of early sown sunflower (Table 6). However, application of organic fertilizer significantly (P≤0.05; F--test) affected seed yield, yield attributes and quality of early sown sunflower, except oil yield. Application of organic fertilizer resulted in significantly (P<0.01) higher values for all the traits measured relative to the control, except oil yield. Variety effect was not significant for any of the traits evaluated. Among the interaction effects, only sowing date×variety and fertilizer×variety were significant (P≤0.05; F-test) for number of seeds per head of early sown sunflower, respectively (Table 6). Staggered sowing of sunflower in the late season significantly (P≤0.05; F-test) affected head diameter, number of seeds per head and seed yield (Table 7). Application of organic fertilizer significantly (P≤0.05; F-test) increased seed yield, all yield attributes, oil yield and seed quality of late sown sunflower, except protein content. Varietal effect was only significant (P≤0.05; F-test) on head diameter with SAMSUN-3 producing head with higher diameter. Sowing date×fertilizer interaction significantly (P≤0.05; F-test) affected oil and protein content of late sown sunflower. Whereas, sowing date×variety interaction significantly (P≤0.05; F-test) affected head diameter and head weight of late sown sunflower (Table 7).

Effects of sowing date×organic fertilizer on plant height at flowering and seed quality of late sown sunflower

The mean values of plant height at flowering and seed quality (protein and oil contents) that were significantly (P<0.05; F-test) affected by sowing date×organic fertilizer application interaction effects of late sown sunflower are presented in Table 8. Fertilized sunflower sown between 14 and 28 August recorded significantly (P≤0.05) higher plant height at flowering than the fertilized sunflower sown on 4 September and unfertilized sunflower sown on 21 August and 4 September. The protein content of fertilized sunflower sown on 28 August was significantly (P≤0.05) higher than the other treatments, except the unfertilized sunflower sown on 14 August. However, the oil content of fertilized sunflower sown on 21 and 28 August was significantly (P≤0.05) higher than all the unfertilized sunflower treatments, except the sunflower sown on 14 August (Table 8).

Table 8:

Effects of sowing date×organic fertilizer on plant height at flowering (R5), protein and oil content of late sown sunflower

Sowing dateFertilizer applicationLate sown
Height (m) at R5Protein content (%)Oil content (%)
IF02.120.425.3
IIF01.919.322.8
IIIF02.218.320.2
IVF01.618.123.0
IF12.217.823.4
IIF12.319.925.9
IIIF12.321.226.1
IVF11.917.525.8
LSD 5%0.12*1.05*2.20*

Effects of sowing date×variety on number of seeds per head of early sown sunflower and some yield attributes of late sown sunflower

Funtua variety sown on 26 June produced significantly (P≤0.05) higher number of seeds per head than SAMSUN-3 sunflower variety sown on the same date. Plants of Funtua variety sown on 28 August were significantly (P<0.05) taller than all the plants of SAMSUN3 and Funtua varieties sown across all the sowing dates, except Funtua sown on 14 August (Table 9). The latest sown Funtua variety (4 September) produced significantly (P0.05) smaller head diameter and smaller head weight than those of other treatments, except SAMSUN-3 sown 3 July.

Table 9:

Effects of sowing date×variety on number of seeds per head of early sown sunflower and plant height at physiological maturity (R9), head diameter and average head weight per plant of late sown sunflower

Sowing dateVarietyEarly sownLate sown
No. of seeds per headHeight at R9 (m)Head diameter (cm)Head weight (g)
IV11,097.52.116.981.0
IIV1927.62.216.895.6
IIIV11,007.02.116.178.0
IVV11,096.01.815.479.4
IV21,034.02.415.994.1
IIV21,128.32.216.494.2
IIIV21,051.32.516.5103.1
IVV21,114.51.913.866.2
LSD 5%114.74*0.20*0.99*14.61**

Effects of organic fertilizer application×variety on number of seeds per head of early sown sunflower

Mean values of seeds per head of early sown sunflower varieties as affected by organic fertilizer×variety interaction are presented in Table 10. On average, the fertilized treatments of SAMSUN-3 and Funtua produced significantly (P≤0.05) higher number of seeds than their unfertilized treatments by 16.6 and 13.8%, respectively.

Table 10:

Effects of organic fertilizer×variety on number of seeds per head of early sown sunflower

Organic fertilizerSAMSUN-3Funtua
No. of seeds per headNo. of seeds per head
Fo953.01,001.9
F11,111.01,162.1
LSD 5%81.13**

Discussion

The productivity of sunflower is largely determined by the prevailing weather conditions throughout its life cycle and imposed cultural practices (Kaleem et al., 2011a). Cultural practices like sowing date and fertilizer application and some environmental factors (temperature and rainfall) are major factors which affect plant growth and development. In our study, varying responses were observed on the two test varieties to these factors. Although, temperature is not a limiting climatic factor in the tropics, delay in sowing resulted in lower values of GGD of late sown sunflower, especially Funtua (late-maturing variety). The overall range of total GGD of 1,942.37–2,423.07 compared favourably with values (2,187.00–2,293.30) reported for sunflower hybrids in Berlin by Canavar et al. (2010) and higher than values, 1,656.0–1,890.0 and 1,469.0–1,598.0 recorded for sunflower hybrids in Pakistan during spring and autumn, respectively (Qadir et al., 2007). Sunshine hour range of 300.6 to 497.0 from planting to maturity was much lower than 894.1–959.5 h recorded in Berlin by Canavar et al. (2010). The lower values could be attributed to heavier cloud cover in the tropics compared to the temperate region. As sowing was delayed, number of phenological days to flowering of early sown sunflower significantly (P≤0.05) increased. Whereas number of phenological days to flowering and physiological maturity of late sown sunflower significantly (P≤0.05) decreased. This trend could be attributed to increased vegetative growth in early sown sunflower relative to the late sown crop. Early sown Funtua variety flowered 4 days later than SAMSUN-3 and was also significantly (P≤0.05) taller at flowering and physiological maturity in both early and late sowing dates. However, Funtua matured 7 days later than SAMSUN-3 during late sowing. Application of organic fertilizer significantly (P≤0.05) hastened number of phenological days to flowering of early sown sunflower by 2 days and also enhanced plant height of early and late sown sunflower. The nutrients supplied through the application of organic fertilizer apparently enhanced the growth of sunflower. When sowing was delayed till 4 September, 2012 in the late sown sunflower, head diameter, number of seeds per head and seed yield were significantly (P≤005) reduced. However, organic fertilizer application significantly (P≤0.05) increased seed yield and yield attributes in both early and late sown sunflower. Increased seed yield in sunflower had also been attributed to increase in the values of seed yield attributes after nitrogen application (Bakht et al., 2010; Ahmad et al., 2011 and Nasim et al., 2012b). Among the seed yield attributes evaluated, only number of seeds per head, head diameter and head weight were significantly affected by sowing date×variety interaction effect with Funtua recording higher values. Number of seeds per head had earlier been reported to contribute greatly to variation in sunflower oil yield by de la Vega and Hull (2002). In our study, the effect of sowing date, organic fertilizer application and variety on seed quality was variable. Sowing date did not affect oil and protein content of early and late sown sunflower, except protein content of early sown sunflower. Sunflower sown on 3 July, 2012 contained the highest protein (22.9%) and it compared favourably with values (17.25–18.89%) reported for hybrids in Pakistan (Ahmad et al., 2011) and on par with values (21.91–27.51%) in Moldova (Yasin et al., 2013). Application of organic fertilizer significantly (P≤0.05) increased oil and protein contents in both early and late sown sunflower, except protein content of late sown sunflower. Nasim et al. (2012a) also reported optimum oil content when nitrogen was applied at 60 kg/ha and a decline as N increased to 240 kgN/ha. A significant (P≤0.05) high protein content of 29.71%) was reported when N was applied at the rate of 150 kg/ha in Moldova (Yasin et al., 2013). The ultimate goal of growing sunflower is for edible oil contained in its seed and the oil yield is a function of the genotype, seed yield and oil concentration (de la Vega and Hall, 2002; Petcu et al., 2010). Delay in sowing in both early and late sown sunflower did not affect oil yield even though sowing date has been reported to be the main source of variation for oil yield by de la Vega and Hull (2002). Application of organic fertilizer significantly (P≤0.05) increased oil yield by 23% relative to the control in the late sown sunflower. The oil yield values of 213.56–381.46 kg/ha recorded on late sown sunflower compared favourably with values (226.42–302.91 kg/ha) earlier reported for sunflower sown between late July and early September in a forest location (Lawal et al., 2011). In the late sown sunflower, oil yield was higher in earlier than later sowing dates. This trend was consistent with findings in Serbia (Balalic et al., 2007, 2010) and Nigeria (Lawal et al., 2011). Only organic fertilizer application significantly (P≤0.05) affected both early and late sown sunflower seed yield. The response to applied fertilizer could be attributed to availability of nutrients in the soil during the physiological growth and development stages of the plants as recently reported by Yasin et al. (2013). The seed yield range (852.45–1,525.78 kg/ha) recorded in our study was on par with the Nigerian (1,000 kg/ha), African (812 kg/ha) averages (Olowe et al., 2013) and world average (1,520 kg/ha) according to USAD (2012). This performance confirmed the potential of sunflower especially when sown in early July or second to third week in August. The late season is usually the more preferred period to sow sunflower in the humid tropics because of the desire to harvest the heads in November/December when the weather is dry in order to get good quality seeds.

References

Agele, S.O., 2003. Sunflower responses to weather variations in rainy and dry cropping seasons in a Tropical rainforest zone. IJOP32: 1733.Search in Google Scholar

Ahmad,M., Iqbal,J., Kaleem,S., Wasaya,A., Ishaque,M., 2011. Qualitative analysis of spring planted sunflower hybrids as influenced by varying nutritional area. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition10: 291295.10.3923/pjn.2011.291.295Search in Google Scholar

Ali,A., Afzal,M., Rasool,I., Hussain,S., Ahmad,M., 2011. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids performance at different plant spacing under agro-ecological conditions of Sargodha, Pakistan. International Conference on Food Engineering and Biotechnology9: 317322.Search in Google Scholar

Ali, A., Ahmad, A., Khaliq, T., Akhatar, J., 2012. Planting density and nitrogen rates optimization for growth and yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences22: 10701075.Search in Google Scholar

Anjum, A.S., Muhammad, S., Imran, M., Arshadullah, M., 2012. Performance of early and late sown sunflower hybrids under organic farming system in rainfed area. Science Technology and Development31: 2628.Search in Google Scholar

Anonymous1989. Fertilizer use and management practices for crops in Nigeria (Series 2). In: Enwezor, W.O., Udo, E.J., Usoroh, N.J., Ayotade, K.A., Adepetu, J.A., Chude, V.O., Udegbe, C.I. (eds) Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Water Resources and Rural Development. Bobma Publishers, Ibadan, Nigeria, p. 163.Search in Google Scholar

Asbag, F.T., Gorttapeh, A.H., Fayaz-Moghadam, A., Saber-Rezaie, M., Feghnabi, F., Eizadkhah, M., Jahannavard, S., Parvizi, S., Moghadam-Pour, S.N., 2009. Effects of planting date and irrigation management on sunflower yield and yield components. Research Journal of Biological Sciences4: 306308.Search in Google Scholar

Bakht, J., Shafi, M., Yousaf, M., Shah, H.U., 2010. Physiology, phenology and yield of sunflower (autumn) as affected by NPK fertilizer and hybrids. Pakistan Journal of Botany42: 19091922.Search in Google Scholar

Balalic, I., Crnobarac, J., Duzanic, N., 2007. Planting date effects on oil yield in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Helia30: 153158.10.2298/HEL0747153BSearch in Google Scholar

Balalic, I.M., Crnobarac, J.Z., Miklic, V.J., 2010. Interaction hybrid×planting date for oil yield in sunflower. Journal of Agricultural Science55: 915.10.2298/JAS1001009BSearch in Google Scholar

Baydar, H., Erbas, S., 2005. Influence of seed development and seed position on oil, fatty acids and contents in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture29: 179186.Search in Google Scholar

Branski, M., Srednicka-Tober, D., Volakakis, N., Seal, C, Sanderson, R., Stewart, G.B., Benbrook, C., Biavati, B., Markellou, E., Giotis, C., Gromadzka-Ostrowska, J., Rembialkowska, E., Skwarlo-Sonta, K., Tahvonen, R., Lanovska, D., Niggli, U., Nicot, P., Leifert, C., 2014. Higher antioxidant and lower cadmium concentrations and lower incidence of pesticide residues in organically grown crops: A systematic literature review and meta-analyses. British Journal of Nutrition112: 794811.10.1017/S0007114514001366Search in Google Scholar

Canavar, O., Ellmer, F., Chimeileski, F.M., 2010. Investigation of yield and yield components of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars in the ecological conditions of Berlin (Germany). Helia33(53): 117130.10.2298/HEL1053117CSearch in Google Scholar

de la Vega,A., Hall,A.J., 2002. Effects of planting date, genotype, and their interactions on sunflower yield: II. Components of oil yield. Crop Science42: 12021210.10.2135/cropsci2002.1202Search in Google Scholar

Dosio,G.A.A., Aguirrezabal,L.A.N., Andrade,F.H., Pereyra,V.R., 2000. Solar radiation intercepted during seed filling and oil production in two sunflower hybrids. Crop Science40: 166371644.10.2135/cropsci2000.4061637xSearch in Google Scholar

Egan,H., Kick,R.S., Sawyer,R., 1981. Soxhlet extraction method. In: Person’s Chemical Analysis of Food, 8th ed. Livingstone Publishers, London, pp. 507547.Search in Google Scholar

Flagella, Z.T., Rotundo, E., Tarantino, R., DiCaterina. De Caro, A., 2002. Changes in seed yield and oil fatty acid composition of high oleic sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids in relation to the sowing date and water regime. Agronomy Journal17: 221230.10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00012-6Search in Google Scholar

Freed,R., Einmensmith,S.P., Guetz,S., Reicosky,D., Smail,V.W., Wolberg,P., 1989. User’s guide to MSTATC, An analysis of agronomic research experiments. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.Search in Google Scholar

Kaleem, S., Hassan, F.-u., Ahmad, M., Mahmood,I., Wasaya, A., Randhawa, M.A., Khaliq, P., 2011a. Effect of growing degree days on autumn planted sunflower. African Journal of Biotechnology10: 88408846.10.5897/AJB11.608Search in Google Scholar

Kaleem, S., Hassan, F.-u., Mahmood,I., Ahmad, M., Ullah, R., Ahmad,M., 2011b. Response of sunflower to environmental disparity. Nature and Science9: 7381.Search in Google Scholar

Kaleem, S., Hassan, F.U., Saleem, A, 2009. Influence of environmental variations on physiological attributes of sunflower. African Journal of Biotechnology8: 35313539.Search in Google Scholar

Lawal,B.A., Obigbesan,G.O., Akanbi,W.B., Kolawole,G.O., 2011. Effect of planting time on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) productivity in Ibadan, Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research6: 30493054.Search in Google Scholar

McMaster, G.S., Wilhelm, W.W., 1997. Growing degree days: one equation, two interpretations. Agricultural Forestry and Forest Meteorology87: 291300.10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00027-0Search in Google Scholar

Nasim, W., Ahmad, A., Bano, A., Olatinwo, R., Usman, M., Khaliq, T., Wajid, A., Hammad, H.M., Mubeen, M., Hussain, M., 2012a. Effect of nitrogen on yield and oil quality of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrid under sub humid conditions of Pakistan. American Journal of Plant Science3: 243251.10.4236/ajps.2012.32029Search in Google Scholar

Nasim, W., Ahmad, A., Hammad, H.M, Chaudhary, H.J., Munis, M.F., 2012b. Effect of nitrogen on growth and yield of sunflower under semi-arid conditions of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany44: 639648.Search in Google Scholar

National Agricultural Seeds Council (NASC), 2013. Sunflower. In: Catalogue of crop varieties released and registered in Nigeria, Vol. 5. Proexpand Publishers, Ibadan, p. 41.Search in Google Scholar

Ogunremi, E.A., 2000. Sunflower, Kenaf and sugar-cane in Nigeria: My experiences. In: Akoroda, M.O. (ed) Agronomy in Nigeria. University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria, pp. 130142.Search in Google Scholar

Olowe, V.I.O., 2005. Effect of plant population densities on growth and yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in the transition zone of south west Nigeria. Tropical Agricultural Research and Extension8: 3744.Search in Google Scholar

Olowe,V.I.O., Adebimpe,O.A., Obadiahi,T.E., 2005. Response of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) to nitrogen and phosphorus application in a forest – Savanna transition zone of south west Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Horticultural Science10: 2329.10.4314/njhs.v10i1.3405Search in Google Scholar

Olowe, V.I., Folarin, O.M., Adeniregun, O., Atayese, M.O., Adekunle, Y.A., 2013. Seed yield, head characteristics and oil content in sunflower varieties as influenced by seeds from single and multiple headed plants under humid tropical conditions. Annals of Applied Biology163: 394402.10.1111/aab.12064Search in Google Scholar

Petcu, E., Babeanu, N., Popa, O., Partal, E., Pricop, S.M., 2010. Effect of planting date, plant population and genotype on oil content and fatty acid composition in sunflower. Romanian Agricultural Research27: 5357.Search in Google Scholar

Posner, J.L., Baldock, J.O., Hedtcke, J.L., 2008. Organic and conventional production systems in Wisconsin integrated cropping systems trials I. Productivity 1990–2002. Agronomy Journal100: 253260.10.2134/agronj2007.0058Search in Google Scholar

Qadir, G., Hassan, F.-u., Malik, M.A., 2007. Growing degree days and yield relationship in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology9: 564568.Search in Google Scholar

Qahar, A., Khan, Z.H., Anwar, S., Badshan, H., Ullah, H., 2010. Nitrogen use efficiency, yield and other characteristics of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids as affected by different levels of nitrogen. Biological Diversity and Conservation3: 121125.Search in Google Scholar

Rasool, F.-u., Hassan, B., Jahangir, I.A., Ali, T., Mubarak, T., 2013. Nutritional yield and economic responses of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) to integrated levels of nitrogen, sulphur and farmyard manure. The Journal of Agricultural Science8: 1727.10.4038/jas.v8i1.5373Search in Google Scholar

Rodrigues, D., Romero-Garcia, J., Rodriguez-Garcia, R., Angualo-Sanchez, J.L., 2002. Characterization of proteins from sunflower leaves and seeds: relationship of biomass and seed yield. In: Trends in New Crops and New Uses. Proc. AAIC Fifth National Symposium, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN, pp. 143149.Search in Google Scholar

Rosa, P.M., Antoniassi,R., Freitas,S.C., Bizzo,H.R., Zanotto,D.L., Oliveira,M.F., Castiglioni,V.B.R., 2009. Chemical composition of Brazilian sunflower varieties. Helia32: 145156.10.2298/HEL0950145RSearch in Google Scholar

Schneiter, A.A., Miller, J.F., 1981. Description of sunflower growth stages. Crop Science21: 901903.10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060024xSearch in Google Scholar

Seiler, G.J., Jan, C., Gulya, T.J., 2008. Use of world Helianthus species in sunflower breeding. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Conventional and Molecular Breeding of Field and Vegetable crops, November 24–27, 2008, Novi Sad, Serbia, Pp. 7176.Search in Google Scholar

Shakuntala, N.M., Vyakaranahal,B.S., Shankergoud,I., Deshpande,V.K., Pujari,B.T., Nadaf,H.L., 2012. Influence of planting ratios and staggered planting on seed yield and quality in hybrid seed production of sunflower hybrid RSFH-130. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science25: 5257.Search in Google Scholar

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2012. Statistics on oilseeds, fats and oils. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Ag_Statistics/2012/chapter03.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Yasin, M., Mahmood, A., Ali, A., Aziz, M., Javaid, M.M., Iqbal, Z., Tanveer, A., 2013. Impact of varying planting patterns and fertilizer application strategies on autumn planted sunflower hybrid. Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova56: 3951.10.2478/v10298-012-0082-xSearch in Google Scholar

Yiridoe, E.K., Bonti-Ankomah, S., Martin, R.C., 2005. Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: A review and update of the literature. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems20: 193205.10.1079/RAF2005113Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-6-6
Accepted: 2014-9-16
Published Online: 2014-10-4
Published in Print: 2014-12-1

©2014 Oshundiya et al. published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 3.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/helia-2014-0012/html
Scroll to top button