Home New improvements on numerical radius bounds via the Moore–Penrose inverse
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

New improvements on numerical radius bounds via the Moore–Penrose inverse

  • Mohamed Amine Ighachane , Fuad Kittaneh EMAIL logo and Yonghui Ren
Published/Copyright: October 11, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this paper, we establish several inner product inequalities that characterize the positivity of block operator matrices. By examining specific blocks of positive operator matrices involving the Moore–Penrose inverse, we derive new inner product inequalities that refine recently established bounds. As an application, we further refine certain numerical radius inequalities from the literature. Our findings generalize and extend several well-known results in this field, contributing to ongoing advancements in operator inequalities.

MSC 2020: 47A30; 47A12; 47B15

Funding statement: The work of Yonghui Ren is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Henan (252300421797).

References

[1] A. Abu-Omar and F. Kittaneh, Numerical radius inequalities for n × n operator matrices, Linear Algebra Appl. 468 (2015), 18–26. 10.1016/j.laa.2013.09.049Search in Google Scholar

[2] R. Bhatia, Positive Definite Matrices, Princeton Ser. Appl. Math., Princeton University, Princeton, 2007. Search in Google Scholar

[3] P. Bhunia, F. Kittaneh and S. Sahoo, Improved numerical radius bounds using the Moore–Penrose inverse, Linear Algebra Appl. 711 (2025), 1–16. 10.1016/j.laa.2025.02.013Search in Google Scholar

[4] M. L. Buzano, Generalizzazione della diseguaglianza di Cauchy–Schwarz, Rend. Semin. Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino 31 (1971/73), 405–409. Search in Google Scholar

[5] G. Corach and A. Maestripieri, Weighted generalized inverses, oblique projections, and least-squares problems, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 26 (2005), no. 6, 659–673. 10.1080/01630560500323083Search in Google Scholar

[6] G. Fongi and M. C. Gonzalez, Moore–Penrose inverse and partial orders on Hilbert space operators, Linear Algebra Appl. 674 (2023), 1–20. 10.1016/j.laa.2023.05.021Search in Google Scholar

[7] C. W. Groetsch, Generalized Inverses of Linear Operators: Representation and Approximation, Monogr. Textb. Pure Appl. Math. 37, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1977. Search in Google Scholar

[8] I. H. Gumus, O. Hirzallah and F. Kittaneh, Norm inequalities involving accretive-dissipative 2 × 2 block matrices, Linear Algebra Appl. 528 (2017), 76–93. 10.1016/j.laa.2016.04.015Search in Google Scholar

[9] T. Hiroshima, Majorization criterion for distillability of a bipartite quantum state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003), no. 5, Article ID 057902. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.057902Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] F. Kittaneh, Notes on some inequalities for Hilbert space operators, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 24 (1988), no. 2, 283–293. 10.2977/prims/1195175202Search in Google Scholar

[11] F. Kittaneh, A numerical radius inequality and an estimate for the numerical radius of the Frobenius companion matrix, Studia Math. 158 (2003), no. 1, 11–17. 10.4064/sm158-1-2Search in Google Scholar

[12] F. Kittaneh, Numerical radius inequalities for Hilbert space operators, Studia Math. 168 (2005), no. 1, 73–80. 10.4064/sm168-1-5Search in Google Scholar

[13] F. Kittaneh, H. R. Moradi and M. Sababheh, Refined Kato inequality and applications to norm and numerical radius inequalities, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. RACSAM 118 (2024), no. 3, Paper No. 97. 10.1007/s13398-024-01600-4Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. Sababheh, D. S. Djordjević and H. R. Moradi, Numerical radius and norm bounds via the Moore–Penrose inverse, Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 18 (2024), no. 5, Paper No. 117. 10.1007/s11785-024-01560-ySearch in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-04-01
Accepted: 2025-07-22
Published Online: 2025-10-11

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gmj-2025-2076/html
Scroll to top button