Home Exact asymptotic formulas for the heat kernels of space and time-fractional equations
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Exact asymptotic formulas for the heat kernels of space and time-fractional equations

  • Chang-Song Deng EMAIL logo and René L. Schilling
Published/Copyright: October 23, 2019

Abstract

This paper aims to study the asymptotic behaviour of the fundamental solutions (heat kernels) of non-local (partial and pseudo differential) equations with fractional operators in time and space. In particular, we obtain exact asymptotic formulas for the heat kernels of time-changed Brownian motions and Cauchy processes. As an application, we obtain exact asymptotic formulas for the fundamental solutions to the n-dimensional fractional heat equations in both time and space

βtβu(t,x)=(Δx)γu(t,x),β,γ(0,1).

Appendix

We will need a moment formula for stable subordinators which can be found in Sato [31, Eq. (25.5), p. 162] (without proof but references to the literature). The following short and straightforward derivation seems to be new.

Lemma 4.1

The moments of orderκ ∈ (–∞, α) of aα-stable subordinator (St)t≥0exist and are given by

EStκ=Γ1κβΓ(1κ)tκ/β,t>0.

Proof

Since St has the same probability distribution as t1/αS1, it is enough to consider t = 1. Recall that the Laplace transform of S1 is 𝔼 etS1 = etα, t > 0. Substituting λ = S1 in the well-known formula [32, p. vii]

λr=1Γ(r)0eλxxr1dx,λ>0,r>0,

and taking expectations yields, because of Tonelli’s theorem,

ES1r=1Γ(r)0EexS1xr1dx=1Γ(r)0exβxrdxx.

Now we change variables according to y = xα, and get

ES1r=1Γ(r)1β0eyyrβdyy=1rΓ(r)rβΓrβ=Γ1+rβΓ(1+r).

Setting κ = –r proves the assertion for κ ∈ (–∞, 0). Note that this formula extends (analytically) to –r = κ < α. Alternatively, use the very same calculation and the formula [32, p. vii]

λr=rΓ(1r)01eλxxr1dx,λ>0,r(0,1),(4.1)

to get the assertion for κ ∈ (0, α).□

The following theorem is known in the literature in dimension n = 1, see [31, p. 163]. The multivariate setting and the short proof via subordination are new.

Lemma 4.2

Let (Xt)t≥0be a rotationally symmetricα-stable Lévy process onnwith 0 < α < 2. For anyκ ∈ (–n, α),

E|Xt|κ=2κΓn+κ2Γ1καΓn2Γ1κ2tκ/α,t>0.

Ifκ ≤ –n orκαthe moments are infinite.

Proof

Let (Bt)t≥0 be a Brownian motion on ℝn (starting from zero) with transition probability density given by (1.2), and (St)t≥0 be an independent α/2-stable subordinator, that is an increasing Lévy process. From Bochner’s subordination is well known that the time-changed process BSt, t ≥ 0, is a rotationally symmetric α-stable Lévy process on ℝn.

For any κ > –n and t > 0, we have

E|Bt|κ=1(4πt)n/2Rn|x|κexp|x|24tdx=21ntn/2Γn20rn+κ1expr24tdr=2κΓn+κ2Γn2tκ/2.

Let 𝔼B and 𝔼S denote the expectations w.r.t. (Bt)t≥0 and (St)t≥0, respectively. Using Lemma 4.1, we obtain that for any κ ∈ (–n, α) and t > 0,

E|BSt|κ=ESEB|BSt|κ=2κΓn+κ2Γn2EStκ/2=2κΓn+κ2Γ1καΓn2Γ1κ2tκ/α.

If κ ≤ –n or κα, we have 𝔼|Xt|κ = ∞, see [8, Theorem 3.1.e) and Remark 3.2.d)].□

Remark 4.1

We want to sketch another, slightly more general proof of Lemma 4.2 which avoids the subordination argument. Combining the well-known formulas

|x|κ=κ2κ1Γn+κ2πn/2Γ1κ2Rn{0}(1cos(xξ))|ξ|κndξ,κ(0,2),|x|κ=2κΓn+κ2πn/2Γκ2Rn{0}|ξ|nκeixξdξ,κ(n,0)

(the second formula is to be understood in the sense of L. Schwartz distributions) with an Abel-type convergence factor argument and Fubini’s theorem, also yields the moment formula of Lemma 4.2.

Lemma 4.3

Letψ : [1, ∞) → ℝ be a bounded function such that lims→∞ψ(s) = 0 andω : [0, ∞) → (0, ∞) a non-increasing function satisfying1s–1ω(s) ds < ∞. For anyc > 0 andδ > 0 one has

limA1logAcAδs1ω(s)ds=δω(0+)

and

limA1logAcAδs1ω(s)ψc1/δAs1/δds=0.

Proof

The first claim follows easily from l’Hospital’s rule. For n ∈ ℕ, we can use the first part of the lemma and get

1logAcAδs1ω(s)ψc1/δAs1/δds1logAcAδs1ω(s)ψc1/δAs1/δdsψ1logAcAδncAδs1ω(s)ds+ψ1[n1/δ,)1logAncAδs1ω(s)dsAψ(δω(0+)δω(0+))+ψ1[n1/δ,)δω(0+)=ψ1[n1/δ,)δω(0+)n0,

and this completes the proof.□

The following asymptotic formula for integrals can be proved by the Laplace method, see e.g. de Bruijn [10, Section 4.2, pp. 63–65] for r0 = 0.

Lemma 4.4

Assume that –∞ ≤ v < w ≤ ∞, hC2(v, w), andvweh(r)dr<.Letr0 ∈ (v, w). Ifh(r0) ≥ 0, h″(r0) > 0, andhis strictly decreasing on (v, r0] and strictly increasing on [r0, w), then

vweCh(r)dreCh(r0)2πCh(r0)asC.

Lemma 4.5

Letϕ : (0, ∞) → (–1, ∞) be a continuous function such thatϕ(0+) = 0 and lim sups→∞sθ(1 + ϕ(s)) < ∞ for someθ ∈ ℝ. For all constants a ∈ ℝ and b, c, d > 0 the following asymptotics holds

0saeBsbcsd(1+ϕ(s))dsI(B)asB

where the valueI(B) is given by the following expression

2πb+d(bB)2(a+1)+d2(b+d)(cd)2(a+1)b2(b+d)exp(b+d)b1cbb+dd1Bdb+d.

Proof

First, we prove that

0saeBsbcsddsI(B)asB.(4.2)

If a ≠ –1, changing variables according to r = (c–1B)(a+1)/(b+d)sa+1 gives

0saeBsbcsdds=cB1a+1b+d|a+1|0expcbb+dBdb+drba+1+rda+1dr.

Lemma 4.4 with h(r) = rb/(a+1) + rd/(a+1), r0 = (b–1d)(a+1)/(b+d), v = 0, w = ∞ and C = cb/(b+d)Bd/(b+d) yields (4.2).

If a = –1, we change variables according to r = log s + (b+d)–1 log(c–1B), and use Lemma 4.4 with v = –∞, w = ∞, h(r) = ebr + edr, r0 = (b + d)–1 log(b–1d) and C = cb/(b+d)Bd/(b+d) to obtain (4.2).

We still have to check that the following limit is zero:

limBB2(a+1)+d2(b+d)exp(b+d)b1cbb+dd1Bdb+d0saeBsbcsdϕ(s)ds.

To this end, we fix n ∈ ℕ and observe that

I1(n,B):=01/nsaeBsbcsd|ϕ(s)|dsϕ1(0,1/n)01/nsaeBsbcsddsϕ1(0,1/n)0saeBsbcsdds.

Moreover, set

I2(n,B):=1/nsaeBsbcsd|ϕ(s)|ds.

By our assumption, there exists a constant C(n) > 0 depending on n such that 1 + ϕ(s) ≤ C(n)sθ for all s ≥ 1/n. Thus,

|ϕ(s)|1+(1+ϕ(s))(ns)θ0+C(n)sθC(n,θ)sθ0,s1/n,

where C(n, θ) := nθ∨0 + C(n)n(–θ)∨0. Using the dominated convergence theorem we deduce

B2(a+1)+d2(b+d)exp(b+d)b1cbb+dd1Bdb+dI2(n,B)C(n,θ)1/nB2(a+1)+d2(b+d)sa+(θ0)×exp(b+d)b1cbb+dd1Bdb+dBsbcsddsBC(n,θ)0=0.

Combining these calculations gives

B2(a+1)+d2(b+d)exp(b+d)b1cbb+dd1Bdb+d0saeBsbcsdϕ(s)dsB2(a+1)+d2(b+d)exp(b+d)b1cbb+dd1Bdb+d(I1(n,B)+I2(n,B))B2(a+1)+d2(b+d)exp(b+d)b1cbb+dd1Bdb+d×ϕ1(0,1/n)0saeBsbcsdds+I2(n,B)Bϕ1(0,1/n)2πb+db2(a+1)+d2(b+d)n(cd)2(a+1)b2(b+d)+0n0.

This completes the proof.□

Acknowledgements

Chang-Song Deng gratefully acknowledges financial support through the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11401442, 11831015).

References

[1] B. Baeumer, M.M. Meerschaert, Stochastic solutions for fractional Cauchy problems. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 4 (2001), 481–500.Search in Google Scholar

[2] A. Bendikov, Asymptotic formulas for symmetric stable semigroups. Expo. Math. 12 (1994), 381–384.Search in Google Scholar

[3] A. Bendikov, Heat kernels for isotropic-like Markov generators on ultrametric spaces: A survey. p-adic Numbers, Ultrametic Analysis and Applications10 (2018), 1–11; 10.1134/S2070046618010016.Search in Google Scholar

[4] R.M. Blumenthal, R.K. Getoor, Some theorems on stable processes. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 95 (1960), 263–273; 10.1090/S0002-9947-1960-0119247-6.Search in Google Scholar

[5] S. Bochner, Diffusion equation and stochastic processes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 35 (1949), 368–370; 10.1073/pnas.35.7.368.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] Y. Butko, Chernoff approximation for semigroups generated by killed Feller processes and Feynman formulae for time-fractional Fokker—Planck—Kolmogorov equations. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 21, No 5 (2018), 1203–1237; 10.1515/fca-2018-0065; https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/fca.2018.21.issue-5/issue-files/fca.2018.21.issue-5.xml.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Z.-Q. Chen, P. Kim, T. Kumagai, J. Wang, Heat kernel estimates for time fractional equations. Forum Math. 30 (2018), 1163–1192; 10.1515/forum-2017-0192.Search in Google Scholar

[8] C.-S. Deng, R.L. Schilling, On shift Harnack inequalities for subordinate semigroups and moment estimates for Lévy processes. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 125 (2015), 3851–3878; 10.1016/j.spa.2015.05.013.Search in Google Scholar

[9] J. Dubbeldam, Z. Tomovski, T. Sandev, Space-time fractional Schrödinger equation with composite time fractional derivative. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 18, No 5(2015), 1179–1200; 10.1515/fca-2015-0068; https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/fca.2015.18.issue-5/issue-files/fca.2015.18.issue-5.xml.Search in Google Scholar

[10] N.G. de Bruijn, Asymptotic Methods in Analysis. North–Holland, Amsterdam (1958).Search in Google Scholar

[11] R. Gorenflo, Y. Luchko, M. Yamamoto, Time-fractional diffusion equation in the fractional Sobolev spaces. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 18, No 3 (2015), 799–820; 10.1515/fca-2015-0048; https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/fca.2015.18.issue-3/issue-files/fca.2015.18.issue-3.xml.Search in Google Scholar

[12] A. Grigor’yan, T. Kumagai, On the dichotomy in the heat kernel two sided estimates. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 77 (2008), 199–210; 10.1090/pspum/077.Search in Google Scholar

[13] M. Hahn, S. Umarov, Fractional Fokker–Planck–Kolmogorov type equations and their associated stochastic differential equations. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 14, No 1 (2011), 56–79; 10.2478/s13540-011-0005-9; https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/fca.2011.14.issue-1/issue-files/fca.2011.14.issue-1.xml.Search in Google Scholar

[14] K. Hu, N. Jacob, C. Yuan, Existence and uniqueness for a class of stochastic time fractional space pseudo-differential equations. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 19, No(2016), 56–68; 10.1515/fca-2016-0004; https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/fca.2016.19.issue-1/issue-files/fca.2016.19.issue-1.xml.Search in Google Scholar

[15] N. Jacob, Pseudo Differential Operators and Markov Processes, Vol. 1–3. Imperial College Press, London (2001–2005).10.1142/p395Search in Google Scholar

[16] N. Jacob, V. Knopova, S. Landwehr, R.L. Schilling, A geometric interpretation of the transition density of a symmetric Lévy process. Sci. China Math. 55 (2012), 1099–1126; 10.1007/s11425-012-4368-0.Search in Google Scholar

[17] P. Kern, S. Lage, M. Meerschaert, Semi-fractional diffusion equations. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 22, No (2019), 326–357; 10.1515/fca-2019-0021; https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/fca.2019.22.issue-2/issue-files/fca.2019.22.issue-2.xml.Search in Google Scholar

[18] M. Kwaśnicki, Ten equivalent definitions of the fractional Laplacian. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 20, No 1 (2017), 7–51; 10.1515/fca-2017-0002; https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/fca.2017.20.issue-1/issue-files/fca.2017.20.issue-1.xml.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Y. Luchko, Initial-boundary-value problems for the one-dimensional time-fractional diffusion equation. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 15, No (2012), 141–160; /10.2478/s13540-012-0010-7; https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/fca.2017.20.issue-1/issue-files/fca.2017.20.issue-1.xml.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Y. Luchko, M. Yamamoto, General time-fractional diffusion equation: some uniqueness and existence results for the initial-boundary-value problems. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 19, No 3 (2016), 676–695; 10.1515/fca-2016-0036; https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/fca.2016.19.issue-3/issue-files/fca.2016.19.issue-3.xml.Search in Google Scholar

[21] M. Magdziarz, Path properties of subdiffusion–a martingale approach. Stoch. Models26 (2010), 256–271; 10.1080/15326341003756379.Search in Google Scholar

[22] M. Magdziarz, R.L. Schilling, Asymptotic properties of Brownian motion delayed by inverse subordinators. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 143 (2015), 4485–4501; 10.1090/proc/12588.Search in Google Scholar

[23] M. Magdziarz, A. Weron, K. Weron, Fractional Fokker–Planck dynamics: Stochastic representation and computer simulation. Phys. Rev. E75 (2007), Art. # 016708; 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.016708.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] M.M. Meerschaert, E. Nane, Y. Xiao, Large deviations for local time fractional Brownian motion and applications. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 346 (2008), 432–445; 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.05.087.Search in Google Scholar

[25] M.M. Meerschaert, H.P. Scheffler, Limit theorems for continuous time random walks with infinite mean waiting times. J. Appl. Probab. 41 (2004), 623–638; 10.1239/jap/1091543414.Search in Google Scholar

[26] R. Metzler, J. Klafter, The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach. Phys. Rep. 339 (2000), 1–77; 10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00070-3.Search in Google Scholar

[27] G. Pagnini, F. Paradisi, A stochastic solution with Gaussian stationary increments of the symmetric space-time fractional diffusion equation. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 19, No 2 (2016), 408–440; 10.1515/fca-2016-0022; https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/fca.2016.19.issue-3/issue-files/fca.2016.19.issue-3.xml.Search in Google Scholar

[28] A. Piryatinska, A.I. Saichev, W.A. Woyczynski, Models of anomalous diffusion: The subdiffusive case. Phys. A349 (2005), 375–420; 10.1016/j.physa.2004.11.003.Search in Google Scholar

[29] G. Pólya, On the zeros of an integral function represented by Fourier’s integral. Messenger Math. 52 (1923), 185–188.Search in Google Scholar

[30] S.G. Samko, A.A. Kilbas, O.I. Marichev, Fractional Integrals and Derivatives. Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam (1993).Search in Google Scholar

[31] K. Sato, Lévy Processes and Infinitely Divisible Distributions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999).Search in Google Scholar

[32] R.L. Schilling, R. Song, Z. Vondraček, Bernstein Functions. Theory and Applications, 2nd Ed. De Gruyter, Berlin (2012).10.1515/9783110269338Search in Google Scholar

[33] V.V. Uchaikin, V.M. Zolotarev, Chance and Stability. Stable Distributions and their Applications. VSP, Utrecht (1999).10.1515/9783110935974Search in Google Scholar

[34] L. Yan, X. Yin, Large deviation principle for a space-time fractional stochastic heat equation with fractional noise. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 21, No 2 (2018), 462—485. 10.1515/fca-2018-0026; https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/fca.2018.21.issue-2/issue-files/fca.2018.21.issue-2.xml.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-02-10
Published Online: 2019-10-23
Published in Print: 2019-08-27

© 2019 Diogenes Co., Sofia

Downloaded on 31.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/fca-2019-0052/html
Scroll to top button