Abstract
In this paper, I explore how bio-hybrid forms can be created and combined starting from organic forms. The thesis put forward is epistemological: the combinatorial practice of bionics, biomimetics, biorobotics, and all design strategies inspired by nature is not based on a kind of biomimetic inspiration, i. e., on a kind of imitation of nature, but on a practice of translation.
To develop this thesis, I focus on the practices of contemporary biorobotics, first examining the practice of translating natural forms into technical artefacts as developed by Raoul Heinrich Francé at the beginning of the 20th century, secondly, analysing the production of robots capable of replicating complex locomotion systems and, finally, investigating the interaction between robots and living organisms (fish). In the last part of the paper, I reflect on the philosophical payoff and broader conditions of possibility for this translational practice. I discuss when and to what extent a translation of biological forms into biotechnical ones is acceptable and point out the notion of form that underlies this practice. Moreover, I draw attention to the need to philosophically investigate what happens between different domains of knowledge – and especially between science and technology. This article is thus an invitation to philosophers to develop a philosophy in the interstices of knowledge production.
Literatur
Ankeny, R., Chang, H., Boumans, M., u. Boon, M. (2011), Introduction: Philosophy of Science in Practice, in: European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1.3, 303.10.1007/s13194-011-0036-4Search in Google Scholar
Baedke, J., (2019), O Organism, Where Art Thou? Old and New Challenges for Organism‐Centered Biology, in: Journal of the History of Biology 52.2, 293–324.10.1007/s10739-018-9549-4Search in Google Scholar
Baker, M. (Hg.) (2003), Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, London.10.4324/9780203359792Search in Google Scholar
Becker, R. (2021), Qualitätsunterschiede: Kulturphänomenologie als kritische Theorie, Hamburg.10.28937/978-3-7873-3964-8Search in Google Scholar
Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2019), Bio-Informed Emerging Technologies and Their Relation to the Sustainability Aims of Biomimicry, in: Environmental Values 28.5, 551–571.10.3197/096327119X15579936382392Search in Google Scholar
Bensaude-Vincent, B., Loeve, S., Nordmann, A., u. Schwarz, A. (Hg.) (2017), Research Objects in Their Technological Setting, London.10.4324/9781781448397Search in Google Scholar
Benyus, J. M. (2002), Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature, New York.Search in Google Scholar
Bredekamp, H. (2001), Gazing Hands and Blind Spots: Galileo as Draftsman, in: Science in Context 14.1, 153.10.1017/S0269889701000333Search in Google Scholar
Breyer, T., u. Niklas, S. (2018), Ernst Cassirer in systematischen Beziehungen: zur kritisch-kommunikativen Bedeutung seiner Kulturphilosophie, Berlin.10.1515/9783110549478Search in Google Scholar
Canguilhem, G. (2007), Maschine und Organismus, in: Gugerli, D., et al. (Hg.), Zürcher Jahrbuch für Wissensgeschichte 3, Zürich u. Berlin, 185–211.Search in Google Scholar
Cardani, M. (2019), El problema de la realitat en Mach, Schlick i Cassirer: reflexions crítiques al voltant de la filosofia de la ciència i del neokantisme, in: Enrahonar 63, 81–103.10.5565/rev/enrahonar.1255Search in Google Scholar
Cardani, M., u. Tamborini, M. (2016), Data–Phenomena: Quid Juris?, in: Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 70.4, 527–548, URL: https://doi.org/10.3196/004433016820168266 (12.1.2023).10.3196/004433016820168266Search in Google Scholar
Cardani, M., u. Tamborini, M. (2017), Italian New Realism and Transcendental Philosophy: A Critical Account, in: Philosophy Today 61.3, 539–554, URL: https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday2017919170(12.1.2023)10.5840/philtoday2017919170Search in Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (2000), Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff; Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen der Erkenntniskritik (= Gesammelte Werke 6), Hamburg.Search in Google Scholar
Chang, H. (2011), The Philosophical Grammar of Scientific Practice, in: International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25.3, 205–221.10.1080/02698595.2011.605244Search in Google Scholar
Chang, H. (2012), Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-007-3932-1Search in Google Scholar
Chang, H. (2017), Is Pluralism Compatible with Scientific Realism?, in: Saatsi, J. (Hg.), The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism, 176–186, London.10.4324/9780203712498-15Search in Google Scholar
Coeckelbergh, M. (2011), You, Robot: on the Linguistic Construction of Artificial Others, in: AI & Society 26.1, 61–69.10.1007/s00146-010-0289-zSearch in Google Scholar
Coeckelbergh, M. (2017a), Language and Technology: Maps, Bridges, and Pathway, in: AI & Society 32.2, 175–189.10.1007/s00146-015-0604-9Search in Google Scholar
Coeckelbergh, M. (2017b), Using Words and Things: Language and Philosophy of Technology, London.10.4324/9781315528571Search in Google Scholar
Cordeschi, R. (2002), The Discovery of the Artificial: Behavior, Mind and Machines Before and Beyond Cybernetics, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Corning, P. A. (2020), Beyond the Modern Synthesis: A Framework for a More Inclusive Biological Synthesis, in: Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 153, 5–12.10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2020.02.002Search in Google Scholar
Datteri, E. (2021), Interactive Biorobotics, in: Synthese 198, 1–19.10.1007/s11229-020-02533-2Search in Google Scholar
Datteri, E. (2020b), The Logic of Interactive Biorobotics, in: Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 8, 1–15.10.3389/fbioe.2020.00637Search in Google Scholar
Datteri, E., u. Schiaffonati, V. (2019), Robotic Simulations, Simulations of Robots, in: Minds and Machines 29.1, 109–125.10.1007/s11023-019-09490-xSearch in Google Scholar
Datteri, E., u. Tamburrini, G. (2007), Biorobotic Experiments for the Discovery of Biological Mechanisms, in: Philosophy of Science 74.3, 409–430.10.1086/522095Search in Google Scholar
Del Fabbro, O. (2021), Philosophieren mit Objekten: Gilbert Simondons prozessuale Individuationsontologie, Frankfurt am Main.10.12907/978-3-593-44703-2Search in Google Scholar
Devitt, M. (Hg.) (2007), Scientific Realism. The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy, Oxford.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199234769.003.0026Search in Google Scholar
Dicks, H. (2016), The Philosophy of Biomimicry, in: Philosophy & Technology 29.3, 223–243.10.1007/s13347-015-0210-2Search in Google Scholar
Dicks, H. (2018), Nature as Mentor: Foundations of Biomimetic Epistemology, Preprint.Search in Google Scholar
Drack, M., Limpinsel, M., Bruyn, G. de, Nebelsick, J. H., u. Betz, O. (2017), Towards a Theoretical Clarification of Biomimetics Using Conceptual Tools from Engineering Design, in: Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 13.1, 016007.10.1088/1748-3190/aa967cSearch in Google Scholar
Dresow, M. (2020), History and Philosophy of Science after the Practice-Turn: From Inherent Tension to Local Integration, in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 82, 57–65.10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.01.001Search in Google Scholar
Drux, R. (Hg.) (1994), Die Geschöpfe des Prometheus – Der künstliche Mensch von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, Bielefeld.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, U. (2016), Dire quasi la stessa cosa, Mailand.Search in Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. (2014), Extinction and Evolution: What Fossils Reveal About the History of Life, Buffalo, N. Y.Search in Google Scholar
Esposito, M. (2016), Romantic Biology, 1890–1945, London u. New York.10.4324/9781315654539Search in Google Scholar
Fehrenbach, F. (2019), Leonardo da Vinci: der Impetus der Bilder, Berlin.10.1007/978-3-476-05728-0_10236-1Search in Google Scholar
Francé, R. H. (1920), Die Pflanze als Erfinder, Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar
Francé, R. H. (1928), Der Organismus: Organisation und Leben der Zelle, München.Search in Google Scholar
Franzini, E. (1987), Il mito di Leonardo, Mailand.Search in Google Scholar
Franzini, E. (2008), „I simboli e l’invisibile“. Figure e forme del pensiero simbolico, Mailand.Search in Google Scholar
Fraassen, B. C. van (1980), The Scientific Image, Oxford.10.1093/0198244274.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Friedman, M., u. Krauthausen, K. (2021), Materials matter: introduction, in: Fratzl, P., et al. (Hg.), Active Materials, Berlin, 1–36.10.1515/9783110562064-001Search in Google Scholar
Gabriel, M. (2014), Der neue Realismus, Berlin.10.5771/0031-8183-2014-2-352Search in Google Scholar
Goethe, J. W. v. (2008), Maximen und Reflexionen [1817], 14. Aufl., München.Search in Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1978), Ways of Worldmaking, Hassocks.10.5040/9781350928558Search in Google Scholar
Grunwald, A. (2015), Die hermeneutische Erweiterung der Technikfolgenabschätzung, in: TATuP – Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis 24.2, 65–69.10.14512/tatup.24.2.65Search in Google Scholar
Gutmann, M. (2017), Leben und Form: zur technischen Form des Wissens vom Lebendigen, Wiesbaden.10.1007/978-3-658-17438-5Search in Google Scholar
Heßler, M. (2015), Die Ersetzung des Menschen? Die Debatte um das Mensch-Maschinen-Verhältnis im Automatisierungsdiskurs, in: Technikgeschichte 82.2, 109–136.10.5771/0040-117X-2015-2-108Search in Google Scholar
Hood, E. (2004), RoboLobsters: The Beauty of Biomimetics, in: Environmental Health Perspectives 112.8, A486–489.10.1289/ehp.112-a486Search in Google Scholar
Huneman, P. (2019), Special Issue Editor’s Introduction: Revisiting the Modern Synthesis, in: Journal of the History of Biology 52.4, 509–518.10.1007/s10739-019-09585-2Search in Google Scholar
Huneman, P., u. Walsh, D. M. (2017), Challenging the Modern Synthesis: Adaptation, Development, and Inheritance, Oxford.10.1093/oso/9780199377176.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1901), Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Teil: Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis, Halle (Saale).Search in Google Scholar
Ijspeert, A. J. (2014), Biorobotics: Using Robots to Emulate and Investigate Agile Locomotion, in: Science 346.6206, 196–203.10.1126/science.1254486Search in Google Scholar
Ijspeert, A. J., Crespi, A., Ryczko, D., u. Cabelguen, J.-M. (2007), From Swimming to Walking With a Salamander Robot Driven by a Spinal Cord Model, in: Science 315.5817, 1416–1420, URL: https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.1138353 (12.1.2023).doi.org/10.1126/science.1138353Search in Google Scholar
Innocenzi, P. (2018), The Innovators Behind Leonardo: the True Story of the Scientific and Technological Renaissance, Berlin.10.1007/978-3-319-90449-8Search in Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1974), Kritik der Urteilskraft [1790], Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1998), Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Hamburg.10.28937/978-3-7873-2112-4Search in Google Scholar
Knippers, J., u. Speck, T. (2012), Design and Construction Principles in Nature and Architecture, in: Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 7.1, 015002.10.1088/1748-3182/7/1/015002Search in Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1965), Betrachtungen über die Erkenntnis, die Wahrheit und die Ideen [1684], in: ders., Philosophische Schriften 1, Darmstadt, 32–47.Search in Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1890), Philosophische Schriften 7, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Leonelli, S. (2016), Data-Centric Biology: A Philosophical Study, Chicago.10.7208/chicago/9780226416502.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Liggieri, K., u. Müller, O. (Hg.), (2019), Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion. Handbuch zu Geschichte – Kultur – Ethik, Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-476-05604-7Search in Google Scholar
Liggieri, K., u. Tamborini, M. (Hg.) (2021), Organismus und Technik. Anthologie zu einem produktiven und problematischen Wechselverhältnis, Darmstadt.Search in Google Scholar
Lohmar, D. (1998), Erfahrung und kategoriales Denken: Hume, Kant und Husserl über vorprädikative Erfahrung und prädikative Erkenntnis, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-011-5120-7Search in Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1905), Erkenntnis und Irrtum. Skizzen zur Psychologie der Forschung, Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar
Manzoni, A. (1856), I promessi sposi, or, The betrothed, London.Search in Google Scholar
Manzoni, A. (1879), Die Verlobten, Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar
Manzoni, A. (1997), I promessi sposi, Mailand.Search in Google Scholar
Manzoni, A. (2015), Los novios, Madrid.Search in Google Scholar
Mazzolai, B., Beccai, L., u. Mattoli, V. (2014), Plants as Model in Biomimetics and Biorobotics: New Perspectives, in: Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2.2.10.3389/fbioe.2014.00002Search in Google Scholar
Moon, F. C. (2007), The Machines of Leonardo Da Vinci and Franz Reuleaux: Kinematics of Machines from the Renaissance to the 20th Century, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-1-4020-5599-7Search in Google Scholar
Müggenburg, J. (2019), Bionik, in: Liggieri/Tamborini (2019), 241–243.10.1007/978-3-476-05604-7_36Search in Google Scholar
Müller, G. B., u. Newman, S. A. (Hg.) (2003), Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Developmental and Evolutionary Biology, Cambridge, Mass.10.7551/mitpress/5182.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Nicholson, D. J. (2014), The Return of the Organism as a Fundamental Explanatory Concept in Biology, in: Philosophy Compass 9.5, 347–359.10.1111/phc3.12128Search in Google Scholar
Nicholson, D. J., u. Gawne, R. (2015), Neither Logical Empiricism nor Vitalism, but Organicism: What the Philosophy of Biology was, in: History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 37.4, 345–381.10.1007/s40656-015-0085-7Search in Google Scholar
Nordmann, A. (2002), Another New Wittgenstein: The Scientific and Engineering Background of the Tractatus, in: Perspectives on Science 10.3, 356–384.10.1162/106361402321899087Search in Google Scholar
Nyakatura, J. A., Melo, K., Horvat, T., Karakasiliotis, K., Allen, V. R., Andikfar, A., Andrada, E., et al. (2019), Reverse-Engineering the Locomotion of a Stem Amniote, in: Nature 565.7739, 351.10.1038/s41586-018-0851-2Search in Google Scholar
Pigliucci, M. (2007), Do We Need an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis?, in: Evolution 61.12, 2743–2749.10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00246.xSearch in Google Scholar
Pigliucci, M., u. Müller, G. (Hg.) (2010), Evolution – The Extended Synthesis, Cambridge, Mass.10.7551/mitpress/9780262513678.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1960), Word and Object, Cambridge, Mass.Search in Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1969), Ontological Relativity and other Essays, New York,10.7312/quin92204Search in Google Scholar
Raup, D. M., u. Sepkoski, J. J., Jr. (1984), Periodicity of Extinctions in the Geologic Past, in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 81.3, 801–805.10.1073/pnas.81.3.801Search in Google Scholar
Riskin, J. (2003), Eighteenth-Century Wetware, in: Representations 83.1, 97–125.10.1525/rep.2003.83.1.97Search in Google Scholar
Riskin, J. (2016), The Restless Clock: A History of the Centuries-Long Argument over What Makes Living Things Tick, Chicago.10.7208/chicago/9780226303086.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Romano, D., u. Stefanini, C. (2021), Unveiling Social Distancing Mechanisms Via a Fish-Robot Hybrid Interaction, in: Biological Cybernetics, 1–9.10.1007/s00422-021-00867-9Search in Google Scholar
Sand, M. (2019), On „not having a future“, in: Futures 107, 98–106.10.1016/j.futures.2019.01.002Search in Google Scholar
Schlick, M. (1938), Form and Content. An Introduction to Philosophical Thinking, in: Gesammelte Aufsätze. 1926–1936, Wien, 285–369.Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. C. (2021), TA und unterschiedliche Formen des Wissens, in: Böschen, S., Grunwald, A., Krings, B.-J., u. Rösch, C. (Hg.), Technikfolgenabschätzung: Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Praxis, Baden-Baden, 191–208.10.5771/9783748901990-191Search in Google Scholar
Sepkoski, D. (2020), Catastrophic Thinking: Extinction and the Value of Diversity from Darwin to the Anthropocene, Chicago.10.7208/chicago/9780226354613.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (2007), Kant and Goethe: On the History of the Modern Weltanschauung, in: Theory, Culture & Society 24.6, 159–191.10.1177/0263276407078717Search in Google Scholar
Simondon, G. (2012), Du mode d’existence des objets techniques, Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Simondon, G. (2013), L’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information, Grenoble.Search in Google Scholar
Soler, L., Zwart, S., Lynch, M., u. Israel-Jost, V. (Hg.) (2014), Science After the Practice Turn in the Philosophy, History, and Social Studies of Science, Abingdon u. New York.10.4324/9781315857985Search in Google Scholar
Speck, T., Poppinga, S., Speck, O., u. Tauber, F. (2021), Bio-Inspired Life-Like Motile Materials Systems: Changing the Boundaries Between Living and Technical Systems in the Anthropocene, in: The Anthropocene Review 9.2, 237–256.10.1177/20530196211039275Search in Google Scholar
Stadler, F. (2019), Ernst Mach – Zu Leben, Werk und Wirkung, Berlin.10.1007/978-3-030-03772-7Search in Google Scholar
Steigerwald, J. (2002), Goethe’s Morphology: Urphänomene and Aesthetic Appraisal, in: Journal of the History of Biology 35.2, 291–328.10.1023/A:1016028812658Search in Google Scholar
Tamborini, M. (2020a), Technische Form und Konstruktion, in: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 68.5, 712–733, URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2020-0049 (12.1.2023).10.1515/dzph-2020-0049Search in Google Scholar
Tamborini, M. (2020b), Technoscientific Approaches to Deep Time, in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 79.1, 57–67, URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.03.002(12.1.2023)10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.03.002Search in Google Scholar
Tamborini, M. (2021), The Material Turn in The Study of Form: From Bio-Inspired Robots to Robotics-Inspired Morphology, in: Perspectives on Science 29.5, 643–665, URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00388 (12.1.2023).10.1162/posc_a_00388Search in Google Scholar
Tamborini, M. (2022a), Entgrenzung. Die Biologisierung der Technik und die Technisierung der Biologie, Hamburg.10.28937/978-3-7873-4255-6Search in Google Scholar
Tamborini, M. (2022b), The Architecture of Evolution: The Science of Form in Twentieth-Century Evolutionary Biology, Pittsburgh, Pa.10.2307/j.ctv348f8w7Search in Google Scholar
Tamborini, M. (2022c), The Circulation of Morphological Knowledge: Understanding „Form“ across Disciplines in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries, in: Isis 4.113, URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/722439 (12.1.2023).10.1086/722439Search in Google Scholar
Tamborini, M., u. Datteri, E. (2023), Is Biorobotics Science? Some Theoretical Reflections, in: Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 18.015005, URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/aca24b(7.2.2023)10.1088/1748-3190/aca24bSearch in Google Scholar
Vasari, G. (1886), Le vite de più eccellenti pittori, scultori e architetti, Florenz.Search in Google Scholar
Vasari, G. (2020), Lebensläufe der berühmtesten Maler, Bildhauer und Architekten, München.Search in Google Scholar
Vercellone, F. (2019), Le ragioni della forma, Mailand.Search in Google Scholar
Vercellone, F., u. Tedesco, S. (2020), Glossary of Morphology, Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-030-51324-5Search in Google Scholar
Voigt, W., u. Sucker, U. (1987), Johann Wolfgang von Goethe als Naturwissenschaftler, Wiesbaden.10.1007/978-3-322-94551-8Search in Google Scholar
Vollgraff, M. (2021), The Library of Life. Biological Connections in Mies’s Collection, in: Martin, S., u. Wallner, J. (Hg.), Lehmbruck – Kolbe – Mies Van Der Rohe: Künstliche Biotope / Artificial Biotopes, München, 207–218.Search in Google Scholar
Voskuhl, A. (2013), Androids in the Enlightenment, Chicago.10.7208/chicago/9780226034331.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1921), Tractatus logico-philosophicus, Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar
Zammito, J. H. (2013), Post-positivist Realism: Regrounding Representation, in: Partner, N., u. Foot, S. (Hg.), The SAGE Handbook of Historical Theory, London, 401–423.10.4135/9781446247563.n24Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Inhalt
- Tugendhat über Moralbegründung, Mystik und Religion
- Philosophie der Bionik: Das Komponieren von bio-robotischen Formen
- ‚Hervorbringende Organe‘, ‚bildende Kraft‘?
- Schwerpunkt: Verlegenheit als Phänomen und als philosophische Denkfigur
- Schwerpunkt: Verlegenheit als Phänomen und als philosophische Denkfigur
- Das Phänomen der Verlegenheit und seine Rolle im personalen Lebenszusammenhang
- Zur Bedeutung von Verlegenheit für einen Begriff politischer Öffentlichkeit
- Sokrates’ Verlegenheit(en)
- Philosophie aktuell: Public Philosophy – brauchen wir das?
- Philosophie aktuell: Public Philosophy – brauchen wir das?
- „Bei euch geht es ja um was!“
- Public Philosophy und Expertise
- Denken in Überschriften
- Public Philosophy als gesellschaftliche Praxis
- Buchkritik
- Begriff, Bedingungen und Funktionen des Kompromisses
- Aufklärung über ein dunkles Gefühl
- Zur metaphysischen Bestimmung des Menschen
Articles in the same Issue
- Inhalt
- Tugendhat über Moralbegründung, Mystik und Religion
- Philosophie der Bionik: Das Komponieren von bio-robotischen Formen
- ‚Hervorbringende Organe‘, ‚bildende Kraft‘?
- Schwerpunkt: Verlegenheit als Phänomen und als philosophische Denkfigur
- Schwerpunkt: Verlegenheit als Phänomen und als philosophische Denkfigur
- Das Phänomen der Verlegenheit und seine Rolle im personalen Lebenszusammenhang
- Zur Bedeutung von Verlegenheit für einen Begriff politischer Öffentlichkeit
- Sokrates’ Verlegenheit(en)
- Philosophie aktuell: Public Philosophy – brauchen wir das?
- Philosophie aktuell: Public Philosophy – brauchen wir das?
- „Bei euch geht es ja um was!“
- Public Philosophy und Expertise
- Denken in Überschriften
- Public Philosophy als gesellschaftliche Praxis
- Buchkritik
- Begriff, Bedingungen und Funktionen des Kompromisses
- Aufklärung über ein dunkles Gefühl
- Zur metaphysischen Bestimmung des Menschen