Home Uncertain diagnoses in a children’s hospital: patient characteristics and outcomes
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Uncertain diagnoses in a children’s hospital: patient characteristics and outcomes

  • Courtney A. Sump EMAIL logo , Trisha L. Marshall , Anna J. Ipsaro , Shivani J. Patel , Dane C. Warner , Patrick W. Brady and Philip A. Hagedorn
Published/Copyright: January 31, 2020

Abstract

Background

A quality improvement initiative at our institution resulted in a new process for prospectively identifying pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) patients with uncertain diagnoses (UD). This study describes the clinical characteristics and healthcare utilization patterns of patients with UD.

Methods

This single center cross-sectional study included all PHM patients identified with UD during their admission. A structured chart review was used to abstract patient demographics, primary symptoms, discharge diagnoses, and healthcare utilization patterns, including consult service use, length of stay (LOS), escalation in care, and 30-day healthcare reutilization. Appropriate descriptive statistics were used for categorical and continuous variables.

Results

This study includes 200 PHM patients identified with UD. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the primary finding in 45% of patients with UD. Consult service use was highly variable, with a range of 0–8 consult services for individual patients. The median LOS was 1.6 days and only 5% required a rapid response team evaluation. As for reutilization, 7% of patients were readmitted within 30 days.

Conclusions

This descriptive study highlights the heterogeneity of patients with uncertain diagnoses. Ongoing work is needed to further understand the impact of UD and to optimize the care of these patients.


Corresponding author: Courtney A. Sump, MD, Categorical Pediatric Resident, Pediatric Residency Training Program, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, MLC 5018, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA, Phone: +(757) 647-0862

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Osler W. Aequanimitas with other addresses to medical students, nurses, and practitioners of medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Blakiston; 1932. 34 p.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bhise V, Rajan SS, Sittig DF, Morgan RO, Chaudhary P, Singh H. Defining and measuring diagnostic uncertainty in medicine: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2018;33:103–15.10.1007/s11606-017-4164-1Search in Google Scholar

3. Eddy DM. Variations in physician practice: the role of uncertainty. Health Aff 1984;3:74–89.10.1377/hlthaff.3.2.74Search in Google Scholar

4. Bovier PA, Perneger TV. Stress from uncertainty from graduation to retirement – a population-based study of Swiss physicians. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22:632–8.10.1007/s11606-007-0159-7Search in Google Scholar

5. Farnan JM, Johnson JK, Meltzer DO, Humphrey HJ, Arora VM. Resident uncertainty in clinical decision making and impact on patient care: a qualitative study. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:122–6.10.1136/qshc.2007.023184Search in Google Scholar

6. Green SM, Martinez-Rumayor A, Gregory SA, Baggish AL, O’Donoghue ML, Green JA, et al. Clinical uncertainty, diagnostic accuracy, and outcomes in emergency department patients presenting with dyspnea. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:741–8.10.1001/archinte.168.7.741Search in Google Scholar

7. Wray CM, Loo LK. The diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of medical uncertainty. J Grad 2015;7:523–7.10.4300/JGME-D-14-00638.1Search in Google Scholar

8. Simpkin AL, Schwartzstein RM. Tolerating uncertainty – the next medical revolution? N Engl J Med 2016;375:1713–5.10.1056/NEJMp1606402Search in Google Scholar

9. Gordon G, Joos S, Byrne J. Physician expressions of uncertainty during patient encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2000;40:59–65.10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00069-5Search in Google Scholar

10. Brady PW, Muething S, Kotagal U, Ashby M. Improving situation awareness to reduce unrecognized clinical deterioration and serious safety events. Pediatrics 2013;131:e298–308.10.1542/peds.2012-1364Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Ipsaro AJ, Patel SJ, Richardson D, Chan ST, Luksic E, Rohrmeier K, et al. Identification and communication of uncertain diagnosis in hospitalized children. Pediatric Hospital Medicine 2018 Conference. Atlanta, GA (Poster Presentation).Search in Google Scholar

12. Smith MM, Chumpia M, Wargo L, Nicol J, Bugnitz M. Watcher initiative associated with decrease in failure to rescue events in pediatric population. Hosp Pediatr 2017;7:710–5.10.1542/hpeds.2017-0042Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Kim JS. Acute abdominal pain in children. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr 2013;16:219–24.10.5223/pghn.2013.16.4.219Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Bhise V, Rajan SS, Sittig DF, Vaghani V, Morgan RO, Khanna A, et al. Electronic health record reviews to measure diagnostic uncertainty in primary care. J Eval Clin Pract 2018;24:545–51.10.1111/jep.12912Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2019-09-19
Accepted: 2020-01-04
Published Online: 2020-01-31
Published in Print: 2021-08-26

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Chest pain management and biomarkers: the lack of trust in cardiac troponins measurement
  4. Reviews
  5. Bringing the clinical laboratory into the strategy to advance diagnostic excellence
  6. Atrial fibrillation: is there a role for cardiac troponin?
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. Towards better metainterpretation: improving the clinician’s interpretation of the radiology report
  9. The challenges of diagnosing diabetes in childhood
  10. Guidelines and Recommendations
  11. Measuring patient experience of diagnostic care and acceptability of testing
  12. Original Articles
  13. Clinical assessment of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test
  14. Delayed treatment of bacteremia during the COVID-19 pandemic
  15. Strengths and weaknesses in the diagnostic process of endometriosis from the patients’ perspective: a focus group study
  16. Identifying trigger concepts to screen emergency department visits for diagnostic errors
  17. Handshake antimicrobial stewardship as a model to recognize and prevent diagnostic errors
  18. Uncertain diagnoses in a children’s hospital: patient characteristics and outcomes
  19. The effects of rudeness, experience, and perspective-taking on challenging premature closure after pediatric ICU physicians receive hand-off with the wrong diagnosis: a randomized controlled simulation trial
  20. Resident-faculty overnight discrepancy rates as a function of number of consecutive nights during a week of night float
  21. CONUT: a tool to assess nutritional status. First application in a primary care population
  22. Is there a real need for sputum culture for community-acquired pneumonia diagnostics? Results from a retrospective study in Russia
  23. Differentiating solid breast masses: comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of shear wave elastography and magnetic resonance imaging
  24. Short Communication
  25. Chest pain management: use of troponins in internal medicine wards
  26. Case Report
  27. Learning from tragedy – The Jessica Barnett story: challenges in the diagnosis of long QT syndrome
  28. Letters to the Editor
  29. Usability of non-medicinal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection to circumvent supply shortages
  30. Medical decision making during the COVID-19 epidemic: an opportunity to think how we think
Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2019-0058/html
Scroll to top button