Abstract
Fungal infections, especially in immunocompromised individuals, are emerging as a significant global health threat, contributing to high morbidity and mortality rates. The growing resistance of pathogens like Cryptococcus neoformans, Aspergillus fumigatus, Candida albicans and Candida auris coupled with limited treatment options, underscores the urgent need for improved diagnostics and antifungal therapies. Utilizing a comprehensive comparative proteomic approach, we identified the critical role of 1-(5-phosphoribosyl)-5-[(5-phosphoribosylamino) methylideneamino] imidazole-4-carboxamide (5-proFAR) isomerase in Amino acid transport metabolism, a vital pathway for fungal growth and virulence. Through advanced in silico techniques, including molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations (MDS), and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), we screened potential inhibitors and identified Mugineic acid and 9-amino-2-deoxy-2,3-dehydro-n-acetyl-neuraminate as the most promising candidates, displaying favorable binding affinity, stability, and strong interactions with key residues within the enzyme’s active site. These compounds exhibited low RMSD and RMSF values, indicative of high conformational stability, making them ideal candidates for further experimental validation. Our findings suggest that targeting 5-proFAR isomerase offers a broad-spectrum, resistance-evading therapeutic strategy that could significantly mitigate the global burden of fungal infections, particularly in immunocompromised individuals, thus paving the way for the development of next-generation antifungal drugs to combat the growing challenge of multidrug-resistant fungal pathogens.
Acknowledgments
Authors are highly thankful to VFSTR (Deemed to be University) for providing faculty seed grant (F.No. VFSTR/REG/A6/30/2023-24/01 dated 16-05-2023).
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. Hemantha Mani Kumar Chakravarthi Chanda: Executed in silico analyses including molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations, and contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript. Haripriya Narra: Assisted with data interpretation, prepared figures and tables, and contributed to drafting the manuscript. Sudheer Kumar Katari: Contributed to the study’s conceptualization and design, and conducted in silico analysis, including target prediction and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: All other authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
References
1. Rayens, E, Norris, KA. Prevalence and healthcare burden of fungal infections in the United States, 2018. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022;9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab593.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
2. Zhao, Y, Ye, L, Zhao, F, Zhang, L, Lu, Z, Chu, T, et al.. Cryptococcus neoformans, a global threat to human health. Infect Dis Poverty 2023;12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-023-01073-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
3. Ahmad, S, Alfouzan, W. Candida auris: epidemiology, diagnosis, pathogenesis, antifungal susceptibility, and infection control measures to combat the spread of infections in healthcare facilities. Microorganisms 2021;9. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9040807.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
4. Bernardo-Cravo, AP, Schmeller, DS, Chatzinotas, A, Vredenburg, VT, Loyau, A. Environmental factors and host microbiomes shape host–pathogen dynamics. Trends Parasitol 2020;36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2020.04.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. van der Torre, MH, Andrews, RAJ, Hooker, EL, Rankin, A, Dodd, S. Systematic review on Cryptococcus neoformans/Cryptococcus gattii species complex infections with recommendations for practice in health and care settings. Clin Infect Pract 2022;15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinpr.2022.100154.Search in Google Scholar
6. Earle, K, Valero, C, Conn, DP, Vere, G, Cook, PC, Bromley, MJ, et al.. Pathogenicity and virulence of Aspergillus fumigatus. Virulence 2023;14. https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2023.2172264.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
7. Sabino, R, Veríssimo, C, Pereira, ÁA, Antunes, F. Candida auris, an agent of hospital-associated outbreaks: which challenging issues do we need to have in mind? Microorganisms 2020;8. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020181.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
8. Rodrigues, CF, Rodrigues, ME, Henriques, M. Candida sp. infections in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Clin Med 2019;8. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8010076.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
9. Malinovská, Z, Čonková, E, Váczi, P. Biofilm formation in medically important Candida species. Journal of Fungi 2023;9. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9100955.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
10. Azambuja, AZD, Wissmann Neto, G, Watte, G, Antoniolli, L, Goldani, LZ. Cryptococcal meningitis: a retrospective cohort of a Brazilian reference hospital in the Post-HAART era of universal access. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2018;2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6512468.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
11. Rajasingham, R, Wake, RM, Beyene, T, Katende, A, Letang, E, Boulware, DR. Cryptococcal meningitis diagnostics and screening in the era of point-of-care laboratory testing. J Clin Microbiol 2019;57. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01238-18.Search in Google Scholar
12. Fang, W, Wu, J, Cheng, M, Zhu, X, Du, M, Chen, C, et al.. Diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: challenges and recent developments. J Biomed Sci 2023;30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-023-00926-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
13. Lionakis, MS, Drummond, RA, Hohl, TM. Immune responses to human fungal pathogens and therapeutic prospects. Nat Rev Immunol 2023;23. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-022-00826-w.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
14. Rodrigues, ML, Nosanchuk, JD. Fungal diseases as neglected pathogens: a wake-up call to public health officials. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2020;14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007964.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
15. Hupfeld, E, Schlee, S, Wurm, JP, Rajendran, C, Yehorova, D, Vos, E, et al.. Conformational modulation of a mobile loop controls catalysis in the (βα) 8-barrel enzyme of histidine biosynthesis HisF. JACS Au 2024;4:3258–76. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.4c00558.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
16. Sun, M, Dai, P, Cao, Z, Dong, J. Purine metabolism in plant pathogenic fungi. Front Microbiol 2024;15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1352354.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
17. Chandel, NS. Nucleotide metabolism. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2021;13. https://doi.org/10.1101/CSHPERSPECT.A040592.Search in Google Scholar
18. Lee, Y, Robbins, N, Cowen, LE. Molecular mechanisms governing antifungal drug resistance. npj Antimicrob Res 2023;1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44259-023-00007-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
19. Pasala, C, Chilamakuri, CSR, Katari, SK, Nalamolu, RM, Bitla, AR, Umamaheswari, A. An in silico study: novel targets for potential drug and vaccine design against drug resistant. H. pylori. Microb Pathog 2018;122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.05.037.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Liu, T, Pyle, AM. Highly reactive group I introns ubiquitous in pathogenic fungi. J Mol Biol 2024;436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168513.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
21. Martins-Santana, L, Rezende, CP, Rossi, A, Martinez-Rossi, NM, Almeida, F. Addressing microbial resistance worldwide: challenges over controlling life-threatening fungal infections. Pathogens 2023;12. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12020293.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
22. Chanda, HMKC, Mulpuru, V, Mishra, N. Artificial intelligence: a multidisciplinary approach towards teaching and learning. Sharjah: Bentham Science Publishers; 2024.Search in Google Scholar
23. Johnson, AJ, Kennedy, SC, Arlehamn, CSL, Goldberg, MF, Saini, NK, Xu, J, et al.. Identification of mycobacterial RplJ/L10 and RpsA/S1 proteins as novel targets for CD4+ T cells. Infect Immun 2017;85. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01023-16.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
24. Li, J, Wang, HT, Wang, WT, Zhang, XR, Suo, F, Ren, JY, et al.. Systematic analysis reveals the prevalence and principles of bypassable gene essentiality. Nat Commun 2019;10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08928-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
25. Ayoub, N, Gedeon, A, Munier-Lehmann, H. A journey into the regulatory secrets of the de novo purine nucleotide biosynthesis. Front Pharmacol 2024;15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1329011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
26. Feinstein, WP, Brylinski, M. Calculating an optimal box size for ligand docking and virtual screening against experimental and predicted binding pockets. J Cheminform 2015;7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-015-0067-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
27. Mathe, A, Mulpuru, V, Katari, SK, Karlapudi, AP, Venkateswarulu, TC. Virtual screening and invitro evaluation of cyclooxygenase inhibitors from Tinospora cordifolia using the machine learning tool. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2024;42:13275–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2023.2275175. 37904339. In this issue.10.1080/07391102.2023.2275175Search in Google Scholar PubMed
28. Malmstrom, RD, Watowich, SJ. Using free energy of binding calculations to improve the accuracy of virtual screening predictions. J Chem Inf Model 2011;51. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci200126v.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
29. Agyapong, O, Asiedu, SO, Kwofie, SK, Miller, WAIII, Parry, CS, Sowah, RA, et al.. Molecular modelling and de novo fragment-based design of potential inhibitors of beta-tubulin gene of Necator americanus from natural products. Inform Med Unlocked 2021;26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2021.100734.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
30. Madhulitha, NR, Pradeep, N, Sandeep, S, Hema, K, Chiranjeevi, P, Kumar, KS, et al.. E-Pharmacophore model assisted discovery of novel antagonists of nNOS. Biochem Anal Biochem 2017;06. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-1009.1000307.Search in Google Scholar
31. Katari, SK, Pasala, C, Nalamolu, RM, Bitla, AR, Umamaheswari, A. In silico trials to design potent inhibitors against matrilysin (MMP-7). J Biomol Struct Dyn 2022;40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2021.1965032.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
32. Satuluri, SH, Katari, SK, Pasala, C, Amineni, U. Novel and potent inhibitors for dihydropteroate synthase of Helicobacter pylori. J Recept Signal Transduction 2020;40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10799893.2020.1731533.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
33. Katari, S, Pasala, C, Nalamolu, R, Vankadoth, U, Alexander, S, Pakala, S, et al.. Pathophysiology of matrix metalloproteinases in breast cancer progression. J Clin Sci Res 2019;8. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcsr.jcsr_67_19.Search in Google Scholar
34. Salo-Ahen, OMH, Alanko, I, Bhadane, R, Bonvin, AMJJ, Honorato, RV, Hossain, S, et al.. Molecular dynamics simulations in drug discovery and pharmaceutical development. Processes 2021;9. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9010071.Search in Google Scholar
35. Rahimi, M, Taghdir, M, Abasi Joozdani, F. Dynamozones are the most obvious sign of the evolution of conformational dynamics in HIV-1 protease. Sci Rep 2023;13:14179. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40818-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston