Home MAGLUMI® Tacrolimus (CLIA) assay: analytical performances and comparison with LC-MS/MS and ARCHITECT Tacrolimus (CMIA) assay
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

MAGLUMI® Tacrolimus (CLIA) assay: analytical performances and comparison with LC-MS/MS and ARCHITECT Tacrolimus (CMIA) assay

  • Mingpeng Fu , Shanchun Chen , Xianliang Zheng , Xuehong Li , Honggao Sun , Jin Chen EMAIL logo and Hua Pei EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 16, 2025

Abstract

Objectives

Tacrolimus has been a cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy over the past two decades. Due to its narrow therapeutic window and pharmacokinetic variability, drug monitoring is vital for enhancing the efficacy and safety during therapy. In the present study, we evaluated the analytical performances of the MAGLUMI® Tacrolimus assay based on chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), and compared with LC-MS/MS and the previously validated ARCHITECT Tacrolimus assay based on chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA).

Methods

We assessed the precision, limit of blank (LoB), limit of quantification (LoQ), limit of detection (LoD) and linearity of the MAGLUMI® Tacrolimus assay using patient whole blood samples. Interference was assessed by introducing potential interferents into clinical samples. We also analyzed the correlation and agreement with the gold standard method (LC-MS/MS) and another previously validated high-performing ARCHITECT Tacrolimus (CMIA) assay by including 125 whole blood samples from patients and 44 spiked samples.

Results

MAGLUMI® Tacrolimus (CLIA) assay exhibits superior precision, as coefficients of variation (CVs) for reproducibility and between-run precision were 0.55–3.63 % and 2.18–5.14 %, respectively. The LoB and LoQ were 0.1 μg/L and 0.5 μg/L. All samples in LoD verification had tacrolimus concentrations above LoB. The assay exhibited excellent linearity (r=0.99990, 0.5–50 μg/L) with no interference. Additionally, the results of the MAGLUMI® Tacrolimus (CLIA) assay showed strong correlation and concordance with LC-MS/MS and the CMIA assay.

Conclusions

The MAGLUMI® Tacrolimus (CLIA) assay has excellent performance and strong concordance with LC-MS/MS and the ARCHITECT assay, making it a good alternative for tacrolimus measurement.


Corresponding authors: Jin Chen, Institute of Clinical Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, 570311, China, E-mail: ; and Hua Pei, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, 571199, China; and NHC Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Control, School of Tropical Medicine & The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, 571199, China, E-mail:
Mingpeng Fu, Shanchun Chen, and Xianliang Zheng contributed equally to this work.

Award Identifier / Grant number: ZDYF2022SHFZ100

  1. Research ethics: Collection and experiments of clinical samples were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University (2024-K47-01).

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: HP and JC: study design; MF, SC and XZ: drafted the manuscript; XZ, HS and XL: samples collection; MF, SC and XZ: conducted the experiments; MF and SC: statistical analysis; HP and JC: revised the manuscript. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: This project was funded by the Key Research and Development Project of Hainan Province (ZDYF2022SHFZ100) and Shenzhen Snibe Co., Ltd. Financial support did not affect the results of the present study.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Starzl, TE, Todo, S, Fung, J, Demetris, AJ, Venkataramman, R, Jain, A. FK 506 for liver, kidney, and pancreas transplantation. Lancet 1989;2:1000–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91014-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Shrestha, BM. Two decades of tacrolimus in renal transplant: basic science and clinical evidences. Exp Clin Transplant 2017;15:1–9. https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.2016.0157.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Fanouriakis, A, Kostopoulou, M, Bertsias, G, Boumpas, DT. Response to: correspondence on ’EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus: 2023 update’ by Fanouriakis et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2024;83:e19. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2024-226636.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Berloco, P, Rossi, M, Pretagostini, R, Sociu-Foca Cortesini, N, Cortesini, R. Tacrolimus as cornerstone immunosuppressant in kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 2001;33:994–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0041-1345(00)02301-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. cott, LJ, McKeage, K, Keam, SJ, Plosker, GL. Tacrolimus: a further update of its use in the management of organ transplantation. Drugs 2003;63:1247–97. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200363120-00006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Jing, Y, Kong, Y, Hou, X, Liu, H, Fu, Q, Jiao, Z, et al.. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosing guidelines for tacrolimus co-administration with Wuzhi capsule in Chinese renal transplant recipients. J Clin Pharm Therapeut 2021;46:1117–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13407.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Rayar, M, Tron, C, Jézéquel, C, Beaurepaire, JM, Petitcollin, A, Houssel-Debry, P, et al.. High intrapatient variability of tacrolimus exposure in the early period after liver transplantation is associated with poorer outcomes. Transplantation 2018;102:e108–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/tp.0000000000002052.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Hesselink, DA, van Schaik, RH, van der Heiden, IP, van der Werf, M, Gregoor, PJHS, Lindemans, J, et al.. Genetic polymorphisms of the CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and MDR-1 genes and pharmacokinetics of the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2003;74:245–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9236(03)00168-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Golubović, B, Vučićević, K, Radivojević, D, Kovačević, SV, Prostran, M, Miljković, B. Total plasma protein effect on tacrolimus elimination in kidney transplant patients--population pharmacokinetic approach. Eur J Pharmaceut Sci 2014;52:34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2013.10.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Min, S, Papaz, T, Lafreniere-Roula, M, Nalli, N, Grasemann, H, Schwartz, SM, et al.. A randomized clinical trial of age and genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing after pediatric solid organ transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2018;22:e13285. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.13285.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Shuker, N, Bouamar, R, van Schaik, RH, Clahsen van Groningen, M, Damman, J, Baan, C, et al.. A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of Cyp3a5 genotype-based with body-weight-based tacrolimus dosing after living donor kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2016;16:2085–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.13691.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Elens, L, Bouamar, R, Hesselink, DA, Haufroid, V, van der Heiden, IP, van Gelder, T, et al.. A new functional CYP3A4 intron 6 polymorphism significantly affects tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients. Clin Chem 2011;57:1574–83. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2011.165613.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Størset, E, Holford, N, Midtvedt, K, Bremer, S, Bergan, S, Åsberg, A. Importance of hematocrit for a tacrolimus target concentration strategy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2014;70:65–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-013-1584-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Ekberg, H, Tedesco-Silva, H, Demirbas, A, Vítko, Š, Nashan, B, Gürkan, A, et al.. Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2562–75. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa067411.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Gatault, P, Kamar, N, Büchler, M, Colosio, C, Bertrand, D, Durrbach, A, et al.. Reduction of extended-release tacrolimus dose in LowImmunological-risk kidney transplant recipients increases risk of rejection and appearance of donor-specific antibodies: a randomized study. Am J Transplant 2017;17:1370–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14109.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Kuypers, DR, Claes, K, Evenepoel, P, Maes, B, Vanrenterghem, Y. Clinical efficacy and toxicity profile of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in relation to combined long-term pharmacokinetics in de novo renal allograft recipients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2004;75:434–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpt.2003.12.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Mendoza Rojas, A, Hesselink, DA, van Besouw, NM, Dieterich, M, de Kuiper, R, Baan, CC, et al.. High tacrolimus intrapatient variability and subtherapeutic immunosuppression are associated with adverse kidney transplant outcomes. Ther Drug Monit 2022;44:369–76. https://doi.org/10.1097/ftd.0000000000000955.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Liu, X, Hu, S, Chen, Z, Chen, B. Determination of tacrolimus in whole blood by liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometry and its application in the pharmacokinetic study in liver transplant patients. Pharmaceut Clin Res 2013;21:329–33.Search in Google Scholar

19. Lu, MJ, Zhong, WH, Liu, YX, Miao, HZ, Li, YC, Ji, MH. Sample size for assessing agreement between two methods of measurement by Bland-Altman method. Int J Biostat 2016;12:20150039. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2015-0039.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Evaluation of precision of quantitative measurement procedures; approved guideline, 3rd ed. Berwyn: CLSI Document EP05-A3; 2014.Search in Google Scholar

21. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Evaluation of detection capability for clinical laboratory measurement procedures; approved guideline, 2nd ed.. Berwyn: CLSI document EP17-A2; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

22. Clinical and laboratory standards institute. Evaluation of linearity of quantitative measurement procedures, 2nd ed.. Berwyn: CLSI document EP06; 2020.Search in Google Scholar

23. Clinical and laboratory standards institute. Interference testing in clinical chemistry; approved guideline, 2nd ed. Berwyn: CLSI document EP07-A2; 2005.Search in Google Scholar

24. Saitman, A, Metushi, IG, Mason, DS, Fitzgerald, RL. Evaluation of the Waters MassTrak LC-MS/MS assay for tacrolimus and a comparison to the Abbott Architect immunoassay. Ther Drug Monit 2016;38:300–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/ftd.0000000000000252.Search in Google Scholar

25. Wallemacq, P, Goffinet, JS, O’Morchoe, S, Rosiere, T, Maine, GT, Labalette, M, et al.. Multi-site analytical evaluation of the Abbott ARCHITECT tacrolimus assay. Ther Drug Monit 2009;31:198–204. https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0b013e31819c6a37.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Birdwell, KA, Decker, B, Barbarino, JM, Peterson, J, Stein, C, Sadee, W, et al.. Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium (CPIC) guidelines for CYP3A5 genotype and tacrolimus dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2015;98:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.113.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2025-02-14
Accepted: 2025-04-14
Published Online: 2025-07-16
Published in Print: 2025-10-27

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Advancing diagnostic stewardship through claims-based utilization analysis: toward a system-wide vision of diagnostic excellence
  4. Review
  5. Biomarkers in body fluids and their detection techniques for human intestinal permeability assessment
  6. Mini Review
  7. Challenges of using natriuretic peptides to screen for the risk of developing heart failure in patients with diabetes: a report from the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Committee on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Bio-Markers (C-CB)
  8. Opinion Papers
  9. Reference intervals in value-based laboratory medicine: a shift from single-point measurements to metabolic variation-based models
  10. Overview of laboratory diagnostics for immediate management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute bleeding
  11. What Matters Most: an Age-Friendly approach to pathology and laboratory medicine
  12. No fault or negligence after an adverse analytical finding due to a contaminated supplement: mission impossible. Two examples involving trimetazidine
  13. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  14. Utilization analysis of laboratory tests using health insurance claims data: advancing nationwide diagnostic stewardship monitoring systems
  15. Evaluating large language models as clinical laboratory test recommenders in primary and emergency care: a crucial step in clinical decision making
  16. A novel corrective model based on red blood cells indices and haemolysis index enables accurate unhaemolysed potassium determination in haemolysed samples – Hemokalc project
  17. Validation of (self-collected) capillary blood using a topper collection system as alternative for venous sampling for 15 common clinical chemistry analytes
  18. Acoustophoresis-based blood sampling and plasma separation for potentially minimizing sampling-related blood loss
  19. Clinical validation of a liquid chromatography single quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method using Waters Kairos™ Amino Acid Kit reagents
  20. Robustness of steroidomics-based machine learning for diagnosis of primary aldosteronism: a laboratory medicine perspective
  21. Investigation of the possible cause of over-estimation of human aldosterone in plasma, using a unique, non-synthetic human aldosterone-free matrix
  22. Performance of afternoon (16:00 h) serum cortisol for the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome
  23. MAGLUMI® Tacrolimus (CLIA) assay: analytical performances and comparison with LC-MS/MS and ARCHITECT Tacrolimus (CMIA) assay
  24. Assessment of 2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome classification criteria in a Spanish cohort
  25. Comprehensive evaluation of antiphospholipid antibody testing methodologies in APS diagnosis: performance comparisons across assay systems and clinical subtypes
  26. Candidate Reference Measurement Procedures and Materials
  27. Exploring commutable materials for serum folate measurement: challenges in cross-method harmonization
  28. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  29. Reference ranges for ionized calcium in plasma in Danish children aged 0 days to 3 years using laboratory registry data
  30. A step forward in pediatric hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and autoimmune disease: pediatric reference interval for serum soluble IL-2 receptor and soluble CD163
  31. Cancer Diagnostics
  32. Cellular expression of PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 in patients with JAK2V617F mutated myeloproliferative disorders
  33. Diabetes
  34. Serum N-glycans as independent predictors of the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a prospective investigation in the AEGIS cohort
  35. Infectious Diseases
  36. An assessment of molecular diagnosis of tuberculosis and multi-drug resistant tuberculosis testing and quality assessment: findings of an international survey
  37. Letters to the Editor
  38. Targeting low-value laboratory care
  39. Is time a significant factor in the release of potassium from lithium heparin plasma and serum?
  40. External quality assessment in resource-constrained laboratories: a survey of practices and perceptions in Nepal
  41. Is successfulness of platelet clump disaggregation by vortexing influenced by platelet measurement methods?
  42. Oligoclonal banding analysis: assessing plasma use and time interval requirements for paired CSF and blood
Downloaded on 1.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2025-0181/pdf
Scroll to top button