Home A technical and clinical evaluation of a new assay for inhibin A and its use in second trimester Down syndrome screening
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A technical and clinical evaluation of a new assay for inhibin A and its use in second trimester Down syndrome screening

  • Georgina Wilson , Päivi Liitti , Tuukka Pölönen , Mikko Sairanen and Kevin Spencer EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 17, 2016

Abstract

Background:

The objective of the study was to compare a new AutoDELFIA® Inhibin A kit (B064-102) with the Access Inhibin A kit (A36097) using clinical specimens and to evaluate the AutoDELFIA® Inhibin A assay performance in screening for Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy.

Methods:

Using clinical samples, we performed a method comparison between new and existing inhibin A kits and assessed AutoDELFIA® Inhibin A kit precision performance. Normal median values for the second trimester of pregnancy were also determined. Finally, we evaluated the screening performance of the AutoDELFIA® Inhibin A kit together with other second trimester biomarkers for the detection of Down syndrome.

Results:

The two methods showed a high degree of correlation (r=0.99, Pearson and Spearman correlation), and the average relative level difference between the methods at a concentration range of 41.7–1925 pg/mL was 19.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) from 17.6% to 21.5%]. The acceptable precision of the AutoDELFIA® Inhibin A kit was demonstrated: the within-lot CV% varied from 1.9% to 3.9%. The screening performance results show that AutoDELFIA® Inhibin A when added to a combination of other second trimester serum markers [human alpha foetoprotein (hAFP), free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (free hCGβ) and unconjugated estriol (uE3) or hAFP and free hCGβ] improves the detection rate of screening in both combinations.

Conclusions:

The performance of the AutoDELFIA® Inhibin A assay is highly acceptable for routine laboratory use for screening Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy.


Corresponding author: Kevin Spencer, Prenatal Screening Research Unit, Clinical Biochemistry Department, King George Hospital, Barley Lane, Goodmayes, IG3 8YB, UK, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: The employers of KS and GW received research funding from PerkinElmer.

  3. Employment or leadership: PL, TP and MS are employees of PerkinElmer, the producers of the assay under evaluation. KS is an advisor to ThermoFisher Scientific on matters of Prenatal Screening.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Kingsley DM. The TGF-beta superfamily: new members, new receptors, and new genetic tests of function in different organisms. Genes Dev 1994;8:133–46.10.1101/gad.8.2.133Search in Google Scholar

2. Qu J, Thomas K. Inhibin and activin production in human placenta. Endocr Rev 1995;16:485–507.10.1210/edrv-16-4-485Search in Google Scholar

3. Petraglia F. Inhibin, activin and follistatin in the human placenta – a new family of regulatory proteins. Placenta 1997;18:3–8.10.1016/S0143-4004(97)90065-5Search in Google Scholar

4. Haddow JE, Palomaki GE, Knight GJ, Foster DL, Neveux LM. Second trimester screening for Down’s syndrome using maternal serum dimeric inhibin A. J Med Screen 1998;5:115–9.10.1136/jms.5.3.115Search in Google Scholar

5. Lockwood GM, Muttukrishna S, Ledger WL. Inhibins and activins in human ovulation, conception and pregnancy. Hum Reprod Update 1998;4:284–95.10.1093/humupd/4.3.284Search in Google Scholar

6. Illingworth PJ, Groome NP, Duncan WC, Grant VI, Tovanabutra SO, Baird DT, et al. Measurement of circulating inhibin forms during the establishment of pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996;81:1471–5.Search in Google Scholar

7. Aitken DA, Wallace EM, Crossley JA, Swanston IA, van Pareren Y, van Maarle M, et al. Dimeric inhibin A as a marker for Down’s syndrome in early pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1231–6.10.1056/NEJM199605093341904Search in Google Scholar

8. Van Lith JM, Pratt JJ, Beekhuis JR, Mantingh A. Second-trimester maternal serum immunoreactive inhibin as a marker for fetal Down’s syndrome. Prenat Diagn 1992;12:801–6.10.1002/pd.1970121005Search in Google Scholar

9. Spencer K, Wood PJ, Anthony FW. Elevated levels of maternal serum inhibin immunoreactivity in second trimester pregnancies affected by Down’s syndrome. Ann Clin Biochem 1993;30:219–20.10.1177/000456329303000226Search in Google Scholar

10. Palomaki GE, Lambert-Messerlian GM, Canick JA. A summary analysis of Down syndrome markers in the late first trimester. Adv Clin Chem 2007;43:177–210.10.1016/S0065-2423(06)43006-7Search in Google Scholar

11. Wenstrom KD, Owen J, Chu DC, Boots L. Elevated second-trimester dimeric inhibin A levels identify Down syndrome pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:992–6.10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70002-4Search in Google Scholar

12. Canick JA, Lambert-Messerlian GM, Palomaki GE, Schneyer AL, Tumber MB, Knight GJ, et al. Maternal serum dimeric inhibin is elevated in Down syndrome pregnancy. Am J Hum Genet 1994;55:A9.Search in Google Scholar

13. Lambert-Messerlian GM, Canick JA, Palomaki GE, Schneyer AL. Second trimester levels of maternal serum inhibi A, Total inhibin, α inhibin precursor, and activin in Down’s Syndrome Pregnancy. J Med Screen 1996;3:58–62.10.1177/096914139600300202Search in Google Scholar

14. Wald NJ, Densem JW, George L, Muttukrishna S, Knight PG. Prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome using inhibin-A as a serum marker. Prenat Diagn 1996;16:143–53.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199602)16:2<143::AID-PD825>3.0.CO;2-FSearch in Google Scholar

15. Spencer K, Wallace EM, Ritoe S. Second-trimester dimeric inhibin-A in Down’s syndrome screening. Prenat Diagn 1996;16:1101–10.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199612)16:12<1101::AID-PD5>3.0.CO;2-7Search in Google Scholar

16. Wallace EM, Swanston IA, McNeilly AS, Ashby JP, Blundell G, Calder AA, et al. Second trimester screening for Down’s syndrome using maternal serum dimeric inhibin A. Clin Endocrinol 1996;44:17–21.10.1046/j.1365-2265.1996.544368.xSearch in Google Scholar

17. Wallace EM, Crossley JA, Ritoe SC, Aitken DA, Spencer K, Groome NP. Evolution of an inhibin A ELISA method: implications for Down’s syndrome screening. Ann Clin Biochem 1998;35:656–64.10.1177/000456329803500510Search in Google Scholar

18. Malone FD, Canick JA, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, Bukowski R, et al. First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2001–11.10.1056/NEJMoa043693Search in Google Scholar

19. Canick JA, MacRae AR. Second trimester serum markers. Semin Perinatol 2005;29:203–8.10.1053/j.semperi.2005.05.011Search in Google Scholar

20. Brown LF, Shearing CH, Tydeman G. Stability of inhibin A and unconjugated oestriol in the second trimester of pregnancy. Ann Clin Biochem 2011;48:72–4.10.1258/acb.2010.010149Search in Google Scholar

21. Coulson M, Bickerton S, Betts CJ, Jacobsen M, Stewart J, Chapin RE, et al. Analytic evaluation of a human ELISA kit for measurement of inhibin B in rat samples. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 2013;98:4–16.10.1002/bdrb.21047Search in Google Scholar

22. CLSI EP05 Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline – Second Edition, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

23. CLSI EP06 Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement procedures: A statistical Approach; Approved Guideline – First Edition. 2003.Search in Google Scholar

24. CLSI EP09 Measurement Procedure Comparison and. Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline – Third Edition, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-11-13
Accepted: 2016-1-13
Published Online: 2016-2-17
Published in Print: 2016-9-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. The Theranos phenomenon, scientific transparency and freedom of speech
  4. Holotranscobalamin: in the middle of difficultly lies opportunity
  5. Review
  6. Laboratory and clinical risk assessment to treat myelodysplatic syndromes
  7. Mini Review
  8. Quantitative nucleic acid amplification by digital PCR for clinical viral diagnostics
  9. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  10. Hybrid minigene splicing assay verified the pathogenicity of a novel splice site variant in the dystrophin gene of a Chinese patient with typical Duchenne muscular dystrophy phenotype
  11. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  12. Prospective validation of an automated chemiluminescence-based assay of renin and aldosterone for the work-up of arterial hypertension
  13. Sex steroid hormone stability in serum tubes with and without separator gels
  14. Reduced absorption and enhanced synthesis of cholesterol in patients with cystic fibrosis: a preliminary study of plasma sterols
  15. An International Standard for holotranscobalamin (holoTC): international collaborative study to assign a holoTC value to the International Standard for vitamin B12 and serum folate
  16. A technical and clinical evaluation of a new assay for inhibin A and its use in second trimester Down syndrome screening
  17. Investigation on the ability of first trimester glycodelin and angiopoietin-2 to predict small-for-gestational age pregnancies at delivery
  18. Plasma total C-terminal agrin fragment (tCAF) as a marker for kidney function in patients with chronic kidney disease
  19. Hematology and Coagulation
  20. Thirty-minutes’ exposure to smartphone call triggers neutrophil activation in vitro
  21. Performance of the XN-2000 WPC channel-flagging to differentiate reactive and neoplastic leukocytosis
  22. Differences in lupus anticoagulant final conclusion through clotting time or Rosner index for mixing test interpretation
  23. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  24. Derivation of level-specific reference change values (RCV) from a health screening database and optimization of their thresholds based on clinical utility
  25. Cancer Diagnosis
  26. BRAF analysis before surgery for papillary thyroid carcinoma: correlation with clinicopathological features and prognosis in a single-institution prospective experience
  27. Letters to the Editor
  28. Significant increase of serum prostate-specific antigen after exercise
  29. Serum delipidation but not high-speed centrifugation is effective in clearing lipemia interference in serum lipase activity measurement
  30. A relationship between absolute monocyte count and C-reactive protein in patients with migraine undergoing no pharmacological therapy
  31. Validation of the “Vacutainer® urinalysis preservative plus urine tube” for the determination of albumin and protein
  32. Performance evaluation of a novel automated HIV Ag/Ab chemiluminescence immunoassay
  33. SLC26A4 genotypes associated with enlarged vestibular aqueduct malformation in south Italian children with sensorineural hearing loss
  34. Is cystatin C level altered in women with polycystic ovary syndrome?
  35. Venous thromboembolism in a patient with persistent inhibitor to coagulation factor V – a case report
  36. Free light chains nephelometric assay: human urine stability in different storage conditions
  37. Comparing the viscoelastomeric fibrin polymerization assays FIBTEM® (ROTEM) vs. Functional Fibrinogen® (TEG): or why is a higher threshold for fibrinogen substitution better than a lower one?
  38. Reply to: Comparing the visco-elastomeric fibrin polymerization assays FIBTEM® (ROTEM) vs. Functional Fibrinogen® (TEG): or why is a higher threshold for fibrinogen substitution better than a lower one? By Schöchl et al.
  39. Congress Abstracts
  40. 5th Slovenian Congress of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2015-1118/html
Scroll to top button