Home Textkritik im Dienste der Wahrheitsfindung? Das VI. Ökumenische Konzil (680/81) und seine Fälschungsnachweise
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Textkritik im Dienste der Wahrheitsfindung? Das VI. Ökumenische Konzil (680/81) und seine Fälschungsnachweise

  • Heinz Ohme
Published/Copyright: April 12, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This article investigates the plausibility of the proof presented at the Sixth Ecumenical Council (680/81) to show that the Logos of Patriarch Menas (536-552) and the two letters of Pope Vigilius (537-555) were forgeries. These texts were among the most important testimonia of the so-called Monotheletes, and prove the assertion of one operation and one will in Christ long before the controversy of the seventh century. Through an analysis of the conciliar acts and other texts it is shown that the argumentation of the council was not only incoherent and self-contradictory but actually scandalous, since the evidence presented by an authentic papyrus roll of the Acts of the Fifth Council, with its clear proof of the authenticity of the Vigilius letters, was ignored. In an adoption and further development of the frequently overlooked treatment of this matter in the 1971 edition of the Acts of the Fifth Ecumenical Council (553) (ACO, ser. I, 4/1) the following is demonstrated: the discovery of the longer first edition of the Acts, containing the Vigilius letters, in the original papyrus rolls of the Acts of the Fifth Council led, from the beginning of the so-called monenergist-monothelete controversy, to the (re‐)introduction of the disputed texts into the shorter second edition contained in codices. It is indisputable that these texts are authentic.

Published Online: 2022-04-12
Published in Print: 2022-03-01

© 2022 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Titelei
  2. Inhalt
  3. Siglenverzeichnis
  4. I. Abteilung
  5. On the toponymics of the Great Palace of Constantinople: the Daphne
  6. Late Roman emperorship in Constantinople: embodiment and ‘unbodiment’ of Christian virtues
  7. Heraclius Constantine III – Emperor of Byzantium (613–641)
  8. The Arab conquest in Byzantine historical memory: the long view
  9. Allegorie und Lob der Physik: Das Proömium der Paraphrase des Theodoros Metochites zu naturwissenschaftlichen Schriften des Aristoteles
  10. A list of village payments and the bouleutic career of Theodoros
  11. Late Byzantine sigillographic evidence from Cappadocia: lead seals from Kırşehir with a unique overstruck example
  12. “A statue of bronze, by which times of old used to honor men of rare example”: Materials of honorific statues in Late Antiquity
  13. Textkritik im Dienste der Wahrheitsfindung? Das VI. Ökumenische Konzil (680/81) und seine Fälschungsnachweise
  14. Justinianus Eponymus: Überlegungen zur letzten Glanzzeit kaiserlicher Namensverleihungen an Städte
  15. Islamicate alchemy in Greek letters on the first page of Marcianus graecus 299
  16. The silk industry around Naupaktos and its implications
  17. II. ABTEILUNG
  18. Pauline Allen / Bronwen Neil. Greek and Latin letters in Late Antiquity. The Christianisation of a literary form
  19. Nicholas Drocourt / Élisabeth Malamut (eds.). La diplomatie byzantine, de l’Empire romain aux confins de l’Europe (ve–xve s.)
  20. James Howard-Johnston. The last great war of antiquity
  21. Alex Metcalfe / Hervin Fernandez-Acevez / Marco Muresu (eds.). The making of medieval Sardinia
  22. David K. Pettegrew / William R. Karaher / Thomas W. Davis (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of early Christian archaeology
  23. Nachrichten
  24. Totentafel
  25. Nachrufe. Athanasios Kambylis (9. 1. 1928 – 20. 9. 2021), von Ioannis Vassis — 391 Benjamin Hendrickx (24 July 1939 – 8 July 2021)
Downloaded on 20.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bz-2022-0010/html
Scroll to top button