Home Social Sciences Whose Realism? Which Legitimacy? Ideologies of Domination and Post-Rawlsian Political Theory
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Whose Realism? Which Legitimacy? Ideologies of Domination and Post-Rawlsian Political Theory

  • William Clare Roberts EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 7, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

There is something amiss about post-Rawlsian efforts to bring political theory down to earth by insisting upon the political primacy of the question of legitimacy, peace, or order. The intuition driving much realism seems to be that we must first agree to get along, and only then can we get down to the business of pursuing justice. I argue that the ideological narratives of the powerful pose a political problem for this primacy of legitimacy thesis. To prioritize the achievement of democratic legitimacy seems to make sense only to the extent that we already live in a world in which systematic domination—and its ideological baggage—has been stamped out. I draw on the social study of domination for the sake of combatting in political theory the temptation to focus on the static design of the constitutional state at the expense of ignoring or even condemning the social processes that motivate legal and constitutional changes.


Corresponding author: William Clare Roberts, Associate Professor of Political Science, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CA, E-mail:

References

Aristotle 1984. The Politics. Chicago: Universityof Chicago Press. Translated by Carnes Lord.10.7208/chicago/9780226026701.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bagg, S. 2022. “Realism against Legitimacy: For a Radical, Action-Oriented Political Realism.” Social Theory and Practice 48 (1): 29–60. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract2021129146.Search in Google Scholar

Bartky, S. L. 1990. Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. Thinking Gender. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Bavister-Gould, A. 2013. “Bernard Williams: Political Realism and the Limits of Legitimacy: Political Realism and the Limits of Legitimacy.” European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4): 593–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00464.x.Search in Google Scholar

Berkman, E. 2015. Poor People Don’t Have Less Self-Control. Poverty Forces Them to Think Short-Term. New Republic. 22 September 2015. (accessed March 13, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Clegg, J., and A. Usmani. 2019. “The Economic Origins of Mass Incarceration.” Catalyst: A Journal of Theory and Strategy 3 (3): 9–53.Search in Google Scholar

Contrary, C. 2014. “Women Do Not Understand Themselves.” Return of Kings (Blog). 26 March 2014. Archived version (accessed March 13, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Douglass, F. 2003. My Bondage and My Freedom, edited by J. D. Smith. New York: Penguin Classics, Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar

Flynn, E. G., W. C. Smith, and W. E. Trautmann. 2014. Direct Action & Sabotage: Three Classic IWW Pamphlets from the 1910s, edited by S. Salerno. Oakland: Charles H. Kerr Library, PM Press.Search in Google Scholar

Forrester, K. 2012. “Judith Shklar, Bernard Williams and Political Realism.” European Journal of Political Theory 11 (3): 247–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885111430605.Search in Google Scholar

Forrester, K. 2019. The Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691189420Search in Google Scholar

Frye, M. 1983. The Politics of Reality: Essays in Feminist Theory. The Crossing Press Feminist Series. Trumansburg: Crossing Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gädeke, D. 2020. “Does a Mugger Dominate? Episodic Power and the Structural Dimension of Domination.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 28 (2): 199–221.10.1111/jopp.12202Search in Google Scholar

Galston, W. A. 2010. “Realism in Political Theory.” European Journal of Political Theory 9 (4): 385–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885110374001.Search in Google Scholar

Genovese, E. D. 1974. Roll, Jordan, Roll; the World the Slaves Made. New York: Pantheon Books.Search in Google Scholar

Geuss, R. 1981. The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Modern European Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hirschmann, N. J. 2003. The Subject of Liberty: toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Horton, J. 2010. “Realism, Liberal Moralism and a Political Theory of Modus Vivendi.” European Journal of Political Theory 9 (4): 431–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885110374004.Search in Google Scholar

Ince, O. U. 2018. Colonial Capitalism and the Dilemmas of Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190637293.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Istook, E. 2014. “‘No Justice; No Peace!’ Chants in Ferguson Are Actually Saying, ‘We Want Revenge!’” In The Washington Times. Archived version (accessed March 13, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, H. 2015. Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl. Oxford World Classics, edited by R. J. Ellis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/owc/9780198709879.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

James, C. L. R. 1989. The Black Jacobins, 2nd ed. New York: Vintage Books.Search in Google Scholar

King, M. L.Jr. 2012. All Labor Has Dignity. King Legacy, edited by M. K. Honey. Boston: Beacon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lovett, F. 2010. A General Theory of Domination and Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579419.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1973. Werke, Vol. 18. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1976. Karl Marx, Frederick Engels: Collected Works, Vol. 6. New York: International Publishers. 50 vols.Search in Google Scholar

Mazie, S. 2014. “What Does ‘No Justice, No Peace’ Really Mean?” Big Think. 5 December 2014. (accessed March 13, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Na’aman, O. 2012. “The Checkpoint.” In Boston Review. 13 November 2012 (accessed March 13, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Newman, S. 2022. “La Boétie and Republican Liberty: Voluntary Servitude and Non-domination.” European Journal of Political Theory 21 (1): 134–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885119863141.Search in Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F. 1997 On the Genealogy of Morality, Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought, edited by K. Ansell-Pearson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Translated by Carol Diethe.Search in Google Scholar

Oxford English Dictionary Online. 2022 (March). “chav, n.”. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pareto, V. 2014 Manual of Political Economy: A Critical and Variorum Edition, edited by A. Montesano, A. Zanni, L. Bruni, J. S. Chipman, and M. McLure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Patterson, O. 1982. Slavery and Social Death: A Comparative Study. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pettit, P. 2012. On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. The Seeley Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139017428Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Rev. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674042582Search in Google Scholar

Rosen, M. 1996. On Voluntary Servitude: False Consciousness and the Theory of Ideology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rossi, E. 2013. “Consensus, Compromise, Justice and Legitimacy.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (4): 557–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2013.810393.Search in Google Scholar

Scott, J. C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sharp, H. 2022. “Spinoza on the Fear of Solitude.” In Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, Vol. 11. forthcoming.10.1093/oso/9780192884749.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Siegel, S. 2015. “Epistemic Evaluability and Perceptual Farce.” In The Cognitive Penetrability of Perception: New Philosophical Perspectives, 405–24. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sleat, M. 2016. “Realism, Liberalism and Non-ideal Theory or, Are There Two Ways to Do Realistic Political Theory?” Political Studies 64 (1): 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12152.Search in Google Scholar

Stanley, J. 2015. How Propaganda Works. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400865802Search in Google Scholar

Tacitus, P. C. 1899. De Vita et Moribus Iulii Agricolae. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Search in Google Scholar

Teevster 2013. “Anti-Slut Defense: What it Is & How to Handle it (Long and Detailed).” In NextASF. 19 April 2013. Archived version (accessed March 13, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Therborn, G 1999. The Ideology of Power and the Power of Ideology, 4th impressionVerso Classics ed. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

United States Department of Justice 2015. Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department. US: Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division.Search in Google Scholar

Valentini, L. 2012. “Ideal vs. Non-Ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map.” Philosophy Compass 7 (9): 654–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00500.x.Search in Google Scholar

Waldron, J. 2013. “Political Political Theory: An Inaugural Lecture.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 21 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12007.Search in Google Scholar

Waldron, J. 2016. Political Political Theory: Essays on Institutions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674970342Search in Google Scholar

Wartenberg, T. E. 1990. The Forms of Power: From Domination to Transformation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, B. 2008 In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, edited by G. Hawthorn. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400826735Search in Google Scholar

Wollstonecraft, M. 1995. “A Vindication of the Rights of Men with a Vindication of the Rights of Women and Hints.” In Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought, edited by S. Tomaselli. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wordsworth, Dot 2014. “Where Did ‘No Justice, No Peace’ Come from?” In The Spectator. 18 January 2014 (accessed March 13, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-07-07
Published in Print: 2022-05-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/auk-2022-2028/pdf
Scroll to top button