Abstract
In this study, we investigate the hypothesis that γ-ray emissions from jetted active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are strongly beamed using the dominant relativistic beaming model of the samples of 532 blazars (281 flat-spectrum radio quasars [FSRQs] and 251 BL Lacertae objects [BL Lacs]) and 16 narrow line Seyfert 1 galaxies (NLSy1s). Our comparison of the distribution of the radio core-dominance (R) reveals that FSRQs exhibit the highest core dominance with a mean value of 1.32 ± 0.08, followed by BL Lacs at 1.21 ± 0.05, and NLSy1s at 0.93 ± 0.21. Our analysis indicates that over 80% (approximately 426) of our samples have log R > 0, with the values for FSRQs and BL Lacs extending by more than one magnitude. This suggests that γ-ray emissions in BL Lacs and FSRQs are significantly and relativistically boosted, while the effect is less pronounced in NLSy1s. Additionally, the data show that NLSy1s have the largest mean viewing angle compared to FSRQs and BL Lacs. This implies that at very small viewing angles, relativistic beaming and orientation effects are more significant in blazars than in NLSy1s. Further analysis reveals a moderate positive correlation (coefficient r ∼ 0.50) between the core-dominance parameter and both the γ-ray luminosity and redshift for the combined samples. These results are consistent with the relativistic beaming model and suggest that γ-ray emissions from blazars and NLSy1 galaxies are strongly beamed. This comprehensive analysis supports the notion that relativistic beaming plays a critical role in testing the hypothesis of γ-ray emissions of jetted AGNs. Thus, our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the concept of relativistic beaming in different types of jetted AGNs, highlighting the importance of viewing angles and relativistic effects in interpreting γ-ray observations.
1 Introduction
Active galactic nuclei (AGNs) denote a special class of galaxies that emit copious amounts of energy due to an actively accreting central supermassive (≳106 M ⊙) black hole (SMBH). They emit across the entire observable electromagnetic spectrum and constitute the largest fraction of sources in any extra-galactic survey (Ackermann et al. 2015). At γ-ray energies covered by the Fermi-Large Area Telescope (Fermi-LAT), AGNs constitute about 50% of the total population in the latest release (4FGL), and more than 75% are high energy (50 MeV to 1 TeV) sources (Abdollahi et al. 2020, Ajello et al. 2020). AGNs show bimodality in the distribution of their radio-loudness parameter R L defined as the ratio of the radio emission intensity to the optical emission intensity. Few AGNs (∼10–15%) are known as radio-loud with R L ≥ 10, while ∼85% with R L < 10 are radio-quiet AGNs (Kellermann et al. 1989, Xu et al. 1999, Zhang et al. 2021). Most radio-loud AGNs have prominent and well-collimated relativistic jets, while radio-quiet AGNs have relatively weak jets with negligible emissions (Tarchi et al. 2011; Doi et al. 2013). Blazars are the most extreme subtype of radio-loud, jetted AGNs whose relativistic jets are aligned to observers’ lines of sight (Urry and Padovani 1995). Blazars are classified into flat-spectrum radio quasars (FSRQs) and BL Lacertae objects (BL Lacs) based on the rest-frame equivalent width (EW) of the optical emission line. FSRQs have broad emission lines with EW >5 Å, while BL Lacs have weak or no emission lines with EW ≤5 Å (see Marcha et al. 1996, Xiong and Xiong 2014). The ratio of broad emission line luminosity (L BLR) to Eddington luminosity (L Edd) has also been used to further classify blazars with FSRQs having L BLR/L Edd ≥ 5 × 10−4, while BL Lacs have L BLR/L Edd < 5 × 10−4 (Ghisellini and Celotti 2001, Ghisellini et al. 2011).
Narrow Line Seyfert 1 galaxies (NLSy1s) are another special class of radio-loud AGNs that show powerful relativistic jets, low black hole mass ranging between 106 and 108
Preliminary investigations on the γ-ray emissions of FSRQs and BL Lacs indicate a strong relationship between radio core dominance and γ-ray luminosity and these are crucial factors in the study of relativistic beaming and orientation effects in AGNs (Browne and Murphy 1987, Kembhavi 1993, Fan et al. 2005, Odo et al. 2015). Subsequently, the study of γ-ray emission from a sample of 80 blazars observed by Fermi-LAT yields a strong correlation between radio core-dominance Rr and the γ-ray luminosity, suggesting that the relativistic beaming effect can play a major role in the detection of radio emissions of AGNs (Liu et al. 2016, Chen et al. 2016, Pei et al. 2020b). Similarly, some authors (see von Montigny et al. 1995, Mattox et al. 1993) suggest that the γ-ray emissions of blazars originate from the relativistic jet and are strongly beamed similar to their radio emission counterparts. Also, Linford et al. (2011) found that the difference between γ-ray loud and radio-quiet FSRQs can be explained by Doppler boosting. Therefore, since astrophysicists appear to explore the fact that γ-ray emissions are associated with Doppler boosting, the relativistic beaming model and γ-ray emissions in jetted AGNs need to be thoroughly investigated on a large scale by using an updated sample of blazars and blazar-like NLSy1s. Inspired by the availability of the observed data of both blazars and NLSy1s by the Fermi-LAT, we aim to use the radio core-dominance parameter and γ-ray luminosity to statistically investigate the hypothesis that γ-ray emissions of blazars and NLSy1s are strongly beamed.
2 Theory of relativistic beaming in AGNs
The relativistic beaming and radio source orientation model predicts that radio sources that are viewed at small angles to the line-of-sight of the observer exhibit Doppler enhancement of the core emission relative to the extended emission component (see Orr and Browne 1982). This general relativistic concept has effectively explained the observational properties of jetted AGNs. The model involves studying the emission mechanisms from two luminosity components: the core (L C) and extended (L E) components (Orr and Brown 1982, Fan and Zhang 2003). The ratio of the two components, called the core-dominance parameter (R), is an essential statistical indicator of relativistic beaming and can be expressed as
where ϕ is the angle between the jet and the line of sight,
Meanwhile, the relativistic beaming effect, which can be quantified using the bulk Lorentz factor, is primarily described by the Doppler factor at a very small viewing angle (Bai and Lee 2001, Nieppola et al. 2008, Meyer et al. 2011) and is expressed as
where
where
Here, R m is the mean value of the R distribution. Similarly, it can be inferred from Eq. (1) that maximum boosting occurs when the angle between the jet and the line of sight is zero. In this case, combining Eqs (1) and (3) yields the value for the maximum core-dominance parameter (R max) given as
Moreover, numerous authors (see, e.g., Bridle et al. 1994, Fan and Zhang 2003, Pei et al. 2019, 2020, Iyida et al. 2021, 2024) have shown that the core-dominance parameter is a very reliable statistical indicator of the relativistic beaming hypothesis. In particular, it has been argued that R is strongly related to γ-ray luminosity (L γ) in samples of jetted AGNs in a general form (e.g., Wu et al. 2014, Pei et al. 2020, Iyida et al. 2021) as
where λ is a sample-dependent factor. In effect, the jet model of γ-ray emission from AGNs leverages a correlation between the radio core-dominance parameter and γ-ray luminosity, and a correlation between the two parameters (Liu et al. 2016, Pei et al. 2020b) is an indication that γ-ray emission from these sources is strongly beamed. Thus, R – L γ-ray correlations can also be used to study relativistic beaming hypotheses in samples of jetted AGNs.
3 Data sample and results
3.1 Data selection
The Fermi-LAT is one of the two key instruments on board the Fermi γ-ray space telescope. It is a pair conversion telescope that can detect high-energy γ-rays in the energy range of 50 MeV to 1 TeV (see Atwood et al. 2009, Abdollahi et al. 2020, Ajello et al. 2020). We considered the characteristics of 532 blazars (281 FSRQs and 251 BL Lacs) selected from Pei et al. (2020b) and verified their identification and classifications using two databases, NASA/IPAC EXTRAGALACTIC DATABASE (NED: http://ipac.caltech.edu/forms/byname.html) and the Roma BZ-CAT database (http://www.asdc.asi.it/bzcat/), respectively. For these blazar samples, we selected their redshift, γ-ray luminosity, and radio core dominance. For the NLSy1s sample, a list of bonafide γ-ray emitting AGNs (4 Seyfert galaxies and 12 NLS1s) with relevant information (redshift and γ-ray luminosity) was compiled by Foschini et al. (2021). These sources were cross-matched with data sample by Chen et al. (2021). We found out that the parameters of 4 NLSy1s do not overlap with the sample by Foschini et al. (2021) and were removed.
3.2 Analysis and results
The statistical analysis of the parameters of AGNs is essential in understanding their intrinsic relationships. We study these properties using the probability density function (PDF) and the two-dimensional Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K–S) test. The PDF is a key hypothesis test tool used to describe the distribution of probabilities over a continuous random value. On the other hand, the K–S test calculates the chance probability (p-value) for independent parameters and measures the null hypothesis that two samples originate from the same underlying distribution. The threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis is a confidence level of 95%, corresponding to a p-value of less than 0.05. The probability density distribution of the radio core-dominance parameter (R) for the sample of blazar on a logarithmic scale is shown in Figure 1a. The distribution is continuous, with more than 80% (∼426) of FSRQs, BL Lacs, and NLSy1s having log R > 0, with the values for FSRQs and BL Lacs extending by more than one magnitude. The values of log R for NLSy1s range from −0.45 to 2.24 and lie in between FSRQs and BL Lacs, while FSRQs and BL Lacs appear to have larger values, spreading from −3.56 to 3.46; this indicates the level of relativistic beaming in FSRQs and BL Lacs. However, we computed the mean FSRQs, BL Lacs, and NLSy1s values, and the results are shown in Table 1. However, to estimate the mean viewing angles for observing the γ-ray emissions of FSRQs, BL Lacs, and NLSy1s, the choice of R T plays a key role (see Orr and Browne 1982, Kembhavi 1993, Zeng et al. 2022). A number of authors (e.g., Odo et al. 2015, Pei et al. 2020) have argued that R T < 0.10 is compatible with the relativistic beaming of AGNs. Hence, using R T = 0.024, which has been used consistently across different wavebands (Orr and Browne 1982, Fan et al. 2005, Pei et al. 2020, Iyida et al. 2021), we computed the mean viewing angles of each subsample using Eq. (4), and the results are provided in Table 1. It can be deduced from the table that FSRQs and BL Lacs with small viewing angles are strongly beamed compared to NLSy1s. Further statistical analysis on the distributions of R for FSRQs, BL Lacs, and NLSy1s was done using the K–S test. The cumulative distribution function (CDF) is shown in Figure 1b. In general, we found that at 95% confidence, there is approximately zero probability p ∼ 0, and there is no fundamental difference between the distributions of these objects in R. The NLSy1s appear not to be significantly different from blazars, which suggests that a relativistic beaming effect is observed in both samples of AGNs.

(a) PDF and (b) CDF of radio core-dominance parameters of FSRQs, BL Lacs, and NLSy1s.
Mean values of R and viewing angles of FSRQs, BL Lacs, and NLSy1s
| Samples | Mean value (R) | θ m |
|---|---|---|
| FSRQs | 1.32 ± 0.08 | 21.4° |
| BL Lacs | 1.21 ± 0.05 | 18.8° |
| NLSy1s | 0.93 ± 0.21 | 27.5° |
The PDF of the logarithm of the γ-ray luminosity parameter (L γ-ray) for the present sample of blazars and NLSy1s is shown in Figure 2. There is a sequence that shows the level of emission of high-energy γ-rays among FSRQs, BL Lacs, and NLSy1s, with BL Lacs being the least emitter of γ-rays; however, NLSy1s appear to have the highest values, suggesting that NLSy1s are the highest γ-ray emitters of our sample followed by the FSRQs. Nonetheless, the distribution of our sample yield mean (logarithm) values ∼ 46.40 ± 0.20 for FSRQs, 45.39 ± 0.10 for BL Lacs, and 47.25 ± 0.20 for NLSy1s. A two-sample K–S test was carried out on log L γ-ray data. The CDF is shown in Figure 2b. It was found that the distribution shows that the samples belong to different parent populations (p ≪ 10−5). However, the high values of NLSy1s indicate that they emit most in the γ-ray band compared to FSRQs and BL Lacs.

(a) PDF and (b) CDF of γ-ray luminosity of FSRQs, BL Lacs, and NLSy1s.
To further investigate the evolutionary relationship among FSRQs, BL Lacs, and NLSy1s, we show in Figure 3a the PDF of the spectroscopic redshift of our sample. From the figure, the ranges of redshift (z) of FSRQs, BL Lacs, and NLSy1s are −1.72 < (z) < 0.79, −2.53 < (z) < 0.63 and −1.84 < (z) < 0.45, respectively. A K–S test was performed on the redshift data. Generally, our results indicate that BL Lacs do not appear to be significantly different from NLSy1s (p ∼ 0.05), indicative of their cosmological distance. The CDF is shown in Figure 3(b).

(a) PDF and (b) CDF of the redshift of FSRQs, BL Lacs, and NLSy1s.
3.3 γ-ray emission properties of jetted AGNs
The hypothesis of γ-ray emissions in AGNs predicts that γ-ray emission properties of jetted AGNs are strongly beamed, as can be inferred from Eq. (6). To investigate the effect of relativistic beaming on the γ-ray emission of blazars and NLSy1s, we test the consistency of this prediction using the Pearson correlation theory. We computed the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (r) for the combined samples using the following expression (Pavlidou et al. 2012):
Here,

Relations between radio core-dominance parameter, (a) γ-ray luminosity, and (b) redshift for FSRQs, BL Lacs, and NLSy1s.
Results of regression analysis for the whole sample taken together
| Plots | Sample | k | Δk | k 0 | Δk 0 | r | Chance probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Combined sample | 1.23 | 0.02 | −1.07 | 0.01 | 0.51 | 2.05 × 10−6 |
|
|
Combined sample | 1.68 | 0.03 | −0.98 | 0.02 | 0.32 | 5.08 × 10−4 |
Furthermore, it is known that considerable uncertainties characterize the statistical analyses of data samples of extragalactic sources. Thus, in view of the extent of uncertainties in the radio core dominance and γ-ray luminosity, as well as a redshift of blazars and NLSy1s, we theorize that a more unbiased investigation of the hypothesis γ-ray emissions in AGNs requires the use of the average values of the parameters obtained from carefully chosen bins. The binning was done over the γ-ray luminosity and redshift as follows: L
γ-ray ≤ 44.00, 44.00 < L
γ-ray ≤ 45.00, 45.00 < L
γ-ray ≤ 46.00, 46.00 < L
γ-ray ≤ 47.00, 47.00 < L
γ-ray ≤ 48.00, 48.00 < L
γ-ray ≤ 49.00 and z ≤ −1.50, −1.50 < z ≤ −1.00, −1.00 < z ≤ −0.50, −0.50 < z ≤ 0.00, and 0.00 < z ≤ 0.50, respectively. The average values of R – L
γ and R – z were calculated for each bin. The standard errors of the average values of these parameters were also calculated. The plot of the average values of R – L
γ-ray and R – z are shown in Figure 5. Linear regression analysis of R – L
γ and R – z data gives

Relation between the average values of radio core-dominance parameter, binned (a) γ-ray luminosity, and (b) redshift for FSRQs, BL Lacs, and NLSy1s.
4 Discussion
The relativistic beaming model has been proposed to explain certain observed properties of different classes of AGNs and is extensively applied in the testing emission properties of sources. A key implication of this model is that relativistic Doppler boosting and geometric projection effects are expected to be more significant in sources where the radio axes are inclined at an angle to the line of sight. Consequently, the relativistic beam from the core of an AGN is expected to be narrow and characterized for a particular class of AGNs. In this work, we compiled a sample of jetted FSRQs, BL Lacs, and NLSy1s to test the fact that gamma-ray emissions are relativistically beamed for jetted AGN sources. Hitherto, some authors have looked at the relativistic beaming effect in AGNs (see Fan et al. 2011, Pei et al. 2016, 2019, Iyida et al. 2021). The argument is based on the fact that these sources possess ultra-relativistic jets and have common properties. Generally, in relativistic beaming effects, blazars are assumed to be the beamed counterparts of the two classes of radio galaxies (see Urry and Padovani 1995).
Previously, Ghisellini et al. (1993) and Fan et al. (2011) compiled a sample consisting of different classes of AGNs. They found that the average value of log R for BL Lacs is higher than FSRQs. Meanwhile, Murphy et al. (1993) studied the distribution of R for 74 objects at 5 GHz and discovered that there is a tendency for BL Lacs to have lower values than their FQs counterparts. From the results of our analysis of the distributions of R for NLS1s, BL Lacs, and FSRQs, we observed that the R for the majority of FSRQs, BL Lacs, and NLSy1s are fairly large (>1), thus implying that γ-ray emissions in BL Lacs and FSRQs are relativistically boosted. In the same vein, values of Rr for FSRQs and BL Lacs extend by more than one magnitude, thus suggesting that relativistic beaming is more significant in blazars than NLSy1s.
Also, we showed from the distributions of γ-ray luminosity and redshift that FSRQs, BL Lacs, and NLSy1s form a sequence, which indicates the level of relativistic beaming in each class. However, one can imagine that the distributions of R, L γ-ray, and redshift for FSRQs BL Lacs and NLS1y1s originate from the same parent distribution. We explored this further using the K–S tests. It was found that the probabilities p for both NLS1s and blazar subclasses to come from the same distribution are low (<0.005), showing that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected.
Also, very indispensable in our analysis is the investigation of the effects of relativistic beaming on the γ-ray emission of blazars and NLS1s. We found that γ-ray emissions in FSRQs, BL Lacs, and NLSy1S are relativistically beamed, and there are intrinsic similarities between the blazars and NLSy1s. The R – L γ-ray plot is observed to be moderately correlated for the combined samples of FSRQs, BL Lac, and NLSy1s, which agrees with the relativistic beaming effects (see Orr and Browne 1982, Odo et al. 2012). It is, therefore, observed from the figure that the beaming model is more pronounced in BL Lacs and FSRQs than in NLSy1s. Thus, these results are quite consistent with several previous results on relativistic beaming and orientation effects in AGNs (see, e.g., Fan et al. 2011, 2005, Zhou et al. 2007, Resconi et al. 2017, Iyida et al. 2021). However, the fact that FSRQ, BL Lacs, and NLSy1s populate distinct and practically like regions in the log R – log L γ-ray plot implies that they have a common history (e.g., Urry and Padovani 1995, Li et al. 2016, Pei et al. 2019). Analyses of AGN subclasses by Odo and Ubachukwu (2013) and Odo et al. (2015) suggest that sources that are projected very close to the line of sight exhibit a high beaming effect. Therefore, the correlation observed in the log R – log L γ-ray plot is attributed to relativistic beaming and orientation effects.
5 Conclusion
Using a compiled sample from the fourth Fermi-LAT data catalog, we investigated the γ-ray properties of jetted AGNs in the context of relativistic beaming. Our analysis of the distributions of the radio core-dominance parameter (R) and γ-ray luminosity (L γ-ray) shows that the beaming effect is stronger in FSRQs and BL Lacs compared to NLSy1s. The results indicate that FSRQs and BL Lacs are observed at smaller viewing angles and are more strongly beamed than NLSy1s, which have relatively larger viewing angles, supporting the predictions of relativistic beaming theory. Additionally, a moderate correlation (r ∼ 0.50) was found in the R–L γ-ray plot for the combined samples. This is consistent with the relativistic beaming model, suggesting that γ-ray emissions from both blazars and NLSy1s are strongly beamed.
Acknowledgements
We are highly indebted to the anonymous referees for carefully reading through the manuscript and offering very helpful and critical comments that helped to improve the article. EUI acknowledges support from GRAO/GSSTI through the Development in Africa with Radio Astronomy (DARA) phase 3 funded by the UK s Science and Technologies Facilities Council (Reference number 508 ST/Y006100/1).
-
Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted full responsibility for the content of this manuscript, consented to its submission to the journal, reviewed the results, and approved the final version. CIO conceived the research idea and developed the initial framework. EUI and IOE contributed equally to the development of the theoretical models and the analysis. FCO conducted the data analysis and assisted with the interpretation of the results.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abdollahi S, Acero F, Ackermann M, Ajello M, Atwood WB, Axelsson M, et al. 2020. Fermi large area telescope fourth source catalog. Astrophys J Suppl Ser. 247:33.Search in Google Scholar
Ackermann M, Ajello M, Atwood WB, Baldini L, Ballet J, Barbiellini G, et al. 2015. The third catalog of active galactic nuclei detected by thefermilarge area telescope. Astrophy J. 810:14–47.10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/14Search in Google Scholar
Ajello M, Angioni R, Axelsson M, Ballet J, Barbiellini G, Bastieri D, et al. 2020. The fourth catalog of active galactic nuclei detected by the fermi large area telescope. ApJ. 892:105.Search in Google Scholar
Atwood WB, Abdo AA, Ackermann M, Althouse W, Anderson B, Axelsson M, et al. 2009. The large area telescope on the Fermi gamma-ray space telescope mission. ApJ. 697:1071.Search in Google Scholar
Bai JM, Lee MG. 2001. New evidence for the unified scheme of BL lacertae objects and FR I radio galaxies. Am J Phys. 548:244–248. 10.1086/318695.Search in Google Scholar
Bassani L, Dean AJ, Sembay S. 1983. Super-Eddington luminosity characteristics of active galactic nuclei. A & A. 125:52.Search in Google Scholar
Bridle AH, Stanghellini C., Lonsdale CJ, Burns J, Laing RA. 1994. Deep VLA imaging of twelve extended 3CR quasars. Astrophys J. 108:766.10.1086/117112Search in Google Scholar
Browne IW, Murphy DW. 1987. Beaming and the X-ray, optical and radio properties of quasars. MNRAS. 226:601–627.10.1093/mnras/226.3.601Search in Google Scholar
Chen YY, Zhang X, Xiong DR, Wang SJ, Yu XL. 2016. The beaming effect and γ-ray emission for Fermi blazars. Res Astro Astrop. 16:13.10.1088/1674-4527/16/1/013Search in Google Scholar
Chen Y, Gu Q, Fan J, Wang H, Qin S, Ding N, et al. 2021. From the Fermi blazar sequence to the relation between Fermi blazars and γ-ray Narrow-line Seyfert 1 Galaxies. Astrophys J. 906:108.10.3847/1538-4357/abcb82Search in Google Scholar
D’Ammando F. 2019. Relativistic jets in gamma-ray-emitting narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies. Galaxies. 7(4):87. 10.3390/galaxies7040087.Search in Google Scholar
D’Ammando, F., Raiteri, C.M. Villata, M. et al. 2019. Investigating the multiwavelength behaviour of the flat spectrum radio quasar CTA102 during 2013–2017. Monthly Not R Astron Soc. 490:5300–5316. 10.1093/mnras/stz2792.Search in Google Scholar
Doi A, Asada K, Fujisawa, K, Nagai H, Hagiwara Y, Wajima K, et al. 2013. Very long baseline array imaging of parsec-scale radio emissions in nearby radio-quiet narrow-line seyfert 1 galaxies. Astrophys J. 765:69.10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/69Search in Google Scholar
Fabian AC, Zoghbi A, Ross RR, Uttley P, Gallo LC, Brandt WN, et al. 2009. Broad line emission from iron K- and L-shell transitions in the active galaxy 1H 0707-495. Nature. 459(7246):540–542.10.1038/nature08007Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Fan JH, Zhang JS. 2003. The core dominance parameter of extragalactic radio sources. JoAA. 407(3):899.10.1051/0004-6361:20030896Search in Google Scholar
Fan JH, Romero GE, Wang YX, Zhang JS. 2005. Separation of different contributions to the total X-ray luminosity in gamma-ray loud blazars. Chin J Astron Astrophys. 5:457–462.10.1088/1009-9271/5/5/003Search in Google Scholar
Fan JH, Yang JH, Pan J, Hua TX. 2011. Chemical constituents of Asplenium ruta-muraria L. RAA. 11(12):1413–1418.10.1080/14786419.2011.599805Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Foschini L. 2011. Accretion and jet power in active galactic nuclei. Astron Astrophys. 11:1266–1278.10.1088/1674-4527/11/11/003Search in Google Scholar
Foschini L, Lister ML, Anton S, Berton M, Ciroi S, et al. 2021. A new sample of gamma-ray emitting jetted active galactic nuclei—preliminary results. Universe 7:372. 10.3390/universe7100372.Search in Google Scholar
Ghisellini G, Celotti A. 2001. Relativistic large-scale jets and minimum power requirements, Monthly Not R Astron Soc. 327:739–743. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04700.x.Search in Google Scholar
Ghisellini G, Padovani P, Celotti A, Maraschi L. 1993. Relativistic bulk motion in active galactic nuclei. Astrophys J. 407:65.10.1086/172493Search in Google Scholar
Ghisellini G, Tavecchio F, Foschini L, Ghirlanda G. 2011. The transition between BL Lacobjects and flat spectrum radio quasars. Monthly Not R Astron Soc. 414, 2674–2689. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18578.x.Search in Google Scholar
Iyida EU, Odo FC, Chukwude AE. 2021. Radio core-dominance of Fermi-blazars: implication for blazar unification. Astrophys Space Sci. 366:40.10.1007/s10509-021-03946-2Search in Google Scholar
Iyida EU, OnahCI, Eya IO. 2024. Statistical tests of the relativistic beaming indicators of jetted AGNs and implication for the revised blazar sequence. Niger J Phys. 33(2):75–86.10.62292/njp.v33i2.2024.222Search in Google Scholar
Kellermann KI, Sramek R, Schmidt M, Shaffer DB, Green R. 1989. VLA observations of objects in the Palomar Bright Quasar Survey. Astron J. 98:1195.10.1086/115207Search in Google Scholar
Kembhavi A. 1993. X-ray beaming in radio quasars. Mon Not R Astron Soc. 264:683–690.10.1093/mnras/264.3.683Search in Google Scholar
Li Y, Fu SY, Feng HJ, He SL, Lin C, Fan JH, et al. 2016. Ratio of the core to the extended emissions in the comoving frame for blazars. Astrophys Astron. 38:22.10.1007/s12036-017-9442-0Search in Google Scholar
Linford JD, Taylor GB, Romani RW, Helmboldt JF, Readhead ACS, Reeves R, et al. 2011. Contemporaneous VLBA 5 GHz observations of large area telescope detected blazars. ApJ. 744(2):177.10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/177Search in Google Scholar
Liu Z, Wu Z, Gu M. 2016. Sharp chandra view of ROSAT all-sky survey bright sources — I. improvement of positional accuracy. Res Astron Astrophys. 16:103.10.1088/1674-4527/16/12/187Search in Google Scholar
Lind KR, Blandford RD. 1985. Semidynamical models of radio jets – Relativistic beaming and source counts. ApJ. 295:358.10.1086/163380Search in Google Scholar
Luashvili A, Boisson C, Zech A, Arrieta-Lobo M, Kynoch D, et al. 2023. Modelling the variable emission states of γ-ray-emitting narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies. Monthly Not R Astron Soc. 523:404–427. 10.1093/mnras/stad1393.Search in Google Scholar
Marcha MJM, Browne IWA, Impey CD, Smith PS. 1996. Optical spectroscopy and polarization of a new sample of optically bright flat radio spectrum sources. MNRAS. 281(2):425–448.10.1093/mnras/281.2.425Search in Google Scholar
Mattox JR., Bertsch DL, Chiang J, Dingus BL, Fichtel CE, Hartman RC, et al. 1993. The EGRET detection of quasar 1633+ 382. Astrophys J. 410:609–614.10.1086/172778Search in Google Scholar
Meyer ET, Fossati G, Georganopoulos M, Lister ML. 2011. From the blazar sequence to the blazar envelope: revisiting the relativistic jet dichotomy in radio-loud active galactic nuclei. ApJ. 740:98.10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/98Search in Google Scholar
Murphy DW, Browne IWA, Perley RA. 1993, VLA observations of a complete sample of core-dominated radio sources. Mon Not R Astron Soc. 264:298.10.1093/mnras/264.2.298Search in Google Scholar
Nieppola E, Valtaoja E, Tornikoski M, Hovatta T, Kotiranta M. 2008. Blazar sequence–an artefact of Doppler boosting. A&A. 488:867.10.1051/0004-6361:200809716Search in Google Scholar
Odo FC, Aroh BE. 2020. On the unified view of gamma-ray energy distribution of BL Lac objects and flat spectrum radio quasars. J Astrophys Astron. 41:9. 10.1007/s12036-020-9626-x.Search in Google Scholar
Odo FC, Ubachukwu AA, Chukwude AE. 2012. Relativistic beaming and orientation effects in BL Lacertae objects. J Astrophy Astron. 33:279–290.10.1007/s12036-012-9141-9Search in Google Scholar
Odo FC, Ubachukwu AA. 2013. Linear size–extended radio luminosity (D–P E ) correlation in BL Lacertae objects: evidence for large scale beaming. Astrophys Space Sci. 347(2):357–364.10.1007/s10509-013-1528-9Search in Google Scholar
Odo FC, Ubachukwu AA, Chukwude AE. 2015. Extended radio emission in core-dominated quasars: implications for relativistic beaming hypothesis. Astrophys Space Sci. 357:147.10.1007/s10509-015-2377-5Search in Google Scholar
Orr MJ, Browne IWA. 1982. Relativistic beaming and quasar statistics. MNRAS. 200:1067–1080.Search in Google Scholar
Orr MI, Browne WA. 1982. Relativistic beaming and quasar statistics, Monthly Not R Astron Soc. 200:1067–1080. 10.1093/mnras/200.4.1067.Search in Google Scholar
Oshlack AYKN, Webster RL, Whiting MT. 2001. A very radio loud narrow-line Seyfert 1: PKS 2004-447. Astrophys J. 558:578–582. 10.1086/322299.Search in Google Scholar
Osterbrock DE, Pogge RW. 1985. The spectra of narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies. Astrophys J. 297:166–176.10.1086/163513Search in Google Scholar
Pavlidou V, Richards JL, Max-Moerbeck W, King OG, Pearson TJ, Readhead ACS, et al. 2012. Assessing the significance of apparent correlations between radio and gamma-ray blazar fluxes. Astrono J. 751:149.10.1088/0004-637X/751/2/149Search in Google Scholar
Pei ZY, Fan JH, Bastieri D, Sawangwit U, Yang JH. 2019. The relationship between the radio core-dominance parameter and spectral index in different classes of extragalactic radio sources (II). Res Astron Astrophy. 19:70.10.1088/1674-4527/19/5/70Search in Google Scholar
Pei Z, Fan J, Yang J, Bastieri D. 2020. Beamed and unbeamed emission of γ-ray blazars. PASP 132:114102.10.1088/1538-3873/abb78fSearch in Google Scholar
Pei Z, Fan J, Bastieri D, Yang J, Xiao H. 2020b. Radio core dominance of Fermi/LAT-detected AGNs. Sci China Phy Mech Astr. 63:259511.10.1007/s11433-019-1454-6Search in Google Scholar
Peterson BM, Wandel A. 2000. Evidence for supermassive black holes in active galactic nuclei from emission-line reverberation. ApJ. 540(1):L13–L16.10.1086/312862Search in Google Scholar
Qin P, Xie GZ. 1998. Infrared variability of BL Lacertae. Astron Astrophys Suppl Series. 133:217–220.10.1051/aas:1998318Search in Google Scholar
Rakshit S, Stalin CS. 2017 Optical variability of narrow-line and broad-line Seyfert 1 Galaxies. ApJ. 842:96.10.3847/1538-4357/aa72f4Search in Google Scholar
Resconi E, Coenders S, Padovani P, Giommi P, Caccianga L. 2017. Connecting blazars with ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays and astrophysical neutrinos. MNRAS. 468:597–606.10.1093/mnras/stx498Search in Google Scholar
Tarchi A, Castangia P, Columbano A, Panessa F, Braatz JA. 2011. Narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies: an amasing class of AGN. Astron Astrophys. 532:A125.10.1051/0004-6361/201117213Search in Google Scholar
Ubachukwu A, Chukwude A., Alhassan J. 2002. On the asymmetries in powerful extragalactic radio sources. Astrophys Space Sci. 281:601–607.10.1023/A:1015814206837Search in Google Scholar
Urry CM, Padovani P. 1995. Unified schemes for radio-loud active galactic nuclei. PASP. 107:803.10.1086/133630Search in Google Scholar
von Montigny C., Bertsch DL, Chiang J, Dingus BL, Esposito JA, Fichtel CE, et al. 1995. Studies of some superluminal blazars and strong flat-spectrum radio quasars, that are not seen in high energy gamma-rays by EGRET. Astron Astrophys. 299:680.Search in Google Scholar
Wu Z, Jiang D, Gu M. 2014. Why are some BL Lacertaes detected by Fermi, but others not? A &A 562:A64.10.1051/0004-6361/201220851Search in Google Scholar
Xiong DR, Xiong Z. 2014. Intrinsic γ-ray luminosity, black hole mass, jet and accretion in Fermi blazars. MNRAS. 441(4):3375–3395.10.1093/mnras/stu755Search in Google Scholar
Xu DW, Wei JY, Hu JY. 1999. Spectroscopy of 18 New Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxies from the ROSAT All-Sky Survey. ApJ, 517:622.10.1086/307239Search in Google Scholar
Yang Y, Bartos I, Haiman Z, Kocsis B, Márka Z, Stone NC, et al. 2019. AGN disks harden the mass distribution of stellar-mass binary black hole mergers. ApJ. 876(2):122.10.3847/1538-4357/ab16e3Search in Google Scholar
Yuan W, Zhou HY, Komossa S, Dong XB, Wang TG, Lu HL, et al. 2008. A population of radio‐loud narrow‐line Seyfert 1 galaxies with blazar‐like properties. Astrophys. J. 685:801–827.10.1086/591046Search in Google Scholar
Zeng X, Zhang Z, Pei Z, Xiao H, Fan J. 2022. Two-component model of the X-ray emissions for $\mathit {Fermi}$-LAT selected blazars. Astrophys Space Sci. 367:36.10.1007/s10509-022-04064-3Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, YW, Huang Y, Bai, J., Liu XW, Wang JG, Dong XB, et al. 2021. A systematic search for dual AGNs in merging galaxies (Astro-daring): III: Results from the SDSS spectroscopic surveys. Astron J. 162:276.10.3847/1538-3881/ac1ce7Search in Google Scholar
Zhou J, Fan J, Li J, Liu Y. 2007. A statistical study of XBLs, RBLs and FSRQs at 1.5GHz. Chinese J Astron Astrophy. 7(5):629–663.10.1088/1009-9271/7/5/03Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Research Articles
- Deep learning application for stellar parameter determination: III-denoising procedure
- X-ray emission from hot gas and XRBs in the NGC 5846 galaxy
- Investigation of ionospheric response to a moderate geomagnetic storm over the mid-latitude of Saudi Arabia
- Constraining relativistic beaming model for γ-ray emission properties of jetted AGNs
- Radiogenic heating in comets: A computational study from an astrobiological perspective
- Search for the optimal smoothing method to improve S/N in cosmic maser spectra
- The stellar Mg/Si, C/O, Ca/Si, Al/Si, Na/Si, and Fe/Si ratios and the mineral diversity of rocky exoplanets
- Analogical education in times of virtuality: Back to the hands-on activities – 15 years of NASE program
- Physical conditions in spherical prestellar cores with analytical equations
- Special Issue: New Horizons in Astronomy Education
- Innovative practices in astronomy science education in China – A case study of BJP's science communication activities
- Enhancing astronomy literacy in Indonesia: Evaluating the impact of NASE training programs
- Democratizing Astronomy through teacher training in Portuguese-speaking contexts
Articles in the same Issue
- Research Articles
- Deep learning application for stellar parameter determination: III-denoising procedure
- X-ray emission from hot gas and XRBs in the NGC 5846 galaxy
- Investigation of ionospheric response to a moderate geomagnetic storm over the mid-latitude of Saudi Arabia
- Constraining relativistic beaming model for γ-ray emission properties of jetted AGNs
- Radiogenic heating in comets: A computational study from an astrobiological perspective
- Search for the optimal smoothing method to improve S/N in cosmic maser spectra
- The stellar Mg/Si, C/O, Ca/Si, Al/Si, Na/Si, and Fe/Si ratios and the mineral diversity of rocky exoplanets
- Analogical education in times of virtuality: Back to the hands-on activities – 15 years of NASE program
- Physical conditions in spherical prestellar cores with analytical equations
- Special Issue: New Horizons in Astronomy Education
- Innovative practices in astronomy science education in China – A case study of BJP's science communication activities
- Enhancing astronomy literacy in Indonesia: Evaluating the impact of NASE training programs
- Democratizing Astronomy through teacher training in Portuguese-speaking contexts